Poulsbo

Researchers are studying the safety and effects of a medicine called Mevrometostat for treating three types of cancer RelapsedRefractory Small Cell Lung Cancer SCLC, Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer CRPC, and Follicular Lymphoma FL. This study is a Phase 1 trial that includes three parts, with Parts 1 and 2 now closed for enrollment. The current enrollment is open for men with CRPC who have previously been treated and whose disease has progressed since their last treatment. The purpose is to evaluate how Mevrometostat works alone or combined with other treatments in these cancers. The study involves giving Mevrometostat by mouth either alone or with other drugs such as Enzalutamide and Itraconazole, depending on the specific part or cohort. Part 3 consists of two substudies a Bioequivalence BE substudy where participants take three single doses of two Mevrometostat formulations over three periods, and a Drug-Drug Interaction DDI substudy with two cohorts receiving Mevrometostat alone or combined with Enzalutamide andor Itraconazole. After these assessment phases, participants enter a maintenance phase where they take Mevrometostat twice daily and Enzalutamide once daily until the cancer no longer responds. During the study, participants will be closely monitored for safety, including adverse events, laboratory tests, and vital signs over about two years. The researchers will also assess how well the drug works by measuring cancer response and progression-free survival. Pharmacokinetic studies will track how the drug behaves in the body. Patient experiences and symptoms will be evaluated through questionnaires. Overall, participants can expect regular visits to receive the study drugs, undergo testing, and provide feedback throughout their participation, which may last until disease progression or study completion.

This trial investigates monitoring and treatment options for patients with low risk and standard risk metastatic germ cell tumors, which are cancers that start in the cells that produce sperm or eggs. The study aims to find out if active surveillance after surgical removal of low risk tumors can maintain high survival rates, and whether carboplatin or cisplatin chemotherapy works better for treating standard risk tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults. Patients with low risk tumors undergo observation after surgery and may transfer to a standard risk treatment arm if the tumor recurs. Those with standard risk tumors are randomly assigned to receive one of two chemotherapy regimens one containing carboplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide, or the other containing cisplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide. Treatments are given intravenously in cycles every 21 days for up to 3 or 4 cycles depending on the group. Throughout the study, patients have imaging scans, blood tests, tumor biopsies, and pulmonary function tests to monitor response and side effects. Participants are followed closely during treatment and afterward with regular check-ups including CT, MRI, and chest X-rays, as well as blood sample collections. Follow-up visits occur every 2 months for the first year, then every 3-6 months up to 2 years, every 6 months for years 3 to 5, and annually up to 10 years. Researchers measure overall survival, event-free survival, hearing loss, body composition, tumor markers, and patient-reported outcomes related to hearing and neuropathy. This long-term monitoring helps assess the effects and safety of chemotherapy and surveillance strategies.

This research aims to establish a national biorepository by collecting research data and samples from patients who experience side effects from immunotherapy treatments used in cancer care. It focuses on patients who have serious immune-related reactions, rare infections, or accelerated tumor growth after receiving immuno-oncology therapies. The goal is to help researchers better predict, prevent, and treat these side effects in the future. Participants will have tissue and blood samples collected within 72 hours after confirmation of a serious immune-related side effect and again one month later. For patients experiencing colitis, stool samples may also be collected. Alongside sample collection, medical records will be reviewed for up to one year. This study is observational and involves no experimental treatments. During the study, participants will provide biospecimens at two time points and allow access to their medical records for a year. Researchers will analyze these samples and clinical data to build a resource for future studies on immune-related adverse events. The main outcome is the establishment of this biorepository, which will be maintained for up to one year after enrollment.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab in treating patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. This phase III trial aims to compare overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and safety between these treatments. The study also explores patient-reported quality of life, treatment adherence, minimal residual disease status, and imaging associations during therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first group receives daratumumab intravenously on a detailed schedule across up to 24 courses, plus oral lenalidomide daily for 21 days and dexamethasone on specific days during the first 12 courses. The second group receives only oral lenalidomide and dexamethasone on a similar schedule for up to 24 courses. Treatment cycles repeat every 28 days unless disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants complete quality-of-life questionnaires and undergo laboratory tests, including minimal residual disease assessments and PETCT imaging. Safety is closely monitored, especially infusion-related reactions and toxicity. After treatment, patients are followed for up to 15 years with periodic visits every 3 to 12 months to track long-term outcomes and survival.

Researchers are evaluating a master screening protocol called Lung-MAP for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. This phase IIIII trial aims to develop a genomic screening method for large cancer populations and assign participants to appropriate sub-studies based on specific cancer biomarkers. The goal is to compare new targeted therapies designed to block cancer growth or spread with standard care, including sub-studies for patients not eligible for biomarker-driven treatments. The study involves screening patient specimens to determine eligibility for various biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies within the Lung-MAP umbrella protocol. This is a screening study without direct interventions instead, patients are assigned to different treatment sub-studies, each operating independently. The protocol also includes an optional ancillary study evaluating attitudes about the return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of germline mutations. Participants provide tumor tissue for biomarker testing, including molecular profiling and PD-L1 analysis, and may submit fresh biopsies and blood samples for circulating tumor DNA testing. Researchers will monitor screening success rates up to three years and collect patient and physician feedback on genetic findings. Participation involves signing informed consent, providing smoking history, and possibly completing surveys. The study duration and assessments vary depending on sub-study assignment and patient progression.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

This trial studies adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has spread outside the lungs and has specific mutations in the EGFR gene. Researchers are comparing two treatment approaches osimertinib alone versus osimertinib combined with bevacizumab. The study aims to evaluate how these treatments affect the time patients live without disease progression and overall survival, as well as their effects on brain metastases and treatment safety. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives osimertinib pills daily every 21 days, while the other group receives osimertinib daily plus an intravenous infusion of bevacizumab every 21 days. Treatment continues until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants undergo tests including echocardiography, MUGA scans, CT scans, and possibly MRI, along with blood and urine sample collection. After treatment ends, participants are followed every three months for up to 10 years to monitor disease status and survival. Researchers will assess progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, time to brain progression, and side effects. The study includes long-term follow-up to understand the lasting effects of these treatments and to explore resistance mechanisms through tumor DNA analysis.

Researchers are evaluating how well radiation therapy with or without the chemotherapy drug cisplatin works in treating patients who have stage III-IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after surgery. This phase II trial aims to understand if adding cisplatin to radiation therapy improves disease-free survival and to explore the role of p53 mutations as a biomarker for treatment benefit. The study also assesses the safety and side effects of these treatments and looks for other genetic changes that might guide new therapies. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives intensity-modulated radiation therapy IMRT once daily, five days a week for six weeks. The other group receives the same radiation schedule plus weekly intravenous cisplatin for six weeks. After treatment, participants are followed up every six months for three years and then yearly for seven years to monitor outcomes. During the study, patients will have assessments including surgical tumor tissue analysis for p53 mutation, imaging scans to check for cancer spread, and blood tests to monitor health and organ function. Researchers will track disease recurrence, new tumors, or death for up to 10 years. Side effects will be recorded during treatment. The total study participation includes treatment over six weeks followed by long-term follow-up visits lasting up to 10 years.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel versus the FOLFIRI regimen leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, and irinotecan hydrochloride in treating patients with advanced or treatment-resistant small bowel adenocarcinoma. Ramucirumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets VEGFR-2 to potentially reduce tumor blood supply and growth. Chemotherapy drugs like paclitaxel, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, and irinotecan work by stopping tumor cell growth through different mechanisms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. In the first group, patients receive ramucirumab intravenously over 30-60 minutes on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15, with each cycle lasting 28 days. In the second group, patients receive irinotecan intravenously over 90 minutes on days 1 and 15, leucovorin intravenously over 2 hours on days 1 and 15, and fluorouracil both as an IV bolus on days 1 and 15 and continuously over 46-48 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17. Treatment cycles repeat every 28 days unless disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. During the study, patients are monitored with assessments every 8 weeks until their disease progresses. After progression, follow-up continues every 6 months for up to 3 years. Researchers measure progression-free survival, overall response rate, overall survival, and track any adverse events. Tissue and blood samples are also collected for future research. Patient safety and treatment effects are carefully evaluated throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating patients with metastatic HER-2-positive breast cancer who are receiving trastuzumab-based therapy and are at risk of heart problems. The study includes two groups one large observational group taking beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs alongside trastuzumab, and a smaller randomized group comparing the effects of carvedilol versus no treatment. The aim is to understand the occurrence of heart issues and whether carvedilol might help prevent cardiac side effects from chemotherapy. Participants are assigned to one of three arms based on their current medications. Patients not on beta blockers, ARBs, or ACE inhibitors are randomized to either receive carvedilol orally twice daily or no study intervention. Those already taking these heart medications enter an observational arm without additional treatment. Treatment and observation continue for up to 108 weeks unless disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the study, participants undergo heart function monitoring with echocardiograms every 12 weeks and provide blood samples for biomarker analysis. Researchers track the time to the first sign of heart dysfunction and any cardiac events, as well as adherence to medication and side effects. The study also collects data to develop models predicting heart risk and banks samples for future research. Participant involvement may last over two years with regular assessments to monitor safety and heart health.