Marshfield

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a new medicine called NNC0487-0111 in people who have Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction HFpEF or Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction HFmrEF and excess body weight. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating these conditions compared to a placebo. Participants have HFpEF or HFmrEF and a body mass index of 30 or above. The study is sponsored by Novo Nordisk AS and uses a randomized, quadruple-masked design. Participants will receive either NNC0487-0111 or a matching placebo by injection under the skin once a week. The NNC0487-0111 is given in increasing doses over time. The study is parallel in design, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups and receive that treatment throughout the trial. This treatment period extends for up to about 165 weeks. The study evaluates the time to certain heart failure events, hospitalizations, cardiovascular deaths, and other major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess heart failure outcomes and kidney function, as well as quality of life using questionnaires like the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Safety and effectiveness are assessed through hospital visits, heart failure event tracking, and blood tests including kidney function and blood sugar levels. The total participation spans over three years, with ongoing evaluations to measure the time to heart failure events and cardiovascular outcomes. Participants receive close medical monitoring throughout the study period.

Researchers are investigating the best way to combine chemotherapy and radiation therapy for patients aged 3 to 29 years with localized non-germinomatous germ cell tumors NGGCT in the brain. This phase II trial aims to optimize treatment based on how well the tumor responds to initial chemotherapy, with the goal of reducing spinal cord relapses and adjusting therapy for better disease control. The study also compares different radiation types and examines cognitive and physical effects in children and young adults with NGGCT. Participants first receive induction chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide over six cycles every 21 days. Based on tumor response, patients are assigned to one of two plans Plan A involves whole ventricular plus spinal canal irradiation WVSCI, delivered daily for 6 weeks, while Plan B includes high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant followed by radiation therapy to the whole brain and spine. Some patients may undergo second-look surgery depending on tumor response before continuing treatment. Throughout the study, participants undergo MRI scans, collection of cerebrospinal fluid and blood samples, and questionnaires assessing cognitive, social, and behavioral functioning. Researchers monitor tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and patterns of disease recurrence for up to 10 years. Safety and side effects are also evaluated to better understand long-term outcomes of these treatment approaches.

Researchers are evaluating alisertib as a single treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer SCLC that has progressed after prior therapies. This Phase 2 study focuses on patients who have already received at least one platinum-based chemotherapy and an anti-PD-L1PD-1 immunotherapy, with allowance for up to two prior treatment regimens in total. The study aims to identify specific biomarker groups that may respond best to alisertib and to assess its effectiveness, safety, and how the body processes the drug. Participants will receive alisertib tablets orally in doses of 50 mg, 60 mg, or 70 mg twice daily for seven days within each 21-day treatment cycle. The dosing amount depends on protocol amendments and is given on a schedule of days 1 to 7 of each cycle. This treatment continues under close monitoring to evaluate patient response and side effects. During the study, participants will be regularly evaluated for response to treatment, including measures such as tumor shrinkage and disease control, lasting up to 36 months after the first dose. Researchers will also assess progression-free survival and overall survival within biomarker-defined groups and the overall enrolled population. Safety is monitored by tracking adverse events from the start of treatment through 28 days after the last dose. Patients will be followed for up to three years to gather comprehensive data on treatment outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating how well combination chemotherapy works in treating patients with newly diagnosed stages 2 to 4 diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumor DAWT and patients with relapsed favorable histology Wilms tumor FHWT. This phase II trial compares the effects of two chemotherapy regimens, UH-3 and ICECycloTopo, on event-free survival and overall survival, aiming to improve outcomes based on different relapse risk groups and prior treatments. The study also explores kidney toxicity, genetic markers, surgery impacts, and radiation therapy techniques to reduce side effects and better understand tumor behavior. Participants are assigned to one of two treatment groups. In Arm I Regimen UH-3, patients receive cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan intravenously over various days in a 21-day cycle, with radiation therapy at week 7 of cycle 3 if needed. In Arm II Regimen ICECycloTopo, patients receive cycles of carboplatin, etoposide, ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, and topotecan intravenously over 10 cycles every 21 days, with surgery andor radiation therapy during certain cycles as clinically indicated. Throughout the trial, patients undergo multiple imaging tests including CT scans, PET scans, chest x-rays, MRIs, abdominal ultrasounds, and bone scans, along with blood sample collections and biopsies. After completing treatment, follow-up visits occur every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3 and 4, and once at year 5. The main outcomes measured are event-free survival and overall survival up to 5 years from study entry, with ongoing monitoring for treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for children and young adults with low-risk and average-risk medulloblastoma, a type of brain cancer. This phase III trial aims to reduce hearing loss caused by cisplatin chemotherapy in average-risk patients by adding sodium thiosulfate STS to standard treatment. For low-risk patients, the study tests whether reduced radiation therapy can maintain benefits while causing fewer side effects. The study also monitors survival, tumor recurrence, and quality of life outcomes. Participants receive radiation therapy five days a week for six weeks, alongside weekly vincristine infusions during this period. Following chemoradiotherapy, maintenance therapy includes cycles of lomustine, cisplatin, sodium thiosulfate, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine given on specific days over up to nine cycles, depending on tolerance and disease progression. Patients undergo regular MRI scans and may provide cerebrospinal fluid and blood samples during the study. Throughout the trial, participants are closely monitored with hearing tests, neurocognitive assessments, and quality-of-life surveys. Follow-up visits occur every three months for the first two years, every six months for years three and four, and annually up to ten years to track hearing loss, event-free survival, overall survival, tumor recurrence, and psychosocial outcomes. The study also collects biological samples for future molecular research, with the total participation lasting up to ten years.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment approach for children and young adults newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia AML, including those with and without FLT3 gene mutations. The trial compares standard chemotherapy using daunorubicin, cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin to therapy with CPX-351, a liposome-encapsulated form of daunorubicin and cytarabine, andor the drug gilteritinib which may block abnormal FLT3 gene function. The study aims to understand which treatment works better and to monitor heart function changes during and after therapy. Participants are assigned to different treatment groups based on their risk and FLT3 mutation status. Treatments include various chemotherapy regimens delivered intravenously and intrathecally, with some groups receiving CPX-351 and others receiving standard drugs. Patients with FLT3 mutations receive additional oral gilteritinib for extended periods, including maintenance therapy up to one year. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is also part of the treatment for some high-risk patients following chemotherapy courses. During the study, participants will undergo multiple assessments including blood tests, bone marrow biopsies, imaging scans, and neuropsychological testing to monitor leukemia status and treatment effects. Cardiac function is closely followed using echocardiography and biomarkers. Patient outcomes such as event-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease, relapse rates, and treatment safety are tracked for up to three years. The total study participation may extend over several years with ongoing evaluations.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to the standard treatment of chemotherapy with or without radiation improves survival for patients aged 5 to 60 with early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares progression-free survival and overall survival between the standard therapy and the immunotherapy-enhanced approach, as well as patient-reported outcomes and long-term side effects. Participants initially receive two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days and then undergo imaging to classify their early response. Based on risk level and response, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continuing standard chemotherapy, receiving immunotherapy drugs, or combinations with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are delivered intravenously or orally in cycles lasting 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Participants are monitored regularly with PET scans, CT or MRI imaging, and blood tests. Follow-up visits occur every 3 months in the first year, then every 6 months for years two and three, and annually up to 12 years from registration. Researchers assess survival outcomes, adverse events, patient-reported symptoms and quality of life, and metabolic tumor burden. Long-term effects such as cardiovascular and pulmonary health are also evaluated using questionnaires and clinical assessments.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain. This phase II trial compares two combinations encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab. The study aims to determine which approach is more effective at shrinking and controlling brain metastases, and it also examines survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group takes encorafenib daily by mouth, binimetinib twice daily by mouth, and receives nivolumab through an intravenous IV infusion every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab IV every cycle and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes during the first four cycles, with cycles repeating every 21 days initially, then every 28 days. Treatment continues unless disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Participants undergo brain MRI scans before enrollment and throughout the study to assess tumor response using specific criteria. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for two years, then yearly up to three years. The study collects tissue, blood, spinal fluid, and stool samples for future research. Researchers monitor progression-free survival as the main outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects.

Researchers are studying two surgical procedures to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 genetic mutations. This trial compares bilateral salpingectomy, which removes only the fallopian tubes, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which removes both fallopian tubes and ovaries. The goal is to find out if removing just the fallopian tubes with delayed ovary removal is nearly as effective as removing both from the start. Participants choose between two groups one undergoes bilateral salpingectomy with the option of later ovary removal, and the other undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups have imaging tests like pelvic ultrasounds or pelvic MRIs during screening and provide blood samples throughout the study. Follow-up visits occur at multiple time points, including 10 to 60 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and then yearly for up to 20 years. During the study, researchers track if ovarian or related cancers develop and assess symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, cancer-related distress, sexual function, menopausal symptoms, medical decision making, and any adverse events. Various questionnaires and imaging tests support these evaluations. Long-term safety and cancer risk reduction are monitored for up to two decades after surgery.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of Pumitamig compared to Pembrolizumab in adults with previously untreated advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC who have a PD-L1 expression level of 50% or higher. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study focuses on patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to better understand first-line treatment options. Participants receive either Pumitamig or Pembrolizumab as the study drug, given at specified doses on certain days. The study uses a parallel design with two treatment groups to compare these therapies as first-line options. The study is planned to continue until October 2031, with treatment and follow-up periods extending up to approximately 5 years for overall survival assessments. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor disease progression and response to treatment using criteria like RECIST v1.1. Researchers will evaluate progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rates, duration of response, disease control rate, and symptom changes related to lung cancer over time. Safety and treatment effects will be closely monitored throughout the study duration.