Clinician experiences in a DBT-informed consultation group embedded within a US academic primary care clinic: a qualitative study.
Nicole M Gier, Rachel R Maurer, Joyce W Tang
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41145263/Actively Recruiting
Led by University of Chicago · Updated on 2025-04-09
3000
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
104 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are evaluating different care programs to reduce hospitalizations among socioeconomically disadvantaged Medicare patients who are at higher risk of being hospitalized. The study compares three care models Ambulatory Care Coordination Team ACCT, Comprehensive Care Physician CCP program, and the Comprehensive Care, Community and Culture Program C4P. The goal is to understand how these programs impact hospital stays, patient involvement, satisfaction, health status, and goal achievement over one year. The study involves randomly assigning 3,000 patients into three groups of 1,000 each. In the ACCT group, patients receive care from different doctors in hospital and clinic, with access to nurse and social worker care coordination services for high-risk patients. The CCP group receives care from the same physician for both inpatient and outpatient needs to enhance continuity. The C4P group builds upon the CCP model by adding screening for unmet social needs, community health worker support, and access to community-based arts and culture programs to better engage patients. Participants will be involved for up to 4.5 years, with key assessments including hospitalization rates tracked quarterly via Medicare claims. Researchers will also measure patient activation, satisfaction with care, general and mental health status, and personal goal attainment using surveys and health assessments. The study aims to identify which care approach best supports patients in reducing hospitalizations and improving overall health and engagement.
CONDITIONS
Comprehensive Care Community and Culture Study
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
University of Chicago
Lead Sponsor
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | ACCT | CCP | C4P |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Care coordination model using a team of ambulatory care coordinators to manage high‑risk Medicare beneficiaries | Care coordination model where a single physician provides both ambulatory and hospital care to beneficiaries | Care coordination model combining physician‑led care with community health worker support and screening for social needs |
| Role in trial | One of three randomized care coordination approaches being directly compared | One of three randomized care coordination approaches being directly compared | One of three randomized care coordination approaches being directly compared |
| Primary use | To reduce hospitalization rates among Medicare beneficiaries at increased risk | To reduce hospitalization rates among Medicare beneficiaries at increased risk | To reduce hospitalization rates among Medicare beneficiaries at increased risk |
| How it is delivered | Coordinated ambulatory care by a team focused on managing transitions and services | Same physician delivers both clinic and hospital care to improve continuity | Integrated physician care with community health worker and social‑needs support |
| Evidence status | Care coordination programs have shown inconsistent effects on reducing hospitalizations in Medicare populations | Same overarching evidence context applies: care coordination effects are mixed | Same overarching evidence context applies: evidence for social‑need integrated coordination remains limited |
| Important limitations | Outcome findings from prior coordination trials were inconsistent and may vary by implementation context | Same limitation: effectiveness depends on implementation and may be inconsistent | Added complexity of social‑needs and community components may affect fidelity and scalability |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Up to 4.5 years depending on enrollment time
Participants receive care according to one of three care coordination models: ACCT with care coordination by nurses and social workers, CCP with care from the same physician in inpatient and outpatient settings, or C4P which adds social needs screening, community health worker access, and community-based programming to CCP care.
Ongoing care visits as scheduled by care providers
Duration - Up to 4.5 years
Participants are followed for outcomes including hospitalization rates, patient activation, satisfaction with care, general and mental health, and goal attainment for up to 4.5 years.
Quarterly visits or assessments over the follow-up period
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Number of Arms
3
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Nicole M Gier, Rachel R Maurer, Joyce W Tang
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41145263/University of Chicago
Lead Sponsor
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Collaborating Sponsor