Shepparton

Researchers are evaluating elacestrant compared to standard endocrine therapies in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive ER, HER2-negative early breast cancer who are at high risk of cancer returning. The study focuses on those who have had prior endocrine therapy and aims to measure how well elacestrant may prevent invasive breast cancer recurrence over five years. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either 345 mg of elacestrant daily for five years or continue their prior standard endocrine therapy, which may include an aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane or tamoxifen. The trial is open-label, meaning both participants and researchers know which treatment is given. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer recurrence, survival, side effects, and quality of life. Evaluations include questionnaires on health status and physical functioning at baseline, six months, and annually for up to five years. Safety is tracked through adverse event reporting up to five years plus 28 days. The total participation duration can last up to five years with ongoing monitoring and data collection.

Researchers are evaluating if adding LY3537982 olomorasib to standard anti-cancer drugs improves treatment for participants with untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has a specific KRAS G12C gene change. This Phase 3 treatment study includes participants with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and aims to compare this combination against standard care. The study is sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company and could last up to 3 years depending on individual response and disease progression. Participants receive LY3537982 orally combined with pembrolizumab given intravenously in 21-day cycles. Some groups also receive chemotherapy drugs pemetrexed and platinum cisplatin or carboplatin intravenously. There are different dose levels and combinations being tested, including placebo groups for comparison. Treatment continues until specific discontinuation criteria are met. Parts of the study are randomized and double-blinded, with some parts non-randomized for safety lead-in. During the study, participants have regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, blood tests, and questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor side effects and survival outcomes. The main measures include progression-free survival and treatment-emergent adverse events over about one year, with overall survival followed for up to three years. Participants are closely followed throughout treatment and after to evaluate the effects and safety of the study medications.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of Tersolisib LY4064809STX-478 to other anti-cancer drugs as a first treatment for adults with advanced hormone receptor-positive HRhuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative HER2- breast cancer that has a PIK3CA mutation. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aims to understand the efficacy and safety of this combination compared to placebo, focusing on improving outcomes for patients with this specific genetic change. Participants receive LY4064809 orally in one of two doses combined with a CDK46 inhibitor such as Ribociclib, Palbociclib, or Abemaciclib and endocrine therapy ET administered orally or via intramuscular injection. The comparison group receives a placebo combined with the same CDK46 inhibitor and ET. The study includes two parts Part 1 explores dose optimization, and Part 2 evaluates the treatment combinations effectiveness and safety as a first-line therapy. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer response, progression, and safety over an estimated period of up to 5 years or more. Researchers will measure outcomes such as overall response rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and quality of life. Treatment continues as long as the cancer benefits without intolerable side effects. Safety monitoring, laboratory tests, and quality of life questionnaires are part of the participant involvement throughout the trial.

This trial is focused on adults with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy and experience nausea and vomiting as side effects. Researchers are studying a drug called LY3537021 to see how well it controls these symptoms and to evaluate its safety. The study is a Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to better understand the treatment options for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in this population. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either LY3537021 or a placebo, both given as a subcutaneous injection before chemotherapy. All participants also receive standard anti-nausea treatments, which may be taken orally, intravenously, or through skin patches. The chemotherapy drugs involved include cisplatin or an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide combination. The study treatment is given prior to chemotherapy, and the trial lasts about two months per participant. During the study, participants will be monitored for nausea and vomiting from the time of their chemotherapy infusion through up to five days afterward. Researchers will collect data on symptom control, the need for rescue medications, and drug levels in the body. Participants will complete diaries to track nausea severity. Safety and response to treatment are carefully observed. The study aims to measure how many participants have a complete response to nausea and vomiting during the delayed phase after chemotherapy.

This trial studies participants with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic colorectal cancer. It evaluates the safety and effectiveness of pumitamig combined with chemotherapy compared to bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy. The study includes participants who do not have specific genetic markers like dMMR, MSI-H, or BRAF V600E mutations, which may affect treatment response. Participants receive treatment with study drugs such as pumitamig, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy regimens including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and CAPOX. The treatments are given at specified doses on specific days. The study uses a randomized, double-blind design with multiple experimental and comparator arms to assess these combinations. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments to measure tumor response and survival outcomes. Key evaluations include imaging tests using RECIST v1.1 criteria, monitored by both investigators and independent reviewers, over a period of up to 5 years. Researchers track objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival to determine treatment outcomes and safety.

Researchers are conducting a three-part Phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate a potential new medicine called Sofetabart Mipitecan Sofe-M in people with high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. The study focuses on patients with platinum-resistant cancer in Part A, meaning their disease worsened during or within six months of platinum-based chemotherapy, and platinum-sensitive cancer in Parts B and C, where disease remained controlled for more than six months after platinum treatment. The goal is to assess whether Sofe-M works better than current standard treatments and to understand its safety. Participants receive treatments administered intravenously. Part A compares Sofe-M to investigators choice of chemotherapy or Mirvetuximab Soravtansine MIRV. Parts B and C compare Sofe-M plus bevacizumab to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The study includes multiple chemotherapy options such as paclitaxel, topotecan, gemcitabine, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Each participants involvement duration depends on their response to treatment. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging to measure progression-free survival and overall survival. Researchers also track tumor marker responses, side effects, quality of life scores, and pharmacokinetics of Sofe-M. The study uses a randomized design without masking. Follow-up can last up to about 70 months, allowing for long-term safety and effectiveness monitoring.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term effects of lidocaine infusions given during and after surgery to reduce moderate or severe chronic post-surgical pain in adult women undergoing elective breast cancer surgery. This large, international, randomized, double-blind trial aims to detect a meaningful reduction in chronic pain one year after surgery and also assesses safety, pain relief, opioid use, nerve-related pain symptoms, psychological health, and quality of life. Participants receive either a lidocaine infusion starting with an intravenous bolus after anesthesia induction, continuing with an intraoperative intravenous infusion, and followed by a post-operative subcutaneous infusion for up to 24 hours. The lidocaine dosing is adjusted by lean body weight with a cap, while the comparison group receives a saline placebo infusion following the same schedule. Day-case surgeries receive only the intraoperative treatments without the post-operative infusion. During the trial, participants will be monitored for pain severity, opioid consumption, nerve-related symptoms, psychological distress, physical functioning, quality of life, safety events, and health care costs up to one year after surgery. The primary outcome is the incidence of moderate or severe chronic post-surgical pain reported at one year. Assessments include patient-reported outcomes, pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively, and opioid use at various timepoints. The total participation duration extends up to one year after surgery.

Researchers are evaluating palazestrant OP-1250 compared to standard endocrine therapies for adults with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after endocrine therapy combined with a CDK46 inhibitor. This international phase 3 trial aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of palazestrant versus fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either palazestrant daily on a 28-day cycle at doses of 90 mg or 120 mg during the dose-selection phase, or the standard-of-care endocrine therapy including fulvestrant administered on specific days or one of the aromatase inhibitors given daily on similar cycles. The trial includes an initial dose-selection period with about 120 participants, followed by a larger randomized phase with approximately 390 participants receiving the selected dose of palazestrant or standard treatment. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for adverse events, dose adjustments, and drug discontinuations up to 16 weeks. Researchers will measure progression-free survival for up to two years and overall survival for up to four years after randomization. Regular assessments will include clinical evaluations and safety monitoring to observe the effects and tolerability of the treatments during the trial.

The trial investigates treatments for bloodstream infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus SAB, which can be life-threatening with a 15-30% death rate within three months. This international, multi-center randomized adaptive platform trial aims to find the best treatment options to reduce mortality within 90 days of infection. The trial adapts over time by assigning more patients to treatments that show better outcomes and removing less effective options. Participants receive various antibiotic treatments depending on their group. These include intravenous vancomycin or daptomycin, flucloxacillin or cloxacillin, cefazolin, or benzylpenicillin, with dosages adjusted for kidney function or illness severity. Some receive adjunctive drugs like clindamycin, and others may switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics if eligible after 7 or 14 days. Additionally, some participants undergo PETCT scans as part of the study. During the study, participants are monitored closely with blood cultures, temperature checks, and clinical assessments to track infection clearance and complications. Researchers measure all-cause mortality at 90 days as the primary outcome, along with other outcomes such as survival at earlier time points, hospital stay length, microbiological treatment failure, serious reactions, and antibiotic use. Safety and health economic data are also collected to evaluate treatments comprehensively throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating whether olomorasib combined with pembrolizumab or durvalumab is more effective than these immunotherapies alone in participants with KRAS G12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC. The study focuses on two groups those with resected NSCLC and those with unresectable NSCLC. This Phase 3 trial aims to assess disease-free survival and progression-free survival among these participants over an estimated period of up to 3 years. Participants will receive either olomorasib or a placebo orally along with pembrolizumab or durvalumab administered intravenously for up to one year. After this combination phase, participants continue with olomorasib or placebo alone for up to a total of three years of treatment. The study includes randomized, double-blind groups to compare these combinations in both resected and unresectable NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments to monitor disease progression, overall survival, and quality of life using questionnaires and imaging. Researchers measure outcomes such as disease-free survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and symptom changes related to NSCLC. The study also tracks safety and health impacts over the treatment period, which may last up to three years for each participant.