Randomized Study Comparing Robotic and Open Hysterectomy Surgery for Early Stage Cervical Cancer

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are conducting a randomized controlled trial to compare survival outcomes between robotic-assisted laparoscopy and open hysterectomy with lymph node assessment for early-stage cervical cancer. The study aims to determine if robotic hysterectomy with tumor containment before colpotomy is not worse than abdominal hysterectomy in terms of disease-free survival. It includes patients with specific cervical cancer stages and tumor sizes suitable for surgery. Participants will undergo either a radical or simple hysterectomy using either traditional open surgery or a robotic-assisted technique. In the robotic group, the vagina is closed before colpotomy, and certain vaginal manipulators are not allowed. Both groups may have salpingectomy and oophorectomy with or without ovarian transposition. Surgeons will document operative details, including any complications, blood loss, and reasons for conversion to open surgery. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored with preoperative assessments like labs, EKG, and MRI to confirm eligibility. Surgical findings and complications will be recorded. The primary outcome measured is survival at 36 months. Participants must provide informed consent and undergo follow-up to assess disease status and survival over the study period, which extends until 2030.

A Trial of Robotic Versus Open Hysterectomy Surgery in Cervix Cancer