Lewisville

Ovarian cancer is a serious health concern with the highest death rate among gynecological cancers. Currently, a definitive diagnosis can only be made after surgery, as reliable tests to distinguish cancerous from benign ovarian abnormalities before surgery are lacking. Cleo Diagnostics has developed a new blood test measuring five biomarkers to better differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian conditions, showing promising results compared to the standard CA125 test. The study is evaluating the Cleo Diagnostics (CleoDX) Ovarian Adnexal Mass Score Test System. This diagnostic test analyzes five substances in the blood to provide a score indicating the likelihood of cancer in patients with an ovarian mass who require surgery. The test aims to help doctors make more informed decisions about surgery and patient care by improving pre-surgical cancer risk assessments. Participants will provide blood samples for the CleoDX test before surgery. Researchers will analyze the results after completing patient recruitment and continue for up to 12 months or until August 2026. The main outcome measured is the calculation of the CleoDX adnexal mass score. The study focuses on improving patient outcomes by identifying those with malignant conditions who need specialist care.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of two different methods of giving pegloticase, a drug for uncontrolled gout, combined with methotrexate (MTX). This Phase 3 trial compares pegloticase given as an 18 mg injection under the skin every two weeks with pegloticase given as an 8 mg intravenous (IV) infusion every two weeks, both alongside weekly oral MTX. The main goal is to see which method better maintains normalized serum uric acid levels below 6 mg/dL for at least 80% of the time during the sixth month of treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive pegloticase either by subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion every two weeks, along with weekly oral doses of methotrexate. Both groups will be treated over several months while closely monitored. The study is double-blind, meaning neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is being given to maintain unbiased results. During the trial, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor their serum uric acid levels and overall response to treatment, especially focusing on weeks 20 through 24 (Month 6). Safety and efficacy will be tracked throughout the study, including how well participants tolerate the treatments and any side effects. The study's main measure is the proportion of participants who achieve a sustained uric acid response during Month 6.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of three different doses of MORF-057 in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). This Phase 2 study is randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and conducted at multiple centers. It aims to compare MORF-057 to placebo to see how well it works in reducing disease activity and symptoms in this patient population. Participants will first go through a 14-week induction period where they receive one of three doses of MORF-057 or a matching placebo, all given orally. After this, all participants will enter a 38-week maintenance phase where they receive open-label MORF-057. Those who complete these 52 weeks of treatment may continue in a 52-week long-term extension to further monitor treatment effects and safety. Throughout the study, participants will have evaluations to assess their response to treatment using endoscopic scoring at Week 14. Researchers will monitor safety, symptom changes, and disease activity over the full treatment and extension periods. Study visits will include assessments, questionnaires, and clinical monitoring to track participants' health and treatment adherence over time.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining baxdrostat with dapagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin alone in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high blood pressure. This Phase III, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to see if this combination reduces risks such as significant kidney function decline, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death. The study includes a 4-week run-in period where participants not previously treated with SGLT2 inhibitors receive dapagliflozin alone. After this, participants are randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or placebo plus dapagliflozin in a double-blinded manner. Study visits occur frequently initially (at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization) and then approximately every 4 months. If participants stop the blinded treatment early, they continue dapagliflozin alone unless specific criteria require its discontinuation. Participants will undergo regular assessments including blood pressure monitoring and laboratory tests related to kidney function and cardiovascular health. The primary outcome measures the reduction in risk of major kidney and heart events over up to 37 months. Even if participants stop the study treatment, they will continue follow-up visits and data collection to ensure comprehensive safety and efficacy evaluation throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy as an additional treatment compared to no stimulation in people with treatment-resistant depression. This prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled, blinded trial focuses on reducing depressive symptoms over 12 months using multiple depression rating scales. The study follows guidelines from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regarding evidence development for this treatment. Participants receive implantation of the VNS device, which delivers stimulation to the vagal nerve. After a minimum two-week period post-implantation, participants are randomly assigned to either active VNS treatment or no stimulation control, with outcomes observed for 12 months. Following this randomized phase, all participants enter an open-label extension where those in the control group receive active stimulation. Additional subjects may join this open-label study for up to five years to further assess long-term effects. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments including the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, Health Outcome Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and Suicidality Tracking Scale. Researchers monitor response rates, remission times, duration of effects, and adverse events from implantation through 12 months. This comprehensive evaluation includes safety monitoring and functional outcome measures to understand the impact of VNS therapy on depression and related disabilities.

Researchers are evaluating a new approach to prevent cardiovascular events in patients at increased risk due to age and conditions like type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, or metabolic syndrome but without known symptomatic cardiovascular disease. The study compares a Cleerly Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Staging System-based care strategy with standard risk factor-based care to see if the former can better reduce cardiovascular events. The Cleerly system uses imaging to visualize and quantify coronary artery disease and guides personalized treatment and education based on this assessment. The trial uses the Cleerly CAD Staging System device, which employs a proprietary algorithm to detect and stage coronary artery disease and generate a risk score to guide treatment decisions. Participants receive either this stage-based care or the usual care based on traditional risk factors. The study is prospective, randomized, and pragmatic, designed to follow patients over an average of 3.5 years to compare cardiovascular event outcomes between these two care approaches. Participants will be monitored through cardiovascular event tracking throughout the study period. Data collected includes imaging results, risk scores, and treatment adherence to evaluate the impact of the care strategies. The primary outcome is the comparison of cardiovascular event risk between the Cleerly stage-based care and risk factor-based care groups. The study also includes ongoing safety monitoring and personalized management by a cardiologist-led team via digital communication devices.

Researchers are investigating the safety and effectiveness of efruxifermin in people with non-cirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) who have moderate to advanced liver fibrosis (stage 2 or 3). This Phase 3 study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, enrolling a total of 1650 participants in two groups to evaluate treatment outcomes. Participants will receive either efruxifermin or a placebo by subcutaneous injection. The study involves two cohorts, with Cohort 1 including patients who have biopsy-confirmed NASH or MASH and specific liver fibrosis and activity scores. The treatment period and detailed dosing schedules are not provided but the study compares the effects of the active drug against placebo. During the study, participants will be monitored for improvement in liver disease status, including resolution of NASH/MASH and at least a one-stage improvement in liver fibrosis after 52 weeks for Cohort 1. Long-term outcomes such as event-free survival will be observed over 240 weeks. Safety and efficacy assessments will be conducted throughout the study period, including evaluations of liver histology and metabolic health.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a medicine called disitamab vedotin for adults with advanced breast cancer that is hard to treat and has spread in the body. This study focuses on participants whose tumors express HER2 and who have received previous treatments for their advanced breast cancer. The goal is to understand how well this medicine works and its safety in these patients through a Phase 1b/2 open-label study. All participants will receive disitamab vedotin intravenously (IV) once every two weeks at the study clinic. They will continue the treatment until they or their doctor decide to stop, which could be due to cancer progression, side effects, or personal choice. During treatment, study visits occur every two weeks. After stopping treatment, participants will have follow-up visits about every six weeks, and later follow-up phone calls approximately every twelve weeks. Participants will undergo evaluations including assessments of their cancer response by the study doctors, following recognized criteria. The study team will monitor the participants for up to about two years or until their disease progresses or they pass away. This includes safety monitoring and collecting information about the medicine’s effects to determine its safety and effectiveness.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness of dotinurad compared to allopurinol in lowering serum uric acid (sUA) levels in adults with hyperuricemia related to gout. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial focuses on adults aged 18 to 75 who have had gout for at least one year and experienced multiple gout flares in the past year. The study aims to assess the percentage of participants achieving an sUA level below 6.0 mg/dL at 24 weeks. Participants receive either dotinurad or allopurinol as oral over-encapsulated tablets. Allopurinol doses range from 200 mg/day for those with moderate kidney impairment to 600 mg/day, with participants maintaining a stable dose for at least three months before starting the study. The trial includes a 24-week treatment period where the effects of these medications on uric acid levels are monitored and compared. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including serum uric acid measurements at screening and throughout the 24 weeks. Female participants of childbearing potential have pregnancy tests and must agree to contraception requirements. Researchers monitor safety, treatment adherence, and gout flare history to evaluate the treatments' efficacy and tolerability over the study period.