Trevose

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Armour Thyroid compared to synthetic T4 treatment in adults with primary hypothyroidism who are currently stable on synthetic T4. The study focuses on assessing how well patients respond to dose conversion from synthetic T4 therapy to Armour Thyroid. This trial is conducted as a Phase 2/3 multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study. Participants receive either Armour Thyroid in oral capsule or tablet form or synthetic T4 capsules. They must have been on a stable dose of synthetic T4 for at least 12 months before screening, with a dose of at least 25 mcg daily. The study compares both treatments over time to evaluate efficacy and safety in maintaining thyroid function. During the study, researchers monitor thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels to measure treatment response at week 55. They also track any adverse events related to the treatments for up to approximately 90 weeks. Participants undergo regular assessments to ensure safety and effectiveness throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of time variant pulse (TVP) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients who suffer from chronic and intractable pain, including low back and leg pain. The study aims to gather real-world clinical outcomes using commercially approved Boston Scientific SCS systems following local instructions for use. It focuses on adults diagnosed with persistent spinal pain syndrome or failed back surgery syndrome who have experienced chronic trunk and/or limb pain for at least six months. The study uses the Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha194; SCS system with time varied pulse settings as the primary intervention. This device is designed to manage pain through optimized sequences by adjusting parameters with independent current control. Participants will have the device activated and monitored, though specific dosing or schedule details are not provided. Participants will be involved in assessments including questionnaires and other evaluations to track their pain response to the device. The primary outcome measured is the targeted pain responder rate three months after device activation. Safety and efficacy data will be collected to understand the impact of the treatment on chronic pain. The total study duration and additional follow-up details are not specified.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.

Researchers are conducting a global, multi-center, prospective post-market study to observe the long-term effectiveness of Boston Scientific neurostimulation systems in managing pain. The study aims to gather real-world clinical outcomes, economic value, and technical performance data of these commercially approved neurostimulation devices when used in routine clinical practice. The treatment involves an initial trial period using a Boston Scientific neurostimulation device for pain relief. Participants who experience a positive response during the trial may proceed to receive a permanent implant of the neurostimulation system. The therapy is tailored individually based on the investigator's judgment and standard care practices at each study site, following specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will be monitored throughout the trial and permanent implant phases to assess pain relief and overall treatment effectiveness. Assessments may include patient evaluations of pain and ability to complete study requirements. The study focuses on capturing comprehensive data to evaluate both clinical outcomes and device performance during regular use. Total participation duration depends on individual treatment progression from trial to permanent implant.