Libourne

Malignant hypertension is the most severe form of high blood pressure, fatal if left untreated. It has not disappeared, with an increasing incidence. Patients with the disease, mainly young (35 to 55 years of age), have an unfavorable cardiovascular prognosis (14% of cardiovascular and renal events at 4 years). Despite these facts, scientific research on the subject remains limited. The definitions and diagnostic criteria have not changed since 1929, and the therapeutic recommendations remain empirical. This first prospective and multicentric registry will increase and modernize the knowledge of the disease. From these data, diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations based on solid scientific evidence could be developed. The investigators want to first recruit 500 patients and define their prognosis at 5 years. The impact of the patient's phenotype, type and number of target organs affected will be studied. A modern definition, adapted to these results, could be proposed. The epidemiology of the disease, the care pathways, the target organ disorders and the management carried out in the centers will be described in detail.

The study includes the following periods: * Part A: An open-label period (up to 13 weeks) * Part B: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind treatment period (up to 52 weeks) for participants who respond to DNTH103 in Part A * Optional open-label extension (OLE) for eligible participants (up to 104 weeks) * Safety follow-up (40 weeks)

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are frequent and chronic myeloid malignancies including Polycythemia Vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) and Prefibrotic myelofibrosis (PreMF). These MPNs are caused by the acquisition of mutations affecting activation/proliferation pathways in hematopoietic stem cells. The principal mutations are JAK2V617F, calreticulin (CALR exon 9) and MPL W515. ET or MFP/PreMF patients who do not carry one of these three mutations are declared as triple-negative (3NEG) cases even if they are real MPN cases. These diseases are at high risk of thrombo-embolic complications and with high morbidity/mortality. This risk varies from 4 to 30% depending on MPN subtype and mutational status. In terms of therapy, all patients with MPNs should also take daily low-dose aspirin (LDA) as first antithrombotic drug, which is particularly efficient to reduce arterial but not venous events. Despite the association of a cytoreductive drug and LDA, thromboses still occur in 5-8% patients/year. All these situations have been explored in biological or clinical assays. All of them could increase the bleeding risk. We should look at different ways to reduce the thrombotic incidence: Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC)? In the general population, in medical or surgical contexts, DOACs have demonstrated their efficiency to prevent or cure most of the venous or arterial thrombotic events. At the present time, DOAC can be used in cancer populations according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) recommendations, except in patients with cancer at high bleeding risk (gastro-intestinal or genito-urinary cancers). Unfortunately, in trials evaluating DOAC in cancer patients, most patients have solid rather than hematologic cancers (generally less than 10% of the patients, mostly lymphoma or myeloma). In cancer patients, DOAC are also highly efficient to reduce the incidence of thrombosis (-30 to 60%), but patients are exposed to a higher hemorrhagic risk, especially in digestive cancer patients. In the cancer population, pathophysiology of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events may be quite different between solid cancers and MPN. If MPN patients are also considered to be cancer patients in many countries, the pathophysiology of thrombosis is quite specific (hyperviscosity, platelet abnormalities, clonality, specific cytokines…) and they are exposed to a lower risk of digestive hemorrhages. It is thus difficult to extend findings from the "general cancer population" to MPN patients. Unfortunately, only scarce, retrospective data regarding the use of DOAC in MPNs are available data. We were the first to publish a "real-life" study about the use, the impact, and the risks in this population. In this local retrospective study, 25 patients with MPN were treated with DOAC for a median time of 2.1 years. We observed only one thrombosis (4%) and three major hemorrhages (12%, after trauma or unprepared surgery). Furthermore, we have compared the benefit/risk balance compared to patients treated with LDA without difference. With the increasing evidences of efficacy and tolerance of DOAC in large cohorts of patients including cancer patients, with their proven efficacy on prevention of both arterial and venous thrombotic events and because of the absence of prospective trial using these drugs in MPN patients, we propose to study their potential benefit as primary thrombotic prevention in MPN.

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) are hematological malignancies associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. Although different cell types have been involved in these complications (platelets, red blood cells, leucocytes and endothelial cells), there do not exist any reliable biomarker to predict the thrombotic risk in MPN patients. While some studies suggested that the JAK2V617F allele burden measured in leukocytes was associated with the risk of thrombosis, other studies did not confirm these results. Besides, a recent work demonstrated that in some patients, the JAK2V617F allele burden measured in platelets and red blood cells was higher than the one determined in leukocytes. Moreover, some patients present JAK2V617F mutated endothelial cells, known as pro-thrombotic in in vitro and animal models. The CLOJAK project will search for an association between the thrombotic risk in MPN and the proportion of cells carrying the JAK2V617F mutation in erythroid cells and platelets or its presence in endothelial cells. The objective is to determine a clonality profile (i.e. the profile of repartition of the JAK2V617F allele burden in the different hematopoietic and endothelial lineages) associated with the occurrence of thrombosis in MPN patients. One hundred and twenty PV and ET patients will be studied at diagnosis. Their platelets, red blood cells, granulocytes and endothelial cells will be isolated. The JAK2V617F allele burden will be measured in these cells thanks to a digital PCR technic. An association between the clonality profile and the existence of a thrombosis at diagnosis, the MPN phenotype (PV or ET), the IPSET-thrombosis score and the type of thrombosis (venous, arterial, splanchnic) will be searched.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) usually evolves over decades and can present several phenotypes. Approximately 85% of newly diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients present the Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) phenotype. After a mean time of approximatively 20 years, a large majority of these patients evolve to the so-called "Secondary Progressive MS" (SPMS) phase. SPMS is characterized by an irreversible disability progression not related to relapses, although relapses could be superimposed. Nevertheless, the shift in-between RRMS and SPMS is not clear. Different subtypes of SPMS have been recently defined by F Lublin et al. This classification takes into account persistent focal inflammatory activity (active vs inactive SPMS) along with disease progression (progressing vs non-progressing SPMS). In clinical routine, it is important to identify these stages of MS as they differently respond to the disease modifying therapies (DMTs). Introducing DMTs during the RRMS phase had consistently demonstrated a significant impact on the annual relapse rate (ARR) and on the short-term disability progression. Conversely, during the SPMS phase, the impact of DMTs remained uncertain on disability progression, especially in older patients, with "inactive" disease. As a matter of fact, the DMTs are considered to be anti-inflammatory by nature, but the focal inflammation reduces with age and disease duration. In addition, the DMTs have side effects and cost approximately 10,000 euros per year and per patient. In this context, the usefulness of continuing DMTs in "inactive" SPMS patients older than 50 years is questionable. In a preliminary retrospective study conducted at our Institute which enrolled 100 SPMS patients, the ARR remained stable 3 years after treatment withdrawal (0.07, 95% CI \[0.05, 0.11\]), relative to the 3 years prior to treatment withdrawal (0.12, \[0.09, 0.16\]). EDSS scores were available for 94 patients The percentage of patients experiencing a significant increase of their EDSS score during the 3 years after treatment withdrawal also remained stable compared to the 3 years prior treatment withdrawal. These preliminary data support the safety of DMTs withdrawal in selected SPMS patients. However, further prospective studies are needed to provide evidence-based guidelines for daily practice. This randomized controlled clinical trial thus aims to compare SPMS patients older than 50 years without evidence of focal inflammatory activity for 3 years, stopping DMTs versus patients with the same criteria still receiving treatment. We hypothesize that stopping DMTs will not induce an increased risk of disability progression or relapse in SPMS patients but will improve their quality of life and have an impact on treatment-related costs. So far, the impact of DMTs withdrawal in a selected SPMS population has not been explored. Having evidence-based recommendations on the treatment management of these patients is essential, considering the consequences in terms of disability, relapses, side effects, quality of life and costs. DMTs in MS are now available since 20 years, with an increasing number of approved molecules. As a matter of fact, this question concerns a large number of patients: a retrospective analysis of patients included in the Rennes EDMUS database allowed to identify 71 SPMS patients older than 50 years and without evidence of focal inflammatory activity for 3 years actually undergoing a DMT. For evident conflict of interests, the pharmaceutical firms will not promote or fund clinical trials on treatment withdrawal. A randomized controlled study initiated by academia and financed by public funding should be performed to explore these questions. We will evaluate the impact of these changes from the patient and the health system's points of view. The results of this clinical trial will lead to a concrete change in clinical practice.

Numerous initiatives have started in France, often associative. It is essential to evaluate in a rigorous manner, these therapies before making them part of the patient's care pathway. Yoga has shown a real benefit in terms of pain reduction in patients with BC treated with HT. These osteoarticular pains are the secondary effect on which a physical therapeutic care can have a real benefit. It thus appears innovative to complete this care with a therapeutic education program (TEP) in postural yoga which will enable patients to practice yoga postures at home by themselves. Yoga allows a large adaptation to pains expressed by each patient. It will favor the development of the feeling of control that they have in particular on their pain. participants will so improve the self-efficacy, the quality of life, and will reduce their fatigue and their pain. The patients involved have already lived major body transformations because of the disease and treatments. Yoga will help them put their lives together again, both physically and psychologically, and reclaim their body. Studies have shown the short-term effects of yoga practice on anxiety, stress, pain and quality of life. Few rare studies have suggested that patients could add yoga practice at home to the supervised sessions, but these studies lacked therapeutic patient education. To date, to our knowledge, no data on the effect of the realization of yoga postures at home on increase of the patients' self-competency feeling are available in France. Also, the long-term effects of such programs need to be assessed. The Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM) has set-up 8 years ago yoga sessions for women with breast cancer, together with an association located in Montpellier.

Sepsis is a common syndrome responsible for multiple organ failure. Septic shock, defined as sepsis with hyperlactatemia and cardiovascular failure requiring vasopressor infusion despite adequate fluid resuscitation has an extremely high mortality rate. Fever is a frequent disease process during sepsis. Fever increases oxygen consumption and can worsen imbalance between oxygen supply and oxygen requirements. Fever increases inflammation but reduces viral and bacterial growth. The beneficial effects of active fever control on inflammation have been mainly shown in a context of lung injury. Pneumonia represents the first cause of septic shock in developed countries. In a pilot study (SEPSISCOOL I), we showed that fever treatment using external cooling significantly increased the resolution of shock, improved organ functions and decreased d-14 mortality. Although reduced, hospital mortality was not significantly different. This study was underpowered to allow conclusion on mortality. A more pronounced beneficial effect was observed among the most severely ill patients with elevated serum lactate level. Fever treatment is commonly applied in septic patients but its impact on survival remains undetermined. The main objective of the study is to compare two strategies of fever management in febrile (body temperature \> 38.3°C) septic shock patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and sedation. These patients will be randomly allocated in two arms: 1. Fever respect 2. Fever control by external cooling to obtain normothermia during 48 hours A covariate-adaptive randomization will be used to ensure the comparability of the two groups at each stage of the study. We will use an adaptive multistage population-enrichment design with a pre-specified subgroup of patients with ARDS identified at randomization. An independent Safety and Data Monitoring Committee will review data on serious adverse events. The decision of study stop for potential harmful effect of one strategy will be let at the entire responsibility of the committee. One interim analysis will be performed by independent observers after enrolment of half of the population. The assumption that fever treatment is more effective in patients with ARDS will be confirmed or not. According to pre-defined rules based on the conditional power calculated in the two subgroups, the trial will be stopped for futility, continued as planned or continued by enrolling only patients with ARDS.

Patients with oral cavity cancer treated by reconstructive surgery with a flap. Patients will be treated in the study for : * Experimental arm: Post-operative radiotherapy with flap sparing * Control arm: Standard post-operative radiotherapy without flap sparing (current practice) Radiotherapy by IMRT using photons or proton therapy (IMPT) Our purpose is to demonstrate the feasibility of sparing surgical flaps from radiotherapy, in order to reduce toxicity while maintaining local disease control.

To date, more than 300 patients have been treated with Glofitamab in the Expanded Access Programme (EAP) in France. In this study, it is proposed to perform a retrospective analysis of some of these patients. The aim is to describe the efficacy and safety of Glofitamab in the largest reported real-world cohort, with an expected median follow-up of more than 9 months. Particular focus will be given to the relapsed or refractory chimeric antigen receptors-T (CAR-T) population to confirm the response rates (CRR: 35-39%) of Glofitamab in this population and to assess the optimal timing of therapy initiation \[8, 15\].

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a neurological and rare type of autoimmune disorder. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is the first-line treatment for CIDP which has been proven to be effective. For several years, published cases have suggested that the Sub-Cutaneous Ig (SCIg) may be an alternative treatment to IVIg in the treatment of CIDP. Compared to IVIg treatment, the SCIg can achieve more stable plasma IgG concentrations, suggesting a potential reduction in the dose exhaustion effect at the end of the cycle, but also fewer systemic effects. SC administration also enables more straightforward treatment to be given for ambulatory patients. Based on the PATH study (NCT01545076), a double blind placebo-controlled, randomised, prospective, international multicentre phase III study, Hizentra® obtained an extension of its marketing authorization for the CIDP indication as maintenance treatment after stabilisation with IVIg. However, in the "real-life" situation, the literature is still based at present on small series of patient or short-term follow-up periods. However, the methods for switching from the IV to the SC route and the characteristics of patients receiving this treatment are not known. In addition, SCIg administration remote from a specialist centre without assistance from a health professional no longer enables a more regular assessment of the patient in terms of tolerability and efficacy. The pHeNIx study, a national multicentre prospective non-interventional study, should help to describe the conditions of use for Hizentra® and the methods for switching from the IV to SC route in everyday practice, together with the tolerability and efficacy of treatment, which is monitored using a patient application (PRO: Patient-Reported Outcomes). The study duration is estimated to be 36 months in view of: a 24-month inclusion period and a 12-month follow-up period.