Valenciennes

A considerable body of research has demonstrated that women who are victims of interpersonal violence are at substantially elevated risk for the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In France, victims can request a medico-legal examination in a clinical forensic medicine unit. Although these units are also a place for initial psychological examination, women often don't attend future scheduled appointments. Decision-making algorithm using phone contact are effective in suicide prevention. Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of case management algorithm using early phone contact compared to a control group treated as usual on clinical outcome after consultation requested in a clinical forensic medicine unit by female victims of violence. Method: Prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial, for women victims of violence. Victims randomized in VIGITRAUMA group will be contacted by phone at 3 weeks after the consultation in a clinical forensic medicine unit, and a second phone call can be done. If the subject is not contacted after the second phone call, he will receive a postcard. Control group will benefit from usual follow-up. All the subjects included will be then evaluated at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year during a phone call.

Malignant hypertension is the most severe form of high blood pressure, fatal if left untreated. It has not disappeared, with an increasing incidence. Patients with the disease, mainly young (35 to 55 years of age), have an unfavorable cardiovascular prognosis (14% of cardiovascular and renal events at 4 years). Despite these facts, scientific research on the subject remains limited. The definitions and diagnostic criteria have not changed since 1929, and the therapeutic recommendations remain empirical. This first prospective and multicentric registry will increase and modernize the knowledge of the disease. From these data, diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations based on solid scientific evidence could be developed. The investigators want to first recruit 500 patients and define their prognosis at 5 years. The impact of the patient's phenotype, type and number of target organs affected will be studied. A modern definition, adapted to these results, could be proposed. The epidemiology of the disease, the care pathways, the target organ disorders and the management carried out in the centers will be described in detail.

The purpose of this phase 3, randomized, placebo controlled, event-driven study is to assess the effect of AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, compared with placebo in reducing the risk of MACE-PLUS in patients with established ASCVD or at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The effect of AZD0780 vs placebo on the risk of MACE-PLUS will be evaluated from randomisation until the primary analysis censoring date (PACD). The Study Closure Visit will be scheduled to occur after the PACD and will be the final visit for each participant in the study.

The study is being done to see if ziltivekimab can be used to treat participants living with heart failure and inflammation. Participants will either get ziltivekimab (active medicine) or placebo (inactive substance that looks like the study medicine but does not contain any medicine). The treatment participants get is decided by chance. Participant's chance of getting ziltivekimab or placebo is the same. Ziltivekimab is not yet approved in any country or region in the world. It is a new medicine that doctors cannot prescribe. The study is expected to last for up to 1 year and 4 months.

This is a study evaluating the efficacy and safety of calderasib with pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in participants with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with identified Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog G12C (KRAS G12C) mutation and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. There are two primary study hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: Combination of calderasib and pembrolizumab is superior to placebo plus pembrolizumab with respect to progression free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Hypothesis 2: Combination of calderasib plus pembrolizumab is superior to placebo plus pembrolizumab with respect to overall survival (OS).

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of elacestrant versus standard endocrine therapy in participants with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer with high risk of recurrence.

This study will assess if adding sacituzumab tirumotecan with pembrolizumab after surgery is effective in treating NSCLC for participants not achieving pathological complete response. The primary hypothesis of this study is sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab is superior to pembrolizumab monotherapy with respect to disease free survival (DFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR).

The purpose of this study is to learn about the safety and effects of Abrocitinib in the real-life clinical setting given for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis, or AD, is a long-lasting disease that causes inflammation, redness, and irritation of the skin. This study is seeking participant who are older than 18 years with moderate-to-severe chronic AD. Participants must have no underlying medical conditions that prevent them from taking Abrocitinib. All participants in this study will receive Abrocitinib as a tablet once daily. They can take Abrocitinib and use medicated topical treatment for AD at the same time. We will examine the experiences of patients receiving the study medicine. This will help us determine if the study medicine is safe and helps in treating AD. Participants will take part in this study for 24 months. During this time, they will visit the study clinic about 5 times (about 1 time every 4 to 6 months).

After a patient has consented to participate to the study, the informed consent form will be signed by the patient and the investigator. The patient will be randomized to one of two groups (pioglitazone or placebo). The patient will take the experimental treatment for 26 weeks and his research follow-up will last 52 weeks (follow-up visit : W1, W2, W3, W4 (research visit), W8, W12, W26, W38 and W52). All participants will receive SOC immunosuppressive treatment with rituximab at 375 mg/m2/week for 4 consecutive weeks, as induction therapy of vasculitis flare, followed by 500 mg re-infusion every 6 months/24 weeks as maintenance therapy, i.e. at week 26 and 52, as recommended. The two treatment groups will also receive a standardized glucocorticoid tapering schedule: one to three i.v. pulses of methylprednisolone (7.5 to 15 mg/kg each) according to physician decision, followed by a predefined oral prednisone tapering schedule as used in the reduced-dose arm of the PEXIVAS trial. Samples (plasma, serum and urine) taken as part of the study will be stored in a biological sample collection (at D0, W1, W2, W3, W12, W26, W38 and W52 visits).

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of arthritis (swelling and stiffness in the joints) that is frequently seen in trial participants who also have the skin condition psoriasis. It is caused by an overactive immune system where the body attacks healthy tissue by mistake. This study aims to describe the long term usage and effectiveness with risankizumab (RZB) relative to other advanced therapeutic options for the management of PsA in daily clinical practice. Risankizumab is an approved drug for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. The study will not be conducted in the United States, however it will be conducted in approximately 15 countries and include at least 900 and up to 1200 participants with a 2 to1 ratio of participant allocation between participants receiving risankizumab and participants receiving other advanced therapeutic agents. The therapy is prescribed in the usual manner in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization and professional and reimbursement guidelines with regards to dose, population, and indication. All study visits will occur during routine clinical practice and participants will be followed for 24 months. There is expected to be no additional burden for participants in this study.