Kinston

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining baxdrostat with dapagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin alone in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high blood pressure. This Phase III, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to see if this combination reduces risks such as significant kidney function decline, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death. The study includes a 4-week run-in period where participants not previously treated with SGLT2 inhibitors receive dapagliflozin alone. After this, participants are randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or placebo plus dapagliflozin in a double-blinded manner. Study visits occur frequently initially (at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization) and then approximately every 4 months. If participants stop the blinded treatment early, they continue dapagliflozin alone unless specific criteria require its discontinuation. Participants will undergo regular assessments including blood pressure monitoring and laboratory tests related to kidney function and cardiovascular health. The primary outcome measures the reduction in risk of major kidney and heart events over up to 37 months. Even if participants stop the study treatment, they will continue follow-up visits and data collection to ensure comprehensive safety and efficacy evaluation throughout the study duration.

Bipolar disorder is a serious and long-lasting mood disorder affecting both adults and children, with up to 1.8% of the pediatric population in the United States affected. Treatment options for depressive episodes in children with bipolar disorder are limited due to fewer studies compared to adults. This research aims to evaluate how cariprazine affects disease symptoms and safety in children and teenagers aged 10 to 17 years who have bipolar I disorder with depressive episodes. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one receiving cariprazine and the other receiving a placebo, with about half of the participants in each group. Cariprazine will be given as oral capsules in doses adjusted based on age and weight. At the third week, doses may be increased for those not responding well, while others will continue their current dose. The treatment lasts 6 weeks, followed by a 4-week safety follow-up period. During the study, participants will attend weekly visits to hospitals or clinics for medical assessments, blood tests, and questionnaires to monitor side effects and treatment effects. Researchers will measure changes in depression scores and monitor for any adverse events or abnormal clinical signs, including vital signs, ECG, and movement disorders. The total study duration includes the treatment and safety follow-up periods, ensuring careful observation of participants' health and response to treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and how the body processes AZD7760 when given as an intravenous infusion. The study includes healthy adults (Phase I) and adults with end-stage kidney disease who are receiving hemodialysis through a central venous catheter (Phase IIa). It aims to understand the occurrence of adverse events and how the drug behaves in these two groups. In Phase I, participants are randomly assigned to receive one of three doses of AZD7760 or a placebo as a single intravenous infusion. This part includes a 28-day screening period, a 3-day dosing period with the infusion given on Day 1, followed by a 12-month follow-up. In Phase IIa, participants receive either AZD7760 or placebo as two intravenous infusions spaced three months apart (Day 1 and Day 91), along with a 28-day screening period and a 12-month follow-up after the last infusion. Participants will be monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events, and special interest events from Day 1 up to 361 days in Phase I and 181 days in Phase IIa. Assessments will include safety laboratory tests, physical exams, and vital signs. Researchers will closely observe participants during follow-up to evaluate safety and gather pharmacokinetic data over the course of one year after dosing.

This research collects data and biological samples from patients who have experienced side effects from immunotherapy treatments for cancer. The goal is to create a national collection of these samples and clinical information to help future studies understand, predict, prevent, and treat serious immune-related side effects, rare infections, or rapid tumor growth after immunotherapy. Participants provide tissue and blood samples when they join the study and again one month later. Some patients may also provide stool samples if they have certain side effects like colitis. Researchers also review participants' medical records for up to one year to gather detailed health information related to their treatment and side effects. During the study, patients undergo sample collections and have their health records examined. The main outcome measured is the establishment of a national biorepository containing these samples and data, which will be used in future research over the course of one year. This study aims to support better understanding and management of immunotherapy side effects in cancer treatment.

Researchers are conducting a two-part, phase 2b/3 study to evaluate CSL300 (Clazakizumab) in adults with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis who have systemic inflammation and either atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes. The study aims to determine the best dose of CSL300 and assess its effects on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in this population. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial targets patients with elevated inflammation markers and significant health risks due to their conditions. In the first part (phase 2b), the study focuses on finding the appropriate dose of CSL300 compared to placebo. CSL300 is given through intravenous (IV) administration. The second part (phase 3) evaluates the impact of CSL300 on cardiovascular events such as heart attack or cardiovascular death over approximately 5 years, continuing to compare CSL300 to placebo for safety and efficacy. The placebo matches CSL300's excipient content but lacks the active drug. Participants will undergo baseline and regular assessments for inflammation markers like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) up to 12 weeks in phase 2b, and long-term monitoring for cardiovascular outcomes in phase 3. The study involves ongoing safety evaluations and efficacy measurements during the entire follow-up period. This comprehensive approach helps researchers understand how CSL300 affects inflammation and cardiovascular health in patients with ESKD on dialysis.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of AZD2373 in adults aged 18 to 65 diagnosed with APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease (AMKD) who carry specific high-risk APOL1 genotypes (G1 and G2). This Phase 2b study aims to see if AZD2373 can reduce the urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) more than a placebo by the 30th week of treatment. Participants must have significant kidney involvement as indicated by UACR and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. The study is designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with multiple treatment groups. The study includes three treatment arms: two different doses of AZD2373 and a placebo, all delivered via accessorized pre-filled syringes as injections. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of these groups and neither they nor the study staff will know their assignment during the trial. Treatment will last for a minimum of 30 weeks, continuing until the last participant completes this period. The study also uses a specialized APOL1 genotyping test to confirm participants' eligibility based on their genetic profile. Participants will undergo screening with urine tests to confirm UACR levels and blood tests for kidney function before joining. During the study, researchers will monitor changes in UACR from baseline to week 30 to assess treatment effects. Safety and tolerability will also be closely observed throughout the treatment period. Around 96 participants will be enrolled, with about 32 in each group, and all will be followed until the last participant completes the 30 weeks of treatment.

Researchers are conducting a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study to assess the efficacy and safety of iloperidone for treating adults aged 18 to 65 with uncontrolled hypertension. The study focuses on participants whose systolic blood pressure remains 130 mmHg or higher despite at least 8 weeks of treatment with one or more antihypertensive therapies. This trial aims to understand how iloperidone affects blood pressure control in this population. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either iloperidone or a placebo. The treatments are administered as drugs, with participants and researchers blinded to the assignments. The study measures changes in systolic blood pressure from baseline to the fourth week of treatment to evaluate the effects of iloperidone compared to placebo. During the study, participants will undergo blood pressure monitoring and safety assessments. The primary outcome is the change in sitting systolic blood pressure after 4 weeks of treatment. The study excludes individuals with severe hypertension, unstable heart disease, or kidney problems to ensure participant safety. The trial duration includes at least 4 weeks of treatment, with ongoing monitoring for efficacy and safety.

Researchers are evaluating treatment preference and satisfaction among adults in the United States diagnosed with schizophrenia who are prescribed xanomeline and trospium chloride (X/T) therapy. The study aims to understand how patients feel about their medication and how satisfied they are with their treatment experience. Participants will receive xanomeline and trospium chloride (X/T) therapy according to the product label. This treatment is being observed in a real-world setting without modifications, focusing on how patients use and respond to this medication combination. During the study, participants will report their medication preference through the Preference of Medication (POM) questionnaire at Month 1, Month 3, and Month 6. Treatment satisfaction will also be measured using the Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) at baseline and at Months 1, 3, and 6. Participants will provide their responses either electronically or on paper, in English or Spanish, over a period of at least six months.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma in this phase III trial. The study compares the effects of lenalidomide and dexamethasone given with or without daratumumab. These drugs work in different ways to stop tumor growth, and the combination with daratumumab, an immunotherapy, may better interfere with tumor cell growth and spread. The trial aims to assess overall survival, progression-free survival, treatment safety, and quality of life among participants. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives daratumumab intravenously on specific days across up to 24 cycles, combined with daily oral lenalidomide for 21 days and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for 12 cycles. The other group receives only lenalidomide and dexamethasone on the same schedule for up to 24 cycles. Treatment continues every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood tests, bone marrow biopsies, imaging scans, and patient questionnaires to monitor treatment effects and quality of life. Researchers track overall survival for up to 15 years, evaluate minimal residual disease, and monitor medication adherence and adverse events. Follow-up visits occur every 3, 6, or 12 months after treatment ends to continue monitoring health outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.