Danville

Researchers are evaluating a multimodal music therapy intervention called AMUSED to see if it can improve engagement and reduce behavioral symptoms in older adults with severe dementia living in care facilities. This pilot randomized clinical trial aims to test the study design, identify the best outcome measures for behavioral symptoms, and assess if speech can indicate treatment effectiveness. The study compares music therapy with a reading activity to determine which leads to greater improvements in behavior and speech patterns. Participants will join group sessions twice a week for 12 weeks, each lasting 40 minutes between lunch and dinner. The music therapy involves live, participant-preferred music with singing, touch, and rhythmic instrument playing led by a certified music therapist. The comparison group will participate in reading sessions with stories and discussions led by a trained assistant, following the same schedule and structure but without music. Each small group will work consistently with the same therapist or reader throughout the study. During the study, participants will be observed and assessed multiple times for behavioral symptoms, cognition, and speech, including a follow-up four weeks after treatment ends. Researchers will measure changes in dementia-related behaviors and speech patterns to evaluate the intervention's impact. The study focuses on feasibility, outcome measures, and obtaining preliminary data on the lasting effects of the music therapy intervention over a total participation period of 12 weeks plus follow-up.

This research aims to collect ongoing safety and effectiveness data for the C-Brace System, a microprocessor-controlled knee ankle foot orthosis used by patients with lower extremity pareses. The study follows patients who have been casted for a C-Brace fitting and consent to participate, focusing on documenting their progress and experiences over time with this device. The C-Brace device includes custom thigh, calf, and foot components connected by an ankle joint and sensor system that continuously monitors knee joint movement. This allows the device to adjust resistance and control knee flexion and extension during walking. Participants will receive standard care including baseline evaluation, fitting, training or therapy sessions, and follow-up visits at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after final fitting. Participants will undergo assessments such as walking speed tests, mobility and balance evaluations, and balance confidence questionnaires to measure changes from baseline. The study also tracks device-related adverse events, especially falls, to monitor safety over 12 months and beyond. The total follow-up period extends up to 36 months to provide comprehensive data on long-term use.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.

Researchers are conducting a global, multi-center, prospective post-market study to observe the long-term effectiveness of Boston Scientific neurostimulation systems in managing pain. The study aims to gather real-world clinical outcomes, economic value, and technical performance data of these commercially approved neurostimulation devices when used in routine clinical practice. The treatment involves an initial trial period using a Boston Scientific neurostimulation device for pain relief. Participants who experience a positive response during the trial may proceed to receive a permanent implant of the neurostimulation system. The therapy is tailored individually based on the investigator's judgment and standard care practices at each study site, following specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will be monitored throughout the trial and permanent implant phases to assess pain relief and overall treatment effectiveness. Assessments may include patient evaluations of pain and ability to complete study requirements. The study focuses on capturing comprehensive data to evaluate both clinical outcomes and device performance during regular use. Total participation duration depends on individual treatment progression from trial to permanent implant.