Riverton

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and tolerability of intermittent use of elismetrep in adults who experience acute migraine attacks. This Phase 3 study aims to monitor adverse events and overall safety during an average of one year of treatment. The study is conducted by Kallyope Inc. and compares two doses of elismetrep with a placebo using a randomized, triple-blind design. Participants will receive oral doses of elismetrep at either 10 mg or 20 mg, or a matching placebo. The study focuses on intermittent use during acute migraine episodes. Participants must have completed a prior acute treatment trial of elismetrep and meet compliance criteria. Treatment and assessments continue through the study duration, averaging one year. During the trial, participants will be monitored for any treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, and events leading to discontinuation. They will use a personal smartphone to complete eDiary check-ins and questionnaires, including assessments at 2 and 4 hours post-dose during migraine attacks. Safety and tolerability data will be collected throughout, with study participation lasting approximately one year.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of elismetrep, an oral drug, compared with a placebo for the acute treatment of migraine in adults aged 18 to 75. This phase 3, double-blind, randomized study is conducted at multiple centers to assess the drugs safety, tolerability, and effectiveness in relieving migraine symptoms quickly. Participants receive either 10 mg or 20 mg of elismetrep or a placebo orally as part of the trial. The study uses a parallel design where participants are randomly assigned to one of these groups and neither the participants nor the researchers know which treatment is given until the study ends. During the trial, participants will be monitored for migraine pain relief and freedom from bothersome symptoms two hours after dosing, among other outcomes. Researchers will also assess pain relief at various time points, use of rescue medication, and safety by tracking any adverse events. Participants will complete questionnaires and use an eDiary app to record their experiences. The study is expected to last until February 2027.

Researchers are evaluating the potential of GB-0895, an investigational drug, as an additional treatment for adolescents and adults with severe asthma that is not well controlled by inhaled corticosteroids and other common asthma medications. This global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of GB-0895 over one year, with an optional extension phase. The study includes participants aged 12 to 80 years with documented severe uncontrolled asthma despite current therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either GB-0895 or a placebo through subcutaneous injections every six months during the 52-week treatment period. The study also includes phases for screening and run-in before treatment, followed by a follow-up period lasting up to 38 weeks after treatment ends. An optional open-label extension allows participants to continue receiving GB-0895 at specified weeks after the initial treatment phase. During the study, participants will attend visits every 1 to 2 months after the first month to monitor health and treatment effects. Assessments include lung function tests, asthma symptom questionnaires, quality of life evaluations, and tracking of asthma exacerbations. Researchers will closely monitor safety and treatment responses through these evaluations and collect data on various health measures to understand the drugs impact on severe asthma over the course of the study.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or Stage III colon cancer based on the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA ctDNA after surgery. This Phase IIIII trial explores whether ctDNA status can help guide decisions about the need for adjuvant chemotherapy and identify the optimal chemotherapy regimen for those at high risk of recurrence. Circulating tumor DNA is a promising biomarker that may detect microscopic residual cancer cells that traditional methods might miss. Participants are assigned to groups based on their ctDNA results after surgery. Those without detectable ctDNA ctDNA- may undergo serial monitoring without treatment or receive different chemotherapy regimens such as mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 3 to 6 months. Patients with detectable ctDNA ctDNA who have a higher risk of recurrence are randomized to receive either standard chemotherapy regimens like mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 6 months or a more intensive regimen called mFOLFIRINOX for 6 months. Central ctDNA testing is performed using the Signatera test to guide these assignments. During the study, participants have blood samples collected for ctDNA testing and undergo imaging scans to check for cancer recurrence. Researchers assess disease-free survival, overall survival, and chemotherapy compliance over several years. The study includes monitoring for safety and treatment effects, with follow-up planned for up to 5 years after randomization. Participants health status, laboratory tests, and tumor markers are regularly evaluated throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating a treatment approach for early-stage hormone-sensitive, HER-2 negative breast cancer with an Oncotype recurrence score of 18 or less. This Phase III trial compares breast conservation surgery with endocrine therapy alone against breast conservation surgery with both radiation and endocrine therapy. The goal is to see if skipping radiation after lumpectomy is not worse in preventing cancer recurrence in the same breast. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive radiation therapy to the breast plus at least five years of endocrine therapy with drugs such as Tamoxifen, Anastrozole, Letrozole, or Exemestane. The other group will receive endocrine therapy only for at least five years without radiation. Radiation must start within 12 weeks of surgery if assigned. Endocrine therapy dosing and schedule are determined by the treating doctor. During the study, participants will have regular follow-ups up to five years to monitor cancer recurrence in the breast and elsewhere, survival, and breast preservation. Assessments will include clinical exams, imaging like mammograms or MRI, and pathology reviews. The main outcome is time to invasive or noninvasive breast tumor recurrence within five years. Some measures will continue through an average of 15 years, including breast conservation rates. Safety and overall health will be monitored throughout and after treatment.

This research aims to compare two different approaches to post-hospitalization follow-up care for children hospitalized with common infections such as pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, acute gastroenteritis, or urinary tract infections. The study evaluates whether automatic follow-up visits scheduled at discharge or a more flexible as-needed PRN follow-up approach, where parents monitor symptoms and decide on visits, impact hospital readmission rates and other health outcomes. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives a recommendation for automatic follow-up, instructing them to schedule and attend a follow-up visit regardless of symptom improvement. The other group receives a recommendation for PRN follow-up, where scheduling a visit at discharge is not required, and parents decide if a visit is necessary based on their childs symptoms. Both groups are monitored to compare outcomes over time. During the study, researchers will track hospital readmissions within 14 days of discharge as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include medical interventions and the childs health-related quality of life measured seven days after discharge. Additional factors like healthcare use, parent anxiety, satisfaction, and costs will also be assessed. The study includes follow-up through communications with healthcare providers and monitoring of immunizations and well-child visits. Participation lasts at least through the 14-day post-discharge period to capture these outcomes.

Researchers are studying how well inotuzumab ozogamicin works when combined with frontline chemotherapy in treating young adults aged 18 to 39 years with newly diagnosed B acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is CD22 positive. This phase III trial investigates the side effects and effectiveness of this combination compared to chemotherapy alone, aiming to improve event-free survival and other outcomes. The study also explores genetic and molecular markers to better understand treatment response and risks. Participants receive a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen called CALGB 10403, which includes multiple courses of treatment remission induction, remission consolidation, interim maintenance, delayed intensification, and maintenance therapy. Some patients also receive inotuzumab ozogamicin intravenously on specific days, followed by blinatumomab if minimal residual disease is detected. Treatment cycles repeat according to response and tolerance, with additional therapies like rituximab and radiation as needed. Imaging and laboratory tests are done throughout. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including bone marrow biopsies, blood tests, and imaging such as echocardiography or multigated acquisition scans. Researchers measure outcomes like event-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects for up to 10 years. After treatment, patients are followed closely every few months for up to 10 years to monitor long-term effects and disease status.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab in treating patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. This phase III trial aims to compare overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and safety between these treatments. The study also explores patient-reported quality of life, treatment adherence, minimal residual disease status, and imaging associations during therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first group receives daratumumab intravenously on a detailed schedule across up to 24 courses, plus oral lenalidomide daily for 21 days and dexamethasone on specific days during the first 12 courses. The second group receives only oral lenalidomide and dexamethasone on a similar schedule for up to 24 courses. Treatment cycles repeat every 28 days unless disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants complete quality-of-life questionnaires and undergo laboratory tests, including minimal residual disease assessments and PETCT imaging. Safety is closely monitored, especially infusion-related reactions and toxicity. After treatment, patients are followed for up to 15 years with periodic visits every 3 to 12 months to track long-term outcomes and survival.

Researchers are evaluating how well radiation therapy works compared with observation in patients who have a newly diagnosed grade II meningioma that has been completely removed by surgery. This phase III trial aims to determine the clinical benefit of adding radiation therapy after complete tumor removal and also studies overall survival, disease-specific survival, side effects, neurocognitive function, patient-reported outcomes, and biomarker correlations. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group undergoes observation with regular MRI scans and blood collection throughout the study. The other group receives intensity-modulated radiation therapy IMRT or proton beam radiation therapy five days a week for about 6.5 to 7 weeks, totaling 33 treatment sessions, unless disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Both groups continue to have MRI scans and blood tests during the study. Participants are followed for up to 10 years after treatment or observation, with visits scheduled at 3, 6, and 12 months, then every 6 months for years 2 and 3, and yearly thereafter. The study measures time without disease progression as the main outcome, along with survival rates, adverse events, cognitive function changes, and adherence to treatment protocols. Tissue and blood samples are also collected for ongoing research.

Researchers are evaluating how well serum tumor marker directed disease monitoring STMDDM works compared to usual care in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This trial aims to see if monitoring with serum tumor markers can provide similar overall survival outcomes to the standard approach, which involves regular imaging scans. The study also looks at healthcare costs, patient anxiety, and quality of life related to these monitoring methods. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the usual care group, patients receive imaging studies at least every 12 weeks and may have serum tumor marker tests as determined by their doctor. In the STMDDM group, patients have blood tests for specific tumor markers every 4 to 8 weeks, and imaging scans are only done if these markers indicate a possible progression of disease. Both groups continue their monitoring for up to 312 weeks unless the disease progresses. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood tests for tumor markers, imaging scans as needed, and questionnaires about anxiety and quality of life. Researchers track overall survival for up to 312 weeks and compare healthcare costs and patient-reported outcomes for up to 48 to 102 weeks. The study also collects data on how often and by what methods disease monitoring is performed, along with patient and physician preferences related to monitoring.