Long Branch

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with sacituzumab govitecan-hziy compared to the standard chemotherapy treatments in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. This Phase III trial focuses on cancers that have spread to nearby tissues, lymph nodes, or other parts of the body. The study aims to compare overall survival and other outcomes such as progression-free survival, response rates, clinical benefits, duration of response, and treatment toxicity between the two treatment approaches. Quality of life and fatigue are also assessed as secondary measures. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives standard of care chemotherapy, which may include carboplatin or cisplatin combined with gemcitabine, or alternatively docetaxel or paclitaxel, administered intravenously in cycles every 21 days for up to six cycles, unless the disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. The other group receives sacituzumab govitecan-hziy intravenously on days 1 and 8, along with pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, continuing for up to 35 cycles or two years, unless there is disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular blood sample collections and imaging scans using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to monitor their condition. Quality of life questionnaires are also completed to assess symptoms and fatigue over time. After treatment ends, patients are followed up 30 days later and then annually for up to five years to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety. The main outcome measured is overall survival from the time of randomization up to five years.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to standard chemotherapy, with or without radiation, can improve survival for patients aged 5 to 60 years with newly diagnosed stage I or II classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares outcomes in groups based on their early response to initial chemotherapy, aiming to understand if immunotherapy can lead to better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard treatment alone. The study also looks at side effects, quality of life, and long-term health impacts across different patient groups. Participants first receive two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to classify their response as rapid or slow early responders and their risk status as favorable or unfavorable. Based on these factors, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continued standard chemotherapy regimens or immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, sometimes combined with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are given intravenously or orally depending on the drugs, and cycles typically last 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected regularly throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo frequent scans such as FDG-PET, CT, MRI, and PET-CT to monitor their disease status. Blood samples and questionnaires assess treatment effects and quality of life. After completing treatment, patients have scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for two years, and annually up to 12 years to track long-term outcomes, side effects, and survival. The main measurements focus on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported experiences.

Researchers are investigating the addition of an immunotherapy drug called durvalumab to standard chemotherapy treatment in patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk (MP2) stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial aims to compare the effectiveness of usual chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy combined with durvalumab. Immunotherapy with durvalumab may help the immune system attack cancer cells and prevent tumor growth and spread, while chemotherapy drugs like paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide work to stop cancer cells from growing or dividing. Previous studies suggest patients with an MP2 result might respond better to this combined treatment approach. Participants first undergo MammaPrint testing to confirm MP2 status before randomization into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for 6 cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously on day 1 every 14 days for 4 cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule plus durvalumab intravenously over 60 minutes on specified cycles during both chemotherapy phases. Mammography is performed during screening, and optional tissue and blood samples are collected for future studies. Throughout the study, participants are monitored through various assessments including imaging, physical exams, laboratory tests, and quality of life questionnaires focusing on fatigue and physical and mental health. Researchers track breast cancer event-free survival and other outcomes such as treatment side effects and response rates. After completing treatment, patients are followed for up to 10 years or until death to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment schedule for patients with advanced lung or head and neck cancers. This study focuses on alternating cycles of combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy with immunotherapy alone during the initial treatment phase. The goal is to see if less frequent chemotherapy, given once every six weeks instead of every three weeks, can effectively control cancer while maintaining quality of life. This is a three-arm, parallel phase II study assessing the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of these treatments. The study involves three treatment groups receiving different combinations of chemotherapy drugs (including Paclitaxel, Pemetrexed, 5Fluorouracil, Carboplatin) and the immunotherapy drug Pembrolizumab. Treatment during the induction phase alternates between chemoimmunotherapy and immunotherapy alone to reduce chemotherapy exposure. Patients with specific types of lung or head and neck cancers are assigned to different study arms based on cancer histology. Treatment cycles vary up to six cycles for head and neck cancer patients. Participants will undergo assessments including imaging and laboratory tests before and during treatment to evaluate tumor response and safety. Researchers will track the percentage of patients completing chemotherapy cycles, response rates at six weeks, and the best overall response. Safety and tolerability of the treatments will also be monitored throughout the study. The study requires informed consent and regular clinical evaluations to ensure participant health and study compliance.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with colon cancer after surgery by using the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood. This approach aims to identify microscopic residual tumor cells and may provide better risk prediction for cancer recurrence compared to traditional methods. The trial focuses on patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or III colon cancer who have undergone complete tumor removal. Participants will have their tumor tissue and blood tested centrally using the Signatera assay to determine ctDNA status. Patients without detectable ctDNA may avoid chemotherapy, while those with detectable ctDNA are considered at higher risk and will be randomly assigned to receive different chemotherapy regimens, including mFOLFOX6, CAPOX, or mFOLFIRINOX, given intravenously or orally over periods ranging from 3 to 6 months. The study includes initial screening, treatment, and possible second randomization for patients whose ctDNA status changes during monitoring. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including blood tests, imaging scans, and performance evaluations to monitor their health and response to therapy. Researchers will track the time to ctDNA positivity and disease-free survival for up to 3 and 5 years, respectively. Safety and treatment effects will be closely observed throughout the study duration, ensuring thorough follow-up and monitoring for all participants.

Researchers are evaluating different treatment combinations for younger patients with intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in this phase II MyeloMATCH trial. The study compares three regimens: cytarabine with daunorubicin, cytarabine with daunorubicin plus venetoclax, and venetoclax with azacitidine. The goal is to see if adding venetoclax improves the elimination of AML cells by at least 20% compared to the standard cytarabine and daunorubicin treatment. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. One group receives daunorubicin intravenously on days 2-4, continuous intravenous cytarabine on days 2-8, and oral venetoclax daily on days 1-11, with possible reinduction cycles. Another group receives azacitidine intravenously or subcutaneously on days 1-7 or days 1-5 and 8-9, plus oral venetoclax daily for 28 days, repeated for 2 cycles. The last group receives daunorubicin intravenously on days 1-3 and continuous intravenous cytarabine on days 1-7, with possible reinduction. Treatments continue unless disease progresses or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants undergo bone marrow aspirations and blood sample collections to monitor response. Follow-up visits occur 4 weeks after treatment, then every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months in the second year, and yearly afterward. Researchers measure how well the treatments eliminate measurable residual disease and assess remission rates, side effects, survival outcomes, and treatment responses based on genetic features.

Researchers are evaluating treatment options for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or younger patients unfit for standard treatment who have a mutation in the IDH2 gene. This phase II trial compares the effectiveness of ASTX727 and venetoclax alone versus ASTX727, venetoclax, and enasidenib combined. The goal is to see if adding enasidenib can improve the rate of complete remission without measurable residual disease in this patient group. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives ASTX727 orally once daily on days 1 to 5 and venetoclax orally once daily on days 1 to 28 of each 28-day cycle. The second group receives the same treatment plus enasidenib orally once daily on days 1 to 28 of each cycle. Treatment continues in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the trial, patients undergo blood sample collection, bone marrow aspiration, and biopsy. During the study, participants have regular assessments including blood tests, bone marrow evaluations, and monitoring for side effects. After treatment ends, follow-up visits occur monthly for the first year, every two months in the second year, every three months in the third year, and every six months until five years after enrollment or death. The primary outcome measured is the rate of complete remission without measurable residual disease from baseline up to five years after treatment begins.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of two different monoclonal antibody treatments, rituximab and mosunetuzumab, for patients with follicular lymphoma that has a low tumor burden. This is a phase III trial aiming to compare how well these treatments work in preventing disease progression, transformation to a more aggressive lymphoma, or death. The study also looks at overall survival, response rates, event-free survival, and the frequency and severity of side effects. Specimens will be collected and stored for future research. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. In the first group, patients receive rituximab intravenously on the first day and then rituximab combined with hyaluronidase subcutaneously on several days during a 56-day cycle, repeated for up to five cycles if the disease does not worsen or cause unacceptable side effects. In the second group, patients receive mosunetuzumab subcutaneously on several days during a 21-day cycle, repeated for up to eight cycles under the same conditions. Both groups undergo CT or PET/CT scans and blood sample collection during treatment and follow-up. After completing the treatment cycles, patients are followed every six months for five years and then yearly up to a total of 10 years to monitor their health and disease status. Researchers collect imaging results, blood tests, and other assessments to track progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment response, and safety. The study measures how long participants live without disease progression or transformation and records any treatment-related toxicities throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating if adding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) to ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) compared to OFS plus ET alone. This Phase III trial focuses on premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, and has a 21-gene recurrence score between 16-25 for node-negative patients or 0-25 for patients with 1-3 positive nodes. The study addresses the need for better treatment options for younger women diagnosed with this type of breast cancer, as younger age is linked to worse outcomes despite standard therapies. Participants receive one of two treatments: either OFS combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for five years or adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same OFS plus AI regimen. The specific AI and GnRH agonist used, along with their dosing schedules, are chosen by the investigator, commonly including goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin administered monthly or every three months. Bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. Endocrine therapy beyond five years is at the investigator's discretion. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival over an 11-year period from randomization. Assessments include clinical evaluations, hormone receptor testing, tumor staging, and genetic recurrence scoring prior to enrollment. Safety and effectiveness data will be collected throughout the study, with particular attention to treatment side effects and long-term outcomes. The trial involves detailed eligibility screening and ongoing follow-up to ensure accurate measurement of the study's primary outcome.

Researchers are studying how social and genetic factors affect outcomes for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Compared to children and older adults, AYAs with these cancers face unique biological, clinical, psychological, and social challenges that influence their risk of illness and early death after treatment. By collecting blood samples and detailed health and treatment information, the study aims to better understand these risks and improve support for AYA cancer survivors. Participants in this observational study provide blood samples and complete health-related quality of life questionnaires at the start of the study and again at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The study examines how social-environmental risk factors and individual resilience relate to disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life. It also explores how gene expression changes may mediate these effects and whether factors like race, sex, gender identity, and geography influence outcomes. Throughout the two-year period, researchers monitor participants for disease-free survival, overall survival, and comorbidities including symptoms and late effects. The study collects repeated assessments through questionnaires and blood draws to track health status, quality of life, and biological markers. This comprehensive approach helps identify factors that impact long-term health for adolescent and young adult lymphoma survivors.