La Louviere

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of elenestinib (BLU-263) combined with symptom-directed therapy (SDT) compared to placebo plus SDT in people with indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) whose symptoms are not well controlled by SDT alone. This Phase 2/3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study includes participants with ISM and smoldering systemic mastocytosis, and also involves groups for pharmacokinetic studies and participants who previously received a selective KIT inhibitor. The study is divided into multiple parts. Parts 1 and 2 enroll participants with ISM who will receive either elenestinib oral tablets or placebo alongside their symptom-directed therapy. Participants from Part 2 may continue into Part 3, which is an open-label extension where all receive elenestinib. Part K enrolls participants with ISM who have prior experience with selective KIT inhibitors. The study tracks treatment effects and safety over time. Participants will be monitored for up to 5 years, with assessments including the number of treatment-emergent adverse events, changes in symptom scores measured by the ISM-Symptom in Assessment Form, and overall safety monitoring. Evaluations occur at baseline, 13 weeks, 49 weeks, and throughout the long-term follow-up. The study also includes detailed tracking of symptom control and adverse events to evaluate the impact of treatment on participants' health and quality of life.

Researchers are looking for ways to treat germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GCB DLBCL). DLBCL is a fast-growing blood cancer that affects B-cells. GCB is a type of DLBCL that affects young B-cells that are still maturing. The goal of this study is to learn if more people who receive zilovertamab vedotin (MK-2140) and R-CHP have the cancer respond (go away) than those who receive polatuzumab vedotin and R-CHP.

The trial investigates the use of volrustomig in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not shown disease progression after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in this patient population. Participants have tumors that express PD-L1 and the study is conducted as a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center global trial. Participants are assigned to receive either volrustomig as sequential therapy following cCRT or to an observation group. The treatment period involves monitoring participants who have completed definitive cCRT but remain unresected and have no evidence of metastatic disease. The study focuses on participants with Stage III, IVA, or IVB LA-HNSCC according to AJCC criteria, who have not undergone tumor resection before cCRT and have not been treated with radiotherapy alone. During the study, participants are regularly evaluated for progression-free survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately 8 years to assess long-term outcomes. Researchers will monitor safety and disease progression closely. The overall participation duration includes screening, treatment or observation, and extended follow-up to capture both efficacy and safety data over time.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of combining durvalumab and domvanalimab compared to durvalumab plus placebo in adults with locally advanced (Stage III), unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease has not worsened after definitive platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study involves multiple centers. Participants receive intravenous infusions of durvalumab and domvanalimab or durvalumab and placebo. The treatments are given after patients have completed concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy with a total radiation dose of approximately 60 Gy. The study monitors patients over time to assess treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor tissue analysis for PD-L1 status, performance status assessments, and monitoring of organ and marrow function. The main outcome measured is progression-free survival up to 8 years after randomization. Researchers also monitor for any adverse effects and disease progression throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of zodasiran injections in adolescents and adults aged 12 years and older who have genetically or clinically diagnosed Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). This phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study aims to understand how the treatment affects levels of LDL cholesterol, a harmful type of cholesterol, in the blood over time. Participants receive either zodasiran or a placebo through subcutaneous injections during the double-blind treatment period. After completing this phase, those who wish can enter an optional open-label extension where all placebo participants have the chance to switch to the active drug. The study involves ongoing monitoring to compare the effects of zodasiran versus placebo. Throughout the study, participants will have their LDL cholesterol levels measured at the start and after 12 months to assess changes. Researchers will also monitor safety through regular clinical assessments and laboratory tests. The total duration includes the double-blind period plus the optional extension, providing detailed information on treatment impact and participant health over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of pirtobrutinib in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). The study focuses on two parts: Part 1 tests three different doses of pirtobrutinib in participants who have had 1 to 3 prior treatments, including a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Part 2 evaluates pirtobrutinib alone in participants who have not received prior treatment but have a specific genetic deletion called 17p. This is a phase 2, open-label, randomized study. Pirtobrutinib is given orally to participants in both study parts. Participants in Part 1 receive one of three dose levels, while those in Part 2 receive pirtobrutinib monotherapy. Part 1 participation lasts about 3 years, and Part 2 participation can last up to 2 years. The study compares the effects of different doses and treatment histories to better understand pirtobrutinib’s impact on CLL/SLL. Throughout the study, researchers monitor participants' overall response to treatment from the start up to 3 years. They assess safety and side effects, and participants are required to be able to swallow oral medication and have a performance status that allows them to participate. The study includes regular evaluations to determine how well the treatment controls the disease and to track any adverse events over the course of the study periods.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of two treatment combinations, 5-FU with nanoliposomal irinotecan (NALIRI) and 5-FU with nanoliposomal irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (NALIRINOX), for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that has progressed after initial gemcitabine-based therapies. This phase 2 randomized study focuses on patients who are physically fit with good performance status (ECOG 0-1). The main goal is to measure how long patients live without disease progression after starting these treatments. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The control group receives NALIRI with 5-FU and leucovorin, while the investigational group receives NALIRINOX, which adds oxaliplatin to the same combination. Dosing varies between groups: NALIRI is given at 70 mg/m² with 2400 mg/m² of 5-FU and 400 mg/m² of leucovorin, while NALIRINOX includes 50 mg/m² of nanoliposomal irinotecan, 2400 mg/m² of 5-FU, 400 mg/m² of leucovorin, and 60 mg/m² of oxaliplatin. The study assesses safety, side effects, tumor response via imaging and tumor markers, and overall survival alongside progression-free survival. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to evaluate tumor size and response, blood tests to monitor safety and tumor markers, and evaluations of side effects using standard criteria. Researchers will track progression-free survival at day 85 from randomization as the primary outcome. The study also monitors overall survival and treatment tolerability. Participants must be monitored for safety throughout, with follow-up visits to assess long-term outcomes and treatment effects.

Researchers are evaluating the anti-tumor activity of amivantamab combined with pembrolizumab and carboplatin compared to pembrolizumab, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and platinum therapy (carboplatin or cisplatin) in participants with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This trial focuses on participants who have not received prior systemic treatment in the recurrent/metastatic setting. HNSCC is a type of cancer affecting the outer tissue layer of the mouth and throat and other head and neck regions. Participants will receive either amivantamab added to pembrolizumab and carboplatin or the standard care regimen of pembrolizumab, 5-FU, and a platinum agent (carboplatin or cisplatin). 5-FU will be given as an infusion over a 4-day period. The study is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing these treatment combinations. During the study, researchers will monitor overall survival and the objective response rate using standard tumor evaluation criteria for up to about 3 years and 7 months. Participants will undergo assessments to measure disease response, including imaging and other evaluations, to track how well the treatments work. Safety and side effects will also be monitored throughout the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of bleximenib, venetoclax (VEN), and azacitidine (AZA) compared to placebo with venetoclax and azacitidine alone in treating adults newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have specific gene mutations (NPM1 or KMT2A) and are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. This is a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study focusing on participants with AML harboring these genetic abnormalities. The study aims to assess treatment effectiveness by measuring complete remission rates and overall survival. Bleximenib and venetoclax are given orally, while azacitidine is administered either intravenously or under the skin. Participants will receive either the combination of bleximenib, venetoclax, and azacitidine or placebo with venetoclax and azacitidine, following a rigorous treatment schedule. The study includes an initial treatment period where the effects of these drugs are compared to determine their impact on AML with the given mutations. Participants will be closely monitored through regular assessments, including evaluations of remission status and survival over a period of up to 4 years and 1 month. Safety and treatment responses will be tracked throughout the study. Participants must consent to follow the study procedures and agree to contraception requirements during and after treatment. The trial involves continuous observation to gather comprehensive data on treatment outcomes and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of two drugs, eltrekibart and mirikizumab, in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This study is a phase 2 trial lasting about 4 to 5 years, aiming to understand how well these treatments work alone or together for this chronic condition. Participants will receive either eltrekibart alone, mirikizumab alone, a combination of both, or a placebo. The treatments are administered as drugs, and the study includes a screening period of up to 35 days before enrollment. The total participation time for each person is approximately 69 weeks, which includes the screening and treatment periods. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored to assess the percentage who achieve clinical remission by week 12. Researchers will conduct regular evaluations, which may include medical assessments and questionnaires, to track the safety and effects of the treatments. The study emphasizes careful follow-up to ensure participant safety and to gather detailed information about the therapies over the entire study duration.