Cheyenne

Researchers are evaluating the use of pemigatinib for adults with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer that has spread locally or to distant parts of the body. This study focuses on patients whose cancer has specific abnormal changes in the FGFR gene, which can promote cancer growth. The goal is to see if pemigatinib can block these abnormal genes to stop tumor growth and improve quality of life. Participants take pemigatinib orally once daily for 14 days in each 21-day cycle, continuing as long as the cancer does not worsen or side effects are manageable. During the study, patients undergo blood tests, CT andor MRI scans, and optical coherence tomography OCT. Additional scans like whole body bone scans and eye exams may be performed if needed. After treatment, patients are followed up 30 days later and then every 4 months for one year. Throughout the study, researchers assess tumor response using imaging and blood tests, including monitoring cell-free DNA to track response and resistance. They measure overall response rate up to 24 months and evaluate progression-free survival, disease control, overall survival, and side effects up to 12 months. Safety and tolerability are closely monitored, and patients overall health and treatment effects are regularly checked to understand the impact of pemigatinib.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain. This phase II trial compares two combinations encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab. The study aims to determine which approach is more effective at shrinking and controlling brain metastases, and it also examines survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group takes encorafenib daily by mouth, binimetinib twice daily by mouth, and receives nivolumab through an intravenous IV infusion every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab IV every cycle and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes during the first four cycles, with cycles repeating every 21 days initially, then every 28 days. Treatment continues unless disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Participants undergo brain MRI scans before enrollment and throughout the study to assess tumor response using specific criteria. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for two years, then yearly up to three years. The study collects tissue, blood, spinal fluid, and stool samples for future research. Researchers monitor progression-free survival as the main outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of amlitelimab, given as a subcutaneous injection, for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis AD in participants aged 12 years and older. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study includes participants who have not responded adequately to prior biologic or oral Janus kinase inhibitor JAKi therapies while using background topical corticosteroids TCS. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving subcutaneous injections of either one of two doses of amlitelimab or a placebo, all alongside background TCS therapy. The treatment period lasts up to 36 weeks, followed by either a 16-week safety follow-up for those not entering the long-term safety study or no further treatment period for those entering the extension study. The entire study duration ranges up to 56 weeks for participants not entering the long-term safety study and up to 40 weeks for those who do. Participants will attend up to 13 visits during the study, or 12 visits if they join the long-term safety study. Assessments include evaluating skin condition using standardized scales such as the Validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD and the Eczema Area and Severity Index. Researchers will monitor safety, side effects, skin symptoms, quality of life, and various patient-reported outcomes. Long-term safety and response to treatment will also be observed for those who continue into the extension study.

Researchers are evaluating the bioequivalence of two eye drop treatments, Bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic solution by Amneal EU and LUMIGAN4 bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.01% by Allergan, in adults with chronic open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension affecting both eyes. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study aims to compare these treatments by measuring their effects on intraocular pressure IOP as the primary clinical endpoint. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the test or reference bimatoprost eye drops, instilling one drop in both eyes every evening around 1000 pm for 42 days. The study includes multiple doses over this period, with evaluations occurring at baseline, two weeks, and six weeks. The test and reference products are both ophthalmic solutions containing the same concentration of bimatoprost. Throughout the study, participants will have clinical assessments to monitor safety and efficacy, including IOP measurements at specific times 0000, 0400, and 0800 hours on days 14 and 42. Safety monitoring for adverse events will continue during the six-week treatment period. The main outcome is the mean difference in IOP between the treatment groups, helping to determine if the test product is equivalent to the reference product in controlling eye pressure.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to help evaluate new tests that could detect cancer early. This study aims to create a set of blinded blood samples from both cancer and non-cancer patients to validate these tests, focusing on multiple cancer types and stages. The goal is to improve early cancer detection through laboratory research. Participants complete a questionnaire at the start and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also have tissue samples collected at these times. The study includes patients with various cancer types and stages, as well as individuals without cancer, with some allowing enrollment before full cancer confirmation under specific conditions. During the study, researchers review the collected samples and questionnaire data to assess test performance by tumor type and clinical stage at diagnosis. Participants are followed for one year after completing the study. Key measurements include the provision of a blinded reference set of cancer versus non-cancer blood samples to support future clinical trials focused on blood-based multi-cancer early detection.

This research aims to establish a national biorepository by collecting research data and samples from patients who experience side effects from immunotherapy treatments used in cancer care. It focuses on patients who have serious immune-related reactions, rare infections, or accelerated tumor growth after receiving immuno-oncology therapies. The goal is to help researchers better predict, prevent, and treat these side effects in the future. Participants will have tissue and blood samples collected within 72 hours after confirmation of a serious immune-related side effect and again one month later. For patients experiencing colitis, stool samples may also be collected. Alongside sample collection, medical records will be reviewed for up to one year. This study is observational and involves no experimental treatments. During the study, participants will provide biospecimens at two time points and allow access to their medical records for a year. Researchers will analyze these samples and clinical data to build a resource for future studies on immune-related adverse events. The main outcome is the establishment of this biorepository, which will be maintained for up to one year after enrollment.

Researchers are comparing two treatment approaches for patients with stage II-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that can be removed by surgery. The study evaluates whether giving standard therapy before and after surgery perioperative is better than giving it only after surgery adjuvant. This phase III trial focuses on chemotherapy and immunotherapy, which are current standard treatments aimed at controlling tumor growth and helping the immune system fight cancer. Patients are divided into two groups. One group undergoes surgery followed by chemotherapy and immunotherapy for up to one year if the disease does not progress or cause severe side effects. The other group receives chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy before surgery, then surgery, followed by immunotherapy alone for up to one year. Chemotherapy drugs may include cisplatin, carboplatin, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, docetaxel, or vinorelbine. Imaging tests like CT, MRI, or PETCT scans are done throughout the study. Participants will have surgery within a month of joining and receive treatments according to their assigned group. They will be monitored with scans and followed up every six months for up to 10 years to assess survival, disease progression, surgical outcomes, side effects, and immune responses. Researchers will measure event-free survival and overall survival as main results, as well as response rates and safety information over the long term.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of the Cost Communication and Financial Navigation CostCOM intervention on adherence to cancer care and financial burden in patients with malignant solid neoplasms. This study focuses on how financial hardship caused by out-of-pocket costs, employment changes, and insurance affects cancer treatment and quality of life. CostCOM aims to provide financial counseling and resource connections to reduce these burdens and improve adherence to care. Participants are randomized into two groups. One group receives a brochure describing financial navigation services Enhanced Usual Care, while the other group receives usual financial care plus CostCOM financial counseling sessions within 30 days of enrollment and again at 3, 6, and 12 months. Non-patient participants complete surveys and participate in interviews 15 to 39 months after the first patient enrollment. Participants complete surveys at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months to report on cost-related care non-adherence, financial hardship, financial worry, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. The study includes follow-up for 12 months after intervention completion. Non-patient participants also provide feedback on the CostCOM intervention through interviews. Researchers will monitor patient experiences and financial outcomes throughout the study.

Researchers are investigating whether adding the drug Docetaxel to the usual hormone treatments, Androgen Deprivation Therapy ADT and Androgen-Receptor Pathway Inhibitor ARPI, can better control metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer in men who have not responded optimally to initial hormone therapy. This phase III, international, open-label, randomized trial seeks to compare the effectiveness of this combined approach against the standard hormone therapy alone. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the standard hormone therapy with ADT plus ARPI or the same hormone therapy combined with Docetaxel chemotherapy. The trial focuses on men with metastatic prostate cancer who continue to have elevated PSA levels after 6 to 12 months of hormone-targeting treatment. Treatments are administered according to physician choice and assignment, and the study evaluates outcomes over a long period. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored with assessments including PSA levels and clinical progression over 39 months. Researchers will measure overall survival as the primary outcome, along with secondary outcomes such as PSA progression, PSA response, PSA kinetics, and progression-free survival. Participants must be accessible for treatment and follow-up to allow for complete documentation of treatment effects and adverse events throughout the study duration.

Researchers are studying premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, focusing on tumors with specific gene recurrence scores. The trial aims to find out if adding chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy improves invasive breast cancer-free survival compared to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy alone. This Phase III trial addresses the need for better treatments in younger women, given their higher risk and past conflicting study results on ovarian suppression and chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ovarian function suppression combined with an aromatase inhibitor for five years, and the other receiving adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibitor regimen. Choices for the aromatase inhibitor and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist are made by the investigator, with options including drugs such as goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin. Endocrine treatment beyond five years is at the investigators discretion, and bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. During the study, participants are monitored over 11 years from randomization, with measurements including invasive breast cancer-free survival as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include disease-free survival, overall survival, recurrence intervals, menopausal symptoms, and pain during aromatase inhibitor therapy. Safety and treatment effects are assessed through regular evaluations, and participants continue to be followed long term to understand the impact of treatments on their breast cancer outcomes.