Blois

This is a Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center event-driven study comparing BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID with GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 μg BID in participants with COPD who are at risk of a cardiopulmonary event.

The TRAK-ER trial is a multi-centre, randomised, open-label trial in patients with early stage oestrogen reception positive (ER+) human epidermal growth receptor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer, whom have detectable circulating DNA (ctDNA) but no overt macroscopic disease on imaging. TRAK-ER aims to demonstrate that fulvestrant plus palbociclib improves relapse free survival compared to standard endocrine therapy in this patient group. Despite current treatment, patients with ER+HER2- breast cancer are considered high-risk of distant recurrence for more than the first two decades after initial diagnosis. ctDNA analysis provides a non-invasive, serial source of tumour material which can monitor tumour dynamics and detect molecular relapse. TRAK-ER will be split into two phases, the first surveillance phase aims to investigate the use of ctDNA to identify and predict the risk of molecular relapse in early ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients whom are receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy with no overt macroscopic disease on imaging. Using ctDNA assays, patients enrolled on TRAK-ER will receive ctDNA testing on a three-monthly basis for up to three years. In the instance where ctDNA is detected, imaging will determine whether overt disease is present. If a patient had a positive ctDNA detection and no macroscopic disease on the staging scan, the patient will be randomised to one of the treatment groups in the second phase of TRAK-ER, the treatment phase. The treatment phase of TRAK-ER will be a randomised, open-label study which aims to determine whether fulvestrant plus palbociclib (intervention arm) improves relapse free survival compared to standard endocrine therapy (control arm) in patients carried through from the surveillance phase. Patients on each arm will receive treatment (fulvestrant plus palbociclib or standard endocrine therapy) for up to 24 months. Six monthly imaging will determine the presence of macroscopic disease. If macroscopic disease is observed, the patient will discontinue TRAK-ER treatment and commence standard therapy outside of the TRAK-ER trial.

Cryoglobulinemia vasculitis (CV) is a systemic immune-mediated small vessel vasculitis. Rituximab proved effective on main vasculitis signs, with a complete clinical response of 65%. However, CV relapse is noted in up to 40% of patients. Following rituximab, serum Blys concentration significantly increased and may favor relapses. Tribeca is a multicentre randomized controled study comparing safety and efficacy of belimumab to placebo in non infectious cryoglobulinemia vasculitis.

This study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, parallel groups, open-label, phase 3 study in subjects with untreated newly diagnoses Multiple Myeloma eligible for ASCT. 824 patients will be enrolled in this study from approximately 70 study sites. The 2 parts in the Treatment Phase are described below. Part 1: Induction/ASCT/Consolidation Phase (1:1 Randomization) After the screening period, patients will be randomly allocated (1:1) to either: * Arm A (standard of care arm): standard induction therapy with 4 cycles of D-VRd, followed by HDCT (Melphalan) + ASCT, D-VRd consolidation therapy * Arm B (experimental arm): standard induction therapy with 4 cycles of D-VRd, followed by elranatamab and lenalidomide consolidation therapy. Part 2: Maintenance Phase (1:1 Re-randomization) Patients will be re-randomized (1:1) and will enter the Maintenance Phase upon completion of consolidation therapy. * Arm C (standard of care arm): lenalidomide * Arm D (experimental arm): elranatamab

Schizophrenia affects about 0.7% of the population. Poor insight, which is common in this disease, linked to poor drug compliance is leads to rehospitalisation with major impact on quality of life. Indeed, many patients relapse with exacerbation of symptoms. Psychoeducation can improve therapeutic alliance and medication compliance. In this context, an individual psycho-education program (PEPITS) has been developed. PEPITS carried out by nurses during the initial stages of hospitalisation. The hypothesis is that PEPITS program will decrease relapse and improve the compliance and insight and and so the quality of life.

This registry is a Post-Authorisation Safety Study called the Increlex® Global Registry which is intended primarily to monitor the safety of Increlex® therapy in children and adolescents with Severe Primary IGF-1 Deficiency and secondly to follow the effectiveness of this treatment. Patients who have already started Increlex® therapy before entering this registry may be included and data will be collected retrospectively. The countries participating in this registry are Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom and the USA

Myringoplasties and ossicular surgery are very common procedures. Following these otological surgeries, most surgeons install a wicking. This intervention consists of placing a wick, absorbable or not, in the external acoustic meatus, after having replaced the tympanomeatal flap. Putting in place a wicking often requires to remove this wicking, feared by the patient. In addition, wicking leads to obstruction of the external acoustic meatus responsible for functional discomfort (feeling of fullness in the ear, pain, significant conductive deafness) which can last from one to several weeks depending on the type of wicking. Despite these drawbacks, the rationale for wicking has never been established, the choice of wick type is often empirical, and its necessity is sometimes controversial in the literature. Recent studies have studied the absence of wicking as an alternative to overcome its many drawbacks. No prospective, randomized, multicenter study has been performed to show the superiority of wicking in healing following middle ear surgery (myringoplasty, stapedo-vestibular ankylosis, ossiculoplasty) via the duct or the endaural route. The only study with a high level of evidence concerns only endoscopic surgery. This study has the advantage of showing that with comparable audiometric and healing results, the absence of wicking allows a reduced operating time, an earlier reduction in otorrhea and the feeling of blocked ears, and an earlier improvement of hearing. Given this work in the literature, our hypothesis is that tympanic healing is not impaired in the absence of wicking.

All patients will receive letrozole plus ribociclib as neoadjuvant therapy. Treatment will consist of six 28-days cycles of daily letrozole (2.5mg; continuous) and ribociclib (600 mg/day; 3 weeks ON and 1 week OFF). In pre-menopausal and men patients, monthly LHRH agonists will be added to letrozole and ribociclib, beginning at least two weeks before starting letrozole and ribociclib. After finalization of neoadjuvant treatment, patients will undergo surgery. Surgery samples of the residual tumor tissue (or tumor bed if pathological complete response \[pCR\] is achieved) will be collected regardless of whether they completed full neoadjuvant treatment. This is not a randomized study; therefore, adjuvant treatment will be decided according to centrally assessed ROR and pathological stage after surgery. Patients are considered responders if they achieve a pCR or have ypN0 and ROR ≤ 30 or ypN1mi (cancer the lymph node is \> 0.2 mm but \< 2 mm) and ROR ≤ 20 or ypN1 and ROR ≤ 10. All patients with ypN0 and ROR \> 30, ypN1mi and ROR \> 20, ypN1 and ROR \> 10 or ypN2-3 are considered non-responders. Patients who progress during neoadjuvant treatment with ribociclib will be considered non-responders. If indicated, adjuvant radiotherapy will be performed after surgery in the responder group and after adjuvant chemotherapy in the non-responders group. Patients considered as responders will continue on treatment after optimal recovery of surgery and radiotherapy if indicated. Treatment with ribociclib (400 mg/day; 3 weeks ON and 1 week OFF) in the adjuvant setting will be maintained for 30 months approximately corresponding to 33 cycles. Letrozole treatment duration must be of at least 5 years. Visits during ribociclib treatment will be scheduled every three cycles. At the end of ribociclib treatment, visits will be every 6 months until 5 years from last patient's surgery. Patients considered as non-responders will be treated with standard chemotherapy regimens. Patients will continue treatment with ribociclib and letrozole after optimal recovery of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy if indicated. Treatment with ribociclib (400 mg/day; 3 weeks ON and 1 week OFF) in the adjuvant setting will be maintained for 30 months approximately corresponding to 33 cycles after adjuvant chemotherapy. Endocrine therapy treatment duration must be of at least 5 years. Visits during ribociclib treatment will be scheduled every three cycles. At the end of ribociclib treatment, visits will be every 6 months until 5 years from last patient's surgery. During adjuvant treatment (both responders and non-responders), letrozole can be switched to another aromatase inhibirtor (AI). Tamoxifen is only permitted after the 30-day post ribociclib visit, according to investigator criteria. Maintaining suppression of ovarian function by luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists during adjuvant treatment is mandatory (if AI are taken)/ recommended (if tamoxifen is taken) in premenopausal and men patients unless there is unmanageable toxicity. Adjuvant hormonal treatment of patients who progress during neoadjuvant Ribociclib will be at the investigator's discretion. Blood samples for ctDNA will be collected at screening, C2D1, pre-surgery, post-surgery, and every 6 months during the adjuvant period. Blood samples will be also collected in case of recurrence. The global end of the study is defined as the date when the last patient accomplishes 5 years of follow up after surgery. The total duration of the study is expected to be 32 months for enrollment, 3 years of adjuvant treatment (including 2.5 years of ribociclib treatment), and additional 2.5 years of follow-up.

Fasting in intensive care is a crucial issue that has primarily been studied in mechanically ventilated patients or during the mechanical ventilation weaning process. This practice has recently been challenged with a study which demonstrated the benefits of continuing enteral nutrition before extubation compared to maintaining an empty stomach. Fasting has also been studied in the context of technical procedures (such as tracheostomy or endoscopy) and before surgery, based on an analogy with pre-anesthetic fasting recommendations. To our knowledge, no data are available regarding fasting in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure who are hospitalized in the ICU but not intubated. Nutritional management in this specific patient population is not addressed in current ICU nutrition guidelines, despite evidence in the literature showing that these patients frequently fail to meet theoretical caloric targets. A large proportion of them receive no nutritional intake, whether orally, enterally via a nasogastric or orogastric tube, or parenterally. This highlights a strong rationale for maintaining nutritional support in patients with acute respiratory failure. One of the major concerns among healthcare teams managing these patients is the potential risk of aspiration. This often leads to delays in resuming oral intake, with patients remaining fasting, possibly as an overly cautious approach. However, several experimental studies, including animal models and studies in patients with acute respiratory failure receiving respiratory support (such as high-flow nasal oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation), suggest that swallowing reflexes remain intact in these situations. Beyond aspiration concerns, tracheal intubation in ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation carries a risk of gastric content aspiration, estimated between 2% and 5.9% in different studies, potentially leading to pneumonia. Clinically, aspiration may be asymptomatic but can also result in severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary fibrosis, and, ultimately, life-threatening complications. During anesthesia for scheduled surgery, controlled operating room conditions allow for preoperative fasting (six hours without solid food and two hours without clear liquids) before anesthetic induction. By analogy, in intensive care, patients at risk of intubation are often kept fasting as a preventive measure to reduce the risk of aspiration and potential gastric content inhalation in the event of intubation. However, this common practice in ICUs remains unstudied in the literature and is not included in clinical guidelines. Moreover, the systematic use of rapid sequence induction techniques during emergency intubation minimizes the risk of aspiration, potentially reducing the need for preemptive fasting. Finally, ICU patients experience multiple discomforts. Several studies, including a French study validating the IPREA score, have identified hunger and, more notably, thirst as major sources of discomfort in the ICU. In anesthesiology, preoperative comfort has been extensively studied, and research has shown that allowing patients to drink before general anesthesia significantly reduces thirst and hunger sensations. It is reasonable to extrapolate these findings to ICU patients with acute respiratory failure, suggesting that permitting the intake of liquids and solid foods could improve their overall comfort. Thus, fasting in the ICU may be potentially harmful - hunger and thirst are frequent sources of discomfort, and dehydration and malnutrition are often inadequately compensated by parenteral routes - while its benefits remain uncertain. We hypothesize that continuing oral intake in ICU patients at risk of intubation does not increase the need for intubation and does not lead to higher rates of adverse events, such as aspiration or gastric content inhalation, in patients who ultimately require intubation.

Colorectal cancer occurs mainly in elderly patients. Recent estimation showed that in France more than 50% of the patients diagnosed with a colorectal cancer are 70 years old or more. Adjuvant chemotherapy has demonstrated a benefit on disease-free survival and overall survival after a stage III colon cancer resection. Nevertheless adjuvant chemotherapy is poorly used in elderly patients. Prognostic improvement with chemotherapy based on 5FU is suggested by a post-hoc analysis of randomized prospective clinical trial. But elderly patients in this study were highly selected and patients older than 80 represented only 0.7% of the total population. Thus, there is still a concern about the benefit of adjuvant 5FU-based chemotherapy in very elderly unselected patients. The recommended treatment for stage III adjuvant chemotherapy is a combination of fuoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin. Nevertheless oxaliplatin did not demonstrated survival advantage in elderly patients. Altogether there are still two matters of debate: * First, is there a benefit of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for unfit elderly patients? * Second, is there a benefit of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for fit elderly patients? The aim of this randomized phase III study is to evaluate the benefit for disease-free survival of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patient and which chemotherapy. The elderly patient population will be dichotomized into two groups according to physician's choice after a multidisciplinary evaluation involving a geriatrician, with two different randomization assignments. The patients with an expected life-expectancy below 4 years according Lee score are excluded of this study. Some biological tumour abnormalities are more frequently observed in elderly (i.e. mismatch repair deficiency), therefore an evaluation of specific biological prognostic factors is needed in elderly population.