Cheyenne

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of pemigatinib in adults with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer that has spread to nearby tissues, lymph nodes, or distant body parts, and that have specific genetic changes in the FGFR gene. The study focuses on patients whose cancer has FGFR2 gene fusions or other FGFR alterations, aiming to see if pemigatinib can block these abnormal gene functions to stop tumor growth and possibly improve quality of life. This is a phase II trial conducted nationwide using a fully decentralized telemedicine approach to reach participants. Participants receive pemigatinib as an oral medication once daily for 14 days within each 21-day cycle. Treatment continues unless the disease progresses or unacceptable side effects occur. Alongside the drug treatment, patients undergo various imaging tests including CT scans, MRI, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and when needed, whole body bone scans and dilated eye exams (ophthalmoscopy). After finishing treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days and then every four months for one year to monitor their condition. Throughout the study, patients provide blood samples and undergo scans to evaluate treatment response and detect resistance mutations. Researchers track the overall response rate for up to 24 months and assess safety and tolerability. Patients must comply with scheduled visits, tests, and oral medication intake. The total study participation includes treatment cycles and a follow-up period lasting up to approximately 16 months after treatment completion.

Researchers are evaluating two treatment combinations for patients with melanoma that has spread to the brain and has a specific BRAF-V600 mutation. This phase II trial compares encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab against ipilimumab and nivolumab to determine which approach better controls and shrinks brain metastases from melanoma. The study also aims to assess overall survival, response rates, treatment duration, and side effects of each regimen. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives encorafenib orally once daily, binimetinib orally twice daily, and nivolumab intravenously every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab intravenously and ipilimumab intravenously during the first four cycles, with cycles every 21 days initially, then every 28 days thereafter. Treatment continues unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. After treatment ends, participants have follow-up visits every six months for two years, then yearly until three years after starting the study. During the trial, participants undergo brain MRIs to monitor tumor response using standardized criteria. Imaging, tumor tissue, spinal fluid, stool, and blood samples are collected for research. Safety and effectiveness are carefully assessed through scans, physical exams, lab tests, and side effect monitoring. Progression-free survival up to three years after randomization is the main outcome. Participants remain in the study for about three years with periodic evaluations to track their health and disease status.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous amlitelimab compared with placebo in people aged 12 years and older who have moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and have not responded well to prior biologic or oral Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) therapies. This Phase 3, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study includes participants who are also using background topical corticosteroids (TCS). The goal is to see how well amlitelimab works in improving AD symptoms in this group. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either amlitelimab or placebo by subcutaneous injection while continuing their topical treatments, which may include corticosteroids, tacrolimus, or pimecrolimus. The total treatment period lasts up to 36 weeks during a double-blind phase. After the treatment phase, participants can choose to join a long-term safety study. The full study duration is up to 56 weeks for those not entering the safety study and up to 40 weeks for those who do, including screening, treatment, and safety follow-up periods. During the study, participants will attend up to 13 visits (or 12 for those continuing into the long-term safety study) for assessments including the Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and symptom scoring. Safety monitoring and follow-up visits will track progress, side effects, and treatment response. The primary outcomes focus on improvements in skin clearing and reduction of AD severity at Week 36.

Researchers are evaluating the bioequivalence of two ophthalmic solutions containing 0.01% bimatoprost in adults with chronic open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension affecting both eyes. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study aims to compare the effects of a test drug from Amneal EU and the reference drug LUMIGAN4 (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution) in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), a key factor in managing these eye conditions. Participants who meet specific criteria, such as having controlled IOP after washout and similar pressure between eyes, will be randomly assigned to receive either the test or reference drug. Each subject will apply one drop in each eye every evening around 10:00 pm for 42 days. The study involves multiple clinical sites and uses a parallel design with two treatment arms to assess the drugs' bioequivalence based on their clinical effect. Throughout the study, subjects will undergo clinical evaluations to monitor safety and effectiveness. The main outcome is the mean difference in IOP between the two treatment groups, measured at multiple times (00:00, 04:00, and 08:00 hours) on Days 14 and 42. Additional assessments include visual acuity tests and ongoing safety monitoring. The total treatment period is six weeks, with key measurements taken at two and six weeks after starting treatment.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to study and evaluate tests that could help detect cancer early. The goal is to create a blinded reference set of samples to validate blood-based tests for early detection of multiple types of cancer, including leukemia, lymphoma, breast, lung, and others. The study also aims to assess how well these tests perform at the time of initial cancer diagnosis, considering different tumor types and cancer stages. Participants complete a baseline questionnaire and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also provide tissue samples at these times. The study includes patients aged 40 to 75 years, with cancer diagnoses at various stages or individuals without cancer. Special procedures are in place for patients with high suspicion of certain cancers before confirmation. During the study, researchers collect detailed information through questionnaires, blood draws, and tissue sampling to analyze test accuracy. Participants are monitored for up to one year after registration to follow outcomes. The primary measure is providing this blinded set of blood samples to help validate future cancer detection tests, supporting research that could improve early diagnosis and treatment.

This research collects data and biological samples from patients who have experienced side effects from immunotherapy treatments for cancer. The goal is to create a national collection of these samples and clinical information to help future studies understand, predict, prevent, and treat serious immune-related side effects, rare infections, or rapid tumor growth after immunotherapy. Participants provide tissue and blood samples when they join the study and again one month later. Some patients may also provide stool samples if they have certain side effects like colitis. Researchers also review participants' medical records for up to one year to gather detailed health information related to their treatment and side effects. During the study, patients undergo sample collections and have their health records examined. The main outcome measured is the establishment of a national biorepository containing these samples and data, which will be used in future research over the course of one year. This study aims to support better understanding and management of immunotherapy side effects in cancer treatment.

Researchers are comparing two approaches of standard therapy for patients with stage II to IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that can be surgically removed. This phase III trial evaluates whether giving chemotherapy and immunotherapy before and after surgery (perioperative) is more effective than giving the same treatments only after surgery (adjuvant). The study aims to find out which method leads to better event-free survival and overall survival over several years. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the adjuvant group, patients have surgery first, followed by up to four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and up to one year of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment if there is no disease progression or unacceptable side effects. In the perioperative group, patients receive chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors before surgery, then have surgery, and continue immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for up to one year afterward. Chemotherapy drugs used may include cisplatin, carboplatin, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, docetaxel, or vinorelbine, and immunotherapy drugs may include nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab. During the study, patients undergo imaging tests such as CT scans, MRI, or PET/CT scans to monitor their condition. After completing treatment, they are followed for up to 10 years with check-ups every six months. Researchers measure event-free survival at three years, overall survival up to 10 years, surgical outcomes, side effects, and other treatment-related factors to understand which approach offers better results for patients with resectable NSCLC.

Researchers are investigating whether adding the chemotherapy drug Docetaxel to the usual hormone treatments can better control metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in patients who have a less than optimal PSA response after 6 to 12 months of androgen-targeting therapy. This phase III, open-label, randomized international trial compares the effectiveness of Docetaxel combined with standard Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and Androgen-Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPI) versus ADT and ARPI alone. The study focuses on men with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma who have a suboptimal PSA decline following initial hormone therapy. Participants receive standard ADT and an ARPI such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide, which are assigned before enrollment. At enrollment, patients are randomized to receive either the addition of Docetaxel chemotherapy or no chemotherapy alongside their hormone therapy. The goal is to assess whether this combination reduces cancer growth or spread compared to hormone therapy alone. Treatment begins within five working days after enrollment, with close monitoring throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including PSA measurements to monitor cancer activity and overall survival tracked at 39 months. Eligibility requires stable organ function, performance status, and recovery from prior treatment side effects. Patients are monitored for adverse events, safety, and treatment response. The study also ensures participants and their partners use contraception if of childbearing potential, and participants must be accessible for treatment and follow-up visits to document outcomes and safety data.

Researchers are evaluating if adding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) to ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) compared to OFS plus ET alone. This Phase III trial focuses on premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, and has a 21-gene recurrence score between 16-25 for node-negative patients or 0-25 for patients with 1-3 positive nodes. The study addresses the need for better treatment options for younger women diagnosed with this type of breast cancer, as younger age is linked to worse outcomes despite standard therapies. Participants receive one of two treatments: either OFS combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for five years or adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same OFS plus AI regimen. The specific AI and GnRH agonist used, along with their dosing schedules, are chosen by the investigator, commonly including goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin administered monthly or every three months. Bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. Endocrine therapy beyond five years is at the investigator's discretion. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival over an 11-year period from randomization. Assessments include clinical evaluations, hormone receptor testing, tumor staging, and genetic recurrence scoring prior to enrollment. Safety and effectiveness data will be collected throughout the study, with particular attention to treatment side effects and long-term outcomes. The trial involves detailed eligibility screening and ongoing follow-up to ensure accurate measurement of the study's primary outcome.

Researchers are studying how social and genetic factors affect outcomes for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Compared to children and older adults, AYAs with these cancers face unique biological, clinical, psychological, and social challenges that influence their risk of illness and early death after treatment. By collecting blood samples and detailed health and treatment information, the study aims to better understand these risks and improve support for AYA cancer survivors. Participants in this observational study provide blood samples and complete health-related quality of life questionnaires at the start of the study and again at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The study examines how social-environmental risk factors and individual resilience relate to disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life. It also explores how gene expression changes may mediate these effects and whether factors like race, sex, gender identity, and geography influence outcomes. Throughout the two-year period, researchers monitor participants for disease-free survival, overall survival, and comorbidities including symptoms and late effects. The study collects repeated assessments through questionnaires and blood draws to track health status, quality of life, and biological markers. This comprehensive approach helps identify factors that impact long-term health for adolescent and young adult lymphoma survivors.