Fridley

Researchers are evaluating whether combining tucatinib with trastuzumab and mFOLFOX6 works better than standard treatments for people with HER2 positive colorectal cancer that has spread or cannot be removed by surgery. This Phase 3 study also aims to learn about the side effects that may occur when taking this combination of drugs. Participants have metastatic or unresectable colorectal cancer and are randomly assigned to different treatment groups. Participants are randomly placed in one of two study groups. One group receives tucatinib taken orally twice daily along with trastuzumab given intravenously every 3 weeks and mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy every 2 weeks. The other group receives standard care, which may be mFOLFOX6 alone or combined with bevacizumab or cetuximab, both given intravenously on different schedules. Tissue samples and biopsies are collected before treatment to confirm HER2 positivity and other markers. During the study, participants will have regular evaluations including imaging scans to measure cancer progression, blood tests, and assessments of side effects and quality of life. Progression-free survival is the primary outcome measured for up to about 3 years, with other outcomes like overall survival and response rate also tracked. Safety monitoring continues for about one year after the last treatment. The study lasts several years, with ongoing follow-up to understand long-term effects and benefits.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain. This phase II trial compares two combinations encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab. The study aims to determine which approach is more effective at shrinking and controlling brain metastases, and it also examines survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group takes encorafenib daily by mouth, binimetinib twice daily by mouth, and receives nivolumab through an intravenous IV infusion every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab IV every cycle and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes during the first four cycles, with cycles repeating every 21 days initially, then every 28 days. Treatment continues unless disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Participants undergo brain MRI scans before enrollment and throughout the study to assess tumor response using specific criteria. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for two years, then yearly up to three years. The study collects tissue, blood, spinal fluid, and stool samples for future research. Researchers monitor progression-free survival as the main outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects.

Researchers are studying two surgical procedures to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 genetic mutations. This trial compares bilateral salpingectomy, which removes only the fallopian tubes, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which removes both fallopian tubes and ovaries. The goal is to find out if removing just the fallopian tubes with delayed ovary removal is nearly as effective as removing both from the start. Participants choose between two groups one undergoes bilateral salpingectomy with the option of later ovary removal, and the other undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups have imaging tests like pelvic ultrasounds or pelvic MRIs during screening and provide blood samples throughout the study. Follow-up visits occur at multiple time points, including 10 to 60 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and then yearly for up to 20 years. During the study, researchers track if ovarian or related cancers develop and assess symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, cancer-related distress, sexual function, menopausal symptoms, medical decision making, and any adverse events. Various questionnaires and imaging tests support these evaluations. Long-term safety and cancer risk reduction are monitored for up to two decades after surgery.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of an experimental drug combination, fianlimab and cemiplimab, compared to the approved combination of relatlimab and nivolumab Opdualag in adults with advanced or metastatic melanoma, a serious type of skin cancer. This Phase 3 study aims to understand how well these treatments work and what side effects they may cause. The study also investigates how much of the study drugs are present in the blood over time and whether the body produces antibodies against these drugs. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either the experimental combination of fianlimab plus cemiplimab given intravenously every three weeks or the approved combination of relatlimab plus nivolumab given intravenously every four weeks. The study compares these two treatments in parallel groups. Treatments are administered during the study period, and participants are monitored regularly to assess the effects and safety of the medications. During the trial, participants undergo assessments including tumor measurements following standardized criteria to evaluate response to treatment. The study also monitors for adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, and the presence of anti-drug antibodies. The main outcome measure is the objective response rate, evaluated over up to 72 months. Participants are followed for safety and effectiveness throughout this period, which may last several years in total.

This research aims to evaluate the combination of two drugs, cabozantinib and nivolumab, in treating advanced melanoma or squamous cell head and neck cancer that may have spread locally or to distant parts of the body. The study focuses on how these drugs affect tumor growth and the immune systems ability to fight cancer. It also investigates how quickly patients can be grouped based on tumor biomarkers, specifically tumor mutational burden and tumor inflammation signature, to understand differences in treatment responses. Participants receive nivolumab through intravenous infusion on the first day of each 28-day cycle and take cabozantinib orally every day. Treatment cycles continue for up to two years unless the disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. During the study, patients undergo CT or MRI scans and blood sample collections. Tumor biopsies are taken during screening and may be repeated during follow-up. After treatment ends, participants are monitored every 12 weeks for one year and then every six months for up to three years. Throughout the trial, participants are assessed with imaging scans and blood tests to monitor cancer status and treatment effects. Researchers measure the time to receive biomarker results and evaluate tumor response rates. They also track safety, disease control, progression-free survival, and overall survival over the two years of treatment. Specimens are banked for future research. Participants remain under observation for several years after treatment to gather long-term data on outcomes and safety.

This trial studies adults with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, comparing standard treatment alone to standard treatment combined with immunotherapy using atezolizumab. It aims to determine if adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy and bevacizumab improves response rates and survival. The study also explores safety, metabolic responses, surgical outcomes, and blood-based biomarkers related to treatment effects. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives a combination of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and pemetrexed intravenously every 21 days for up to four cycles, followed by cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC within 4 to 8 weeks. Those not eligible for surgery continue maintenance treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. The other group receives bevacizumab, carboplatin, and pemetrexed on the same schedule, followed by surgery and HIPEC or maintenance bevacizumab with or without atezolizumab. Throughout the study, participants undergo CT and PET scans and provide blood and tissue samples for analysis. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for up to three years to assess outcomes including response rates, survival, safety, and pathological effects. The study measures these outcomes using imaging criteria and clinical evaluations to understand treatment benefits and risks.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to help evaluate new tests that could detect cancer early. This study aims to create a set of blinded blood samples from both cancer and non-cancer patients to validate these tests, focusing on multiple cancer types and stages. The goal is to improve early cancer detection through laboratory research. Participants complete a questionnaire at the start and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also have tissue samples collected at these times. The study includes patients with various cancer types and stages, as well as individuals without cancer, with some allowing enrollment before full cancer confirmation under specific conditions. During the study, researchers review the collected samples and questionnaire data to assess test performance by tumor type and clinical stage at diagnosis. Participants are followed for one year after completing the study. Key measurements include the provision of a blinded reference set of cancer versus non-cancer blood samples to support future clinical trials focused on blood-based multi-cancer early detection.

Researchers are collecting blood samples from adults who have cancer, are in cancer remission, have benign diseases such as diabetes or liver conditions, or are healthy volunteers. The study aims to evaluate specific DNA methylation markers in the blood to help detect various types of cancer and understand factors that may affect test results. Participants will provide whole blood, plasma, and serum samples that will be analyzed using a multi-analyte blood test designed to detect DNA methylation markers for cancer detection. The study will also investigate how benign conditions and substances like chemotherapy drugs might influence the tests accuracy. During the study, blood samples will be collected and examined to measure the tests sensitivity and specificity, check for interfering substances, and assess sample stability and reference ranges. Participants will be involved in providing blood samples within an 8-week period, and the main outcomes will be reviewed about one month after collection. The study is sponsored by Helio Genomics and is expected to complete in early 2028.

This research aims to establish a national biorepository by collecting research data and samples from patients who experience side effects from immunotherapy treatments used in cancer care. It focuses on patients who have serious immune-related reactions, rare infections, or accelerated tumor growth after receiving immuno-oncology therapies. The goal is to help researchers better predict, prevent, and treat these side effects in the future. Participants will have tissue and blood samples collected within 72 hours after confirmation of a serious immune-related side effect and again one month later. For patients experiencing colitis, stool samples may also be collected. Alongside sample collection, medical records will be reviewed for up to one year. This study is observational and involves no experimental treatments. During the study, participants will provide biospecimens at two time points and allow access to their medical records for a year. Researchers will analyze these samples and clinical data to build a resource for future studies on immune-related adverse events. The main outcome is the establishment of this biorepository, which will be maintained for up to one year after enrollment.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or Stage III colon cancer based on the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA ctDNA after surgery. This Phase IIIII trial explores whether ctDNA status can help guide decisions about the need for adjuvant chemotherapy and identify the optimal chemotherapy regimen for those at high risk of recurrence. Circulating tumor DNA is a promising biomarker that may detect microscopic residual cancer cells that traditional methods might miss. Participants are assigned to groups based on their ctDNA results after surgery. Those without detectable ctDNA ctDNA- may undergo serial monitoring without treatment or receive different chemotherapy regimens such as mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 3 to 6 months. Patients with detectable ctDNA ctDNA who have a higher risk of recurrence are randomized to receive either standard chemotherapy regimens like mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 6 months or a more intensive regimen called mFOLFIRINOX for 6 months. Central ctDNA testing is performed using the Signatera test to guide these assignments. During the study, participants have blood samples collected for ctDNA testing and undergo imaging scans to check for cancer recurrence. Researchers assess disease-free survival, overall survival, and chemotherapy compliance over several years. The study includes monitoring for safety and treatment effects, with follow-up planned for up to 5 years after randomization. Participants health status, laboratory tests, and tumor markers are regularly evaluated throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.