Comparing Implant Stability and Bone Changes After Different Drilling Techniques for Upper Back Teeth Implants Using Osteotomes, Osseodensification, and Conventional Drilling

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are comparing implant stability and bone health after placing dental implants in patients missing upper back teeth. The study evaluates three methods Osteotomes, Osseodensification using Densah Burs, and conventional drilling. They aim to understand which technique best supports implant stability and reduces bone loss around temporary crowns in healed bone sites. Participants will receive implants using one of three techniques conventional drilling following manufacturers instructions, Osseodensification with Densah Burs which densifies bone by rotating burs in specific directions, or Osteotomes which compress bone to improve density. After implant placement, a temporary acrylic crown will be placed at three months and monitored for a year before final restoration. During the study, implant stability will be measured frequently up to 16 weeks after surgery. Bone levels will be assessed at surgery, 12 weeks, and 48 weeks to monitor bone loss around the implant. Participants will attend regular follow-ups over a year to assess healing, implant integration, and restoration success. The entire participation may last over a year including monitoring and final restoration placement.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability in Healed Maxillary Posterior Sites Comparing Osteotome, Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Implant Placement Techniques