Krems An Der Donau

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and effects of nerandomilast in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) who have previously completed treatment with nerandomilast in earlier studies. The study aims to understand how well participants tolerate nerandomilast over time, and whether it helps improve lung function, delays symptom worsening, reduces hospital visits, or impacts survival. This is a Phase 3 open-label extension trial. Participants take nerandomilast tablets daily for up to 1 year and 10 months while continuing their usual pulmonary fibrosis treatments. The study follows an open-label design where all participants receive nerandomilast. There are no placebo or comparator groups in this extension phase. Throughout the study, participants regularly visit their doctors for health assessments and lung function tests. Doctors monitor any health problems or side effects experienced during treatment. The main outcome measured is whether participants experience any adverse events up to the final follow-up visit, which occurs at week 99. This close monitoring helps evaluate the long-term safety and potential benefits of nerandomilast in this patient group.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating treatments for people with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This phase 3 study compares the effectiveness of adding tarlatamab to a combination of durvalumab, carboplatin, and etoposide against the combination without tarlatamab. The main goal is to see which treatment better prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival over about 3.5 years. Participants receive intravenous infusions of the study drugs. One group gets tarlatamab combined with durvalumab, carboplatin, and etoposide, while the other group receives durvalumab, carboplatin, and etoposide alone. All treatments are given as first-line therapy for their lung cancer. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess their response to treatment and overall health. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival to evaluate treatment benefit. The study also involves ongoing safety monitoring, and participants will be followed for up to approximately 3.5 years to collect these outcomes.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 3 study to compare two front-line treatments for adults with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is stage IV or advanced stage IIIB/C. The study focuses on patients whose tumors have a KRAS p.G12C mutation and are negative for PD-L1 expression. The main goal is to evaluate how each treatment affects progression-free survival and overall survival over about 2.5 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sotorasib combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy or pembrolizumab combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy. Sotorasib is given orally, while pembrolizumab is given intravenously. Both groups will receive the combination therapies as their initial treatment for advanced NSCLC. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess treatment effects and safety. Researchers will track how long patients live without the cancer worsening and overall survival over approximately 2.5 years. The study includes evaluations to determine eligibility and ongoing assessments to monitor health and treatment response throughout the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating how well elacestrant works compared to standard endocrine therapy in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer who are at high risk of the cancer returning. This is a Phase 3 global, multicenter, randomized, open-label study focusing on participants who have had early invasive breast cancer removed and meet specific receptor and risk criteria. The study aims to understand which treatment better prevents invasive breast cancer over up to five years. Participants will receive either elacestrant or one of several standard endocrine therapies, including anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, or tamoxifen, all given as oral tablets. Treatments will be administered according to the study plan, with careful monitoring throughout the trial. The study includes adults who have already received between 24 and 60 months of prior endocrine therapy, with or without certain inhibitors, and who have completed or stopped these treatments as required. During the study, participants will be monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival for up to five years. Researchers will perform regular assessments to track treatment effects, side effects, and cancer recurrence. The study also includes safety monitoring and may involve additional tests or evaluations as needed to ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Ifinatamab Deruxtecan (I-DXd) compared to treatment chosen by physicians for adults with relapsed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The study aims to find out if I-DXd can improve the objective response rate, meaning the proportion of patients whose cancer shrinks or disappears, and extend overall survival time compared to other treatments. Secondary goals include assessing safety, patient-reported outcomes, immune response to I-DXd, B7-H3 protein levels, and how the drug is processed in the body. Participants will receive either I-DXd at a dose of 12 mg/kg given intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle or one of the physician's choice treatments including Topotecan, Amrubicin, or Lurbinectedin, administered according to local standards of care. The study is randomized and open-label, meaning treatments are assigned by chance and both patients and doctors know which treatment is given. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with tumor assessments to evaluate response and detect disease progression, safety evaluations, and quality of life questionnaires. The main outcomes measured are the objective response rate assessed by a blinded independent review and overall survival time, tracked for up to approximately five years after randomization. Researchers will also monitor for any adverse effects and collect health economics data to understand the broader impact of treatments.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the drug BMS-986365 compared to the investigator's choice of therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This Phase 3 study aims to measure the length of time participants live without radiographic disease progression, using established criteria for bone and soft tissue cancer progression. The study focuses on patients who have already been treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and have metastatic prostate cancer confirmed by imaging. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either one of two dose levels of BMS-986365 or the investigator's choice of treatment, which may include Docetaxel plus Prednisone/Prednisolone, Abiraterone plus Prednisone/Prednisolone, or Enzalutamide. The study has two parts: initially, participants are assigned to one of three groups including two BMS-986365 doses or comparator therapy, followed by a second part where they are randomized to either the selected BMS-986365 dose or the comparator treatment. During the study, participants will be monitored for disease progression through scans and evaluations using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group criteria, with follow-up lasting up to four years. Safety and treatment effects will be assessed regularly, and participants' symptoms and quality of life will be closely observed. This long-term follow-up helps researchers understand the treatment's impact on cancer progression and patient well-being.

Researchers are comparing the effectiveness of two treatments for participants with stage IV or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have PD-L1 expression of 1% or higher. This phase 3, randomized, open-label study focuses on first-line treatment options and aims to evaluate overall survival over up to five years for participants with PD-L1 levels between 1% and 49%. The trial involves participants with measurable disease and good performance status who have not received prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. The study compares a combination of Nivolumab and Relatlimab plus chemotherapy against Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Chemotherapy drugs include Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, and Cisplatin, administered at specified doses on scheduled days. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either the Nivolumab and Relatlimab combination with chemotherapy or Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy as their initial treatment. Treatment schedules and doses are defined but not detailed here. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the study, which may last up to five years. Researchers will assess overall survival as the primary outcome, along with regular imaging tests like CT or MRI to measure disease status. Eligibility screening includes assessing PD-L1 levels, performance status, and other health factors. Safety monitoring and follow-up will continue to evaluate treatment effects and participant well-being during and after treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a new drug combination called Mezigdomide (CC-92480) with bortezomib and dexamethasone (MeziVd) compared to an existing combination of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd). This study focuses on adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have previously received between one and three lines of therapy, including prior lenalidomide treatment. The trial is a Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, open-label study aiming to improve outcomes for this condition. Participants will be assigned to receive either the MeziVd or PVd treatment regimen, with specified doses of each drug given on certain days. The study involves two treatment groups: one receiving mezigdomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone, and the other receiving pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone. Both regimens follow precise dosing schedules as determined by the study protocol. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly for disease progression or death, with the primary outcome being progression-free survival over up to approximately five years from the date of randomization. Ongoing assessments will include evaluations of safety and effectiveness. The total participation time may vary, and researchers will closely follow participants to gather detailed information on treatment responses and adverse effects.

Researchers are evaluating patient-reported satisfaction, effectiveness, and safety of subcutaneous Atezolizumab treatment in adults with lung cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma treated in routine clinical practice. This non-interventional, multicenter, multicountry study collects primary data on health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction for participants receiving Atezolizumab for approved indications. The study focuses on patients with specific lung cancer subtypes and advanced liver cancer who meet defined criteria regarding prior treatments and tumor characteristics. Atezolizumab is given subcutaneously at the discretion of the treating physician independently of study participation. Patients eligible for the study include those with early-stage or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with specific PD-L1 expression and genetic profiles, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not previously treated with systemic therapy. Treatment administration follows routine clinical practice, with no experimental interventions assigned by the study. Participants complete questionnaires assessing their satisfaction with Atezolizumab treatment and health-related quality of life during cycles 2 and 3 of therapy, each lasting three weeks. The primary outcome measure is the Therapy Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire Subcutaneous (TASQ-SC) score at these cycles. Safety and effectiveness data are monitored as part of routine care. The study collects data on patient experiences to better understand the real-world use of Atezolizumab over the treatment period.