Comparing Value of In-Person and Telemedicine Care for Adults with Acute Health Issues in Emergency, Walk-in, and Primary Care Settings
Led by Simon Berthelot · Updated on 2024-08-12
4000
Participants Needed
7
Research Sites
52 weeks
Total Duration
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Researchers are evaluating the value of care received by ambulatory adult patients with acute health concerns such as sore throat, cough, fever, and limb injuries. The study compares care in emergency departments EDs, walk-in clinics WICs, and primary care physician PCP practices, including telemedicine visits, to understand which setting offers the best patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. This observational research involves multiple centers in Quebec and Ontario and addresses the impact of telemedicine adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Participants will receive care either in an ED by physicians unfamiliar with them, in walk-in clinics via in-person or virtual visits, or in primary care clinics where they may see their own or a colleague physician. The study uses a time-driven activity-based costing method to calculate care episode costs, followed by monitoring patients through follow-up phone calls conducted 1-3 days and 8-14 days after the initial visit. These calls gather data on patient experience, outcomes, and costs.
During the study, patient data are collected from medical records, provincial databases, and follow-up questionnaires. Researchers will measure patient-reported outcome scores seven days after the visit as the primary outcome, along with experience scores, return visit rates, healthcare costs, hospital admissions, and adherence to care guidelines. The study includes safety monitoring up to 30 days post-visit and aims to help policymakers and providers decide on the most appropriate care setting for ambulatory emergency conditions. The total participation involves at least two follow-up calls after the initial consultation.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
The Right Care, for the Right Patient, at the Right Time, by the Right Provider: A Value-based Comparison of the Management of Ambulatory Patients With Acute Health Concerns in walk-in Clinics, Primary Care Physician Practices and Emergency Departments
Research Team
S
Simon Berthelot, MD MSc FRCPC
A
Ariane Bluteau, MSc
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match. Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Seen in person or via telemedicine in an emergency department, walk-in clinic, or their registered primary care practice
Ambulatory during the entire visit or consultation
Presenting with one of the following complaints: acute diarrhea (three or more loose stools in 24 hours within last 7 days), sore throat, nasal congestion, increased or purulent nasal discharge, earache or ear discharge, shortness of breath, cough, increased or purulent sputum, muscle aches, anosmia, dysgeusia, burning urine, urinary frequency and urgency, dysuria, limb traumatic injury, cervical/thoracic/lumbar back pain, or fever
You will not qualify if you...
Transported by ambulance
Not covered by provincial health insurance plan
Consulted for a similar problem within the previous 30 days
Living in a long-term healthcare facility or incarcerated
Cognitive impairment preventing reliable answers
Receiving palliative care
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person or virtual) for initial assessment and consent
Monitoring
Duration - 7 to 14 days
Participants receive usual care for acute health concerns in an emergency department, walk-in clinic, or primary care practice while data is collected on their experience and outcomes.
1 initial visit plus 2 phone calls: one within 1-3 days and another within 8-14 days after the initial visit
How is the study designed?
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Masking
N/A
Allocation
N/A
Model
N/A
Primary Purpose
N/A
Number of Arms
3
Similar Trials
Evaluating Ambient AI Scribe Voa Health to Reduce Documentation Burden and Improve Well-Being in Outpatient Clinics
Comparing Three Care Models for Medicare Patients at Risk of Hospitalization Care Coordination Team, Comprehensive Care Physician, and Community & Culture Program
Assessing Surgical Quality in Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Using Intraoperative Photo Evaluation
Comparing Dexmedetomidine and Sufentanil Effects on Blood Pressure and Heart Function During Scheduled Outpatient Surgery
Study to Evaluate Hospital Admission Decisions and Quality of Care in Emergency Departments Using Computerized Data
Study of Stress and Well-being of Mothers and Co-parents During the First Year After Childbirth in Switzerland
Comparing Early Complications of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Done as Outpatient Versus Inpatient Procedure
Comparing Value of In-Person and Telemedicine Care for Adults with Acute Health Issues in Emergency, Walk-in, and Primary Care Settings
Observing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences in Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions Hospitalized for Acute Illness at Swiss University Hospitals
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Published Research Related To This Trial
A Value-Based Comparison of the Management of Ambulatory Respiratory Diseases in Walk-in Clinics, Primary Care Practices, and Emergency Departments: Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.
Simon Berthelot, Mylaine Breton, Jason Robert Guertin...