Dudley

The purpose of this phase 3, randomized, placebo controlled, event-driven study is to assess the effect of AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, compared with placebo in reducing the risk of MACE-PLUS in patients with established ASCVD or at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The effect of AZD0780 vs placebo on the risk of MACE-PLUS will be evaluated from randomisation until the primary analysis censoring date (PACD). The Study Closure Visit will be scheduled to occur after the PACD and will be the final visit for each participant in the study.

This trial will include 378 participants with active CD, defined as an HBI \> 6 and the presence of endoscopic ulceration. Approximately 50% of the enrolled population will be bio-naïve and 50% exposed to no more than 1 prior biologic. Eligible participants will be randomised 1:1 to either epigenome-guided treatment selection or usual SOC treatment selection. Randomization will be stratified by prior biologic use (yes/no) and corticosteroid use (yes/no) at baseline. Blood samples for the assessment will be collected for all participants during screening. Peripheral blood will be tested via a machine-learning-powered epigenetic biomarker assay. EpiPredict is a software designed for CSV file input, data transfer, storage, and display, and will be serving as a EpiPredict clinical decision support system. It recommends treatment selections for 2 biologics (Vedolizumab (VDZ) and Vedolizumab (UST)) for CD utilizing genetic data. The intervention (EpiPredict software) will indicate the probability of response to both VDZ and UST (though sites will only be provided with the treatment with the highest outcome) for the treatment of CD using a hybrid capture-based methylation assay (approved for research use only) and the EpiPredict software. All participants in the study will be administered their biologic therapy in accordance with the product label and local SOC recommendations. Dose adjustments will be allowed in both groups at the treating investigator's discretion. During the 26-week treatment period, the study assessments will follow the SOC regimen of the assigned biologic treatment. For participants receiving VDZ, study assessments are to occur at Weeks 6, 14, and 26; for participants receiving UST, study assessments are to occur at Weeks 8, 16, and 26. Long-term follow up assessments are to occur every 6 months (Months 12, 18, and 24) after Week 26. Data for long-term follow up assessments will be collected from the participant's medical records captured at routine SOC visits and online questionnaires.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate effect of povorcitinib on itch and skin lesions in participants with prurigo nodularis.

Background: The presence of cancer in the axillary lymph nodes on needle biopsy in patients with early stage breast cancer before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been the determinant of the need for axillary treatment (in the form of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART)) after completion of NACT. Treatment to the axilla damages lymphatic drainage from the arm and patients can subsequently develop lymphoedema, restricted shoulder movement, pain, numbness, and other sensory problems. As more effective chemotherapy is now available that results in complete eradication of cancer in the axilla in around 40 to 70% of patients, extensive axillary treatment might no longer be necessary in patients with no evidence of residual nodal disease. Aim: To assess whether, omitting further axillary treatment (ALND and ART) for patients with early stage breast cancer and axillary nodal metastases on needle biopsy, who after NACT have no residual cancer in the lymph nodes on sentinel node biopsy, is non-inferior to axillary treatment in terms of disease free survival (DFS) and results in reduced risk of lymphoedema at 5 years. Methods: Study design: A pragmatic, phase 3, open, randomised, multicentre trial and embedded economic evaluation in which participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Study population: T1-3N1M0 breast cancer patients aged 18 years or older, with needle biopsy proven nodal metastases, who after NACT have no residual cancer in the lymph nodes on dual tracer sentinel node biopsy and removal of at least 3 lymph nodes (sentinel nodes and marked involved node). Intervention: All participants will receive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted treatment, endocrine therapy and radiotherapy to breast or chest wall, if indicated according to local guidelines. Patients in the intervention group will not receive further axillary treatment (ALND or ART), whereas those receiving standard care will receive axillary treatment (ALND or ART) as per local guidelines. Follow-up is annually for at least 5 years. Outcomes: The co-primary outcomes are disease free survival(DFS) and self-reported lymphoedema defined as 'yes' to the two questions participants will be asked - 'arm heaviness during the past year' and 'arm swelling now' from the Lymphoedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire at 5 years. Secondary outcomes: arm function assessed by the QuickDASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) questionnaire; health related quality of life assessed using euroqol EQ-5D-5L; axillary recurrence free interval (ARFI); local recurrence; regional (nodal) recurrence; distant metastasis; overall survival; contralateral breast cancer; non-breast malignancy; costs; quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness. Sample size: A sample size of 1900 patients would have the ability to demonstrate a 3.5% non-inferiority margin with a 5% 1-sided significance level and 85% power, allowing for 7% non-collection of primary outcome data assuming a 90% 5-year disease free survival rate in the control arm. It would also be able to detect at least a 5% difference in proportion of patients with lymphoedema with 90% power, a 5% 2-sided significance level and allowing for 25% non-collection of primary outcome data over 5 years. Analysis plan: All analyses will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis to preserve randomisation, avoid bias from exclusions and preserve statistical power. Time to event outcomes, including disease free survival and axillary recurrence free interval, will be assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using Cox proportional hazards models. The proportion of patients experiencing lymphoedema at 5 years will be compared across trial arms using a chi-squared test and a logistic regression model used to adjust for stratification variables. Arm morbidity and health related quality of life will be scored using the appropriate manuals and assessed using a longitudinal mixed model regression analysis if model assumptions valid or a standardised area-under-the-curve analysis. For economic evaluation, incremental cost per QALY gained at 5 years will be estimated. Timelines for delivery: Total project duration is 120 months based on 6 months for set up; 60 months recruitment period (including an 18 months internal pilot phase); and 54 months for follow up, analysis, writing up and dissemination.

The Trial's purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine infusions commenced during surgery and extending up to 24 hours postoperatively, on the incidence of moderate or severe chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) detected one year following surgery in female patients undergoing elective breast cancer surgery. The trial has 90% power to detect a clinically meaningful (25%) reduction in the incidence of the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include safety events, analgesic efficacy (pain scores and opioid consumption), neuropathic characteristics of CPSP, and psychological and quality of life outcomes.

The trial will be a phase III, randomised-controlled, multi-centre, international, open-label trial consisting of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy, where best available therapy is a choice of interferon alpha, any formulation permitted (IFN) or hydroxycarbamide (HC), and which will be elected by the Investigator prior to randomisation. There will be no cross-over either between arm A and B or between therapies on Arm B HC and IFN will be provided as best available therapy, IFN can include standard of pegylated-interferon at Investigators discretion.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II platform study to investigate the efficacy and safety of several interventions in participants with moderate to severe AD. The first intervention planned to be evaluated is GHZ339. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the study arms.

Randomised, phase II/III 3 stage trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with TNBC and/or gBRCA. Disease under investigation: Breast Cancer Purpose of clinical trial: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and/or germline BRCA (gBRCA) breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy. Trial Design: Open label, randomised, 3-stage Phase II/III Sample Size: Minimum of 780 patients (including at least 220 gBRCA patients equally allocated to the control and the selected research arm). Non Investigational Medicinal Products: Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to be given as per local practice and 3 cycles of anthracyclines as per local practice. Treatment period: A minimum of 21 weeks of chemotherapy followed by surgery. Procedures: Screening \& enrolment Eligible patients with early breast cancer will be registered and consented for screening: BRCA mutation test Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes(TILs) score Cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) +/-, Androgen Receptor (AR) status by Immunohistochemistry (IHC). Standard assessment prior to chemotherapy Standard staging to exclude metastatic disease. When eligibility is confirmed, patients will be randomised via a web-based central system which will allocate each patient a unique randomisation number associated with one of the treatment arms. PARTNERing Pathway - For those patients who still have residual disease after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- olaparib there is the opportunity to be screened to a sub-study to receive a further two cycles of chemotherapy consisting of Duralumab and AZD6738. End of Trial: For patients, the end of trial is after the last follow-up visit or contact with the research team planned 10 years after surgery. Procedures for safety monitoring during trial: Pharmacovigilance will be performed by the PARTNER Trial Office. Also, the Trial Management Group and the Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee will regularly review the patient safety data. Criteria for discontinuation of trial treatment on safety grounds: Severe toxicity or inter-current illness, requiring cessation in the judgement of patient's clinician. Patient within 4 weeks has not recovered from toxicity to an extent that allows further treatment. Patient unable to comply with trial procedures. Disease progression while on trial treatment. Patient becomes pregnant.

Hyperphosphataemia is highly prevalent in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and associated with increased mortality risk. The Clinical Practice Guidelines suggest lowering elevated phosphate levels towards the normal range (level 2C suggestion). However, trial data demonstrating that treatments that lower serum phosphate will improve patient-centred outcomes are lacking. The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that compared to a liberal serum phosphate concentration target of 2.0 to 2.5 mmol/L, intensive lowering of serum phosphate towards the normal level (≤1.50 mmol/L) with phosphate binders reduces the risk of fatal or non-fatal major cardiovascular events in ESKD patients receiving dialysis. The secondary objectives are to test the hypothesis that intensive lowering of serum phosphate towards the normal level with phosphate binders would improve physical health, fatigue, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, and pruritus; and be cost-effective. In this pragmatic, multinational, randomised controlled large simple trial, a total of 3600 adult ESKD patients receiving dialysis will be randomised either to intensive (≤1.50 mmol/L) or liberalized (2.0-2.5 mmol/L) serum phosphate target. The choice and dose of phosphate binders will be at the treating physician's discretion and local practice to achieve and maintain serum phosphate concentration within the required target range according to randomisation. The primary endpoint is the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal major cardiovascular or peripheral arterial events. The secondary outcome measures will be individual components of the primary composite endpoint, all-cause death, and utility-based quality of life EQ5D-5L.

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) that is of sufficient severity to require admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with substantial mortality. Patients with pneumonia who are being treated in an ICU will receive therapy that consists of many different treatments, as many as 20 or 30. These treatments act together to treat both the infection and its effects on the body. When treating a patient, doctors choose from many different treatments, most of which are known or believed to be safe and effective. However, doctors don't always know which treatment option is the better one, as individuals or groups of individuals may respond differently. This study aims to help doctors understand which treatments work best. This clinical study has been designed in a way that allows the information from patients already in the study to help new patients joining the study. Most studies aren't able to do that. REMAP-CAP has been designed to: * Evaluate multiple treatment strategies, at the same time, in the same patient. * Reach platform conclusions when sufficient data is accrued, rather than when a pre-specified sample size is reached * Utilise data that is already accrued to increase the likelihood that patients within the trial are randomised to treatments that are more likely to be beneficial * New questions can be substituted into the trial as initial questions are answered, meaning that the trial can be perpetual or open-ended * Interactions between interventions in different domains can be evaluated It is reasonable to presume that any pandemic respiratory infection of major significance to public health will manifest as life-threatening respiratory infection including Severe Acute Respiratory illness and severe Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) with concomitant admission to hospital, and for some patients, admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Previous pandemics and more localized outbreaks of respiratory emerging infections have resulted in severe CAP and ICU admission. Previous pandemics and outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases have outlined the urgent need for evidence, preferably from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), to guide best treatment. However, there are substantial challenges associated with being able to organize such trials when the time of onset of a pandemic and its exact nature are unpredictable. As an adaptive platform trial that enrolls patients during the interpandemic period, REMAP-CAP is ideally positioned to adapt, in the event of a respiratory pandemic, to evaluate existing treatments as well as novel approaches.