Sanford Joe Lueken Cancer Center

Researchers are studying how certain factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect whether patients with malignant solid tumors develop mild or serious side effects from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. This observational study aims to develop and validate a model that predicts severe immune-related side effects during the first year of immunotherapy, while also assessing quality of life and adverse events over 12 months. The study is sponsored by the SWOG Cancer Research Network and includes translational medicine goals such as evaluating cytokine levels as predictors and establishing a tissue and blood sample repository. Participants will provide a tissue sample at the start of their routine cancer treatment and complete questionnaires at multiple time points at treatment start, and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. They may also provide optional blood samples during the study. This design allows researchers to monitor immune-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes over time. During the study, participants will complete various questionnaires to report their quality of life, cognitive function, and side effects. Blood and tissue samples will be analyzed to explore predictive markers of toxicity. Researchers will track the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and assess changes in patient-reported outcomes. The study includes ongoing monitoring and data collection, with participation lasting approximately one year from treatment start.

Researchers are studying adolescent and young adult AYA cancer survivors who had Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma to understand how social and genetic factors affect their health outcomes after treatment. These survivors face unique biological, clinical, psychological, and social challenges that may influence their risks for illness and early death compared to older or childhood cancer patients. The study aims to identify conditions increasing these risks and to better meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors. Participants will complete questionnaires about their quality of life and provide blood samples at the start of the study and again at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. This observational study collects health and treatment information without administering any medical treatments. The study assesses social-environmental risks, individual resilience factors, and gene expression changes to understand their impact on survival and quality of life. Participants will be asked to fill out health-related questionnaires and provide blood samples multiple times over two years. Researchers will measure disease-free survival, overall survival, comorbidities, and quality of life during this period. The study involves ongoing monitoring through questionnaires and blood tests to gather detailed data on how social and genetic factors influence long-term outcomes for AYA lymphoma survivors.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of pembrolizumab alone compared to the standard treatment of chemotherapy cisplatin or carboplatin combined with radiation therapy after surgery in patients with recurrent or second primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. This phase II trial aims to assess overall survival, disease control, metastasis rates, and side effects in high-risk patients, while also exploring whether high PD-L1 expression predicts better responses to pembrolizumab. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives intravenous cisplatin or carboplatin weekly for six cycles alongside daily intensity-modulated radiation therapy or proton beam radiation totaling 30 sessions. The other group receives intravenous pembrolizumab every six weeks for up to nine cycles. Throughout treatment, participants undergo CT or MRI scans to monitor their condition. After completing treatment, participants are followed up 30 days later and then every six months for up to five years. During the study, researchers evaluate overall survival from randomization to death, adverse events for up to five years, disease-free survival, and PD-L1 expression levels. The study monitors patients closely with imaging and clinical assessments to track treatment effects and safety over time.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of pembrolizumab immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy for patients with stage IIA, IIB, IIIA, or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has been completely removed by surgery. This phase III trial aims to compare disease-free survival and overall survival among different treatment approaches, including chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. The study also assesses quality of life and adverse event rates in these patient groups. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups. One group receives only chemotherapy with observation afterward. The other two groups receive chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. Chemotherapy involves one of four platinum doublet regimens administered every 21 days for four cycles, depending on the physicians choice. Pembrolizumab is given intravenously over 25-40 minutes, either after chemotherapy or alongside it, repeated every 21 days or every 6 weeks for multiple cycles. Patients also undergo heart ultrasound, MRI, CT scans, and blood sample collections as part of the study. During the trial, participants have regular medical assessments including imaging and blood tests to monitor their health. Follow-up visits occur 6 weeks after treatment, then every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for years 2-4, and annually up to 10 years from randomization. Researchers measure disease-free survival as the main outcome, tracking the time until cancer recurrence or death. They also evaluate overall survival, side effects, drug tolerability, and patient-reported quality of life over time.

Researchers are investigating targeted therapies directed by genetic testing for patients with locally advanced or advanced solid tumors that have spread or progressed after standard treatments. This Phase 2 screening trial, called ComboMATCH, aims to match patients to specific combination treatments based on genetic mutations found in their tumor cells. The study seeks to improve treatment planning by using genetic information to guide therapy choices. Patients undergo tumor genetic screening using previously collected samples or a new biopsy if eligible and aged 18 or older. Based on their tumors genetic profile, patients are assigned to one of multiple treatment subprotocols involving different drug combinations. Treatments include oral, intravenous, and intramuscular drugs such as selumetinib, olaparib, fulvestrant, binimetinib, and others. Treatment cycles generally repeat every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may also undergo biopsies, blood collection, imaging scans CT, MRI, PET, echocardiograms, and bone marrow procedures as part of the study. Throughout the trial, participants have regular assessments including tumor biopsies, blood draws, imaging tests, and heart function monitoring. These evaluations occur during screening, treatment, and follow-up periods. Researchers measure patient enrollment, assignment to treatment arms, and treatment outcomes over up to 8 years. Safety is monitored via clinical evaluations and diagnostic tests. This comprehensive approach aims to evaluate responses to targeted therapies guided by tumor genetics for advanced solid tumors.

Researchers are evaluating treatment options for patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma who are considered frail or intermediate-fit and who are not candidates for stem cell transplant. This phase III trial compares three different three-drug induction regimens followed by either single or double drug maintenance therapies. The study aims to find which drug combination best controls the cancer and improves patient outcomes while considering patients age, other health conditions, and physical function. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms. In Arm 1, patients receive bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone with bortezomib given subcutaneously and the others taken orally for up to 9 cycles, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Arm 2 involves daratumumab with hyaluronidase-fihj given subcutaneously, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for induction, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Arm 3 includes the same induction as Arm 2, but maintenance therapy combines daratumumab with hyaluronidase-fihj and lenalidomide. Each cycle lasts 28 days, and treatment continues without disease progression or unacceptable side effects. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including tumor measurements, blood tests, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers monitor progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, minimal residual disease status, and patient-reported symptoms and health status. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for one year, every 6 months for two years, and then annually for up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding chemotherapy before surgery can improve outcomes for patients with high-risk dedifferentiated liposarcoma DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma LMS in the retroperitoneal area. This phase III trial compares standard surgery alone to surgery combined with chemotherapy, aiming to improve disease-free survival for these patients. The study is randomized and open-label, involving multiple centers. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. The standard group undergoes large curative surgery within four weeks after randomization. The experimental group receives three cycles of chemotherapy tailored to their sarcoma typedoxorubicin and ifosfamide for high-grade liposarcoma, or doxorubicin and dacarbazine for leiomyosarcomastarting within two weeks of randomization, followed by a reassessment and surgery within three to six weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle. During the study, patients are closely monitored through imaging and pathology reviews to confirm tumor characteristics and treatment effects. Researchers measure disease-free survival over seven years, along with overall survival, recurrence rates, response to chemotherapy, side effects, complications, and quality of life for up to eight years. Participants provide tumor tissue and blood samples for research, and their health and safety are carefully tracked throughout the study period.

Researchers are studying colorectal cancer CRC in participants aged 45 to 70 who have 1 to 2 non-advanced adenomas, which are small colon polyps without high-risk features. The trial compares two surveillance colonoscopy schedules one group receives colonoscopy at 5 and 10 years after polyp detection, while the other group has colonoscopy only at 10 years. This study aims to provide randomized data to guide optimal timing for follow-up colonoscopies to help reduce CRC incidence and improve clinical practices. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups the first group undergoes surveillance colonoscopy at both 5 and 10 years following their qualifying colonoscopy, and the second group undergoes colonoscopy at 10 years only. All colonoscopies, including any unscheduled ones, follow current quality guidelines and institutional preparation standards. The qualifying colonoscopy must have been complete and performed within 4 years before randomization, with all polyps fully removed. During the study, participants will undergo colonoscopies according to their assigned schedules. Researchers will monitor the incidence of colorectal cancer over 10 years as the primary outcome. Participants must be able to understand English or Spanish to complete required procedures. The study may last up to several decades, with ongoing monitoring to assess long-term cancer incidence and the effectiveness of different surveillance intervals.

Researchers are evaluating dose-escalated radiation therapy compared to usual care for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who have already completed 4 to 6 months of chemotherapy. The study is a phase III trial aiming to determine if higher doses of radiation can improve 3-year overall survival, as well as assess effects on tumor progression, chemotherapy-free intervals, treatment toxicity, and quality of life. This trial is led by NRG Oncology and focuses on patients without disease progression after initial chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group receives standard care, which may include additional chemotherapy options such as FOLFIRINOX, NALIRIFOX, or gemcitabinenab-paclitaxel, standard radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy, or observation. The second group receives dose-escalated radiation therapy delivered in either 5 or 25 fractions, with or without concurrent chemotherapy for the 25-fraction option. After radiation, patients who have not completed 6 months of chemotherapy are encouraged to finish it, with treatment beyond 6 months at the physicians discretion. Imaging and tissue biopsies are performed throughout the study. Participants undergo various assessments including blood sample collection, CT scans, MRI, and optional PETCT scans before and during treatment. Tumor tissue biopsies are also collected. Follow-up visits occur every 3 months for the first 2 years and annually for an additional 3 years. Researchers measure overall survival, local disease progression, progression-free survival, chemotherapy-free intervals, and adverse events. Quality of life is evaluated using specific questionnaires over the course of participation.

Researchers are evaluating a master screening protocol called Lung-MAP for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. This phase IIIII trial aims to develop a genomic screening method for large cancer populations and assign participants to appropriate sub-studies based on specific cancer biomarkers. The goal is to compare new targeted therapies designed to block cancer growth or spread with standard care, including sub-studies for patients not eligible for biomarker-driven treatments. The study involves screening patient specimens to determine eligibility for various biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies within the Lung-MAP umbrella protocol. This is a screening study without direct interventions instead, patients are assigned to different treatment sub-studies, each operating independently. The protocol also includes an optional ancillary study evaluating attitudes about the return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of germline mutations. Participants provide tumor tissue for biomarker testing, including molecular profiling and PD-L1 analysis, and may submit fresh biopsies and blood samples for circulating tumor DNA testing. Researchers will monitor screening success rates up to three years and collect patient and physician feedback on genetic findings. Participation involves signing informed consent, providing smoking history, and possibly completing surveys. The study duration and assessments vary depending on sub-study assignment and patient progression.