Mesquite

Ovarian cancer is a serious health concern with the highest death rate among gynecological cancers. Diagnosing ovarian cancer definitively requires surgery since current tests cannot reliably distinguish between benign and malignant ovarian abnormalities before surgery. Researchers are evaluating the Cleo Diagnostics CleoDX Ovarian Adnexal Mass Score Test System, which measures five blood biomarkers to better assess the likelihood of cancer in patients with ovarian masses needing surgery. This test aims to help doctors make more informed decisions about surgery and patient care by providing a more accurate pre-surgical cancer risk assessment. The study involves patients with ovarian cysts or adnexal masses identified by imaging who require surgery but have not yet undergone it. The CleoDX test analyzes blood samples to generate a score indicating cancer risk, and patients are categorized after surgery as having malignant or benign masses. The study compares the CleoDX test results to standard clinical assessments and post-surgical pathology to evaluate the tests accuracy and performance. Participants will provide blood samples before surgery, and their clinical and pathological information will be collected and analyzed. The primary outcome is the calculation of the CleoDX adnexal mass score, with secondary outcomes comparing the tests score to clinical and pathological findings. Data analysis will take place after patient recruitment, continuing for up to 12 months or until the study ends in August 2026. The study involves monitoring and evaluating the tests ability to predict cancer risk accurately before surgery.

Researchers are evaluating whether retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease MASLD who are at high risk based on non-invasive tests. This Phase 3 randomized controlled trial aims to assess these treatments compared to placebo in about 4,500 adults over approximately 224 weeks. The study is sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company and focuses on liver disease progression and related health measures. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive retatrutide, tirzepatide, or placebo, all administered by subcutaneous injection. The trial includes two placebo groups corresponding to each experimental drug. After completing the main study, eligible participants may join a 2-year extension where all will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide regardless of their initial assignment. During the study, participants may attend around 25 to 30 clinic visits for health monitoring, study procedures, and assessments of liver function and disease status. Researchers will measure the time to major adverse liver outcomes, changes in liver fibrosis scores, liver stiffness, liver fat content, liver enzyme levels, body weight, and cardiovascular events. Monitoring will continue from baseline through study completion, with detailed evaluations at multiple timepoints including week 104.

Researchers are evaluating dotinurad, an oral drug, to lower serum uric acid levels in adults with gout who cannot tolerate xanthine oxidase inhibitors XOI or whose uricase treatment has failed. This Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to assess the drugs effectiveness and safety in this specific population. The primary goal is to see how many participants achieve a serum uric acid level below 6.0 mgdL at 24 weeks. Participants will be divided into two groups. One group will take dotinurad for 36 weeks, split into a 24-week initial period followed by a 12-week continuation. The other group will take a placebo for the first 24 weeks and then switch to dotinurad for the final 12 weeks. Dotinurad is given as an oral tablet, while the placebo capsules contain inactive ingredients. This design allows comparison of the drug against placebo and later observation of dotinurads effects. During the study, participants will have their serum uric acid measured at various points, especially at weeks 16, 20, 24, and up to week 40. Researchers will monitor treatment-emergent adverse events throughout the study period. Participants will be followed from screening through treatment and safety assessments, with the primary focus on uric acid levels at week 24. The total study duration for each participant covers screening and up to 40 weeks of follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of KarXT combined with KarX-EC in adults aged 55 to 90 who experience agitation related to Alzheimers Disease. This Phase 3 study aims to understand how these medications impact agitation symptoms in this population, using recognized criteria to confirm Alzheimers diagnosis and agitation severity. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the combination of KarXT and KarX-EC or a placebo. Dosing is specified for certain days, and the study includes a 14-week treatment period during which agitation and other symptoms will be closely monitored. The study design includes a quadruple-blind method to reduce bias. During the study, participants and their caregivers will attend regular visits where the researchers will assess changes in agitation using tools like the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale. Safety will also be carefully monitored through various assessments including vital signs, lab tests, ECGs, and movement scales. Participant involvement extends up to 18 weeks to capture any adverse events and treatment effects.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study. This trial focuses on patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ASCVD or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study aims to assess how AZD0780 compares to placebo in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, also known as MACE-PLUS, over the course of the trial. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 once daily or a matching placebo once daily. The study continues until a primary analysis censoring date, which may be up to approximately 54 months from randomization. After this, a study closure visit will be conducted as the final visit for each participant. During the study, participants will be regularly monitored for cardiovascular events including heart attacks, strokes, urgent coronary revascularizations, and other related outcomes. Researchers will track the time to first occurrence of these events as the primary outcome. Safety and other secondary outcomes like all-cause mortality will also be assessed. The total participation time can last up to about 54 months, with ongoing evaluations throughout this period.

Researchers are evaluating a new care strategy for people at increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ASCVD but without symptoms. The study compares a Cleerly Coronary Artery Disease CAD Staging System-based care approach against the usual risk factor-based care to see if it better reduces cardiovascular events. This pragmatic, randomized trial addresses the need for improved methods to identify and personalize treatment for asymptomatic individuals at risk due to age, diabetes, prediabetes, or metabolic syndrome. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. The risk factor-based care group receives usual care managed by their providers, while a cardiology team monitors and supports guideline-based treatment without revealing certain imaging results during the study. The Cleerly stage-based care group gets personalized management from a remote cardiologist-led team using the Cleerly CAD Staging System, which includes imaging to assess coronary atherosclerosis and guides pharmacotherapy and education. Treatment intensity may increase if plaque worsens after 24 months. During the study, participants will have assessments to monitor heart health and treatment adherence over an average of 3.5 years. Researchers will measure cardiovascular events and other related health outcomes to compare the two care strategies. The study involves ongoing medication monitoring, lab tests, and feedback to optimize prevention, with the goal of improving personalized care for cardiovascular risk management.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a combination inhaler containing fluticasone propionate and albuterol sulfate, delivered via a multidose dry powder inhaler with an electronic module, in participants aged 12 years and older with asthma. This Phase 3 trial aims to compare this combination treatment to fluticasone propionate alone, albuterol sulfate alone, or a placebo inhaler. The study also assesses different dosing schedules, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of these inhalers. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups receiving either the combination inhaler, fluticasone propionate inhaler, albuterol sulfate inhaler, or placebo, all with integrated electronic modules. Treatments are administered over a 4-week period with dosing four times daily. Pharmacokinetic assessments will be conducted after a single dose administration. The study is double-blind and placebo-controlled, with a parallel group design. Throughout the approximately 10-week study period, including screening and treatment, participants will undergo evaluations including lung function tests measuring forced expiratory volume in one second FEV1, asthma control questionnaires, and safety assessments. Researchers will monitor treatment-emergent adverse events and measure blood concentrations of the inhaled drugs. The study includes electronic monitoring of inhaler use and collects data at baseline, during treatment, and at week 4, with follow-up to assess efficacy and safety.

Researchers are evaluating a new medication called CX11 for adults with type 2 diabetes who have not achieved adequate blood sugar control despite taking a stable dose of metformin, with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor, for at least 90 days. This phase 2 study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, aiming to determine the safety and effectiveness of different doses of CX11 in comparison to placebo. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of six groups, each receiving a different dose of CX11 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg, 160 mg, or 200 mg or a matching placebo. The medication is taken orally once daily for 24 weeks, followed by a 2-week safety follow-up period. The study is conducted across multiple medical centers and neither participants nor staff will know the group assignments during the trial. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including blood tests to measure changes in HbA1c a marker of blood sugar control, fasting plasma glucose, body weight, and blood pressure. Continuous glucose monitoring will track time spent in the target glucose range. Safety is monitored by recording adverse events and measuring plasma drug levels at specified intervals. The total participation period is approximately 26 weeks.

This trial evaluates the effectiveness of dotinurad compared with allopurinol in lowering serum uric acid levels in adults with gout-related hyperuricemia. The study focuses on reducing uric acid to below 6.0 mgdL after 24 weeks of treatment, addressing a common complication in gout patients. It is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study involving adult participants aged 18 to 75 years with a history of gout. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups one group continues allopurinol at their existing dose once daily through week 64 the second group receives dotinurad starting at 1 mg once daily for the first 4 weeks, then 2 mg once daily through week 64 the third group begins with 1 mg daily for 4 weeks, increases to 2 mg daily for 8 weeks, then continues 4 mg daily through week 64. All treatments are administered orally as over-encapsulated tablets. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular monitoring of serum uric acid levels and gout flares from baseline up to week 68. Assessments include measuring the percentage of participants achieving target uric acid levels at various points, gout flare rates, and treatment-emergent adverse events. The study also evaluates safety and tolerability over the course of the treatment period, which lasts up to approximately 68 weeks including follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy of dotinurad compared with allopurinol in lowering serum uric acid sUA levels in adults with tophaceous gout. This Phase 3 trial focuses on adult participants aged 18 to 75 years who have measurable tophi and a diagnosis of gout for at least one year. The study aims to assess how well dotinurad reduces sUA levels at Week 24 compared to allopurinol, an established treatment for this condition. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group will stop their current allopurinol and continue with study-supplied allopurinol once daily through Week 76. The other group will discontinue allopurinol and start dotinurad at 1 mg daily for the first 4 weeks, then increase to 2 mg daily for the next 8 weeks, and finally 4 mg daily thereafter until Week 76. Both treatments are given as oral tablets, and participants are closely monitored throughout the study. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including blood tests to measure serum uric acid levels at multiple time points, evaluation of tophi response, and tracking of gout flare frequency and severity. Safety monitoring will include recording any adverse events and serious side effects up to Week 80. The main outcome measures focus on the percentage of participants achieving target sUA levels at Week 24 and clinical responses in tophi at Week 76, with ongoing evaluations up to Week 80 to assess longer-term effects and safety.