Mesquite

Ovarian cancer is a serious health concern with the highest death rate among gynecological cancers. Currently, a definitive diagnosis can only be made after surgery, as reliable tests to distinguish cancerous from benign ovarian abnormalities before surgery are lacking. Cleo Diagnostics has developed a new blood test measuring five biomarkers to better differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian conditions, showing promising results compared to the standard CA125 test. The study is evaluating the Cleo Diagnostics (CleoDX) Ovarian Adnexal Mass Score Test System. This diagnostic test analyzes five substances in the blood to provide a score indicating the likelihood of cancer in patients with an ovarian mass who require surgery. The test aims to help doctors make more informed decisions about surgery and patient care by improving pre-surgical cancer risk assessments. Participants will provide blood samples for the CleoDX test before surgery. Researchers will analyze the results after completing patient recruitment and continue for up to 12 months or until August 2026. The main outcome measured is the calculation of the CleoDX adnexal mass score. The study focuses on improving patient outcomes by identifying those with malignant conditions who need specialist care.

Researchers are evaluating whether the drugs retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) who are at high risk. This Phase 3 trial enrolls about 4,500 adults with MASLD identified by non-invasive tests indicating an increased likelihood of developing serious liver problems. The study aims to understand how these treatments might affect liver health over time compared to a placebo. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either retatrutide, tirzepatide, or a placebo, all given by subcutaneous injection. The study will last approximately 224 weeks, during which participants may attend 25 to 30 clinic visits for monitoring and assessment. After the main study, eligible participants can join an optional 2-year extension where all will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide regardless of their original group. Throughout the trial, participants’ liver function and disease progression will be closely monitored through various health assessments. Researchers will track the time to the first major adverse liver event as the main outcome. Safety and health status will be evaluated regularly during clinic visits, ensuring thorough observation over the long study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of KarXT combined with KarX-EC in adults aged 55 to 90 who have agitation related to Alzheimer's Disease. This phase 3 study aims to better understand how these treatments impact agitation symptoms in this population by comparing them to a placebo group. Participants must have a confirmed Alzheimer's diagnosis and meet specific criteria for agitation severity to join the study. Participants will receive either the Xanomeline/Trospium Chloride Capsule, Xanomeline Enteric Capsule, or a placebo, each given at specified doses on designated days. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled to ensure reliable comparison of treatment effects. The treatment period lasts through Week 14, during which dosing schedules are closely followed. Throughout the study, participants will be regularly assessed using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-International Psychogeriatric Association (CMAI-IPA) to measure changes in agitation levels from baseline to Week 14. Caregivers will provide reports on participant status and help ensure medication compliance. Safety and symptom changes will be carefully monitored to evaluate the treatments' effects during this period.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study to see if it can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-PLUS) in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study compares AZD0780 to a placebo and monitors participants from randomization until the primary analysis censoring date, followed by a final study closure visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 or an oral placebo once daily. The treatment period lasts until the primary analysis censoring date, after which a study closure visit will occur. The study is event-driven and designed to assess the time to the first major cardiovascular event during treatment. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes and safety over approximately 54 months. Researchers will track the time to first event of any component of MACE-PLUS and collect data to assess the effect of AZD0780 compared to placebo. The study includes regular visits and evaluations to ensure participant safety and adherence to treatment.

Researchers are evaluating a new approach to prevent cardiovascular events in patients at increased risk due to age and conditions like type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, or metabolic syndrome but without known symptomatic cardiovascular disease. The study compares a Cleerly Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Staging System-based care strategy with standard risk factor-based care to see if the former can better reduce cardiovascular events. The Cleerly system uses imaging to visualize and quantify coronary artery disease and guides personalized treatment and education based on this assessment. The trial uses the Cleerly CAD Staging System device, which employs a proprietary algorithm to detect and stage coronary artery disease and generate a risk score to guide treatment decisions. Participants receive either this stage-based care or the usual care based on traditional risk factors. The study is prospective, randomized, and pragmatic, designed to follow patients over an average of 3.5 years to compare cardiovascular event outcomes between these two care approaches. Participants will be monitored through cardiovascular event tracking throughout the study period. Data collected includes imaging results, risk scores, and treatment adherence to evaluate the impact of the care strategies. The primary outcome is the comparison of cardiovascular event risk between the Cleerly stage-based care and risk factor-based care groups. The study also includes ongoing safety monitoring and personalized management by a cardiologist-led team via digital communication devices.

Researchers are studying the effectiveness and safety of a combination inhaler containing fluticasone propionate and albuterol sulfate delivered through a multidose dry powder inhaler with an electronic module (Fp/ABS eMDPI). This Phase 3 trial focuses on people aged 12 years and older who have asthma. The study also looks at the safety and tolerability of this inhaler when used four times daily over four weeks, as well as the pharmacokinetics of the combination and its individual components after a single dose. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the Fp/ABS combination inhaler, fluticasone propionate alone, albuterol sulfate alone, or a placebo inhaler. All treatments are given as inhalation powders. The main treatment period lasts four weeks, during which the inhalers are taken four times a day. The total study duration for each participant is about 10 weeks, not counting an optional prescreening visit. Throughout the study, researchers will measure lung function changes, specifically forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), from baseline to week 4. Participants will undergo assessments including lung function tests and safety evaluations. The study monitors how the inhaler affects breathing over time and checks for any side effects or tolerability issues during the treatment period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a new medication called CX11 in adults with type 2 diabetes who have not achieved good blood sugar control despite taking a stable dose of metformin, with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor, for at least 90 days. This Phase 2 study is conducted at multiple medical centers and uses a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design to compare different doses of CX11 against placebo over a 24-week treatment period. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of six groups, each receiving a different dose of CX11 tablets or matching placebo tablets taken orally once daily. The treatment phase lasts 24 weeks, followed by a 2-week safety follow-up period where researchers will monitor participants for any side effects or health changes after stopping the study medication. Throughout the study, participants will undergo assessments including blood tests to measure changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from the start of the study to week 24. Other evaluations will monitor safety and health status. The total participation time is approximately 26 weeks, including treatment and follow-up. Researchers will also track adherence to medication and lifestyle instructions during this time.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness of dotinurad compared to allopurinol in lowering serum uric acid (sUA) levels in adults with hyperuricemia related to gout. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial focuses on adults aged 18 to 75 who have had gout for at least one year and experienced multiple gout flares in the past year. The study aims to assess the percentage of participants achieving an sUA level below 6.0 mg/dL at 24 weeks. Participants receive either dotinurad or allopurinol as oral over-encapsulated tablets. Allopurinol doses range from 200 mg/day for those with moderate kidney impairment to 600 mg/day, with participants maintaining a stable dose for at least three months before starting the study. The trial includes a 24-week treatment period where the effects of these medications on uric acid levels are monitored and compared. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including serum uric acid measurements at screening and throughout the 24 weeks. Female participants of childbearing potential have pregnancy tests and must agree to contraception requirements. Researchers monitor safety, treatment adherence, and gout flare history to evaluate the treatments' efficacy and tolerability over the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of dotinurad compared to allopurinol in lowering serum uric acid (sUA) levels at 24 weeks in adults with tophaceous gout. This condition involves the presence of measurable tophi, or deposits of uric acid crystals, in joints such as hands, wrists, feet, or ankles. The study is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial focused on adults aged 18 to 75 years who have had gout for at least one year. Participants receive either dotinurad or allopurinol in over-encapsulated tablet form, taken orally. The treatments are compared to see which better lowers sUA levels below 5.0 mg/dL after 24 weeks. The study includes a screening period before treatment begins, during which eligibility is confirmed, including measurements of tophi size and uric acid levels. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor serum uric acid levels and the size of tophi. Safety and side effects will also be monitored throughout the 24-week treatment period. The main outcome is the percentage of participants who achieve sUA levels less than 5.0 mg/dL at week 24, helping to understand the comparative efficacy and safety of the two medications.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of eloralintide compared to a placebo for reducing body weight in adults who have overweight or obesity along with type 2 diabetes. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study focuses on participants who have been on stable treatment for their type 2 diabetes and aims to provide detailed information on body weight changes over time. Participants will receive either eloralintide or a placebo administered by subcutaneous injection once weekly. The study lasts about 75 weeks, including treatment and follow-up periods. The goal is to monitor the changes in body weight from the beginning of the study through week 64. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments to track body weight and overall health. Researchers will collect data on weight changes and monitor safety throughout the study period. The main outcome measured is the percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 64, ensuring close observation of participants' responses to the treatment.