Trevose

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Armour Thyroid compared to synthetic T4 in adults with primary hypothyroidism who have been stable on synthetic T4 treatment. The study will also assess how well patients tolerate switching from synthetic T4 to Armour Thyroid. This trial is a Phase 23, randomized, double-blind study sponsored by AbbVie to compare these two thyroid hormone replacement therapies. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Armour Thyroid or to alternate between Armour Thyroid and synthetic T4 for up to 81 weeks. The treatments are oral capsules or tablets taken daily, with doses carefully converted from their stable synthetic T4 dose. The study includes a dose-conversion period where dosage adjustments may be made to maintain appropriate thyroid hormone levels. During the study, participants will have regular blood tests to measure thyroid-stimulating hormone TSH levels, including at week 55 to see who achieves a target TSH response. Researchers will also monitor for any adverse events throughout the study, which lasts up to about 90 weeks. Dose adjustments and safety data will be tracked closely to understand treatment effects and tolerability over time.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a study drug called elecoglipron compared with oral semaglutide in adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus T2DM who have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The study focuses on adults whose diabetes is not adequately controlled by lifestyle changes or stable treatment with other glucose-lowering medications. This is a phase III randomized trial sponsored by AstraZeneca, aiming to compare these two oral medications in managing T2DM and cardiovascular risk. Participants will be assigned to receive either elecoglipron or semaglutide, both administered orally once daily at specified doses. The study runs in parallel groups, with one group receiving elecoglipron and the other receiving semaglutide. Treatment and observation will continue for 52 weeks, during which the effects on blood sugar control and other health indicators will be evaluated. Throughout the 52-week study period, participants will undergo regular assessments including measurements of Hemoglobin A1c HbA1c, body weight, and blood pressure. Researchers will monitor changes from baseline to week 52 to understand the drugs impact on diabetes control and cardiovascular risk factors. The study also tracks safety and tolerability to ensure participant wellbeing during the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of the Time Varied Pulse TVP-SCS settings delivered through commercially approved Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulation SCS Systems in patients experiencing chronic, intractable low back andor leg pain. This study aims to collect real-world clinical outcomes in individuals with persistent spinal pain syndrome or failed back surgery syndrome to better understand pain management using these devices. Participants will receive the TVP-SCS settings using the Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha SCS Systems according to local instructions for use. The study involves a single group of participants who will be treated with this device. The treatment is delivered through the device settings designed to adjust electrical stimulation parameters independently to manage chronic pain. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored up to three months post-activation to assess the primary outcome, which is the Targeted Pain Responder Rate. Participants will complete questionnaires and assessments in English to evaluate their pain levels and response to the treatment. Safety and effectiveness data will be collected during this period to understand the impact of the TVP-SCS settings on chronic pain management.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

Researchers are conducting a global, prospective, multi-center observational study to gather real-world data on the long-term effectiveness, economic value, and technical performance of Boston Scientifics commercially approved neurostimulation systems for pain management. The study focuses on patients using these neurostimulation devices according to their approved instructions for use in routine clinical practice. Participants will first undergo a neurostimulation trial period using any commercially approved Boston Scientific neurostimulator for pain. Those who experience a positive outcome from this trial may then receive a permanent implant of the neurostimulation system. Treatment customization will be guided by the investigators judgment and routine care practices at each site. During the study, participants will be observed to collect information on clinical outcomes, technical device performance, and economic factors related to neurostimulation therapy. The research team will monitor participants over the long term to assess how well the therapy manages pain and its associated benefits. The study is expected to continue until May 2035, with ongoing follow-up and data collection throughout this period.