Detroit

Researchers are evaluating MDNA11, a long-acting beta-only recombinant interleukin-2 designed to activate immune cells that kill cancer while minimizing activation of immunosuppressive cells. This Phase 12 study aims to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and early anti-tumor activity of MDNA11 alone or combined with the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. The study is conducted at multiple sites with regulatory and ethical approvals and includes about 115 patients. The trial has several parts dose escalation and expansion for MDNA11 monotherapy and for its combination with pembrolizumab. MDNA11 is given intravenously every two weeks with doses adjusted to find the recommended dose for expansion. Tumor assessments using CT or MRI scans happen every 8 weeks to monitor response until disease progression or other study-end criteria occur. Treatment may continue beyond progression under certain conditions. Participants undergo evaluations including tumor imaging, laboratory tests, and safety monitoring over up to 24 months. Researchers measure recommended dose levels, treatment-related adverse events, pharmacokinetics, immune response, and anti-tumor activity such as response rates and progression-free survival. Patients can withdraw anytime, and safety follow-up continues to understand MDNA11s effects alone and with pembrolizumab.

Researchers are studying metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer mCRPC to find new treatment options. This trial evaluates if the study medicine ifinatamab deruxtecan I-DXd or MK-2400 helps people live longer overall and experience slower cancer growth or spread compared to chemotherapy. The study is a Phase 3 trial comparing I-DXd with standard chemotherapy for mCRPC patients. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either I-DXd at 12 mgkg every 3 weeks through intravenous infusion or docetaxel chemotherapy at 75 mgm2 every 3 weeks combined with daily prednisone pills. Treatment continues until the disease progresses, unacceptable side effects occur, or treatment is stopped for other reasons. Premedication is given before each dose of I-DXd to help prevent nausea and vomiting. During the study, participants will have regular visits for treatment and monitoring. Researchers will assess overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival for up to about 36 months. Additional measures include response rates, time to pain progression, PSA progression, and adverse events. The study tracks safety, treatment effects, and quality of life over a long follow-up period to better understand the potential benefits and risks of I-DXd compared to chemotherapy.

Researchers are evaluating new treatment options for people living with HIV-1 Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 who have not been treated before. The current standard treatment, antiretroviral therapy ART, involves taking multiple medicines daily and may cause other health problems. This study aims to compare a new study ART combining two medicines, islatravir and ulonivirine, taken once a week, against the standard daily ART to see if it works as well and is safe and tolerable. Participants will receive one of several treatments for 96 weeks the study ART with islatravir and ulonivirine taken once weekly, the standard ART with bictegraviremtricitabinetenofovir alafenamide BICFTCTAF taken once daily, or combinations involving placebos matching these treatments. The study includes two phases Phase 2 which is open-label, and Phase 3 which is double-blind and randomized. During the study, participants will have regular assessments including measuring the amount of HIV-1 RNA in their blood and monitoring for adverse events and medication tolerance. Researchers will evaluate how well the treatments control the virus and affect immune cells over 24, 48, and 96 weeks. Safety monitoring will continue for about 102 weeks. The total study duration for participants is up to 96 weeks of treatment plus follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous ianalumab in adults with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, a condition characterized by skin thickening and other systemic symptoms. This Phase 2 study compares ianalumab to a placebo to understand its impact on this disease, aiming to provide new treatment options for affected individuals. The study is sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals and employs a randomized, double-blind design to ensure reliable results. Participants receive either ianalumab or placebo through subcutaneous injections during the initial 52-week treatment period. After this, all participants enter a second 52-week open-label phase where they receive ianalumab. Following treatment, there is a post-treatment follow-up lasting at least 20 weeks and up to 2 years to monitor long-term effects. The study includes a screening period lasting up to 6 weeks before treatment begins. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments including measuring response based on the rCRISS25 scale at Week 52, lung function tests, skin scoring, and disability index evaluations. Blood samples are taken periodically to measure drug levels and antibodies. Safety is closely monitored through adverse event reporting up to Week 208. The total participation time can extend over several years including treatment and follow-up phases.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing of a combination of two investigational treatments, BNT323 trastuzumab pamirtecan and BNT327 pumitamig, in people with advanced breast cancer. This includes those with hormone receptor-positive or -negative, HER2-positive, HER2-low, HER2-ultralow, HER2-null breast cancer, or triple-negative breast cancer. The study is a Phase III multi-site, open-label trial with a focus on advanced breast cancer treatment options. The study has two parts. Part 1 involves dose escalation of BNT323 combined with BNT327 to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose using six different dose levels. Part 2, which begins after Part 1 completion, includes dose optimization and exploratory cohorts. Cohort 1 in Part 2 uses randomization into four treatment arms, including combination therapy at different doses and monotherapies of either BNT323 or BNT327. Other cohorts receive the recommended dose without randomization. Participants will undergo assessments including tumor scans and cardiac function tests, with monitoring for side effects and tumor response up to 36 months. Researchers will track dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-emergent adverse events during early treatment cycles and monitor objective response rates and disease control over time. Safety and efficacy data will be collected through scheduled visits and tumor assessments during and after treatment to evaluate the study drugs effects and tolerability.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, effectiveness, optimal dose, and behavior of an investigational drug called BNT326, alone or combined with other immunotherapy agents, in adults with advanced solid tumors. This study includes patients with tumors that have either spread metastatic, returned after treatment, or progressed despite previous therapies, across various cancer types such as melanoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and cervical cancer. Participants are divided into two parts Part 1 tests BNT326 alone in different tumor-specific groups, some with dose randomization to find optimal dosing. Part 2 evaluates BNT326 alone or combined with another investigational drug called pumitamig in several cancer types, with some groups receiving randomized doses and others non-randomized treatments. Treatments are given via intravenous infusion, with some oral medications combined in Part 1. The study includes dose escalation and randomization phases, and treatment can continue for up to 24 months or until disease progression or other reasons. During the study, participants undergo screening, treatment, safety follow-up, efficacy follow-up, and long-term survival monitoring phases. Researchers assess adverse events, treatment responses, disease progression, and drug behavior in the body using clinical evaluations and laboratory tests. Follow-up assessments occur up to approximately 38 months for Part 1 and 48 months for Part 2, with continued treatment possible for those benefiting from the therapy. The study aims to gather comprehensive data on safety, dosing, and effectiveness in this patient population.

Researchers are investigating a combination therapy of BNT326 and pumitamig also called BNT327 or PM8002 in adults with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC who may have relapsed, progressive, or treatment-nafve disease. This multi-site, open-label study aims to find the best dose levels for this combination, assess how well participants tolerate the therapy, including side effects, and evaluate its ability to shrink tumors in this population. The study has three parts Part 1 focuses on finding safe dose levels for the combination Part 2a expands the dose evaluation to assess preliminary effectiveness and safety Part 2b is a randomized phase to optimize doses and understand the contribution of each drug component. Participants will receive intravenous infusions of BNT326 and pumitamig or pumitamig alone in some arms. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, withdrawal, study end, or up to 24 months. Dose levels for later parts are chosen based on earlier safety and efficacy data. Participants will go through screening, treatment, safety follow-up, efficacy follow-up, and long-term survival follow-up phases, with total involvement expected to last about 36 months unless treatment benefit continues. Assessments include monitoring for dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events, tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and pharmacokinetics of the drugs. Safety evaluations continue up to 90 days after treatment ends, and antibody responses to the drugs are also measured for up to one year post-treatment.

This trial investigates treatments for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, comparing two surgical approaches radical prostatectomy RP and precision prostatectomy PP. RP is the current standard surgery that removes the entire prostate and surrounding tissue but often leads to side effects like erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. PP is a newer technique that removes most prostate tissue while preserving nerves and structures important for sexual function and continence, aiming to improve quality of life without sacrificing cancer control. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either standard RP or PP surgery. RP involves complete removal of the prostate and nearby tissue, while PP preserves some prostate tissue and nerves on the side opposite the main cancer lesion. Both surgeries follow similar procedures, require no extra equipment, and are covered by standard health insurance. Outcomes will be measured 12 months after surgery, focusing on sexual health and urinary continence. During the study, participants sexual function will be assessed using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men SHIM score before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Urinary continence will also be measured at 12 months by the number of pads used per day. Oncological outcomes will be evaluated by whether additional prostate cancer treatment is needed within 12 months. The study aims to show that PP offers better functional recovery without worse cancer control compared to RP.

Researchers are evaluating BGB-16673, an oral drug, in adults with various types of B-cell malignancies such as marginal zone lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Waldenstrm macroglobulinemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and Richters transformation. This study includes Phase 1 dose finding and safety expansion, followed by Phase 2 expansion cohorts to determine recommended doses and further assess safety and efficacy. The study is divided into several parts, starting with Phase 1 dose escalation to find safe dosage levels, including monotherapy dose escalation and safety expansion in selected doses. Phase 2 involves expansion cohorts where participants receive the recommended doses identified in Phase 1 for further safety and efficacy evaluation. Some cohorts include participants who have not received prior BTK inhibitors, and Japanese participants are also enrolled to assess safety. Treatments are orally administered. Participants will undergo regular assessments including monitoring for adverse events, disease response, and drug concentration levels in the blood at various time points. Researchers will measure outcomes such as overall response rate and progression-free survival over approximately three years. Safety and tolerability will be closely tracked, and quality of life questionnaires will be completed at scheduled intervals. Participation may last several years, including follow-up periods to monitor long-term effects.

Researchers are studying MEN2501, an oral drug, in adults with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer including high-grade serous ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer. This first-in-human, open-label trial aims to assess the safety, tolerability, how the drug moves through the body, its effects, and antitumor activity. The study is conducted in two parts dose escalation and dose expansionoptimization. In Part A, participants receive increasing doses of MEN2501 to evaluate dose-limiting toxicities during the first 28-day cycle. Part B focuses on determining the recommended phase 2 dose over approximately six months. The drug is given orally as tablets. The trial uses a sequential study model with randomized allocation and no masking. Participants will be monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events, tumor response rates, duration of response, clinical benefit, progression-free survival, overall survival, and drug concentration levels. These assessments occur over periods ranging from about six to twelve months. The total study duration extends to June 2028, with ongoing safety and efficacy follow-up through primary and secondary outcome measures.