Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Cigarette smoking has detrimental effects on nearly every organ in the body, leading to a higher incidence of diseases and contributing to a gradual deterioration of the smoker's health, including a progressive impairment of lung function. Cigarette smoking is linked to mild airway obstruction and a deceleration in the growth of lung function. Smokers may experience inflammation and narrowing of their airways, resulting in increased resistance to the outward flow of air during exhalation. This restriction in airflow can negatively impact respiratory parameters, exercise tolerance, and overall quality of life. Performing balloon-blowing exercises with abdominal and lumbar core muscles activation position leads to an improvement on pulmonary function and quality of life in smokers.

This study is a phase II non-randomised, multi-centre, single arm trial of image-guided (IG)-SABR for patients with high-risk centrally located T1-T4 lung tumours (NSCLC) or a single pulmonary oligometastatic lesions. Treatment will consist of IG-SABR using a total of 8 fractions of 7.5 Gy per fraction adhering to organ at risk dose-volume histogram constraints allowing a minimum dose coverage of 75% to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and a minimum dose of 87% to 99% of the gross tumour volume (GTV), using dose intensity modulation. The primary aim of the study is to determine the safety of the 8 x 7.5 Gy treatment regimen on the basis of the rate of ≥ Grade 3 treatment related toxicity using NCI CTCAE V5, in patients with medically inoperable early stage, ultracentrally located lung tumours. This is defined by central tumours which are not fulfilling the conservative hybrid DVCs of the LungTech (Adebahr et al., 2015), RTOG 0813 (Bezjak et al., 2015) studies and current UK consortium guidelines with full dose coverage, but which subsequently meet SOURCE DVC's with potentially reduced dose coverage. To remain in line with international practice, the SOURCE Lung protocol was amended to reduce near maximum dose constraints to 0.1cc for OARs (Diez et al. 2022). Toxicities occurring between start of treatment and one-year from the end of treatment, which are possibly, probably or definitely related to radiotherapy will be assessed. A total of 60 evaluable patients will be required for the study. The sample size was calculated using continuous monitoring for toxicity, up to one year post RT, using a Pocock-type boundary. Accrual will be halted if excessive numbers of ≥ Grade 3 TxR-AEs are seen. The regime will not be considered to be safe if \>25% of evaluable patients experience a ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related adverse event (TxR-AE) by the end of 1-year post-RT. This study will be considered adequately safe if ≤ 25% of evaluable patients experience ≥ Grade 3 TxR-AE by the end of 1 year post-RT. The enrolment period is expected to be 6 years. Toxicity assessments will be carried out weekly during radiotherapy (RT), at 2, 4 and 8-weeks post-treatment and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months post treatment and annually thereafter to 5 years post treatment. Translational Sub-Study 1 (Raman spectroscopic analysis) - Primary aim is to undertake biomarker discovery using label-free Raman spectroscopy coupled with multivariate statistical methods to identify spectral biomarkers that could: 1. Predict response based on individual radiation sensitivity 2. Monitor response based on individual radiation sensitivity Translational Sub-Study 2 (Proteomic analysis) - Primary aim is to use proteomic analysis of sequential blood samples before, during and after treatment to detect changes in protein expression profiles that may predict outcome and identify prognostic biochemical markers of early toxicity.

Briefly, during a one to two hour visit, subjects will provide written informed consent and then undergo: 1. brief medical history and vital signs, 2. full pulmonary function tests, 3. proton MRI, 4. spin-density, diffusion weighted, and/or dissolved phase 129-Xe MRI, 5. Low-dose thoracic CT Full pulmonary function tests including spirometry, plethysmography and diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), Multiple Breath Nitrogen Washout (MBNW) to measure Lung Clearance Index (LCI), and Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) will be performed according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines. MedGraphics Elite Series, MedGraphics Corporation. St. Paul, Minnesota USA and/or nDD EasyOne Spirometer, nDD Medical Technologies Inc. Andover, Massachusetts USA will be used. All measurements will be performed in the Pulmonary Function Laboratory at Robarts Research Institute. Subjects will be placed in the 3T Magnetic Resonance (MR) scanner with one of three 129-Xe chest coils fitted over their torso and chest. Hearing protection will be provided to each subject to muffle the noise produced by the gradient radiofrequency (RF) coils. A pulse oximeter lead will be attached to all of the subjects to monitor their heart rate and oxygen saturation. MRI will be performed for up to a period of 30 minutes. All subjects will have supplemental oxygen available via nasal cannula at a flow-rate of 2 liters per minute as a precaution in the event of oxygen desaturation. Thoracic low dose CT will be performed with the same inhalation breath-hold volume and maneuver (nitrogen gas only) used for MRI to obtain participant-specific high resolution images of lung anatomy (tissue structure and airway morphology).

This is a first in human, Phase 0/1, open-label study of 177Lu-RAD204 consisting of an Imaging Period with 177Lu-RAD204im (imaging dose) and a Treatment Period with 177Lu-RAD204tr (treatment dose) to determine the recommended dose(s) for future exploration of 177Lu-RAD204 in participants with PDL1+ advanced solid tumors. Screening Period: Screening Period of up to 4 weeks. Phase 0 (Imaging Period): Low dose (10mCi) of 177Lu-RAD204 administered on Imaging Day 1 with a follow-up period of up to 2 weeks to assess imaging, safety and dosimetry. The dose may be increased, if needed, to improve image quality. Phase 1 (treatment Period): 177Lu-RAD204tr dose escalation * Treatment Period with each cycle lasting 6 weeks. Extension of the planned dose intervals are possible following discussion and agreement between the Sponsor and Investigator. * Participants may be treated with multiple cycles, as long as they appear to derive clinical benefit as determined by the Investigator and provided there is adequate clinical safety and organ dosimetry data. * Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) observation period for 177Lu-RAD204tr is 6 weeks following the first injection of 177Lu-RAD204tr. * Should an alternative treatment schedule be explored, the DLT observation period for 177Lu-RAD204tr at that dose level will be the proposed cycle duration.

Evaluate the safety of the novel FAP targeted molecular probe 18F-FAPI-YQ104 labeled with radioactive isotopes in clinical applications and verify its effectiveness in tumor diagnosis.

The main technical difficulties in radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation (RISI) lie in the complexity of operation and the control of operation quality. The current data shows that under the combined guidance of 3D-printing template and CT, the accuracy of RISI has been significantly improved, and the actual target dose could meet the design requirements of preoperative plan. At present, 3D printing templates (3DPT) are divided into non-coplanar templates (3DPNCT) and coplanar templates (3DPCT). In clinical practice, due to the complex technical requirements, high production cost and long printing time of 3DPNCT, a considerable number of patients can also complete the treatment with 3DPCT. Moreover, compared with 3DPNCT, 3DPCT has the advantages of accurate needle path control, fast needle path adjustment, convenient for intraoperative real-time optimization, without waiting for printing time, easy for doctors to master, lower cost than 3DPNCT, and easy to carry out at the grass-roots level. Therefore, this study intends to explore 3DPCT technology to further clarify: (1) the accuracy of 3DPCT assisted CT guided RISI in the treatment of thoracic malignant tumors; (2) the short-term efficacy and toxicity of 3DPCT assisted CT guided RISI in the treatment of thoracic malignant tumors.

Radiotherapy for cancer has been a forerunner of personalized medicine, developing individualized treatments based on patient-specific anatomical information. Despite many advances in radiotherapy over the past decade, which have effectively enhanced local or loco-regional tumor control for many patients, there remains substantial room for improvement. The challenges for radiotherapy to further widen the therapeutic window in the era of precision medicine are mainly two-fold: (a) further improve radiation dose conformity to the defined target volume, and (b) adapt novel biological strategies for personalized treatment. Four-dimensional (4D) imaging and deformable image registration (DIR) are key tools in modern radiotherapy, playing critical roles in many recent advances, including 4D radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, and treatment assessment. However, current 4D imaging and DIR technologies are facing significant challenges as the requirement for precision increases. The current standard of 4D imaging in radiotherapy is 4D-CT. However, it has two major limitations preventing it from precision radiotherapy applications: (a) low soft-tissue contrast. 4D-CT is therefore not ideal for abdominal applications; (b) motion artifacts caused by irregular breathing. 4D-CT motion artifacts have been shown to cause errors in various radiotherapy applications, including motion measurement, target volume delineation, dose calculation, DIR, and lung ventilation calculation. 4D-MRI is an emerging 4D imaging technology for radiotherapy. It has superior soft-tissue contrast to 4D-CT and is therefore superb for abdominal imaging. Despite many recent advances in 4D-MRI, current 4D-MRI implementations have inadequate image quality for precision radiotherapy application due to at least one of the following deficiencies: low temporal and/or spatial resolutions, long image acquisition time, and suboptimal contrast in the lungs. Resulting 4D-MRI images lack sufficient anatomical details for clinical applications, which can adversely affect the performance of DIR. Current DIR techniques focus on morphological similarity but not on the physiological plausibility of the deformation. Studies have shown that an increased morphological similarity of the aligned data does not always imply increased registration accuracy. Therefore, more sophisticated approaches are desirable. The investigators will take a systematic approach to address the aforementioned limitations of 4D imaging and deformable image registration (DIR) based on the development and cross-fertilization of two major techniques: ultra-quality 4D-MRI and physiological-based hybrid DIR. There are two parts of this research, comprising three main objectives: Part 1. Technical development in healthy subjects: The investigators will extend their existing pulse sequence strategy for ultra-quality 3D MRI to enable ultra-quality 4D-MRI. Compared to 4D-CT and current 4D-MRI techniques, the proposed ultra-quality 4D-MRI technique offers the following advantages: (a) high spatial resolution (1.5 mm isotropic) with rich image features (e.g. vessel trees) in the whole torso; (b) high temporal pseudo-resolution (\>20 phases/cycle); and (c) (nearly) free of motion artifacts. • Objective 1: Develop an MRI pulse sequence and image reconstruction pipeline that generates images meeting these three design goals. Part 2. Evaluation of 4D-MRI in a patient study: 4D-MRI will be compared with existing DIR and 4D-CT methods. There will be two classes of comparisons, each formulated as a separate objective: * Objective 2: Compare motion modelling based on 4D-MRI with deformable image registration (DIR) in healthy volunteers and cancer patients. An improved motion modeling method will be developed that is tailored for the ultra-quality 4D-MRI applications. The investigators hypothesize that a new motion modeling method based on 4D-MRI will outperform current DIR algorithms for respiratory motion estimation. This hypothesis will be tested by comparing the new method to five DIR algorithms which include a mix of commercial software and publicly available algorithms. * Objective 3: Compare 4D-MRI with 4D-CT in lung and liver cancer patients. The overall hypothesis of this objective is that the ultra-quality 4D-MRI provides better image quality than 4D-CT for motion management of radiotherapy in the lungs and the liver, especially in patients with irregular breathing.

Conventional 18F-FDG PET/CT has important diagnostic value in cell metabolism level, early metastasis, judging malignant potential and prognosis of tumors. It has been routinely used for staging and restaging of most tumors, but there are still some tumors with low uptake of 18F-FDG PET/CT. Moreover, 18F-FDG cannot distinguish between tumors and inflammatory diseases, such as tuberculosis and granuloma. Receptor imaging with a single target also has some limitations in clinical application. For example, not all diseased cells express a large amount of single receptor on the surface, which greatly affects the judgment of the nature of the lesion. The dual-target molecular imaging based on FAP expressed in the lesion site and integrin αvβ3 receptor highly expressed on the surface of the lesion neovascularization will overcome the above limitations and make full use of the advantages of the dual-target molecular imaging, which will greatly assist the diagnosis of malignant tumors such as lung cancer. In this study, a novel dual-target imaging agent 68Ga-FAPI-RGD was used for PET/CT imaging of lung cancer, compared with conventional 18F-FDG, or single target imaging agent 68Ga-RGD or 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT imaging.

Currently, there are limited methods available in clinical practice to distinguish pseudoprogression after immunotherapy. Most patients rely on follow-up observations to monitor the disease, which does not meet clinical needs. 68Ga-grazytracer is a novel imaging agent targeting granzyme B. By detecting the concentration of granzyme B, it reflects the localization of cytotoxic T cells in the tumor region and their potential ability to kill tumor cells. This study aims to leverage the simplicity, non-invasiveness, visualization, and semi-quantitative advantages of 68Ga-grazytracer PET imaging to evaluate its effectiveness and feasibility in diagnosing pseudoprogression.

It is challenging to noninvasively early evaluate the immunotherapy response of cancer. The study will evaluate the application value of 68Ga-grazytracer PET/CT in the early evaluation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy response in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Potential participants will be assessed for inclusion, including the verification of clinical stage and eligibility. Eligible patients with clinically stage IB-IIIA NSCLC will be received standardized neoadjuvant immunotherapy (every 3 weeks for 3 cycles). Patients with nonsquamous NSCLC will be received pembrolizumab plus platinum-pemetrexed, and lung squamous cell carcinoma patients will be received pembrolizumab plus platinum-paclitaxel. 68Ga-grazytracer PET/CT imaging will be performed at baseline and before cycle 3. Pathological response of the primary (MPR vs. Non-MPR), imaging response (iPR vs. Non-iPR; MR vs. MD), and 68Ga-grazytracer PET/CT imaging (Positive vs. Negative) will be given special attention.