Gahanna

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of opevesostat combined with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) compared to alternative treatments, abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide, in adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have previously been treated with one next-generation hormonal agent (NHA). The study aims to determine if opevesostat improves the time participants live without their cancer worsening on scans, considering both those with and without certain androgen receptor mutations. Overall survival was also added as a secondary outcome to be assessed over a longer period. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives oral opevesostat twice daily along with daily dexamethasone and fludrocortisone acetate, continuing until their disease progresses. Hydrocortisone is available as a rescue medication if needed. The other group receives either abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide daily, also until disease progression. The study is open-label, meaning both researchers and participants know which treatment is given. During the study, participants will have regular assessments including imaging scans to monitor cancer progression, blood tests, and questionnaires evaluating quality of life and symptoms. Researchers will track the time until cancer worsens on imaging, overall survival, response rates, pain progression, and side effects. These evaluations may continue for up to approximately 82 months. Safety monitoring and treatment adherence will be followed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain. This phase II trial compares two combinations: encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab. The study aims to determine which approach is more effective at shrinking and controlling brain metastases, and it also examines survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group takes encorafenib daily by mouth, binimetinib twice daily by mouth, and receives nivolumab through an intravenous (IV) infusion every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab IV every cycle and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes during the first four cycles, with cycles repeating every 21 days initially, then every 28 days. Treatment continues unless disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Participants undergo brain MRI scans before enrollment and throughout the study to assess tumor response using specific criteria. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for two years, then yearly up to three years. The study collects tissue, blood, spinal fluid, and stool samples for future research. Researchers monitor progression-free survival as the main outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and potential effectiveness of a topical treatment called ATR04-484 for patients experiencing moderate to severe skin rash caused by EGFR inhibitor therapy. This Phase 1/2, multicenter, randomized, and blinded trial compares ATR04-484 to a placebo vehicle in adults with EGFRi-related dermal toxicity primarily affecting the face, and possibly the neck, chest, and back. The study aims to assess the safety, bioavailability, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary treatment effects of ATR04-484. The trial involves two patient cohorts. The first cohort receives a single 4 g application of ATR04-484 or vehicle to the affected areas followed by a 7-day observation period, potentially continuing with daily applications for 28 days. The second cohort receives daily 4 g applications for 28 days. Both cohorts are followed for 28 days after completing treatment. Clinical assessments will evaluate skin toxicity severity, itching, pain, and quality of life using standardized scales. Participants will apply the study treatment daily as directed and attend clinic visits for evaluations and sample collections. Researchers will monitor safety and tolerability as the primary outcome over 57 days, along with secondary measures including skin rash severity, pruritus, and quality of life. Bioavailability of the topical agent will also be assessed. The study duration includes treatment and follow-up periods to thoroughly monitor effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of computerized cognitive training methods to help breast cancer survivors who experience cognitive difficulties related to cancer and its treatments. This trial focuses on breast cancer survivors with non-metastatic disease who report cognitive problems after their cancer therapy, aiming to address the long-lasting challenges that affect their work and health. The study is a Phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing two types of cognitive training methods. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups. The first group will use global stimulation games featuring non-speeded, strategy-based exercises like solitaire, sudoku, and word search that do not adapt to the player's skill. The second group will use neuroplasticity games designed to improve cognitive functions such as attention, working memory, processing speed, and executive function, with exercises that adapt to the user's performance. The training involves eight exercises tailored to address cognitive concerns common among breast cancer survivors. During the study, participants will be monitored over 12 weeks post-randomization for self-reported cognitive impairment, with further assessments extending to 36 weeks. Researchers will collect data through cognitive tests, questionnaires, and behavioral tracking within the programs to measure changes in cognitive performance. The trial will also evaluate the safety and adherence to the training programs, with the total participation period lasting up to 36 weeks from randomization.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from patients with and without cancer to evaluate tests that might help detect cancer early. This observational study aims to create a blinded reference set of blood samples from both cancer and non-cancer patients to validate blood-based multi-cancer early detection tests. The study also assesses test performance at the time of initial cancer diagnosis by tumor type and clinical stage. Participants complete a questionnaire at the start of the study and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Patients diagnosed with cancer may also provide tissue samples at these same time points. The study collects samples to support the development and validation of early detection assays, with no treatment interventions involved. During the study, participants fill out questionnaires and provide blood and possibly tissue samples. Researchers follow up with participants one year after study completion. The main outcome is the creation of a blinded reference set of blood samples to test early cancer detection methods. The study monitors test performance based on cancer type and stage, with all evaluations completed within one year of enrollment.

This research aims to collect data and samples from patients who experience side effects from immunotherapy used in cancer treatment. The goal is to better understand, predict, prevent, and treat these immune-related side effects, including serious adverse events, rare infections, or accelerated tumor growth. This observational study is led by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology and focuses on patients treated with immuno-oncology therapies who have experienced significant immune-related adverse events. Participants provide tissue and blood samples, with optional stool samples for those experiencing colitis, within 72 hours of confirming a serious immune-related adverse event and again one month later. The study also includes a review of patients' medical records for up to one year. This approach helps establish a national biorepository of biospecimens and clinical data for future research. During the study, participants will undergo sample collection at two time points and have their medical history reviewed over a year. Researchers will monitor the establishment of the biorepository and collect clinical data to support future studies. This process aims to improve knowledge about immune-related side effects from immunotherapy and contribute to better patient care over time.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with colon cancer based on the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after surgery. This Phase II/III trial focuses on patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or Stage III colon adenocarcinoma who have undergone tumor removal. The study aims to use ctDNA status to better predict the risk of cancer recurrence and guide decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants will be assigned to different treatment groups based on their ctDNA status after surgery. Patients without detectable ctDNA will undergo serial ctDNA monitoring without immediate treatment or receive standard chemotherapy regimens such as mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for varying durations. Patients with detectable ctDNA will receive either standard chemotherapy or intensified regimens like mFOLFIRINOX. Treatments involve intravenous and oral chemotherapy drugs given over several cycles spanning weeks to months. Throughout the study, participants will have ctDNA testing using the Signatera test and be monitored for disease-free survival, overall survival, and recurrence up to five years after randomization. Safety and treatment adherence will also be tracked. Regular imaging and laboratory tests will assess disease status and organ function. The study may include re-randomization for patients who develop positive ctDNA during monitoring. Total involvement may last several years with follow-up for long-term outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the impact of the Cost Communication and Financial Navigation (CostCOM) program on how well cancer patients stick to their treatment plans and manage financial stress. Many people with cancer face financial difficulties due to high out-of-pocket costs and changes in employment or insurance, which can cause delays or interruptions in care and lower quality of life. This study compares CostCOM with enhanced usual care to see if it helps reduce financial hardship and improve care adherence and patient satisfaction. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives a brochure about financial navigation services from the Patient Advocate Foundation. The other group receives standard financial care plus CostCOM financial counseling sessions lasting about an hour, given within 30 days of enrollment and again at 3, 6, and 12 months. Non-patient participants, such as providers or coordinators, may take part in surveys and interviews to share their experiences with the CostCOM program. Patients will be followed for 12 months after completing the intervention. During this time, they will complete surveys about their adherence to cancer care, financial hardship, worry, quality of life, and satisfaction with care at several points. Researchers will also assess the accuracy of cost estimates given to patients and explore neighborhood characteristics. The study includes interviews and surveys with non-patient participants conducted 15 to 39 months after the first patient enrollment.

Researchers are evaluating the vaccine FK-PC101 to see if it can delay or prevent the return of prostate cancer in men who have had surgery to remove their prostate tumor. This Phase 2, randomized, open-label trial compares FK-PC101 to current treatment practices in men with localized high-risk prostate cancer. The study also aims to learn about the safety of FK-PC101 and how it affects participants medically. In this study, men will have a sample of their prostate cancer tissue collected during surgery to create a personalized vaccine. Those randomized to the vaccine group will receive up to 7 doses of FK-PC101 over a 6-month period, starting 2 months after surgery. The vaccine doses are given intradermally and include the immune adjuvant BCG for the first two doses. Men in the control group will receive standard care without adjuvant therapy but may receive the vaccine if their cancer returns within a year after surgery. Participants will attend multiple clinic visits for treatment or follow-up over approximately 22 months. Regular blood tests and scans will monitor if the cancer returns. Researchers will assess disease-free survival as the primary outcome, along with time to next treatment, metastasis-free survival, immune response to FK-PC101, and safety. The study involves careful screening before surgery, post-surgery eligibility checks, and ongoing evaluations throughout the study period.

Researchers are studying how certain factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect whether patients with malignant solid tumors develop mild or serious side effects from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. This observational study aims to develop and validate a model that predicts severe immune-related side effects during the first year of immunotherapy, while also assessing quality of life and adverse events over 12 months. The study is sponsored by the SWOG Cancer Research Network and includes translational medicine goals such as evaluating cytokine levels as predictors and establishing a tissue and blood sample repository. Participants will provide a tissue sample at the start of their routine cancer treatment and complete questionnaires at multiple time points: at treatment start, and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. They may also provide optional blood samples during the study. This design allows researchers to monitor immune-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes over time. During the study, participants will complete various questionnaires to report their quality of life, cognitive function, and side effects. Blood and tissue samples will be analyzed to explore predictive markers of toxicity. Researchers will track the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and assess changes in patient-reported outcomes. The study includes ongoing monitoring and data collection, with participation lasting approximately one year from treatment start.