Wilmington

This trial investigates monitoring and treatment options for patients with low risk and standard risk metastatic germ cell tumors, which are cancers that start in the cells that produce sperm or eggs. The study aims to find out if active surveillance after surgical removal of low risk tumors can maintain high survival rates, and whether carboplatin or cisplatin chemotherapy works better for treating standard risk tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults. Patients with low risk tumors undergo observation after surgery and may transfer to a standard risk treatment arm if the tumor recurs. Those with standard risk tumors are randomly assigned to receive one of two chemotherapy regimens one containing carboplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide, or the other containing cisplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide. Treatments are given intravenously in cycles every 21 days for up to 3 or 4 cycles depending on the group. Throughout the study, patients have imaging scans, blood tests, tumor biopsies, and pulmonary function tests to monitor response and side effects. Participants are followed closely during treatment and afterward with regular check-ups including CT, MRI, and chest X-rays, as well as blood sample collections. Follow-up visits occur every 2 months for the first year, then every 3-6 months up to 2 years, every 6 months for years 3 to 5, and annually up to 10 years. Researchers measure overall survival, event-free survival, hearing loss, body composition, tumor markers, and patient-reported outcomes related to hearing and neuropathy. This long-term monitoring helps assess the effects and safety of chemotherapy and surveillance strategies.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to help evaluate new tests that could detect cancer early. This study aims to create a set of blinded blood samples from both cancer and non-cancer patients to validate these tests, focusing on multiple cancer types and stages. The goal is to improve early cancer detection through laboratory research. Participants complete a questionnaire at the start and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also have tissue samples collected at these times. The study includes patients with various cancer types and stages, as well as individuals without cancer, with some allowing enrollment before full cancer confirmation under specific conditions. During the study, researchers review the collected samples and questionnaire data to assess test performance by tumor type and clinical stage at diagnosis. Participants are followed for one year after completing the study. Key measurements include the provision of a blinded reference set of cancer versus non-cancer blood samples to support future clinical trials focused on blood-based multi-cancer early detection.

This research aims to establish a national biorepository by collecting research data and samples from patients who experience side effects from immunotherapy treatments used in cancer care. It focuses on patients who have serious immune-related reactions, rare infections, or accelerated tumor growth after receiving immuno-oncology therapies. The goal is to help researchers better predict, prevent, and treat these side effects in the future. Participants will have tissue and blood samples collected within 72 hours after confirmation of a serious immune-related side effect and again one month later. For patients experiencing colitis, stool samples may also be collected. Alongside sample collection, medical records will be reviewed for up to one year. This study is observational and involves no experimental treatments. During the study, participants will provide biospecimens at two time points and allow access to their medical records for a year. Researchers will analyze these samples and clinical data to build a resource for future studies on immune-related adverse events. The main outcome is the establishment of this biorepository, which will be maintained for up to one year after enrollment.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of the Cost Communication and Financial Navigation CostCOM intervention on adherence to cancer care and financial burden in patients with malignant solid neoplasms. This study focuses on how financial hardship caused by out-of-pocket costs, employment changes, and insurance affects cancer treatment and quality of life. CostCOM aims to provide financial counseling and resource connections to reduce these burdens and improve adherence to care. Participants are randomized into two groups. One group receives a brochure describing financial navigation services Enhanced Usual Care, while the other group receives usual financial care plus CostCOM financial counseling sessions within 30 days of enrollment and again at 3, 6, and 12 months. Non-patient participants complete surveys and participate in interviews 15 to 39 months after the first patient enrollment. Participants complete surveys at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months to report on cost-related care non-adherence, financial hardship, financial worry, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. The study includes follow-up for 12 months after intervention completion. Non-patient participants also provide feedback on the CostCOM intervention through interviews. Researchers will monitor patient experiences and financial outcomes throughout the study.

Researchers are studying how certain factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect whether patients with malignant solid tumors develop mild or serious side effects from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. This observational study aims to develop and validate a model that predicts severe immune-related side effects during the first year of immunotherapy, while also assessing quality of life and adverse events over 12 months. The study is sponsored by the SWOG Cancer Research Network and includes translational medicine goals such as evaluating cytokine levels as predictors and establishing a tissue and blood sample repository. Participants will provide a tissue sample at the start of their routine cancer treatment and complete questionnaires at multiple time points at treatment start, and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. They may also provide optional blood samples during the study. This design allows researchers to monitor immune-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes over time. During the study, participants will complete various questionnaires to report their quality of life, cognitive function, and side effects. Blood and tissue samples will be analyzed to explore predictive markers of toxicity. Researchers will track the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and assess changes in patient-reported outcomes. The study includes ongoing monitoring and data collection, with participation lasting approximately one year from treatment start.

Researchers are conducting a study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of collecting patient-reported outcomes PROs from adolescents and young adults AYAs aged 18 to 39 who have been diagnosed with cancer. The study compares two approaches allowing participants to choose five health-related quality of life HRQOL domains they find most important Choice PRO versus completing five standard HRQOL domains selected by researchers Fixed PRO. The goal is to understand which method better supports AYA engagement and data completion. Participants are randomized into two groups. One group selects five from 15 PRO domains to complete at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, while the other group completes a fixed set of five domains at the same intervals. Questionnaires are completed online, facilitated by reminders via calls and text messages to improve adherence. The study also explores AYA preferences on how their PRO data should be shared with themselves, their families, and healthcare providers. During the study, participants complete assessments online at multiple timepoints, including baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, using a mix of computerized adaptive tests and static forms. Researchers measure feasibility based on the percentage of completed PROs and participant acceptability. The study monitors response rates, preferences, and data sharing views, aiming to enhance future patient-centered care and support in clinical trials involving AYAs with cancer.

Researchers are evaluating a master screening protocol called Lung-MAP for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. This phase IIIII trial aims to develop a genomic screening method for large cancer populations and assign participants to appropriate sub-studies based on specific cancer biomarkers. The goal is to compare new targeted therapies designed to block cancer growth or spread with standard care, including sub-studies for patients not eligible for biomarker-driven treatments. The study involves screening patient specimens to determine eligibility for various biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies within the Lung-MAP umbrella protocol. This is a screening study without direct interventions instead, patients are assigned to different treatment sub-studies, each operating independently. The protocol also includes an optional ancillary study evaluating attitudes about the return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of germline mutations. Participants provide tumor tissue for biomarker testing, including molecular profiling and PD-L1 analysis, and may submit fresh biopsies and blood samples for circulating tumor DNA testing. Researchers will monitor screening success rates up to three years and collect patient and physician feedback on genetic findings. Participation involves signing informed consent, providing smoking history, and possibly completing surveys. The study duration and assessments vary depending on sub-study assignment and patient progression.

Researchers are comparing two chemotherapy combinations for treating advanced, unresectable, or metastatic HER2 negative adenocarcinomas of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach. This phase III trial evaluates modified FOLFIRINOX fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan with or without nivolumab versus modified FOLFOX fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab. Chemotherapy drugs act to stop tumor growth by killing cells or stopping division, and immunotherapy with nivolumab may affect the immune system to hinder tumor growth and spread. Participants are randomized into two groups one receives mFOLFIRINOX plus nivolumab as clinically indicated, and the other receives mFOLFOX plus nivolumab as clinically indicated. Treatments are administered intravenously. Throughout the study, participants undergo magnetic resonance imaging MRI, computed tomography CT scans, and may provide blood samples. Nivolumab is given as needed based on clinical assessment during the trial. Participants will be monitored up to 2 years from randomization for overall survival, with secondary measures including progression-free survival, response rates, duration of response, adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes collected at baseline and during treatment cycles. Safety and tolerability are evaluated, and exploratory analyses include biomarker assessments such as PD-L1 combined positive score and cell-free DNA. The trial includes regular imaging and clinical assessments to track disease status and treatment effects.

Researchers are evaluating a combination therapy approach for adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not intended for early autologous transplantation. This phase III trial compares a four-drug combination including daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone to a three-drug combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. The study aims to determine whether adding bortezomib improves overall survival and progression-free survival, examining minimal residual disease status and patient-reported outcomes related to neuropathy and quality of life. All participants first receive standard induction therapy with daratumumab administered subcutaneously on scheduled days, oral lenalidomide daily for 21 days per cycle, and oral dexamethasone on specific days, repeated every 28 days for 9 cycles. After induction, patients are randomized to either receive consolidation with bortezomib plus daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone followed by maintenance with daratumumab and lenalidomide, or consolidation with daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone followed by the same maintenance regimen. Consolidation cycles repeat every 28 days for 9 cycles, and maintenance cycles repeat every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants undergo regular monitoring including imaging with PETCT scans, bone marrow biopsies for minimal residual disease assessment, and laboratory tests throughout induction, consolidation, and maintenance phases. Patient-reported outcomes on neuropathy and quality of life are collected, alongside safety monitoring for adverse events. After completing study treatment, participants are followed every 3 months for up to 2 years, then every 6 months up to 5 years, and annually up to 15 years to evaluate long-term outcomes and survival.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of several targeted drugsvismodegib, FAK inhibitor GSK2256098, capivasertib, and abemaciclibon patients with progressive meningiomas. These tumors are growing, spreading, or worsening, and the study focuses on different genetic mutations in the tumors to match patients with the appropriate drug. The trial is a phase II study aiming to measure progression-free survival and response rates over six months, along with overall survival and adverse events. Participants are assigned to one of four groups based on their tumor mutation status. Those with SMOPTCH1 mutations receive vismodegib daily those with NF2 mutations receive FAK inhibitor GSK2256098 twice daily patients with AKT1, PIK3CA, or PTEN mutations take capivasertib twice daily on days 1-4 weekly and those with CDK pathway alterations receive abemaciclib twice daily. Treatment cycles repeat every 28 days as long as the disease does not progress or unacceptable side effects occur. After treatment, participants are followed every six months for up to five years. During the study, patients undergo regular monitoring including imaging to assess tumor size and progression, lab tests to monitor blood counts and organ function, and evaluations of side effects. Researchers track progression-free survival at six months and tumor response rates, as well as overall survival. Safety is closely observed up to four weeks after treatment ends. The total study duration includes active treatment cycles and long-term follow-up extending up to five years from registration.