Alliance

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to see how well they reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. The study aims to determine if removing just the fallopian tubes (bilateral salpingectomy) is almost as effective as removing both the fallopian tubes and ovaries (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) in lowering ovarian cancer risk. This trial also assesses symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, sexual function, cancer-related distress, decision-making about surgery, and treatment side effects in these patients. Participants choose between two groups: one group undergoes bilateral salpingectomy and may have their ovaries removed later, while the other group undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups receive pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRI scans during screening, and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Ancillary studies include quality-of-life assessments and questionnaires. The study also collects tissue and blood samples for future research. After surgery, participants have follow-up visits at 10 to 60 days, then at 6, 12, and 24 months, and annually for up to 20 years. Researchers monitor the time until any high-grade serous carcinomas develop, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. They also track menopausal symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, cancer distress, medical decisions about surgery, and any adverse events during this long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with colon cancer after surgery by using the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood. This approach aims to identify microscopic residual tumor cells and may provide better risk prediction for cancer recurrence compared to traditional methods. The trial focuses on patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or III colon cancer who have undergone complete tumor removal. Participants will have their tumor tissue and blood tested centrally using the Signatera assay to determine ctDNA status. Patients without detectable ctDNA may avoid chemotherapy, while those with detectable ctDNA are considered at higher risk and will be randomly assigned to receive different chemotherapy regimens, including mFOLFOX6, CAPOX, or mFOLFIRINOX, given intravenously or orally over periods ranging from 3 to 6 months. The study includes initial screening, treatment, and possible second randomization for patients whose ctDNA status changes during monitoring. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including blood tests, imaging scans, and performance evaluations to monitor their health and response to therapy. Researchers will track the time to ctDNA positivity and disease-free survival for up to 3 and 5 years, respectively. Safety and treatment effects will be closely observed throughout the study duration, ensuring thorough follow-up and monitoring for all participants.

Researchers are evaluating if adding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) to ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) compared to OFS plus ET alone. This Phase III trial focuses on premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, and has a 21-gene recurrence score between 16-25 for node-negative patients or 0-25 for patients with 1-3 positive nodes. The study addresses the need for better treatment options for younger women diagnosed with this type of breast cancer, as younger age is linked to worse outcomes despite standard therapies. Participants receive one of two treatments: either OFS combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for five years or adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same OFS plus AI regimen. The specific AI and GnRH agonist used, along with their dosing schedules, are chosen by the investigator, commonly including goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin administered monthly or every three months. Bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. Endocrine therapy beyond five years is at the investigator's discretion. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival over an 11-year period from randomization. Assessments include clinical evaluations, hormone receptor testing, tumor staging, and genetic recurrence scoring prior to enrollment. Safety and effectiveness data will be collected throughout the study, with particular attention to treatment side effects and long-term outcomes. The trial involves detailed eligibility screening and ongoing follow-up to ensure accurate measurement of the study's primary outcome.

Researchers are evaluating the Integrated Cancer Repository for Cancer Research (iCaRe2), a comprehensive multi-institutional resource developed by the Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center. This resource collects and manages standardized, multi-dimensional, and longitudinal data and biospecimens from adult cancer patients, those at high risk, and normal controls. iCaRe2 includes data from a wide geographic area covering many small and rural hospitals and cancer centers, supporting studies on cancer risk factors, development, progression, and strategies for prevention, screening, early detection, and personalized treatment. iCaRe2 is a web-based, secure, HIPAA-compliant registry that integrates multiple specialized cancer collaborative registries covering a broad range of cancers such as pancreatic, breast, thyroid, thoracic, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, central nervous system, leukemia, gynecological, sarcoma, melanoma, and more. The system allows participating centers to contribute data and biospecimens like tumor samples, germ line DNA, serum, urine, and plasma. This flexible "confederation model" enables centers with different expertise and resources to collaborate on diverse research projects through a common platform. Participants include adult individuals aged 19 and older who have a cancer diagnosis or history, are at risk for cancer, have suspicious clinical findings, or have no history of cancer (normal controls). Data collection includes demographic, clinical, and biospecimen information. The registry supports multi-dimensional data mining and sharing to advance cancer research. The primary outcome is the ongoing development and implementation of this web-based cancer collaborative registry, with long-term data collection and collaboration planned over many years.

Researchers are evaluating a screening and multi-sub-study randomized phase II/III trial called Lung-MAP, designed for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. The trial aims to establish a genomic screening method to assign patients to biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies. Depending on the cancer biomarker type, participants may receive new targeted cancer therapies or combinations compared to standard care, with the goal of approving new treatments. An optional ancillary study explores patient and physician attitudes about returning genetic findings related to germline mutations. The study involves testing patient specimens to determine eligibility for various sub-studies under the Lung-MAP protocol. Patients undergo screening to analyze tumor tissue and blood samples for biomarkers including PD-L1 and c-MET. Those requiring a fresh biopsy also submit blood for circulating tumor DNA testing. Sub-study assignment depends on the molecular profile results. This screening process includes both patients progressing after prior therapy and those pre-screened before progression on current treatment. Participants provide informed consent and tumor tissue that meets quality standards for testing. Researchers collect clinical data including smoking history and performance status. Outcomes focus on screening success, such as adequate tissue submission and matching to biomarker-driven sub-studies, tracked for up to three years. The study also monitors patient and physician knowledge and preferences regarding genomic findings. Participation duration varies based on screening and sub-study assignment.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.

Researchers are evaluating a phase III trial comparing shorter chemo-immunotherapy without anthracycline drugs to the usual chemo-immunotherapy for treating early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). This study focuses on whether the anthracycline-free treatment combined with pembrolizumab is at least as effective as the standard anthracycline-containing regimen in preventing breast cancer events. The trial also examines various secondary outcomes including pathological response, survival rates, safety, tolerability, patient-reported quality of life measures, and translational objectives related to tumor immune markers. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first group receives paclitaxel, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab intravenously followed by doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and pembrolizumab before surgery. The second group receives docetaxel, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab intravenously before surgery. After surgery, patients in both groups may continue pembrolizumab treatment. Blood samples may be collected throughout the trial for additional analyses. During the study, participants undergo multiple assessments including imaging, blood tests, and physical exams before starting treatment. Patient-reported outcomes such as fatigue and physical function are collected through questionnaires. Follow-up visits occur every six months for two years, then annually up to five years to monitor breast cancer event-free survival and overall health. Safety and quality of life are continuously evaluated, and banking of physical specimens is performed for future research.

Researchers are evaluating whether 6 months of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy is as effective as 12 months of the same treatment for patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer who have no remaining invasive cancer after preoperative chemotherapy with trastuzumab. This phase III trial focuses on patients who achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR), aiming to assess recurrence-free survival and quality of life outcomes. The study also explores differences in side effects and survival among subgroups based on treatment delivery and hormone receptor status. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either 6 or 12 months of HER2-targeted therapy, including trastuzumab and possibly pertuzumab, administered intravenously or subcutaneously every 21 days. The treatment cycles continue up to 9 or 17 cycles respectively, unless disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the trial, patients undergo regular heart function tests (echocardiography or MUGA), breast imaging (mammography, ultrasound, or MRI), and may optionally provide blood and tissue samples. During the study, patients complete quality of life questionnaires and are monitored for cancer recurrence and side effects. Follow-up visits occur every 6 months for 5 years and then annually up to 10 years after registration. The main outcomes measured include time without cancer recurrence and patient-reported quality of life at 12 months. Safety and long-term effects of the different treatment durations are also assessed.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding pembrolizumab, a type of immunotherapy, to usual chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with stage IIA, IIB, IIIA, or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer that has been removed by surgery. Pembrolizumab may help the immune system attack cancer cells and prevent tumor growth. Chemotherapy drugs like cisplatin, pemetrexed, carboplatin, gemcitabine hydrochloride, and paclitaxel work by stopping tumor cells from growing and spreading. This phase III trial compares disease-free survival between different treatment approaches involving pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. In Arm B, patients receive four cycles of chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab given intravenously every 21 days for up to 17 cycles or every 6 weeks for 16 cycles. In Arm C, patients receive chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab during the initial four cycles, followed by pembrolizumab alone for up to 13 cycles every 21 days or 12 cycles every 6 weeks. Chemotherapy regimens include various platinum doublets chosen by the treating physician. Arm A was closed as of February 2022. Patients may also undergo tests such as echocardiograms, MRIs, CT scans, and blood sample collections during the trial. Throughout the study, participants are monitored with regular assessments including imaging and blood tests. Follow-up visits occur 6 weeks after treatment, then every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for years 2-4, and annually up to 10 years after randomization. Researchers measure disease-free survival, overall survival, adverse events, drug discontinuation rates, and patient quality of life using questionnaires. The study also explores outcomes based on tumor markers like PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden.