New Albany

Researchers are evaluating the safety and performance of the Canary canturioTM te tibial extension in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis. This prospective observational study compares the Canary canturioTM te device to the legally marketed Zimmer Persona Personalized Knee System with a 14 mm x +30 mm stem extension. The main goal is to assess the nature, severity, and frequency of safety risks within five years after surgery, including complications like revision, loosening, fractures, and radiologic changes. Participants are divided into two groups: one receiving the Zimmer Persona Personalized Knee System with the Canary canturioTM te tibial extension, and the other using the Zimmer Persona Personalized Knee System with a traditional 14 mm x +30 mm stem extension. The study monitors safety outcomes over five years post-TKA. Secondary measures include the collection of step-count and gait data, pain and functional assessments using standardized scores, and evaluation of the device's reliability and accuracy in measuring walking speed and gait parameters at one and two years post-surgery. During the study, patients will be monitored for adverse events and safety risks related to their knee implant. Data collection includes daily step counts, gait activity, and clinical assessments such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS - JR), Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and quality-of-life questionnaires. A subgroup undergoes detailed gait lab assessments to evaluate device performance. The total follow-up period spans five years, allowing researchers to observe long-term outcomes and device safety.

Researchers are evaluating two treatment combinations for patients with melanoma that has spread to the brain and has a specific BRAF-V600 mutation. This phase II trial compares encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab against ipilimumab and nivolumab to determine which approach better controls and shrinks brain metastases from melanoma. The study also aims to assess overall survival, response rates, treatment duration, and side effects of each regimen. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives encorafenib orally once daily, binimetinib orally twice daily, and nivolumab intravenously every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab intravenously and ipilimumab intravenously during the first four cycles, with cycles every 21 days initially, then every 28 days thereafter. Treatment continues unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. After treatment ends, participants have follow-up visits every six months for two years, then yearly until three years after starting the study. During the trial, participants undergo brain MRIs to monitor tumor response using standardized criteria. Imaging, tumor tissue, spinal fluid, stool, and blood samples are collected for research. Safety and effectiveness are carefully assessed through scans, physical exams, lab tests, and side effect monitoring. Progression-free survival up to three years after randomization is the main outcome. Participants remain in the study for about three years with periodic evaluations to track their health and disease status.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of IPN10200, a medication designed to prevent episodic and chronic migraines in adults aged 18 to 80. Migraines cause severe throbbing pain often accompanied by nausea and sensitivity to light and sound, caused by brain activation releasing pain-related chemicals. IPN10200 works by stopping the release of these chemical messengers, and this phase II study aims to find the right dose that balances safety and efficacy. The study has three periods: first, a screening to check eligibility; second, Step 1 where two different doses of IPN10200 are tested sequentially in two groups, with injections given into muscles of the head, face, and neck and safety monitored over 36 weeks; third, Step 2 where new participants with episodic or chronic migraine are randomly assigned to receive one of two doses or a placebo, also via injections in the same areas, with monitoring continuing until Week 36. Participants will complete a daily electronic migraine diary and questionnaires throughout the study lasting up to 44 weeks. Researchers will monitor safety by tracking adverse events, laboratory changes, vital signs, facial exams, ECG readings, and antibody development. They will also measure changes in monthly migraine days to evaluate treatment effectiveness while ensuring participant safety throughout the study.

The goal of this trial is to determine the efficacy of advanced cognitive training for cancer survivors suffering from cancer- and cancer-treatment-related cognitive dysfunction. For millions of cancer survivors, cognitive dysfunction is a prevalent, severe, and persistent problem that has long been associated with poor work-related and health-related outcomes. Evidence suggests that a significant subset of breast cancer survivors (BCS) incur cognitive changes that may persist for years after treatment. Unfortunately, the scientific basis for managing these cognitive changes is extremely limited. Available evidence from pilot studies, including our work, suggests that advanced cognitive training, which is based on the principles of neuroplasticity (ability of brain neurons to re-organize and form new neural networks), may be a viable treatment option. However, previous trials to date have been limited by lack of attention-controlled designs, small samples of BCS, or limited outcome measures. Therefore, to overcome limitations of past studies and build on our pilot results, the purpose of this 2-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to conduct a full-scale efficacy trial to compare advanced cognitive training to attention control in BCS.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to study and evaluate tests that could help detect cancer early. The goal is to create a blinded reference set of samples to validate blood-based tests for early detection of multiple types of cancer, including leukemia, lymphoma, breast, lung, and others. The study also aims to assess how well these tests perform at the time of initial cancer diagnosis, considering different tumor types and cancer stages. Participants complete a baseline questionnaire and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also provide tissue samples at these times. The study includes patients aged 40 to 75 years, with cancer diagnoses at various stages or individuals without cancer. Special procedures are in place for patients with high suspicion of certain cancers before confirmation. During the study, researchers collect detailed information through questionnaires, blood draws, and tissue sampling to analyze test accuracy. Participants are monitored for up to one year after registration to follow outcomes. The primary measure is providing this blinded set of blood samples to help validate future cancer detection tests, supporting research that could improve early diagnosis and treatment.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with colon cancer after surgery by using the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood. This approach aims to identify microscopic residual tumor cells and may provide better risk prediction for cancer recurrence compared to traditional methods. The trial focuses on patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or III colon cancer who have undergone complete tumor removal. Participants will have their tumor tissue and blood tested centrally using the Signatera assay to determine ctDNA status. Patients without detectable ctDNA may avoid chemotherapy, while those with detectable ctDNA are considered at higher risk and will be randomly assigned to receive different chemotherapy regimens, including mFOLFOX6, CAPOX, or mFOLFIRINOX, given intravenously or orally over periods ranging from 3 to 6 months. The study includes initial screening, treatment, and possible second randomization for patients whose ctDNA status changes during monitoring. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including blood tests, imaging scans, and performance evaluations to monitor their health and response to therapy. Researchers will track the time to ctDNA positivity and disease-free survival for up to 3 and 5 years, respectively. Safety and treatment effects will be closely observed throughout the study duration, ensuring thorough follow-up and monitoring for all participants.

Researchers are evaluating the Cost Communication and Financial Navigation (CostCOM) program to see how it affects cancer patients' ability to stick to their care plans and manage financial stress caused by high out-of-pocket medical costs. Financial hardship from cancer treatment can cause delays or stops in care and lower quality of life. This study compares usual care with CostCOM, which offers financial counseling, education, and resource connections to reduce financial barriers and ease financial burden. Patients with newly diagnosed solid cancers are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives a brochure about financial navigation services, while the other group receives the usual financial care plus CostCOM counseling sessions lasting about one hour, given within 30 days after enrollment and then again at 3, 6, and 12 months. Non-patient participants involved in the study complete surveys and participate in in-depth interviews 15 to 39 months after the first patient enrollment. Participants are monitored for 12 months after completing the intervention. Researchers collect patient-reported information on care adherence affected by costs, financial hardship, worry about finances, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. They also assess patient and provider experiences with the CostCOM program, the accuracy of cost estimates communicated, and neighborhood characteristics. The study aims to understand how CostCOM impacts patients over time and their use of financial navigation resources.

Researchers are evaluating whether breast conservation surgery combined with endocrine therapy can achieve a similar rate of invasive or non-invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) compared to breast conservation surgery followed by breast radiation and endocrine therapy in patients with Stage I, hormone sensitive, HER2-negative breast cancer with an Oncotype recurrence score of 18 or less. This Phase III trial builds on the established role of radiation after lumpectomy, aiming to identify if radiation can be safely omitted in certain low-risk patients to reduce treatment burden and side effects. Participants receive either breast radiation plus endocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone. Radiation therapy involves external beam radiation to the whole breast with or without a boost, partial breast irradiation, or accelerated partial breast irradiation, starting within 12 weeks after the last breast surgery. Endocrine therapy is given for a minimum of 5 years, with the specific drug choice and schedule determined by the treating physician. Endocrine therapy may begin before, during, or after radiation therapy, depending on the treatment group. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging such as mammograms or MRI within six months before enrollment, and clinical evaluations to monitor tumor recurrence. The main outcome measured is the time to invasive or non-invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence over five years. Safety, adherence to therapy, and recovery from surgery are also monitored. The total participation period includes at least five years to evaluate long-term recurrence rates.

Researchers are evaluating how factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect the development of side effects in patients with malignant solid tumors receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The study aims to develop and validate a risk prediction model for serious immune-related side effects during the first year of ICI treatment. Additional goals include tracking the occurrence of various side effects, quality of life, patient-reported symptoms, and treatment patterns over 12 months, along with studying biological markers that may predict side effect risk. Participants will have tissue samples collected at the start of their cancer treatment and will complete questionnaires at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. Blood samples may also be collected at multiple times during the study. The study focuses on patients receiving standard-of-care ICI therapy for solid tumors, without combination chemotherapy or other non-ICI treatments. During the study, participants will complete patient-reported outcome forms and health questionnaires to assess side effects and quality of life. Researchers will monitor the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and evaluate biological markers from blood and tissue samples. The study also assesses the use of electronic methods for collecting patient data. Total participation includes assessments over approximately one year following treatment start.

Researchers are evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of completing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 18 to 39 with various types of cancer. This pilot randomized controlled trial compares two approaches: allowing AYAs to choose five health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains to report on (Choice PRO) versus assigning five fixed domains (Fixed PRO). The study aims to improve how PRO data is collected and used to better address patient needs in clinical and supportive care settings. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Choice PRO group, where they select five of 15 PRO domains to complete at each assessment, or the Fixed PRO group, where they complete the same five predetermined domains at each time point. Assessments will be completed online using the EASEE-PRO platform at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Reminder calls and text messages will be used to encourage adherence and reduce missing data. The study will also explore how AYAs want their PRO data shared with themselves, their families, and healthcare providers. During the study, participants will complete questionnaires combining computerized adaptive tests and fixed short forms. Researchers will measure the completion rates and acceptability of the PROs at one month and baseline, respectively, and compare these between groups. The study requires participants to have internet access and the ability to provide informed consent and accurate self-reports. The total participation time includes follow-up over one year with multiple assessments to capture patient experiences and preferences.