Respiratory Failure

This observational study focuses on children under 18 years of age with tracheostomies who are followed at the Long-Term Intensive Care Unit LIVA at Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden. It aims to determine how often tracheostomy-related airway complications are asymptomatic or linked to symptoms detected through surveillance airway endoscopy. Additionally, the study evaluates how accurately caregivers and pediatricians can identify symptoms related to serious airway complications. Children scheduled for regular surveillance airway endoscopy under anesthesia as part of their follow-up at LIVA will be included. Upon admission, caregivers complete a questionnaire about possible symptoms of airway complications. The child then undergoes a physical exam and medical history review by a pediatrician following a set protocol. An ENT surgeon, unaware of the questionnaire and pediatrician exam results, performs the airway endoscopy to identify complications. During the study, researchers will compare caregiver and pediatrician reports with findings from airway endoscopy to assess symptom reliability. The main measurements include the proportion of patients with serious tracheostomy airway complications who show no symptoms before endoscopy. The study spans two years, with ongoing surveillance and the collection of data on symptoms and complications. Ethical approval has been obtained to conduct this research.

Researchers are evaluating whether the Breathlessness diagnostics in a Box BiaB tool can shorten the time to diagnosis for patients experiencing breathlessness compared to usual care. This prospective, interventional study uses a stepped-wedge cluster design in general practice settings across the Netherlands, Spain, and Portugal. The main goal is to see if BiaB speeds up diagnosis, with secondary aims to identify more cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD and cardiovascular disease CVD, and to assess the tools usability and efficiency. The study involves 45 general practice sites that start with a usual care period and sequentially transition to using the BiaB tool. Patients receive care as part of their regular visits, either through standard diagnostic procedures or with support from BiaB. No additional treatments are mandated by the study. Each site participates for 40 weeks, and data are gathered from routine clinical visits, electronic medical records, and questionnaires completed by patients and healthcare professionals. Participants attend a single study visit and may complete up to four quarterly questionnaires over a follow-up period lasting up to one year. Researchers measure the time from first presentation of breathlessness to diagnosis, the number of new COPD and CVD diagnoses, and the usability of the BiaB tool. Data are collected continuously during the usual care and intervention phases, allowing comparison of outcomes between these periods.

Researchers are evaluating the use of early near apneic ventilation compared to usual ultra-protective lung ventilation in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome ARDS who are supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ECMO. The trial, named CALMDOWN, is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled study aiming to investigate whether early apneic ventilation can help reduce ventilator-induced lung injury, ECMO duration, and mortality by day 60 in this critically ill population. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one group receives near apneic ventilation during the first 3 days of ECMO using BIPAPAPRV or pressure-controlled ventilation with specific settings to maintain airway pressure and minimize ventilation rate. Neuromuscular blockade and sedation may be used as needed. After 3 days, apneic ventilation may continue or switch to ultra-protective lung ventilation at the physicians discretion. The other group receives standard ultra-protective lung ventilation throughout ECMO support with defined ventilator settings. Prone positioning is allowed in both groups based on physician judgment. During the study, participants will be monitored closely for outcomes including mortality at day 60, need for lung transplantation, persistence of ECMO support, and days alive without ECMO from day 0 to day 60. Additional assessments cover mortality and other clinical outcomes up to day 90, duration of ventilation, ICU stay, hospital stay, and complications such as pneumonia, pneumothorax, and right ventricular function. The trial is sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hpitaux de Paris and runs until May 2030.

Researchers are studying lung mechanics during the early phase of mechanical ventilation in intensive care and during general anesthesia in surgical patients. The study aims to better understand lung compliance and transpulmonary driving pressures using a new, non-invasive PEEP-step method. This method could improve how ventilator settings are personalized to reduce lung injury and complications, addressing a gap in data collected during the critical first hours of ventilation. The study observes two groups ICU patients receiving ventilator treatment and patients undergoing general anesthesia for surgery. In both groups, a PEEP-step method involves adjusting positive end-expiratory pressure PEEP up and down in one or two steps while measuring changes in lung volume and pressures. This is done directly after intubation and repeated during ventilation or surgery when clinical events occur, using specialized software that analyzes data from standard ventilator monitoring equipment. Participants will be monitored continuously during ventilator treatment or surgery. Measurements include lung elastance and transpulmonary driving pressure, collected before, during, and after respiratory care. Clinical data such as blood gases and ventilator settings are recorded without any invasive procedures. The study assesses lung function changes over time, ventilator duration, and postoperative complications, aiming to enhance ventilator therapy and patient outcomes. Total participation time varies with clinical course.

Researchers are evaluating whether a structured training program for intensive care unit ICU staff can reduce health problems known as post-intensive care syndrome PICS in adults after they leave the hospital. PICS includes new or worsened physical, thinking, or emotional difficulties following serious illness, which can affect daily life, independence, memory, mood, and overall quality of life. This multicenter study compares patients treated before and after ICU staff training, focusing on whether the training reduces PICS three months after hospital discharge. The study also compares standard training on the ABCDEF care bundle with an expanded A-Z bundle that includes additional care elements like nutrition, sleep, infection prevention, safety, and psychological support. The study involves a cluster-randomized design where entire ICUs are assigned to receive training on either the standard ABCDEF bundle or the expanded A-Z bundle. The training program for ICU staff includes a month-long online course with educational materials, checklists, pocket guides, and visual reminders, plus face-to-face sessions to reinforce learning. After training, ICUs continue usual care while researchers track how often the trained care practices are followed during patients ICU stays, up to 21 days or until discharge or death. Follow-up visits for patients occur at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge. Participants are adults who stay in the ICU for at least 48 hours and leave the hospital alive. They will undergo tests and questionnaires on physical health, memory, mood, and quality of life during follow-up visits. Data collection includes ICU care details and patient outcomes, monitored using electronic forms with quality checks. The main outcome measured is the number of participants who develop PICS three months after discharge. Secondary outcomes include adherence to care bundles, incidence of delirium, and quality of life assessments at various timepoints. The study runs until 2028 and maintains ethical and data protection standards throughout.

This study evaluates whether a mobile phone-based mHealth Behavioural Change Communication BCC educational intervention can improve the adoption and exclusive use of Liquid Petroleum Gas LPG for cooking among households in semi-rural Bangladesh. Household air pollutants HAP from biomass fuels such as wood, agricultural residue, and cow dung expose almost 3 billion people worldwide, including 89% of people in Bangladesh. In the earlier GEOHealth study, 24 months of LPG use reduced personal PM2.5 exposure by about 58.2% and produced changes in innate immune and inflammatory responses, while chronic cardio-pulmonary markers remained relatively stable. More than 70% of households continued using LPG after the earlier study, although not exclusively. The investigators will conduct a large household-level randomized controlled trial using an mHealth-based educational intervention and will continue following the cohort. The study will examine the long-term effects of HAP reduction on subclinical measures of cardiovascular and pulmonary dysfunction, innate and inflammatory immune function, and antibody response to vaccines. Personal 24-hour and area-wise 5-day exposure to PM2.5 and black carbon will be repeatedly assessed before and after the intervention. Lung function and lung pathology will be assessed using spirometry, Chest X-ray, and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest. Cardiovascular measures will include blood pressure and EKG, while metabolic dysfunction will be assessed using HbA1c and fasting lipid profile. Immune function will be evaluated through immune cell phenotyping, functional cytotoxic killer cells, and oxidative stress of lymphocytes.

This NIH-sponsored study aims to characterize three biomarkers derived from 129Xe gas exchange MRI and understand how they change in response to interventions. The study focuses on markers derived from the interaction of 129Xe with pulmonary capillary red blood cells RBCs, specifically RBC transfer MRI, cardiogenic oscillations in 129Xe-RBC signal amplitude, and the 129Xe-RBC chemical shift. The study population includes healthy volunteers, patients scheduled to undergo transfusion or phlebotomy, patients with dyspnea, interstitial lung disease ILD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis IPF, non-specific interstitial pneumonias NSIP, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis cHP, sarcoid, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension CTEPH, and acute pulmonary embolism.

3TR-ABC follows people with severe asthma from the day they start a biologic and keeps following them for three years. It is observational, meaning the study does not decide who gets which drug. Patients begin their biologic through normal clinical channels, according to whatever criteria apply in their country, and the study observes what happens next. The point is to work out why these expensive, highly targeted drugs transform life for some patients and do very little for others. The structure is a platform rather than a single trial. One shared core design sits underneath, and individual studies focused on specific biologics run on top of it, each free to add its own extra measurements while keeping the visit schedule and sampling aligned so results can be pooled. Only patients who have never had a biologic before are enrolled. They are assessed thoroughly at the start, then seen again at 4 weeks, 16 weeks, 52 weeks, and at the 2 and 3 year marks, with additional sampling whenever an exacerbation happens. Some sites collect a core package of samples, others an expanded one. Behind it all is the 3TR Consortium, a collaboration spanning 15 European countries and 69 partners, working across seven immune-driven diseases including asthma, COPD, Crohns disease, ulcerative colitis, multiple sclerosis, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis. It is the largest immunology project the Innovative Medicines Initiative has funded. The asthma work sits in what the consortium calls work package 8, and its guiding questions are blunt ones what separates a good responder from a non-responder, and can severe asthma actually be pushed into remission rather than merely managed. Participants are sorted after the fact into three groups based on how they did remission, clinical response, and non-response. The blood, tissue, and breath samples collected before anyone started treatment are then compared across those groups, along with how each groups immune activity shifted over time. Healthy volunteers and people with mild or moderate controlled asthma go through the same baseline visit and serve as reference points, giving the researchers a sense of what these markers look like outside of severe disease. Samples feed into multi-omic analysis, which means examining genes, proteins, metabolites and more from the same person to map the biological pathways involved. The main target is a set of baseline markers that predict remission at one year. Remission here has a specific definition an ACQ-5 score below 1.5, lung function after bronchodilator either at or above 80% of predicted or improved by more than 10%, no exacerbations, and no maintenance steroid use across the previous twelve months. The same question is asked again at three years, alongside how marker profiles shift between those who reach remission and those who dont, how each individual response measure behaves, and how physician and patient ratings of treatment benefit compare with the consortiums own composite response measure. Exploratory work applies network and cluster analysis, discriminant methods such as PLSDA, daily FENO readings, and analysis of host and microbiome interaction to hunt for biomarker signatures nobody has identified yet. One cohort within the platform, AIR-BIO-OCT, focuses on patients taking benralizumab and goes a step further into the airway wall itself. Biologics are currently matched to patients through phenotyping that leans on clinical features, oral steroid use, and eosinophil counts in blood, sputum, or lavage fluid. What remains unclear is whether these drugs change airway remodeling, the structural thickening involving smooth muscle and extracellular matrix that tracks with how severe and how persistent the disease becomes. This substudy pairs exhaled breath analysis, using both GC-MS and electronic nose technology to read volatile organic compounds, with omics and with optical coherence tomography imaging, including a polarization-sensitive form of OCT. Endobronchial biopsies alongside the imaging are used to establish whether smooth muscle and matrix actually decrease after six months to a year on benralizumab. The broader hope is a minimally invasive breath-based signature that could flag likely responders before treatment ever starts.

Opioid overdose deaths have reached record highs in the United States, especially among patients discharged from emergency departments ED. This research aims to evaluate a bundled intervention combining telehealth, peer support, buprenorphine treatment, and linkage to addiction programs to increase treatment uptake, reduce repeat opioid overdoses, and lower mortality in patients with opioid use disorder OUD after ED discharge. The study is supported by the HEAL Initiative and focuses on patients with recent opioid overdoses who face barriers to treatment after leaving the ED. The study includes two phases. In phase 1, 30 patients discharged from the ED will receive daily peer support via telehealth during the first week, then less frequently over 12 weeks, alongside buprenorphine prescribed by physicians. In phase 2, about 160 participants will be randomized to either the same bundled intervention or usual care, which includes ED-initiated buprenorphine and referral lists but no ongoing peer support. The intervention lasts 3 months post-ED discharge, and participants in all groups will complete follow-up surveys at 1 and 3 months. Participants will be involved in baseline assessments, receive the intervention or usual care after ED discharge, and complete self-report questionnaires through electronic surveys at 1 and 3 months. Peer supporters will remind participants to complete surveys. The study will measure treatment retention, adherence to buprenorphine, and successful linkage to addiction treatment programs at 1 and 3 months after ED discharge. These outcomes will help assess the feasibility and impact of this bundled approach to reduce opioid overdose risks and improve care continuity.

Researchers are studying patients with severe pneumonia admitted to the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit RICU to understand the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of pneumonia caused by various factors. This observational cohort study aims to gather detailed clinical data including morbidity, mortality, risk factors, symptoms, and radiographic changes to help improve clinical care for severe pneumonia patients. The study involves patients admitted to the RICU due to pneumonia from any cause. There are no specific treatments or interventions being tested, as this is an observational study collecting data during the patients stay. Researchers will observe respiratory support parameters, treatment options, and symptom developments during the initial days and weeks of hospitalization. Participants will be monitored for outcomes such as mortality and morbidity during their time in the RICU, with measurements taken over one year. Data on symptoms within the first 48 hours, respiratory support during the first 5 days, and treatments over 3 weeks will be collected. The study records clinical information to better understand pneumonia in this critical care setting, with participant involvement lasting as long as their hospital stay and follow-up for outcomes.