+1 877 705 191424 / 7
HIPAA Compliant
ISO 27001 Certified

Actively Recruiting

Age: 18Years +
All Genders
ID06324682

Study of Different Permanent Cardiac Pacing Methods Including Left, Biventricular, Right, and Conduction System Pacing to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness

Led by University Hospital of Ferrara · Updated on 2024-03-22

8400

Participants Needed

31

Research Sites

52 weeks

Total Duration

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating the clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients receiving permanent cardiac pacing to treat various heart rhythm disorders. This observational study compares the effectiveness and safety of different device implantation methods used in routine clinical practice, including the contribution of advanced non-fluoroscopic anatomical and electrophysiological mapping systems. The study focuses on patients over 18 years old who require a pacemaker or intracardiac defibrillator implant following European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The study includes several types of cardiac pacing approaches conventional right ventricular pacing, conduction system pacing such as His bundle or left bundle branch area pacing, cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT with biventricular or left ventricular pacing, epicardial pacing often done during cardiac surgery, and leadless pacing via a percutaneous femoral vein approach. Each method involves implantation of a device connected to cardiac leads positioned in specific heart locations, with vascular access through veins like the cephalic, axillary, or subclavian. Electrical parameters such as pacing threshold and sensing are measured to ensure device stability before final placement. Participants will be followed for up to 120 months with clinical and procedural data collected, including assessments of device efficacy and safety at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months. Outcome measures include stable electrical device performance, absence of cardiovascular hospitalizations or death, and monitoring for heart failure or arrhythmia events. The study also tracks procedural times, radiation exposure, and complications such as infections or lead dislocations. This long-term observation aims to understand the benefits and risks of various pacing strategies in real-world settings.

CONDITIONS

Brief Title

ConTempoRary Cardiac Stimulation in Clinical practicE: lEft, BivEntriculAr, Right, and conDuction System Pacing

Research Team

M

Matteo Bertini, MD, PhD

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here