Green Bay

Researchers are evaluating the use of pemigatinib for adults with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer that has spread locally or to distant parts of the body. This study focuses on patients whose cancer has specific abnormal changes in the FGFR gene, which can promote cancer growth. The goal is to see if pemigatinib can block these abnormal genes to stop tumor growth and improve quality of life. Participants take pemigatinib orally once daily for 14 days in each 21-day cycle, continuing as long as the cancer does not worsen or side effects are manageable. During the study, patients undergo blood tests, CT andor MRI scans, and optical coherence tomography OCT. Additional scans like whole body bone scans and eye exams may be performed if needed. After treatment, patients are followed up 30 days later and then every 4 months for one year. Throughout the study, researchers assess tumor response using imaging and blood tests, including monitoring cell-free DNA to track response and resistance. They measure overall response rate up to 24 months and evaluate progression-free survival, disease control, overall survival, and side effects up to 12 months. Safety and tolerability are closely monitored, and patients overall health and treatment effects are regularly checked to understand the impact of pemigatinib.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a new medicine called CagriSema in helping adults living with obesity, with or without type 2 diabetes, to lose weight. This phase 3 clinical study compares two different weekly doses of CagriSema against an existing medicine, semaglutide. The study aims to understand how well these treatments support weight loss over a long period. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments CagriSema at dose level 1, CagriSema at dose level 2, or semaglutide. Each treatment is given by weekly injection under the skin for 72 weeks. The study lasts about 83 weeks, covering treatment and follow-up periods to observe effects and safety. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor body weight, body mass index BMI, waist size, cholesterol levels, blood sugar control HbA1c, and quality of life. Researchers will track changes from the start of treatment to the end of 72 weeks, including weight loss milestones and health measurements. Safety will also be closely monitored through reports of any adverse events until the study ends.

Researchers are evaluating insulin icodec, a once-weekly insulin injection, compared to insulin glargine, a once-daily injection. This study focuses on adults with type 1 diabetes to see how well the weekly insulin controls blood sugar when combined with insulin aspart, which is taken 2 to 4 times daily. The trial aims to assess blood sugar control over about 8.5 months. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either insulin icodec once a week with insulin aspart daily or insulin glargine once a day with insulin aspart daily. Both insulins are given as subcutaneous injections. The study is designed as a parallel comparison to evaluate the effects of these insulin regimens on blood sugar control. During the study, participants will have regular assessments including blood tests to measure HbA1c and glucose levels, monitoring of hypoglycemic episodes, and tracking of insulin doses and body weight. The primary outcome is the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. Secondary outcomes include time spent in target glucose ranges and frequency of low blood sugar events. The study will last about 8.5 months with ongoing monitoring to evaluate treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating how well combination chemotherapy works in treating patients with newly diagnosed stages 2 to 4 diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumor DAWT and patients with relapsed favorable histology Wilms tumor FHWT. This phase II trial compares the effects of two chemotherapy regimens, UH-3 and ICECycloTopo, on event-free survival and overall survival, aiming to improve outcomes based on different relapse risk groups and prior treatments. The study also explores kidney toxicity, genetic markers, surgery impacts, and radiation therapy techniques to reduce side effects and better understand tumor behavior. Participants are assigned to one of two treatment groups. In Arm I Regimen UH-3, patients receive cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan intravenously over various days in a 21-day cycle, with radiation therapy at week 7 of cycle 3 if needed. In Arm II Regimen ICECycloTopo, patients receive cycles of carboplatin, etoposide, ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, and topotecan intravenously over 10 cycles every 21 days, with surgery andor radiation therapy during certain cycles as clinically indicated. Throughout the trial, patients undergo multiple imaging tests including CT scans, PET scans, chest x-rays, MRIs, abdominal ultrasounds, and bone scans, along with blood sample collections and biopsies. After completing treatment, follow-up visits occur every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3 and 4, and once at year 5. The main outcomes measured are event-free survival and overall survival up to 5 years from study entry, with ongoing monitoring for treatment effects and safety.

This trial studies children, adolescents, and young adults with Philadelphia chromosome positive Ph or ABL-class Philadelphia chromosome-like Ph-like B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia B-ALL. It evaluates the combination of blinatumomab with dasatinib or imatinib alongside standard chemotherapy. The study aims to estimate 3-year event-free survival and overall survival, describe safety and toxicity, and explore treatment responses and immune function in these patients. Participants receive a modified chemotherapy regimen including multiple cycles of blinatumomab without traditional consolidation chemotherapy combined with continuous tyrosine kinase inhibitors dasatinib or imatinib depending on fusion subtype. Treatment includes induction phases, blinatumomab blocks, interim maintenance, delayed intensification, and maintenance cycles over two years, with various drugs administered orally, intravenously, or intrathecally. Radiation therapy may be given in some cases. Throughout the study, participants undergo blood and cerebrospinal fluid sample collection, bone marrow biopsies, and heart function tests such as echocardiography or multigated acquisition scans. Researchers monitor minimal residual disease, treatment-related side effects, and long-term outcomes up to three years. The study involves regular assessments to evaluate treatment effectiveness and safety over the full duration of therapy.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of nivolumab and blinatumomab compared to blinatumomab alone in children and young adults aged 1 to under 31 years with first relapse of CD19 B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia B-ALL, including patients with Down syndrome. This phase II trial aims to compare event-free survival after reinduction and consolidation therapy, assess safety and tolerability, and explore various outcomes such as remission rates and toxicity, with follow-up up to 10 years after enrollment. Participants receive treatments based on their assigned groups and arms, involving cycles of immunotherapy including blinatumomab, nivolumab, dexamethasone, methotrexate, and other chemotherapy drugs given by various routes such as intravenous infusion, intrathecal injection, and oral administration. Treatment cycles repeat every 36 or 37 days for up to two cycles, with some groups receiving radiation therapy or maintenance chemotherapy afterward. Patients with high white blood cell counts or specific disease locations may receive pre-immunotherapy treatments. Throughout the study, participants undergo lumbar punctures, bone marrow biopsies and aspirations, and collection of blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid for monitoring. Researchers measure outcomes such as minimal residual disease negative remission rates and event-free survival. After completing treatment, participants are followed every three months for one year to monitor their health and any long-term treatment effects.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment approach for children and young adults newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia AML, including those with and without FLT3 gene mutations. The trial compares standard chemotherapy using daunorubicin, cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin to therapy with CPX-351, a liposome-encapsulated form of daunorubicin and cytarabine, andor the drug gilteritinib which may block abnormal FLT3 gene function. The study aims to understand which treatment works better and to monitor heart function changes during and after therapy. Participants are assigned to different treatment groups based on their risk and FLT3 mutation status. Treatments include various chemotherapy regimens delivered intravenously and intrathecally, with some groups receiving CPX-351 and others receiving standard drugs. Patients with FLT3 mutations receive additional oral gilteritinib for extended periods, including maintenance therapy up to one year. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is also part of the treatment for some high-risk patients following chemotherapy courses. During the study, participants will undergo multiple assessments including blood tests, bone marrow biopsies, imaging scans, and neuropsychological testing to monitor leukemia status and treatment effects. Cardiac function is closely followed using echocardiography and biomarkers. Patient outcomes such as event-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease, relapse rates, and treatment safety are tracked for up to three years. The total study participation may extend over several years with ongoing evaluations.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to the standard treatment of chemotherapy with or without radiation improves survival for patients aged 5 to 60 with early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares progression-free survival and overall survival between the standard therapy and the immunotherapy-enhanced approach, as well as patient-reported outcomes and long-term side effects. Participants initially receive two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days and then undergo imaging to classify their early response. Based on risk level and response, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continuing standard chemotherapy, receiving immunotherapy drugs, or combinations with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are delivered intravenously or orally in cycles lasting 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Participants are monitored regularly with PET scans, CT or MRI imaging, and blood tests. Follow-up visits occur every 3 months in the first year, then every 6 months for years two and three, and annually up to 12 years from registration. Researchers assess survival outcomes, adverse events, patient-reported symptoms and quality of life, and metabolic tumor burden. Long-term effects such as cardiovascular and pulmonary health are also evaluated using questionnaires and clinical assessments.

Researchers are studying two surgical procedures to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 genetic mutations. This trial compares bilateral salpingectomy, which removes only the fallopian tubes, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which removes both fallopian tubes and ovaries. The goal is to find out if removing just the fallopian tubes with delayed ovary removal is nearly as effective as removing both from the start. Participants choose between two groups one undergoes bilateral salpingectomy with the option of later ovary removal, and the other undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups have imaging tests like pelvic ultrasounds or pelvic MRIs during screening and provide blood samples throughout the study. Follow-up visits occur at multiple time points, including 10 to 60 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and then yearly for up to 20 years. During the study, researchers track if ovarian or related cancers develop and assess symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, cancer-related distress, sexual function, menopausal symptoms, medical decision making, and any adverse events. Various questionnaires and imaging tests support these evaluations. Long-term safety and cancer risk reduction are monitored for up to two decades after surgery.

Researchers are conducting a Phase III, randomized, open-label multicenter study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of giredestrant compared with fulvestrant. Both drugs are combined with the investigators choice of a CDK46 inhibitor palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib in participants with estrogen receptor-positive ER, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have become resistant to prior adjuvant endocrine therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one group will receive giredestrant 30 mg orally daily on Days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle, while the other will receive fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Both groups will also receive a CDK46 inhibitor chosen by the investigator, with dosing schedules depending on the specific inhibitor selected. Preperimenopausal women and men will receive a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH agonist during treatment. Participants will be assessed for progression-free survival over up to 5 years, with additional measures including overall survival, response rates, duration of response, clinical benefit, and quality of life. Safety will be monitored through adverse event reporting, vital signs, and laboratory tests during treatment and up to 28 days after the last dose. The study is led by Hoffmann-La Roche and aims to provide detailed information on the treatments effects in this patient population.