River Forest

This research aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of lebrikizumab in adults diagnosed with perennial allergic rhinitis, a condition characterized by year-round nasal allergy symptoms. The study is a Phase 3 trial involving adult participants who have confirmed allergic reactions to indoor allergens. Researchers are investigating how lebrikizumab compares with placebo, alongside standard intranasal corticosteroid therapy, to better understand treatment options for this condition. Participants will receive either the investigational drug lebrikizumab (LY3650150) administered by subcutaneous injection, a placebo injection, or standard intranasal corticosteroid spray. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, ensuring that neither participants nor researchers know who receives which treatment during the trial. Treatment and observation periods will span up to 29.5 months. During the study, participants will be monitored for changes in their nasal symptoms, specifically measuring the total nasal symptom score from the start of the study to week 16. Researchers will conduct various assessments including clinical evaluations and allergy testing to track symptom changes and treatment effects. Safety will be closely observed throughout the study duration, and participants may be followed for nearly two and a half years in total.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of remibrutinib compared to dupilumab in adults with moderate to severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is not adequately controlled by second generation H1-antihistamines (sgH1-AHs). This Phase 3b, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study is conducted in the US and focuses on early treatment effects at 4 weeks and earlier. The study includes a screening period of up to 4 weeks, followed by a 12-week core treatment period where about 400 participants are randomly assigned to receive either remibrutinib (25 mg twice daily by mouth) with a placebo injection or dupilumab (a 600 mg loading dose followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks by injection) with a placebo tablet. All participants continue their stable dose of sgH1-AH during this period, with the option to add rescue doses if needed, not exceeding four times the standard dose per day. After the core period, participants may join an optional open-label extension to receive remibrutinib for an additional 12 weeks if the drug is not commercially available. Participants will complete daily diaries and regular assessments to track urticaria symptoms and treatment effects. Researchers will measure changes in the Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) from the start to Week 4. Safety follow-up will occur for 12 weeks after treatment ends, with phone calls and site visits as needed, continuing longer if participants join the extension. The total study duration includes screening, treatment, optional extension, and safety follow-up phases.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of ritlecitinib for treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in adults whose condition is not well controlled by antihistamines. CSU causes itchy hives and swelling under the skin without a clear cause. This Phase 2b study compares two oral doses of ritlecitinib, 50 mg and 100 mg, with a placebo to understand if these doses are safe and effective in managing symptoms. Participants will be randomly assigned to take either 50 mg, 100 mg, or placebo capsules once daily for 12 weeks (Period A). After this, those on ritlecitinib will continue their assigned dose while those on placebo will switch to 100 mg for another 12 weeks (Period B). The study involves about 150 adult participants and compares the effects of the two ritlecitinib doses against placebo over these two 12-week periods. Participants will be involved in the study for about 8 months with up to 9 visits to the study site. During visits, they will have physical exams, hearing tests, blood tests, X-rays, and ECGs. They will also complete daily questionnaires about their urticaria symptoms using an electronic diary. Researchers will measure changes in urticaria activity and monitor for any treatment-related side effects or adverse events throughout the study.

The goal of this trial is to determine the efficacy of advanced cognitive training for cancer survivors suffering from cancer- and cancer-treatment-related cognitive dysfunction. For millions of cancer survivors, cognitive dysfunction is a prevalent, severe, and persistent problem that has long been associated with poor work-related and health-related outcomes. Evidence suggests that a significant subset of breast cancer survivors (BCS) incur cognitive changes that may persist for years after treatment. Unfortunately, the scientific basis for managing these cognitive changes is extremely limited. Available evidence from pilot studies, including our work, suggests that advanced cognitive training, which is based on the principles of neuroplasticity (ability of brain neurons to re-organize and form new neural networks), may be a viable treatment option. However, previous trials to date have been limited by lack of attention-controlled designs, small samples of BCS, or limited outcome measures. Therefore, to overcome limitations of past studies and build on our pilot results, the purpose of this 2-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to conduct a full-scale efficacy trial to compare advanced cognitive training to attention control in BCS.

This research collects data and biological samples from patients who have experienced side effects from immunotherapy treatments for cancer. The goal is to create a national collection of these samples and clinical information to help future studies understand, predict, prevent, and treat serious immune-related side effects, rare infections, or rapid tumor growth after immunotherapy. Participants provide tissue and blood samples when they join the study and again one month later. Some patients may also provide stool samples if they have certain side effects like colitis. Researchers also review participants' medical records for up to one year to gather detailed health information related to their treatment and side effects. During the study, patients undergo sample collections and have their health records examined. The main outcome measured is the establishment of a national biorepository containing these samples and data, which will be used in future research over the course of one year. This study aims to support better understanding and management of immunotherapy side effects in cancer treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the drug dupilumab in people with asthma that is not well controlled despite current treatment. Asthma is a condition where the airways are narrow and swollen, making breathing difficult. This study aims to compare adding dupilumab to a medium dose inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) versus increasing the ICS/LABA dose to a higher level. Some patients may also continue using a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) if they are already taking it. Participants will receive either dupilumab or a matching placebo by subcutaneous injection, alongside their inhaled asthma medications given in blinded doses. The study will monitor patients over a period of 52 weeks to compare the effectiveness of the treatment regimens. This is a phase 3b clinical trial conducted in Canada, and minors will not be enrolled in Denmark. Throughout the study, participants will be assessed for asthma symptoms and lung function, including measuring the rate of severe asthma flare-ups. Researchers will track side effects and monitor adherence to treatment. Participants will undergo lung function tests and complete questionnaires to evaluate asthma control. The goal is to understand how well dupilumab works in combination with standard inhaled therapies over one year.

Researchers are evaluating if adding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) to ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) compared to OFS plus ET alone. This Phase III trial focuses on premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, and has a 21-gene recurrence score between 16-25 for node-negative patients or 0-25 for patients with 1-3 positive nodes. The study addresses the need for better treatment options for younger women diagnosed with this type of breast cancer, as younger age is linked to worse outcomes despite standard therapies. Participants receive one of two treatments: either OFS combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for five years or adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same OFS plus AI regimen. The specific AI and GnRH agonist used, along with their dosing schedules, are chosen by the investigator, commonly including goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin administered monthly or every three months. Bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. Endocrine therapy beyond five years is at the investigator's discretion. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival over an 11-year period from randomization. Assessments include clinical evaluations, hormone receptor testing, tumor staging, and genetic recurrence scoring prior to enrollment. Safety and effectiveness data will be collected throughout the study, with particular attention to treatment side effects and long-term outcomes. The trial involves detailed eligibility screening and ongoing follow-up to ensure accurate measurement of the study's primary outcome.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of two inhalers, budesonide/albuterol metered-dose inhaler (BDA MDI) and albuterol sulfate metered-dose inhaler (AS MDI), both taken as needed, on reducing severe asthma attacks in adolescents aged 12 to under 18 years who have a clinical diagnosis of asthma and have experienced at least one severe asthma exacerbation in the past year. This is a Phase IIIb randomized, double-blind, multicenter study lasting 52 weeks with a safety follow-up period after treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either BDA MDI 160/180 micrograms (two puffs of 80/90 micrograms) or AS MDI 180 micrograms (two puffs of 90 micrograms) as needed, alongside their usual asthma maintenance therapy, for 52 weeks. The study includes a 7 to 28-day screening period before treatment and a safety follow-up visit 7 to 14 days after the end of treatment. Additionally, a pharmacokinetic sub-study involves a single dose of open-label BDA MDI administered after the safety follow-up. During the study, participants will be monitored for the annual rate of severe asthma exacerbations from randomization to week 52. Assessments include evaluating inhaler technique, peak expiratory flow measurements, and adherence to contraception methods for participants of childbearing potential. Safety will be monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. The total study duration includes screening, 52 weeks of treatment, and safety follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating how factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect the development of side effects in patients with malignant solid tumors receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The study aims to develop and validate a risk prediction model for serious immune-related side effects during the first year of ICI treatment. Additional goals include tracking the occurrence of various side effects, quality of life, patient-reported symptoms, and treatment patterns over 12 months, along with studying biological markers that may predict side effect risk. Participants will have tissue samples collected at the start of their cancer treatment and will complete questionnaires at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. Blood samples may also be collected at multiple times during the study. The study focuses on patients receiving standard-of-care ICI therapy for solid tumors, without combination chemotherapy or other non-ICI treatments. During the study, participants will complete patient-reported outcome forms and health questionnaires to assess side effects and quality of life. Researchers will monitor the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and evaluate biological markers from blood and tissue samples. The study also assesses the use of electronic methods for collecting patient data. Total participation includes assessments over approximately one year following treatment start.

Researchers are evaluating how well serum tumor marker directed disease monitoring (STMDDM) works for patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. The study compares STMDDM with the usual care approach to see if overall survival is not worse using STMDDM. The trial also looks at healthcare costs, patient anxiety, quality of life, and preferences related to disease monitoring. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives usual care with imaging at least every 12 weeks and other monitoring at the doctor's discretion for up to 312 weeks if the disease does not progress. The other group has their serum tumor markers checked every 4 to 8 weeks, with imaging only if markers are elevated, also for up to 312 weeks without progression. Additional assessments include quality-of-life and anxiety questionnaires. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular evaluations including imaging, blood tests for tumor markers, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Researchers track overall survival up to 312 weeks after randomization, along with healthcare costs and patient experiences. Participants must provide informed consent and are monitored for safety during the study period.