Hambden

Researchers are evaluating two treatment combinations for patients with melanoma that has spread to the brain and has a specific BRAF-V600 mutation. This phase II trial compares encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab against ipilimumab and nivolumab to determine which approach better controls and shrinks brain metastases from melanoma. The study also aims to assess overall survival, response rates, treatment duration, and side effects of each regimen. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives encorafenib orally once daily, binimetinib orally twice daily, and nivolumab intravenously every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab intravenously and ipilimumab intravenously during the first four cycles, with cycles every 21 days initially, then every 28 days thereafter. Treatment continues unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. After treatment ends, participants have follow-up visits every six months for two years, then yearly until three years after starting the study. During the trial, participants undergo brain MRIs to monitor tumor response using standardized criteria. Imaging, tumor tissue, spinal fluid, stool, and blood samples are collected for research. Safety and effectiveness are carefully assessed through scans, physical exams, lab tests, and side effect monitoring. Progression-free survival up to three years after randomization is the main outcome. Participants remain in the study for about three years with periodic evaluations to track their health and disease status.

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to see how well they reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. The study aims to determine if removing just the fallopian tubes (bilateral salpingectomy) is almost as effective as removing both the fallopian tubes and ovaries (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) in lowering ovarian cancer risk. This trial also assesses symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, sexual function, cancer-related distress, decision-making about surgery, and treatment side effects in these patients. Participants choose between two groups: one group undergoes bilateral salpingectomy and may have their ovaries removed later, while the other group undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups receive pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRI scans during screening, and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Ancillary studies include quality-of-life assessments and questionnaires. The study also collects tissue and blood samples for future research. After surgery, participants have follow-up visits at 10 to 60 days, then at 6, 12, and 24 months, and annually for up to 20 years. Researchers monitor the time until any high-grade serous carcinomas develop, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. They also track menopausal symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, cancer distress, medical decisions about surgery, and any adverse events during this long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with colon cancer after surgery by using the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood. This approach aims to identify microscopic residual tumor cells and may provide better risk prediction for cancer recurrence compared to traditional methods. The trial focuses on patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or III colon cancer who have undergone complete tumor removal. Participants will have their tumor tissue and blood tested centrally using the Signatera assay to determine ctDNA status. Patients without detectable ctDNA may avoid chemotherapy, while those with detectable ctDNA are considered at higher risk and will be randomly assigned to receive different chemotherapy regimens, including mFOLFOX6, CAPOX, or mFOLFIRINOX, given intravenously or orally over periods ranging from 3 to 6 months. The study includes initial screening, treatment, and possible second randomization for patients whose ctDNA status changes during monitoring. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including blood tests, imaging scans, and performance evaluations to monitor their health and response to therapy. Researchers will track the time to ctDNA positivity and disease-free survival for up to 3 and 5 years, respectively. Safety and treatment effects will be closely observed throughout the study duration, ensuring thorough follow-up and monitoring for all participants.

Researchers are evaluating how well proton beam radiation therapy compares with intensity modulated photon radiotherapy in treating patients with stage I to IVA esophageal cancer. This phase III trial aims to determine if proton beam therapy can improve overall survival and reduce serious heart and lung side effects compared to photon therapy. The study also looks at symptom impact, quality of life, treatment costs, response rates, and hospitalization length between the two treatments. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either proton beam therapy or intensity modulated photon therapy, both given in 28 sessions over 5.5 weeks alongside chemotherapy. Chemotherapy options include carboplatin/paclitaxel, FOLFOX/CAPOX, or docetaxel/fluorouracil regimens, selected by the patient and physician. After completing chemoradiation, patients may have surgery to remove the tumor if it is safe and feasible. During the study, blood samples and imaging scans such as PET/CT or CT are collected to monitor progress. Patients are followed every 3 to 6 months for three years and then yearly to track survival, side effects, and disease status. Researchers also assess patient-reported symptoms and quality of life. The main outcomes measured are overall survival and the occurrence of serious heart and lung side effects related to treatment over up to eight years. Additional assessments include immune cell levels, disease recurrence, and treatment toxicity.

This trial investigates a treatment approach for women diagnosed with advanced (stage III or IV) ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer who have tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) or similar mutations. The study evaluates whether adding heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin during interval cytoreductive surgery (iCRS), followed by maintenance therapy with niraparib, improves outcomes compared to surgery without HIPEC followed by niraparib. This is a phase III randomized trial focusing on progression-free survival over up to eight years. Participants receive standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for 3-4 cycles before surgery. At the time of interval cytoreductive surgery, patients who have minimal residual disease are randomized either to receive HIPEC—a heated dose of cisplatin delivered directly into the abdomen during surgery—or no HIPEC. After surgery and recovery, all patients continue with additional chemotherapy cycles to complete up to six cycles total, followed by maintenance therapy with niraparib for up to 36 months or until disease progression. During the study, participants undergo regular medical evaluations including imaging, laboratory tests, and physical exams to monitor their cancer status and treatment effects. Progression-free survival is the primary outcome measured from enrollment until disease progression or death. Safety and side effects are monitored continuously, and patients are followed for up to eight years to assess long-term outcomes and tolerability of the treatments.

Researchers are evaluating a phase III trial comparing two treatment approaches for women with locally advanced cervical cancer that has spread to nearby tissues or lymph nodes. The study aims to see if adding induction chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab before standard chemotherapy, radiation, and pembrolizumab maintenance can improve progression-free survival. This trial also investigates overall survival, treatment toxicity, treatment timing, and the role of biomarkers in predicting outcomes. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives standard chemoradiation with cisplatin and pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab maintenance. The other group receives induction therapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab, followed by chemoradiation with cisplatin and pembrolizumab, and then pembrolizumab maintenance. Radiation therapy includes external beam radiation and brachytherapy, given over several weeks. Treatments continue unless the cancer progresses or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the study, participants undergo various scans such as PET, CT, chest x-rays, and MRI, along with blood sample collections. After completing treatment, participants are followed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years to monitor cancer progression or survival. The primary outcome measured is progression-free survival up to 7 years. Additional assessments include treatment safety, biomarker studies, and radiation quality reviews.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma in this phase III trial. The study compares the effects of lenalidomide and dexamethasone given with or without daratumumab. These drugs work in different ways to stop tumor growth, and the combination with daratumumab, an immunotherapy, may better interfere with tumor cell growth and spread. The trial aims to assess overall survival, progression-free survival, treatment safety, and quality of life among participants. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives daratumumab intravenously on specific days across up to 24 cycles, combined with daily oral lenalidomide for 21 days and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for 12 cycles. The other group receives only lenalidomide and dexamethasone on the same schedule for up to 24 cycles. Treatment continues every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood tests, bone marrow biopsies, imaging scans, and patient questionnaires to monitor treatment effects and quality of life. Researchers track overall survival for up to 15 years, evaluate minimal residual disease, and monitor medication adherence and adverse events. Follow-up visits occur every 3, 6, or 12 months after treatment ends to continue monitoring health outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating a screening and multi-sub-study randomized phase II/III trial called Lung-MAP, designed for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. The trial aims to establish a genomic screening method to assign patients to biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies. Depending on the cancer biomarker type, participants may receive new targeted cancer therapies or combinations compared to standard care, with the goal of approving new treatments. An optional ancillary study explores patient and physician attitudes about returning genetic findings related to germline mutations. The study involves testing patient specimens to determine eligibility for various sub-studies under the Lung-MAP protocol. Patients undergo screening to analyze tumor tissue and blood samples for biomarkers including PD-L1 and c-MET. Those requiring a fresh biopsy also submit blood for circulating tumor DNA testing. Sub-study assignment depends on the molecular profile results. This screening process includes both patients progressing after prior therapy and those pre-screened before progression on current treatment. Participants provide informed consent and tumor tissue that meets quality standards for testing. Researchers collect clinical data including smoking history and performance status. Outcomes focus on screening success, such as adequate tissue submission and matching to biomarker-driven sub-studies, tracked for up to three years. The study also monitors patient and physician knowledge and preferences regarding genomic findings. Participation duration varies based on screening and sub-study assignment.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and outcomes of different surgical margin sizes for adults with stage II primary invasive cutaneous melanoma. The trial compares the effects of removing 1 cm versus 2 cm of healthy skin around the melanoma site to see if smaller margins provide similar disease control. This study aims to understand if narrower excision margins can reduce surgery side effects and improve quality of life without increasing the risk of melanoma returning. Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo wide local excision surgery with either a 1 cm or 2 cm margin around the original melanoma scar. Both approaches involve removing an extra margin of skin to eliminate any remaining melanoma cells after the initial biopsy. Surgery is scheduled to be completed within 120 days after diagnosis and within 28 days after randomization. This phase III, multi-center trial will assess if the smaller margin is as effective as the larger one. During the study, patients will be followed for up to 60 months to monitor disease-free survival, which means the length of time without melanoma recurrence. Researchers will also evaluate quality of life, side effects from surgery, and the economic impact on health services. Participants will have regular clinical assessments, and outcomes will be recorded to determine the long-term safety and benefits of the two surgical approaches.

Researchers are evaluating the use of osimertinib alone versus a combination of osimertinib and bevacizumab for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has spread beyond the lungs and has specific mutations in the EGFR gene. This phase III trial focuses on whether adding bevacizumab, which blocks blood vessel growth to tumors, can better control cancer and improve survival compared to osimertinib alone, a drug that blocks EGFR involved in cancer cell growth. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either osimertinib by mouth once daily or osimertinib with bevacizumab given intravenously every 21 days. Treatment continues unless the cancer progresses or side effects become unacceptable. The study includes imaging tests like CT, MRI, echocardiography, and MUGA scans to monitor disease and heart function, along with blood and urine sample collection. Participants are followed for up to 10 years after treatment ends, with check-ups every 3 months to measure progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, and side effects. Researchers also analyze blood samples to study how the cancer develops resistance to treatment. This thorough monitoring helps understand long-term effects and how well the treatments control the cancer.