Randomized Crossover Mannequin Study Comparing Blind Intubation Using Tulip Oropharyngeal Airway and Direct Laryngoscopy for Novice Operators

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating two different techniques for airway management in novice operators using a randomized crossover mannequin simulation. The study compares blind endotracheal intubation through the Tulip oropharyngeal airway with direct laryngoscopy to assess their success rates and performance characteristics. This research aims to improve airway management training by examining these methods under controlled, simulated conditions without involving actual patients. Participants will perform tracheal intubation on mannequins using both methods in a randomized order, serving as their own controls. One method involves blind intubation via the Tulip airway device, while the other uses standard direct laryngoscopy. Each participant will complete both techniques during a single-day simulation session to allow direct comparison. During the study, participants intubation success on the first attempt is the primary measure. Researchers will also observe secondary factors like time to intubation, number of attempts, and ease of use. All procedures occur in a simulated environment, ensuring safety and standardized assessment. The study is sponsored by Ankara Etlik City Hospital and is designed to provide insights into the feasibility and performance of these airway management techniques.

Blind Intubation Through the Tulip Airway Versus Direct Laryngoscopy