Comparison of the Predictive Value of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, GCS and GCS-P Scores for In-hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients After Craniotomy

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are reviewing adult patients admitted to three ICU wards at Beijing Tiantan Hospital from 2017 to 2020 who had undergone craniotomy and stayed in the ICU for more than 24 hours. The study aims to analyze patient information, surgery details, complications, and outcomes to evaluate the ability of different scoring systems to predict patient survival. It also plans to group patients by surgery type to assess how well these scoring systems predict outcomes for each group. The study involves collecting routine scoring data used at the hospital, such as APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, GCS, and GCS-P scores, and verifying their accuracy. Patients will be divided into mortality and survival groups based on their outcomes. The predictive value of each scoring system will be assessed overall and within surgical indication subgroups. Participants' medical records will be reviewed retrospectively to gather baseline and surgery-related data, complications, and outcomes. Researchers will analyze the predictive value of the scoring systems over a 3-month period. The study is observational, and no experimental treatments are given. The total participation involves data collection and analysis from past hospital records without impacting patient care.

Scores in Critically Ill Patients After Craniotomy