Roeselare

Researchers are looking for ways to treat germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GCB DLBCL). DLBCL is a fast-growing blood cancer that affects B-cells. GCB is a type of DLBCL that affects young B-cells that are still maturing. The goal of this study is to learn if more people who receive zilovertamab vedotin (MK-2140) and R-CHP have the cancer respond (go away) than those who receive polatuzumab vedotin and R-CHP.

Researchers are studying adults with confirmed Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and cirrhosis, a scarring of the liver caused by damage to bile ducts. PBC is a slowly progressing disease that causes bile acid buildup and further liver damage, which can lead to cirrhosis. This study aims to evaluate if elafibranor, a daily medication, can prevent worsening clinical outcomes such as the need for liver transplant or death, compared to a placebo. It also looks at the safety of long-term elafibranor use and its effect on symptoms like itching and tiredness. Participants will take either an 80 mg tablet of elafibranor or a matching placebo once daily for up to 3.5 years in a double-blind setup, meaning neither the participants nor researchers know who receives which treatment. This long-term treatment period is designed to monitor the drug's impact over time. The study includes two groups: one receiving elafibranor and the other receiving placebo, with treatment lasting up to approximately 42 months. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed from the start until 4 weeks after treatment ends, with a maximum involvement of 3.5 years. Researchers will measure event-free survival, tracking if participants avoid clinical events indicating disease worsening. Safety monitoring will include tracking side effects and overall health, while symptom impact will be evaluated. Participants will provide informed consent and follow the study protocol throughout this extended observation period.

Researchers are evaluating whether the drugs retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) who are at high risk. This Phase 3 trial enrolls about 4,500 adults with MASLD identified by non-invasive tests indicating an increased likelihood of developing serious liver problems. The study aims to understand how these treatments might affect liver health over time compared to a placebo. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either retatrutide, tirzepatide, or a placebo, all given by subcutaneous injection. The study will last approximately 224 weeks, during which participants may attend 25 to 30 clinic visits for monitoring and assessment. After the main study, eligible participants can join an optional 2-year extension where all will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide regardless of their original group. Throughout the trial, participants’ liver function and disease progression will be closely monitored through various health assessments. Researchers will track the time to the first major adverse liver event as the main outcome. Safety and health status will be evaluated regularly during clinic visits, ensuring thorough observation over the long study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of pelacarsen (TQJ230), given as a monthly injection under the skin, in people with mild to moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis. This study aims to see if pelacarsen can safely slow the progression of this heart valve condition compared to a placebo. The trial is a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at multiple centers. Participants will receive either pelacarsen 80 mg or a matching placebo once a month. Before starting the treatment, they must have elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and be optimally treated for existing cardiovascular risk factors. The study focuses on those aged 50 to under 80 years with mild or moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis. During the 36 months of participation, researchers will monitor changes in peak aortic jet velocity and aortic valve calcium score to assess disease progression. Safety, tolerability, and the impact of the treatment will be evaluated. Participants will undergo regular assessments, including laboratory tests and clinical evaluations, to track heart valve condition and overall health throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating a phase 1/2 open-label study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical effects of an oral drug called Enzomenib (DSP-5336) in patients with acute leukemia, including relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), ambiguous lineage acute leukemia, and in certain sites, high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The study also examines Enzomenib combined with standard AML treatments such as venetoclax plus azacitidine and the intensive chemotherapy 7+3 regimen in patients newly diagnosed with AML who have specific genetic mutations (MLL rearrangement or NPM1 mutation). Participants receive oral Enzomenib either alone or combined with other drugs: venetoclax and azacitidine for a nonintensive treatment group, gilteritinib for a certain relapsed AML group, or intensive chemotherapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) for newly diagnosed AML patients. The study includes dose escalation and expansion phases to determine recommended doses for phase 2. Treatment schedules and doses are adjusted based on response and safety, with some patients enrolled in specialized cohorts according to their genetic markers. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments including clinical exams, laboratory tests, bone marrow samples for genetic analysis, and monitoring for adverse events. Researchers measure safety outcomes such as adverse and serious adverse events, determine optimal dosing for phase 2, and evaluate treatment effectiveness by tracking complete response rates. Safety is monitored up to 30 days after the last dose, with dose recommendations made within four months of treatment start and response assessed around six months. The total participation time varies based on individual treatment and study phase.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining baxdrostat with dapagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin alone in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high blood pressure. This Phase III, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to see if this combination reduces risks such as significant kidney function decline, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death. The study includes a 4-week run-in period where participants not previously treated with SGLT2 inhibitors receive dapagliflozin alone. After this, participants are randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or placebo plus dapagliflozin in a double-blinded manner. Study visits occur frequently initially (at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization) and then approximately every 4 months. If participants stop the blinded treatment early, they continue dapagliflozin alone unless specific criteria require its discontinuation. Participants will undergo regular assessments including blood pressure monitoring and laboratory tests related to kidney function and cardiovascular health. The primary outcome measures the reduction in risk of major kidney and heart events over up to 37 months. Even if participants stop the study treatment, they will continue follow-up visits and data collection to ensure comprehensive safety and efficacy evaluation throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating an investigational drug called linvoseltamab in adults at moderate risk of developing multiple myeloma. This includes patients with precancerous conditions known as High-Risk Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (HR-MGUS) and Non-High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (NHR-SMM). The study aims to understand how well linvoseltamab can eliminate abnormal plasma cells and improve laboratory signs related to these conditions. It is a Phase 2 dose-ranging and interception study focused on these specific patient groups. Participants receive linvoseltamab as directed by the study protocol. The treatment schedule and dosing details are determined per protocol to assess the drug's effects and safety. The study does not mention comparator groups, focusing solely on evaluating linvoseltamab. The study includes a safety observation period lasting 35 days to monitor adverse events and a long-term follow-up of up to 5.5 years to assess the achievement of complete response. During the study, participants are regularly monitored for side effects and treatment-emergent adverse events. Researchers measure how often these events occur and their severity during the 35-day safety period. They also evaluate whether participants achieve a complete response, as determined by the investigator, over up to 5.5 years. Blood tests and laboratory evaluations are conducted to track drug levels and immune responses, including antibody formation against linvoseltamab. The study involves ongoing safety and effectiveness assessments throughout the participation period.

Researchers are evaluating the use of epigenome-guided treatment selection compared to the usual standard-of-care (SOC) treatment in adults with active Crohn's Disease (CD) who are starting biologic therapy. This multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of this approach by comparing clinical remission and endoscopic response at Week 26. About 378 participants with active CD, defined by specific clinical and endoscopic criteria, will be included, with roughly half being biologic-naive and the other half exposed to no more than one prior biologic treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive biologic therapy guided by an epigenetic biomarker assay and the EpiPredict software, which predicts response to two biologics (Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab) or to receive treatment selected according to usual SOC without epigenome guidance. Biologic therapies will be administered following product labels and local SOC recommendations, with dose adjustments allowed as needed. Study assessments will follow the SOC schedule for each biologic during the 26-week treatment period, with different visit weeks depending on the biologic used. Participants will undergo blood sample collection for epigenetic testing during screening. Study visits will include clinical and endoscopic assessments at specified weeks, with long-term follow-up every six months up to 24 months after Week 26 using medical records and questionnaires. Researchers will measure outcomes related to clinical remission and endoscopic response, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Participants' adherence and ability to comply with protocol requirements will be monitored throughout the study.

Researchers are investigating the long-term safety and tolerability of open-label iptacopan in adults with primary IgA nephropathy who have previously completed specific clinical trials (CLNP023X2203 or CLNP023A2301). This extension study is designed to allow participants continued access to iptacopan until certain conditions are met, such as reaching three years from the last patient first visit, loss of treatment benefit, negative benefit-risk profile, initiation of dialysis or kidney transplant, or commercial availability of the drug. The study will also assess the drug's effects on disease progression every six months. Participants who completed the prior trials and meet inclusion criteria may receive oral iptacopan capsules at a dose of 200 mg twice daily. The study is open-label and non-randomized and will continue treatment under this regimen until one of the study-defined stopping points is reached. Supportive care with ACE inhibitors or ARBs is maintained as per clinical guidelines, and vaccination against certain infections is required before enrollment. During the study, participants will be monitored for safety, including serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest, vital sign abnormalities, ECG changes, and laboratory test abnormalities from the first day of treatment until seven days after the last dose. Efficacy assessments occur every six months to evaluate clinical effects on disease progression. The study aims to collect long-term safety and tolerability data while providing ongoing treatment access until the drug becomes commercially available or other stopping criteria apply.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for people with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This phase 3 study compares the effectiveness of adding tarlatamab to a combination of durvalumab, carboplatin, and etoposide against the combination without tarlatamab. The main goal is to see which treatment better prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival over about 3.5 years. Participants receive intravenous infusions of the study drugs. One group gets tarlatamab combined with durvalumab, carboplatin, and etoposide, while the other group receives durvalumab, carboplatin, and etoposide alone. All treatments are given as first-line therapy for their lung cancer. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess their response to treatment and overall health. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival to evaluate treatment benefit. The study also involves ongoing safety monitoring, and participants will be followed for up to approximately 3.5 years to collect these outcomes.