Villingen Schwenningen

This non-interventional study aims to provide information on real-world effectiveness, safety and tolerability, management of adverse events, QoL and patient compliance of patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence treated with ribociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) ± luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) with curative intent according to the current effective local summary of product characteristics. In order to put the results of patients treated with ribociclib into perspective, socio-economic data, data on QoL and patient compliance will also be collected from patients treated with abemaciclib + endocrine therapy (ET) ± LHRH as described in the current effective local summary of product characteristics. To understand reasons for treatment decision, and to analyze the clinical adoption of ribociclib + AI ± LHRH after EU approval over time, baseline data will be collected from cohorts of ribociclib + AI ± LHRH, abemaciclib + ET ± LHRH, and additionally from patients treated with ET monotherapy ± LHRH and analyzed cross-sectionally. The study is planned to be rolled out into a broad set of German and Austrian breast centers and gynecological practices to describe clinical routine in a representative subset of the local healthcare eco-system. It will gather insights into the potential benefits and risks associated with ribociclib + AI ± LHRH in the adjuvant treatment of HR+/HER2- eBC patients at high risk of recurrence. This knowledge will inform about clinical decision-making and contribute to improved patient outcomes in routine practice.

The purpose of this phase 3, randomized, placebo controlled, event-driven study is to assess the effect of AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, compared with placebo in reducing the risk of MACE-PLUS in patients with established ASCVD or at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The effect of AZD0780 vs placebo on the risk of MACE-PLUS will be evaluated from randomisation until the primary analysis censoring date (PACD). The Study Closure Visit will be scheduled to occur after the PACD and will be the final visit for each participant in the study.

This is a pivotal Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of DMX-200 in patients with FSGS. The duration of the double-blind period per patient is estimated to be maximum of 122 weeks, a Screening and Qualification period of between 6 and 14 weeks (including a 4 week period to complete the assessments required for Screening, Titration (if required, up to 4 weeks) and, 6-weeks of Stabilization, a 104-week Treatment period, and up to a 4-week off-treatment Follow-up period. The treatment duration of the OLE period per patient is estimated to be a minimum of 104 weeks (2 years) with a 4-week off-treatment Follow-up period. The total study duration (double-blind period and OLE combined) is currently estimated to be a minimum of 230 weeks.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of sefaxersen (RO7434656), a novel Antisense Oligonucleotide (ASO) therapy in participants with primary IgA nephropathy (IgAN) who are at high risk of progressive kidney disease despite optimized supportive care.

This is a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase IIIb study is to describe changes from baseline in (1) participant-reported nasal congestion as evaluated by the nasal congestion score (NCS) and (2) participant-reported sino-nasal symptoms as evaluated by sino-nasal outcome test, 22 item (SNOT-22) following initiation of tezepelumab treatment. Approximately 60 sites in 10 countries will enrol adult patients with physician determined surgery eligible CRSwNP. The study is divided into 3 periods as described below: * Screening Period (from Week -4 until Week 0, up to 4 Weeks) * Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 24) * Safety Follow-up Period (Week 24 to Week 36)

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of felzartamab compared to placebo on proteinuria in participants with Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). The main secondary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of felzartamab compared to placebo on kidney functions in participants with IgAN. The additional secondary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy of felzartamab compared to placebo on additional clinical endpoints and to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity of felzartamab.

Ultrasound images will be obtained at different timepoints during the operation. First timepoint being after craniotomy (no fluids involved). Second timepoint being when some tumour is left in the bottom of the deeper part of the resection cavity (approximately 80% of tumour removed), and third timepoint being when the surgeon deems resection of the tumour to be completed. At the second and third timepoint ultrasound acquisition will be performed twice at each timepoint. Once with routinely used irrigation fluids (physiologic saline 0.9% / ringer's / lactated ringers' solution) and once with SonoClear® as part of the SonoClear® System There are two performance related primary endpoints, based on core lab assessments: 1. To assess ultrasound images obtained with SonoClear® as part of the SonoClear® System are less influenced by image artefacts compared to images obtained with standard of care irrigation fluid, by measuring the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The CNR is a measure of the relative noise in the image. 2. To assess ultrasound images obtained with SonoClear® as part of the SonoClear® System compared to images obtained with standard of care irrigation fluids, by using a qualitative assessment, called the Surgeons Image Rating (SIR) scale. A Panel of Experts will assess the quality of the obtained images by answering 3 questions for each image. For SIR a 1-10 numeric rating scale, is used to measure the quality of the image according to three questions to be answered at the three different timepoints during the operation. This SIR is designed to explore whether SonoClear® as part of the SonoClear® System having shown to provide better quantitative image quality in the CNR analysis, allows surgeons to detect this improved image quality. Eventually this improved image quality should result in better decision-making during surgery about margins of excision and residual tumour resection. The primary safety event is defined as any core lab determined major Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) finding when post-operative MRI is compared to pre-operative MRI that was found by the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) to be serious and probably or definitely related to the study device OR any DMC determined serious adverse event that is probably or definitely related to the study device that occurs within 30 days of the procedure. The primary safety hypothesis declared in ACF-03 study is to prove the primary safety event rate is less than 10%. Success is demonstrated by observing 0 of these events out of 37 subjects exposed to SonoClear® ACF, i.e. the event rate is 0% with an upper two-sided 95% confidence limit less than 10%. With an event rate of less than 10% for major neurotoxicity events that are serious and probably or definitely related to the device, the benefit of a clearer image for the neurosurgeon balances the potentially increased risk. This study expands the number of patients to evaluate the safety outcome. The primary safety event rate will be evaluated also in a total group of 60 patients, 45 using SonoClear® ACF and 15 using the SonoClear® System.

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system (PCNSL) is a rare lymphoma affecting only the central nervous system compartment. PCNSL patients are typically 60 years or older and have poor prognoses. However, there are alternative treatment approaches to consider with the potential to improve medical outcomes for this patient population. The current standard of care in Germany and many international centres for patients 65 and older is treatment with R-MP, comprising rituximab, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and procarbazine followed by maintenance therapy with procarbazine. An alternative approach comprised of a shorter induction treatment with rituximab, HD-MTX and cytarabine (MARTA) followed by age-adjusted high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) was recently shown to be feasible and effective in elderly PCNSL patients considered eligible for high-dose chemotherapy requiring autologous stem cell transplantation. Nevertheless, data evaluating this short duration treatment approach remains scarce, and randomized trials have not yet been published. The objective of the PRIMA-CNS trial is to demonstrate that intensified chemotherapy followed by consolidating HCT-ASCT is superior to conventional chemotherapy with R-MP followed by maintenance with procarbazine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL; not only regarding survival and remission after treatment but also regarding standards like quality of life (QOL) and treatment related morbidities. Results of this randomized trial will either change the standard of care to an intense and shorter treatment approach or re-define R-MP as a proven treatment standard. In addition, a geriatric assessement is implemented in this trial with the goal to better define transplant eligibility. If this trial shows the superiority of HCT-ASCT, the investigators will establish an improved treatment standard with increased chances for long-term remission and cure and reduced frequency and length of chemotherapy treatment. Considering the poor prognosis of this patient population, this randomized phase III trial is of great clinical importance to provide patients, the patients' families and care takers with optimal treatment.

This is a 2-part (phase 2b/3) prospective, interventional, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Part 1 (phase 2b) is a dose-finding study for CSL300 vs placebo. Part 2 (phase 3) aims to assess the efficacy of CSL300 on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and safety in subjects with systemic inflammation and either atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing maintenance dialysis.

The complete revascularization versus culprit lesion only PCI in NSTEMI (COMPLETE-NSTEMI) trial aims to investigate whether multivessel complete PCI is superior over culprit-lesion only PCI in patients with NSTEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease.