Middletown

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of tulisokibart in participants with moderately to severely active Crohns disease. This program includes two studies Study 1 involves both induction and maintenance treatment phases, while Study 2 focuses only on induction treatment. The main goal is to determine if one or more doses of tulisokibart are more effective than placebo in achieving clinical remission and endoscopic response at various time points up to Week 52. Participants are randomly assigned to receive different dosing regimens of tulisokibart or placebo. These regimens include high or low doses administered intravenously followed by subcutaneous injections, or subcutaneous injections alone. Some participants may continue in an extension phase receiving subcutaneous doses after completing their original treatment arm if they meet specific requirements. The studies use a double-blind design to compare tulisokibarts effects against placebo. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments to measure clinical remission, endoscopic response, and other health outcomes using tools like the Crohns Disease Activity Index and stool frequency with abdominal pain scores. Safety evaluations include monitoring adverse events and treatment discontinuations. The studies last up to 52 weeks for Study 1 and 12 weeks for Study 2, with multiple visits to assess treatment effects and participant health under medical supervision.

Researchers are conducting a randomized controlled trial to compare survival outcomes between robotic-assisted laparoscopy and open hysterectomy with lymph node assessment for early-stage cervical cancer. The study aims to determine if robotic hysterectomy with tumor containment before colpotomy is not worse than abdominal hysterectomy in terms of disease-free survival. It includes patients with specific cervical cancer stages and tumor sizes suitable for surgery. Participants will undergo either a radical or simple hysterectomy using either traditional open surgery or a robotic-assisted technique. In the robotic group, the vagina is closed before colpotomy, and certain vaginal manipulators are not allowed. Both groups may have salpingectomy and oophorectomy with or without ovarian transposition. Surgeons will document operative details, including any complications, blood loss, and reasons for conversion to open surgery. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored with preoperative assessments like labs, EKG, and MRI to confirm eligibility. Surgical findings and complications will be recorded. The primary outcome measured is survival at 36 months. Participants must provide informed consent and undergo follow-up to assess disease status and survival over the study period, which extends until 2030.

This research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRAX-628 in adults with focal onset seizures or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures who are currently taking between one and three anti-seizure medications. The study is an open label clinical trial designed to assess how well PRAX-628 controls seizure frequency and its tolerability in this population. Participants who qualify will receive 30 mg of PRAX-628 orally once daily for a period of 8 weeks. This single treatment group will allow researchers to observe the effects of PRAX-628 without a placebo or comparison group. The study focuses on adults aged 18 to 75 years and excludes those with certain medical histories or conditions that might interfere with the trial. During the 8-week treatment, participants will be monitored for seizure frequency and changes in clinical global impressions of severity as well as patient global impressions. Safety and tolerability will be carefully tracked throughout the study. The main outcome is the change in seizure frequency, with additional assessments of symptom severity and side effects. Participation involves regular visits and evaluations to ensure thorough monitoring of responses to PRAX-628.

Researchers are evaluating the use of carboplatin chemotherapy given before surgery in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who have inherited mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. This phase II trial aims to determine how well carboplatin works in shrinking tumors prior to surgery and to assess its impact on disease progression and survival. The study also monitors treatment side effects and collects tissue samples for future research. Participants receive carboplatin intravenously before undergoing prostate surgery. Those who show signs of disease progression after surgery will have imaging tests such as CT, MRI, chest X-ray, or PSMA PET scans. Blood samples are collected throughout the trial to monitor health and support additional studies. The study includes detailed follow-up to evaluate treatment outcomes and safety. During the trial, participants will have regular assessments including physical exams, PSA tests, and imaging scans if needed. Researchers will review the rate of complete tumor response after carboplatin treatment at surgery and track progression-free survival and overall survival over time. Safety and side effects of the treatment are closely monitored. Participation may last up to five years with ongoing collection of health data and specimens.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or Stage III colon cancer based on the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA ctDNA after surgery. This Phase IIIII trial explores whether ctDNA status can help guide decisions about the need for adjuvant chemotherapy and identify the optimal chemotherapy regimen for those at high risk of recurrence. Circulating tumor DNA is a promising biomarker that may detect microscopic residual cancer cells that traditional methods might miss. Participants are assigned to groups based on their ctDNA results after surgery. Those without detectable ctDNA ctDNA- may undergo serial monitoring without treatment or receive different chemotherapy regimens such as mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 3 to 6 months. Patients with detectable ctDNA ctDNA who have a higher risk of recurrence are randomized to receive either standard chemotherapy regimens like mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 6 months or a more intensive regimen called mFOLFIRINOX for 6 months. Central ctDNA testing is performed using the Signatera test to guide these assignments. During the study, participants have blood samples collected for ctDNA testing and undergo imaging scans to check for cancer recurrence. Researchers assess disease-free survival, overall survival, and chemotherapy compliance over several years. The study includes monitoring for safety and treatment effects, with follow-up planned for up to 5 years after randomization. Participants health status, laboratory tests, and tumor markers are regularly evaluated throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating two digital mindfulness-based interventions to improve mental health and well-being in younger breast cancer survivors who have elevated depressive symptoms. This phase III randomized trial focuses on women diagnosed at or before age 50, who completed primary cancer treatments at least six months earlier. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of live instructor-led sessions via Zoom and a self-paced app-based program, exploring which approach best supports psychological health in this population. Participants will be assigned to one of three groups the live online mindfulness sessions MAPs LO conducted weekly for 6 weeks via Zoom, the MAPs App delivering the same content in shorter sessions over 6 weeks, or a meditation-only control group accessing guided audio meditations. Both English and Spanish speakers can participate in the live online and meditation groups, while the app is only available in English. Tablets and internet hotspots are provided if needed. All groups have access to the UCLA MARC mindfulness meditation app throughout the 6-month follow-up. During the study, participants will attend weekly sessions for the live group or engage with app content at home, with usage tracked to measure intervention dose. Researchers will assess depressive symptoms shortly after the intervention and again up to 6 months later, along with fatigue symptoms. They will also investigate factors influencing intervention effects, such as baseline distress and social determinants, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the programs. The total study duration includes a 6-week intervention period plus follow-up assessments out to 6 months.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

Prostate cancer is a common cause of illness and death among men worldwide, with black men facing earlier, more frequent, and aggressive forms of the disease. This study evaluates the Proclarixae blood test, designed to help identify men at risk for clinically significant prostate cancer, particularly in a diverse multi-ethnic US population. Current risk tools often lack accuracy for different ethnic groups, so this research aims to confirm Proclarixaes performance beyond European populations. Participants with elevated PSA levels between 2 and 10 ngmL, who are scheduled for a prostate biopsy, provide a blood sample before their biopsy. The blood is tested using Proclarixae, which measures two biomarkers, thrombospondin 1 and cathepsin D, combined with PSA levels and age to produce a risk score. Prostate biopsies are conducted as per usual clinical practice, and biopsy results are compared with Proclarixae scores to assess test accuracy. During the study, participants provide informed consent, blood samples, and diagnostic test results. Researchers review biopsy outcomes and compare them with Proclarixae results to evaluate its clinical accuracy. The main measure is how well Proclarixae predicts significant prostate cancer within 90 days from enrollment. Additional analysis includes how Proclarixae relates to other diagnostic tests like MRI or ultrasound. Participation lasts until biopsy results are collected, up to 90 days.

Researchers are evaluating how well radiation therapy with or without the chemotherapy drug cisplatin works in treating patients who have stage III-IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after surgery. This phase II trial aims to understand if adding cisplatin to radiation therapy improves disease-free survival and to explore the role of p53 mutations as a biomarker for treatment benefit. The study also assesses the safety and side effects of these treatments and looks for other genetic changes that might guide new therapies. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives intensity-modulated radiation therapy IMRT once daily, five days a week for six weeks. The other group receives the same radiation schedule plus weekly intravenous cisplatin for six weeks. After treatment, participants are followed up every six months for three years and then yearly for seven years to monitor outcomes. During the study, patients will have assessments including surgical tumor tissue analysis for p53 mutation, imaging scans to check for cancer spread, and blood tests to monitor health and organ function. Researchers will track disease recurrence, new tumors, or death for up to 10 years. Side effects will be recorded during treatment. The total study participation includes treatment over six weeks followed by long-term follow-up visits lasting up to 10 years.

Researchers are examining the effect of abelacimab compared to a placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation AF who are considered unsuitable for oral anticoagulation therapy. This Phase 3 study focuses on high-risk patients with AF to evaluate whether abelacimab can reduce the occurrence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The study is led by Anthos Therapeutics, Inc. and aims to address treatment options in patients where traditional anticoagulation is deemed inappropriate. Participants are randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive either abelacimab 150 mg or a matching placebo by subcutaneous injection once a month. The study consists of three periods a screening period lasting up to 60 days, a double-blind treatment period that continues until at least 111 patients experience a primary endpoint event, and an end-of-treatment visit. Following this, participants may enter a 30-day follow-up or an optional open-label extension to receive abelacimab, depending on eligibility and regulatory approval. During the study, participants undergo assessments to monitor stroke, systemic embolism, and bleeding events, with the primary outcomes measured up to 30 months. Safety is tracked by recording bleeding events classified by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and other thrombotic events. The study also involves regular monitoring and follow-up visits to assess efficacy and safety throughout the treatment and observation periods.