Roseburg

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are studying the effects of DMX-200 (repagermanium), a drug that blocks a receptor involved in inflammation, in people with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) who are also taking an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). This Phase 3 trial aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of DMX-200 compared to placebo over 104 weeks in adults and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Following the initial study, an open-label extension will evaluate long-term safety and benefits for up to two more years. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either DMX-200 at 120 mg twice daily or a placebo, while continuing their ARB treatment. The study includes a screening and qualification period lasting 6 to 14 weeks, a 104-week double-blind treatment phase, and a 4-week follow-up after treatment. Those completing this phase may enter the open-label extension for an additional minimum of 104 weeks, with another 4-week follow-up period, making the total study duration about 230 weeks. During the trial, participants will undergo regular assessments including urine protein and creatinine testing, kidney function monitoring by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and safety evaluations. The main outcomes measured are changes in proteinuria, kidney function slope up to week 104, and long-term safety through week 216. Safety will be closely monitored throughout both the double-blind and extension periods to understand the drug's effects over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and behavior of a new treatment called sefaxersen (RO7434656), an Antisense Oligonucleotide (ASO) therapy, for people with primary IgA nephropathy (IgAN). The study focuses on participants who have a high risk of their kidney disease worsening despite receiving the best available supportive care. This is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at multiple centers. Participants will receive either sefaxersen or a matching placebo through subcutaneous injections according to a specified schedule. The study compares these two groups to see how the treatment affects kidney function over time. The intervention is designed to inhibit Complement Factor B, which is involved in the disease process. The study includes vaccination requirements and contraceptive use for women of childbearing potential to ensure safety. During the study, participants will be monitored for changes in their urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at baseline and at week 37, which is the primary measure of kidney function improvement. Other assessments include kidney biopsy results, kidney function tests estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and ongoing safety evaluations. The trial tracks participants' health closely to assess the treatment's effect and any side effects throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) therapy compared to a stress management training control in Veterans with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), including those with both OCD and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This 4-year randomized clinical trial focuses on whether ERP can improve functioning, quality of life, and OCD symptoms among Veterans receiving care at various VA medical centers and telehealth hubs. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: the ERP group receives 16 weekly therapy sessions delivered via video telehealth (VTH), emphasizing exposure to feared situations and prevention of compulsive rituals. The control group receives 16 weekly sessions of stress management training, which includes psychoeducation and skills such as deep breathing, relaxation, positive imagery, assertiveness, and problem solving. Both treatments include homework practice and symptom monitoring. Throughout the study, participants complete assessments at the end of treatment and six months later to measure changes in work and social functioning using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). Those in the ERP group also provide feedback on treatment satisfaction and participate in qualitative interviews about how the therapy affected their functioning and PTSD symptoms. Providers and VA administrators will also be interviewed to evaluate how ERP could be implemented in VA mental health care settings.