Long Branch

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with sacituzumab govitecan-hziy compared to standard chemotherapy treatments in patients with advanced urothelial cancer that has spread locally or to other parts of the body. This phase III trial focuses on patients whose cancer has not responded to prior anti-PDL1 therapy. The study aims to compare overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, duration of response, treatment side effects, and quality of life between the new combination therapy and usual chemotherapy care. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives standard chemotherapy options such as carboplatin or cisplatin with gemcitabine, or alternatively docetaxel or paclitaxel, given intravenously in 21-day cycles for up to six cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable side effects. The other group receives pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 and sacituzumab govitecan-hziy intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for up to 35 cycles or two years, unless disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. Both groups undergo blood tests and imaging scans like CT or MRI throughout the study. During the trial, participants will have regular assessments including blood sample collection and imaging to monitor their cancer status and treatment effects. Researchers will also evaluate patient-reported quality of life and fatigue at multiple time points up to 12 months. After completing treatment, participants are followed up 30 days later and then annually for five years to track survival and health outcomes. This comprehensive approach helps researchers understand both the clinical outcomes and the impact on patients well-being over time.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to the standard treatment of chemotherapy with or without radiation improves survival for patients aged 5 to 60 with early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares progression-free survival and overall survival between the standard therapy and the immunotherapy-enhanced approach, as well as patient-reported outcomes and long-term side effects. Participants initially receive two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days and then undergo imaging to classify their early response. Based on risk level and response, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continuing standard chemotherapy, receiving immunotherapy drugs, or combinations with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are delivered intravenously or orally in cycles lasting 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Participants are monitored regularly with PET scans, CT or MRI imaging, and blood tests. Follow-up visits occur every 3 months in the first year, then every 6 months for years two and three, and annually up to 12 years from registration. Researchers assess survival outcomes, adverse events, patient-reported symptoms and quality of life, and metabolic tumor burden. Long-term effects such as cardiovascular and pulmonary health are also evaluated using questionnaires and clinical assessments.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding the immunotherapy drug durvalumab to the usual chemotherapy regimen can improve outcomes for patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk MP2 stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial focuses on comparing breast cancer event-free survival and other measures between patients receiving chemotherapy alone and those receiving chemotherapy with durvalumab. Immunotherapy may help enhance the bodys immune response against cancer, while chemotherapy works to stop tumor growth in various ways. Participants are first tested for MP2 status using MammaPrint on previously collected tissue. Those with MP2 results are randomized into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for six cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously every 14 days for four cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule combined with durvalumab given intravenously over 60 minutes on specific cycles. Mammography and optional tumor tissue and blood sample collections occur during the study. During the study, participants undergo assessments including mammography, tumor biopsies, blood tests, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers measure outcomes such as event-free survival, response rates, relapse-free survival, overall survival, treatment side effects, and patient-reported fatigue and physical health. After treatment completion, participants are followed for up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes and survival. Specimens are also banked for future research.

Researchers are evaluating a new schedule of alternating cycles of chemoimmunotherapy chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab and immunotherapy pembrolizumab alone as the first treatment for patients with advanced lung or head and neck cancers. This phase II study aims to see if less frequent chemotherapy during the induction phase can effectively control the cancer while preserving quality of life. The trial also monitors safety and response rates over time. The study has three groups based on cancer type. Each group receives alternating cycles combination chemoimmunotherapy cycles consisting of drugs like carboplatin, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, or 5-fluorouracil with pembrolizumab, followed by cycles of pembrolizumab alone. The number of cycles varies by group, with up to four or six cycles during induction. After induction, maintenance therapy with pembrolizumab alone or combined with pemetrexed continues for up to two years. Participants will have regular assessments including imaging and laboratory tests before and during treatment to measure tumor response and monitor side effects. Researchers will track how many patients complete the induction therapy cycles and evaluate overall response rates at 6 weeks. Safety is monitored throughout the study, which can last up to three years for progression and adverse event follow-up. Patients will provide informed consent and be closely monitored during the trial.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or Stage III colon cancer based on the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA ctDNA after surgery. This Phase IIIII trial explores whether ctDNA status can help guide decisions about the need for adjuvant chemotherapy and identify the optimal chemotherapy regimen for those at high risk of recurrence. Circulating tumor DNA is a promising biomarker that may detect microscopic residual cancer cells that traditional methods might miss. Participants are assigned to groups based on their ctDNA results after surgery. Those without detectable ctDNA ctDNA- may undergo serial monitoring without treatment or receive different chemotherapy regimens such as mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 3 to 6 months. Patients with detectable ctDNA ctDNA who have a higher risk of recurrence are randomized to receive either standard chemotherapy regimens like mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 6 months or a more intensive regimen called mFOLFIRINOX for 6 months. Central ctDNA testing is performed using the Signatera test to guide these assignments. During the study, participants have blood samples collected for ctDNA testing and undergo imaging scans to check for cancer recurrence. Researchers assess disease-free survival, overall survival, and chemotherapy compliance over several years. The study includes monitoring for safety and treatment effects, with follow-up planned for up to 5 years after randomization. Participants health status, laboratory tests, and tumor markers are regularly evaluated throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

The trial investigates treatments for younger patients with intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia AML. It compares three therapy combinations cytarabine with daunorubicin, cytarabine with daunorubicin plus venetoclax, and venetoclax with azacitidine. This phase II study aims to evaluate whether adding venetoclax improves the elimination of leukemia cells compared to standard treatment, focusing on measurable residual disease MRD after remission. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three arms. Arm I receives daunorubicin intravenously on days 2-4, cytarabine intravenously on days 2-8, and venetoclax orally daily on days 1-11, with possible reinduction based on bone marrow assessment. Arm II receives azacitidine intravenously or subcutaneously on days 1-7 or 1-5 and 8-9, plus venetoclax orally daily on days 1-28 for two cycles. Arm III receives daunorubicin intravenously on days 1-3 and cytarabine intravenously on days 1-7, with possible reinduction depending on bone marrow results. Treatment continues unless disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. During the trial, participants undergo bone marrow aspiration, blood sample collection, and heart function tests like echocardiography or MUGA scans. After treatment, follow-up visits occur at 4 weeks, then every 3 months for one year, every 6 months for the second year, and yearly afterward. Researchers assess outcomes such as undetectable MRD rates, remission rates, survival, relapse, and treatment side effects over several years.

This trial investigates treatments for older adults newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia AML who have a specific gene mutation called IDH2. It compares the combination of ASTX727 and venetoclax with or without the addition of enasidenib. The study aims to see if adding enasidenib helps more patients achieve remission by targeting the IDH2 mutation that contributes to leukemia growth. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives ASTX727, an oral combination of cedazuridine and decitabine, plus venetoclax daily for 28 days in repeated 28-day cycles. The other group receives the same treatment with the addition of enasidenib every day in the cycle. Treatment continues unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Throughout the trial, patients undergo blood and bone marrow tests to monitor their response. During the study, participants have regular blood sample collections, bone marrow aspirations, and biopsies to assess disease status and treatment effects. After completing treatment, follow-up visits occur monthly for the first year, then every two months in the second year, every three months in the third year, and every six months up to five years or until death. The main outcome measured is the rate of remission without detectable leukemia after two treatment cycles. Safety and long-term outcomes are also tracked.

Researchers are comparing two monoclonal antibody treatments, rituximab and mosunetuzumab, for adults with previously untreated follicular lymphoma that has a low tumor burden. The study aims to understand which treatment better controls disease progression and improves outcomes over time. Both drugs target cancer cells but work differently, and this phase III trial evaluates their effectiveness and safety. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives rituximab intravenously and subcutaneously in cycles repeating every 56 days for up to five cycles unless the disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. The other group receives mosunetuzumab subcutaneously in cycles repeating every 21 days for up to eight cycles under similar conditions. During treatment, patients undergo CT or PETCT scans and blood tests to monitor their disease and health. After completing the treatment phase, participants are followed with visits every six months for five years, then annually up to ten years. Researchers collect imaging and blood samples during and after treatment to assess progression-free survival and other health outcomes, including overall survival and treatment side effects. This long-term follow-up helps understand the treatments lasting effects and safety.

Researchers are studying premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, focusing on tumors with specific gene recurrence scores. The trial aims to find out if adding chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy improves invasive breast cancer-free survival compared to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy alone. This Phase III trial addresses the need for better treatments in younger women, given their higher risk and past conflicting study results on ovarian suppression and chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ovarian function suppression combined with an aromatase inhibitor for five years, and the other receiving adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibitor regimen. Choices for the aromatase inhibitor and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist are made by the investigator, with options including drugs such as goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin. Endocrine treatment beyond five years is at the investigators discretion, and bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. During the study, participants are monitored over 11 years from randomization, with measurements including invasive breast cancer-free survival as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include disease-free survival, overall survival, recurrence intervals, menopausal symptoms, and pain during aromatase inhibitor therapy. Safety and treatment effects are assessed through regular evaluations, and participants continue to be followed long term to understand the impact of treatments on their breast cancer outcomes.

Researchers are studying adolescent and young adult AYA cancer survivors who had Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma to understand how social and genetic factors affect their health outcomes after treatment. These survivors face unique biological, clinical, psychological, and social challenges that may influence their risks for illness and early death compared to older or childhood cancer patients. The study aims to identify conditions increasing these risks and to better meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors. Participants will complete questionnaires about their quality of life and provide blood samples at the start of the study and again at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. This observational study collects health and treatment information without administering any medical treatments. The study assesses social-environmental risks, individual resilience factors, and gene expression changes to understand their impact on survival and quality of life. Participants will be asked to fill out health-related questionnaires and provide blood samples multiple times over two years. Researchers will measure disease-free survival, overall survival, comorbidities, and quality of life during this period. The study involves ongoing monitoring through questionnaires and blood tests to gather detailed data on how social and genetic factors influence long-term outcomes for AYA lymphoma survivors.