Quincy

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of pemigatinib in adults with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer that has spread to nearby tissues, lymph nodes, or distant body parts, and that have specific genetic changes in the FGFR gene. The study focuses on patients whose cancer has FGFR2 gene fusions or other FGFR alterations, aiming to see if pemigatinib can block these abnormal gene functions to stop tumor growth and possibly improve quality of life. This is a phase II trial conducted nationwide using a fully decentralized telemedicine approach to reach participants. Participants receive pemigatinib as an oral medication once daily for 14 days within each 21-day cycle. Treatment continues unless the disease progresses or unacceptable side effects occur. Alongside the drug treatment, patients undergo various imaging tests including CT scans, MRI, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and when needed, whole body bone scans and dilated eye exams (ophthalmoscopy). After finishing treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days and then every four months for one year to monitor their condition. Throughout the study, patients provide blood samples and undergo scans to evaluate treatment response and detect resistance mutations. Researchers track the overall response rate for up to 24 months and assess safety and tolerability. Patients must comply with scheduled visits, tests, and oral medication intake. The total study participation includes treatment cycles and a follow-up period lasting up to approximately 16 months after treatment completion.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of the investigational drug PF-06821497 (mevrometostat) with enzalutamide compared to enzalutamide alone in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have not previously received androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) or abiraterone. This global, multicenter Phase 3 study focuses on participants whose cancer has progressed despite androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or first-generation anti-androgens but who have not started other systemic anti-cancer treatments for mCRPC. The study excludes those with prior treatment using enzalutamide, darolutamide, apalutamide, or abiraterone in any setting, though chemotherapy is allowed in the hormone-sensitive setting. The study includes a Screening Phase, followed by randomization where participants are assigned equally to one of two groups: one receiving PF-06821497 plus enzalutamide, and the other receiving placebo plus enzalutamide. All treatments are taken orally on a continuous basis. After the treatment phase, participants enter a Safety Follow-up and a Long-Term Follow-up period to monitor ongoing effects. Participants will undergo assessments during the study to evaluate radiographic progression-free survival over about three years. Researchers will collect imaging data such as bone scans and CT or MRI scans to monitor disease progression. Additional evaluations include performance status, life expectancy assessments, and safety monitoring for adverse events. The study duration spans from screening through treatment and follow-up phases to gather comprehensive data on the combination therapy's impact on mCRPC.

This research investigates the effectiveness and safety of combining capivasertib with CDK4/6 inhibitors and fulvestrant in adults with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer that is locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic. It includes a Phase Ib dose-finding portion to establish safe dosages for the triple combination, followed by a Phase III study comparing this combination to CDK4/6 inhibitors plus fulvestrant alone. The study focuses on patients who have not received prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease and aims to assess added benefit in a high-risk population. During Phase Ib, participants receive capivasertib orally twice daily for 4 days followed by 3 days off each week, combined with fulvestrant injections and one of the CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib) at varying doses to find the recommended dose for Phase III. In Phase III, participants are randomized to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant and a CDK4/6 inhibitor at the established dose or fulvestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor alone, with dosing schedules maintained over 28-day cycles. Participants undergo regular monitoring including scans for tumor assessment, blood tests, and safety evaluations over extended periods—up to 47 months for progression-free survival assessment. Researchers track adverse events, serious side effects, and treatment tolerability throughout. Mandatory tumor and blood samples are collected for biomarker analysis. The study evaluates key outcomes such as dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-related adverse events, and progression-free survival, supporting long-term safety and effectiveness evaluation.

Researchers are evaluating ways to improve advance care planning (ACP) among underserved communities, who often receive lower quality end-of-life care and unwanted, costly treatments. This study compares two conversation-based tools designed to encourage discussions about end-of-life wishes and motivate ACP behaviors. The goal is to increase high-quality end-of-life care, reduce health disparities, and lessen unnecessary suffering for patients and families. The study is a cluster randomized controlled trial involving 75 underserved communities across the US. It compares a serious conversation game called Hello, the widely used Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit, and usual care where only an advance directive is distributed. The Hello game has 32 questions prompting sharing of values and beliefs about end-of-life issues, while the CP Starter Kit is a workbook with prompts and resources to facilitate conversations. The third group receives a general conversation game called Table Topics. Participants include adults from underserved populations who have not completed an advance directive in the past 5 years. Researchers will assess completion of a visually verified advance directive six months after the intervention. Other ACP behaviors will also be measured. The study involves community events, follow-up, and data collection to understand which tools best engage underserved groups in ACP and improve end-of-life care outcomes.

A phase 3b, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Nadofaragene Firadenovec vs. Observation in Participants with Intermediate Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (IR NMIBC)