Butte

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Armour Thyroid compared to synthetic T4 treatment in adults with primary hypothyroidism who are currently stable on synthetic T4. The study focuses on assessing how well patients respond to dose conversion from synthetic T4 therapy to Armour Thyroid. This trial is conducted as a Phase 2/3 multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study. Participants receive either Armour Thyroid in oral capsule or tablet form or synthetic T4 capsules. They must have been on a stable dose of synthetic T4 for at least 12 months before screening, with a dose of at least 25 mcg daily. The study compares both treatments over time to evaluate efficacy and safety in maintaining thyroid function. During the study, researchers monitor thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels to measure treatment response at week 55. They also track any adverse events related to the treatments for up to approximately 90 weeks. Participants undergo regular assessments to ensure safety and effectiveness throughout the study period.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether ibuzatrelvir is effective and safe in adults and adolescents with COVID-19 who do not need to be in the hospital but who are at high risk for progression to severe disease. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned (by chance) to receive ibuzatrelvir or matching placebo orally for 5 days. Co-administration of locally available standard of care is allowed. The total duration of the study is around 6 months.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of trimodulin as an additional treatment to standard care in adults hospitalized with severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) who require invasive mechanical ventilation. This phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-center trial aims to compare trimodulin plus standard care against placebo plus standard care. The study also includes substudies to understand the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of trimodulin. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either trimodulin or placebo via intravenous infusion once daily for five consecutive days alongside standard care. After the treatment phase, patients will be followed for up to 23 days, with an end-of-follow-up visit or telephone call on day 29. For those still hospitalized after day 29, extended follow-up continues until discharge or day 90, followed by a final visit or call on day 91. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including monitoring of mortality rates up to day 29, clinical evaluations, and safety monitoring. Researchers will collect data on inflammation markers and other health parameters. Follow-up contacts and visits will ensure ongoing evaluation of patient status and adverse events throughout the study period, which may last up to 91 days or longer depending on hospital discharge timing.

Researchers are evaluating if adding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) to ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) compared to OFS plus ET alone. This Phase III trial focuses on premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, and has a 21-gene recurrence score between 16-25 for node-negative patients or 0-25 for patients with 1-3 positive nodes. The study addresses the need for better treatment options for younger women diagnosed with this type of breast cancer, as younger age is linked to worse outcomes despite standard therapies. Participants receive one of two treatments: either OFS combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for five years or adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same OFS plus AI regimen. The specific AI and GnRH agonist used, along with their dosing schedules, are chosen by the investigator, commonly including goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin administered monthly or every three months. Bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. Endocrine therapy beyond five years is at the investigator's discretion. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival over an 11-year period from randomization. Assessments include clinical evaluations, hormone receptor testing, tumor staging, and genetic recurrence scoring prior to enrollment. Safety and effectiveness data will be collected throughout the study, with particular attention to treatment side effects and long-term outcomes. The trial involves detailed eligibility screening and ongoing follow-up to ensure accurate measurement of the study's primary outcome.

Researchers are evaluating how factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect the development of side effects in patients with malignant solid tumors receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The study aims to develop and validate a risk prediction model for serious immune-related side effects during the first year of ICI treatment. Additional goals include tracking the occurrence of various side effects, quality of life, patient-reported symptoms, and treatment patterns over 12 months, along with studying biological markers that may predict side effect risk. Participants will have tissue samples collected at the start of their cancer treatment and will complete questionnaires at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. Blood samples may also be collected at multiple times during the study. The study focuses on patients receiving standard-of-care ICI therapy for solid tumors, without combination chemotherapy or other non-ICI treatments. During the study, participants will complete patient-reported outcome forms and health questionnaires to assess side effects and quality of life. Researchers will monitor the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and evaluate biological markers from blood and tissue samples. The study also assesses the use of electronic methods for collecting patient data. Total participation includes assessments over approximately one year following treatment start.

Researchers are evaluating the impact of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to standard lymph node dissection on reducing leg swelling (lymphedema) in women undergoing hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer. This phase III trial aims to compare rates of lower extremity limb dysfunction using a symptom questionnaire and assess other factors such as lymph node detection, complications, cancer spread, and treatment decisions. The study also explores the cost-effectiveness of the lymph node assessment methods and tracks survival outcomes. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups during minimally invasive hysterectomy. One group receives sentinel lymph node mapping with a special dye and camera, with lymph nodes removed only if mapping is incomplete. The other group receives sentinel lymph node mapping followed by removal of additional lymph nodes as standard care. Both groups may have imaging tests and optional blood sample collection as part of the study procedures. During the study, patients complete questionnaires and are monitored for symptoms of leg swelling and limb circumference changes. Follow-up visits occur every three months for one year, then at 18 and 24 months after surgery. Researchers track patient-reported limb dysfunction starting 18 months post-hysterectomy through 39 months, along with safety and survival outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating how well inotuzumab ozogamicin works when combined with frontline chemotherapy in treating young adults aged 18 to 39 years who have newly diagnosed B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This Phase III trial aims to confirm the safety and effectiveness of adding inotuzumab ozogamicin, a monoclonal antibody that targets cancer cells, to a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen called CALGB 10403. The study also explores the impact of this combination on survival, minimal residual disease, genetic factors, treatment side effects, and medication adherence. Participants begin with remission induction therapy that includes oral allopurinol, intravenous and intrathecal chemotherapy drugs such as daunorubicin, vincristine, dexamethasone, pegylated L-asparaginase, and methotrexate, along with bone marrow tests. Those who respond to induction are randomized to one of two groups: one receives standard chemotherapy courses including consolidation, maintenance, and intensification phases, while the other receives inotuzumab ozogamicin infusions in addition to the same chemotherapy regimen. Treatments are given by mouth, intravenous, subcutaneous, or intrathecal routes on specific days over several courses lasting up to three years for maintenance therapy. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular bone marrow biopsies, blood tests, and biomarker analyses to monitor disease status and treatment effects. Researchers assess event-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, treatment toxicity, genetic markers, and medication adherence using electronic monitoring. After treatment ends, patients are followed monthly for the first year, then less frequently up to ten years to track long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma in this phase III trial. The study compares the effects of lenalidomide and dexamethasone given with or without daratumumab. These drugs work in different ways to stop tumor growth, and the combination with daratumumab, an immunotherapy, may better interfere with tumor cell growth and spread. The trial aims to assess overall survival, progression-free survival, treatment safety, and quality of life among participants. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives daratumumab intravenously on specific days across up to 24 cycles, combined with daily oral lenalidomide for 21 days and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for 12 cycles. The other group receives only lenalidomide and dexamethasone on the same schedule for up to 24 cycles. Treatment continues every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood tests, bone marrow biopsies, imaging scans, and patient questionnaires to monitor treatment effects and quality of life. Researchers track overall survival for up to 15 years, evaluate minimal residual disease, and monitor medication adherence and adverse events. Follow-up visits occur every 3, 6, or 12 months after treatment ends to continue monitoring health outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating LMN-201, an oral medication made from dried spirulina engineered to target Clostridioides difficile, in adults recently diagnosed with C. difficile infection (CDI). This Phase 2/3 study focuses on assessing the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of LMN-201 in preventing CDI recurrence when given alongside standard antibiotic therapy. Participants include adults diagnosed within the past 7 days and scheduled to receive up to 28 days of standard antibiotics such as fidaxomicin, metronidazole, or vancomycin. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either LMN-201 or a placebo that looks identical. LMN-201 works by binding and neutralizing C. difficile toxin B and includes an enzyme that destroys the bacteria’s cell wall. The treatment period involves taking these oral capsules during the course of antibiotic therapy. The study is double-blind and placebo-controlled, ensuring neither participants nor researchers know who receives LMN-201 or placebo. During the study, participants will undergo monitoring to track their response, including assessments up to 16 weeks after starting therapy to determine who achieves a global cure. Researchers will collect data on safety, tolerability, and recurrence rates. Participants must be able to take oral medication, use a smartphone, and commit to all study procedures. Safety follow-up and adherence to treatment schedules are part of the study process, which aims to gather comprehensive information on LMN-201’s potential benefits and risks.

Researchers are evaluating a screening and multi-sub-study randomized phase II/III trial called Lung-MAP, designed for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. The trial aims to establish a genomic screening method to assign patients to biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies. Depending on the cancer biomarker type, participants may receive new targeted cancer therapies or combinations compared to standard care, with the goal of approving new treatments. An optional ancillary study explores patient and physician attitudes about returning genetic findings related to germline mutations. The study involves testing patient specimens to determine eligibility for various sub-studies under the Lung-MAP protocol. Patients undergo screening to analyze tumor tissue and blood samples for biomarkers including PD-L1 and c-MET. Those requiring a fresh biopsy also submit blood for circulating tumor DNA testing. Sub-study assignment depends on the molecular profile results. This screening process includes both patients progressing after prior therapy and those pre-screened before progression on current treatment. Participants provide informed consent and tumor tissue that meets quality standards for testing. Researchers collect clinical data including smoking history and performance status. Outcomes focus on screening success, such as adequate tissue submission and matching to biomarker-driven sub-studies, tracked for up to three years. The study also monitors patient and physician knowledge and preferences regarding genomic findings. Participation duration varies based on screening and sub-study assignment.