Bad Krozingen

PeriPREVENT is a prospective, multi-centre, controlled, open-label, 1:1 randomized superiority trial with two parallel groups. In the intervention group patients will undergo a routine peripheral angiographic intervention (PVI) using a maximally contrast medium sparing strategy with an automated CO2 injection system including iodinated CM as bailout option in case of insufficient image quality or patient's intolerability of CO2 angiography. The control intervention is routine PVI using iodinated contrast media (CM) as standard of care. All patients are followed up until 12 months after the PVI.

Researchers are evaluating the clinical utility of serum neurofilament light (sNfL) as a prognostic marker for disease activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional study in Germany aims to understand how sNfL values can influence patient management and treatment decisions. The study focuses on patients treated with category 1 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) who have incorporated sNfL testing into their care. Participants will either continue their current category 1 DMT, which includes therapies such as dimethylfumarate, glatiramer acetate, interferon beta, and teriflunomide, or switch to ofatumumab based on their physician’s clinical judgment. There is no treatment allocation by the study itself. Data collection will cover up to 24 months, and the frequency of visits and assessments will follow routine clinical practice without a fixed protocol. During the study, baseline and follow-up data will be gathered according to standard care recommendations, including clinical evaluations and sNfL measurements. Researchers will monitor the proportion of patients with high sNfL levels over time to assess disease activity. The observational period is flexible and guided by the treating physician, with no additional diagnostic or monitoring procedures beyond standard care. Participants will be followed for up to two years to better understand how sNfL influences treatment management in relapsing MS.

This research aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a drug called DII235 in adults who have high levels of lipoprotein(a), a condition linked to lipoprotein disorder. The study focuses on adults aged 18 to 80 years who also have evidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes. This is a Phase 2 study designed to identify the best dose of DII235 and understand its impact on lipoprotein(a). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either DII235 or a placebo in a controlled, double-blind manner to ensure unbiased results. The study involves administering DII235 or a saline placebo as solutions for injection. The trial is designed as a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding study. Participants will receive different doses of DII235 or the placebo, and their responses will be compared over time to evaluate the drug's effects on lipoprotein(a) levels. The dosing and treatment schedules are carefully monitored to assess the safety, tolerability, and appropriate dosage levels of DII235. Participants will be followed and evaluated through various assessments, including measuring the percentage change from their baseline lipoprotein(a) levels between Day 60 and Day 180, and also between Day 60 and Day 360 for different doses. Safety and tolerability will be closely monitored throughout the study duration. The trial includes regular laboratory testing and clinical evaluations to track participant health and treatment response. Overall participation in the study spans several months to capture both short-term and longer-term effects of the treatment.

Researchers are evaluating whether the medicine vicadrostat, combined with empagliflozin, helps adults with chronic heart failure (HF) who have a weakened heart pumping function, specifically a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 40%. Eligible participants must have been diagnosed with chronic HF at least 3 months before joining. The study is a Phase III trial designed to compare the effects of vicadrostat plus empagliflozin against placebo plus empagliflozin in people with symptomatic chronic HF classified as New York Heart Association classes II to IV. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group takes tablets containing vicadrostat and empagliflozin, while the other group takes placebo tablets that look like vicadrostat along with empagliflozin. Tablets are taken once daily for a period ranging from about 6 months up to about 3.5 years. Participants continue their usual heart failure treatments during the study. The study is double-blind, meaning neither the participants nor the study staff know who is receiving which treatment. During the study, participants regularly visit the study site or may have phone contacts for follow-up. They answer questions about their health and well-being. Doctors monitor and record any worsening of heart failure symptoms, hospital visits due to heart failure, or deaths. They also check participants' overall health and note any side effects. The main outcome measured is the time until a participant experiences cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, or an urgent heart failure visit, over up to 43 months of follow-up.

This research aims to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of pelacarsen (TQJ230) in adults with established cardiovascular disease and elevated Lipoprotein(a) who have completed the parent trial CTQJ230A12301. The study is an open-label extension following the phase 3 parent study, providing participants continued access to pelacarsen after the initial trial. Participants will receive pelacarsen 80 mg by subcutaneous injection once a month during this open-label extension. The study is single-arm and multicenter, focusing on continued treatment with pelacarsen for up to 36 months after completion of the parent study. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess safety and tolerability, with particular attention to adverse events occurring up to 36 months. Researchers will collect data on health status throughout this period to understand the long-term effects of pelacarsen in this patient population.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of using multiple arterial grafts (MAG) versus a single arterial graft (SAG) in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This international, multi-center randomized trial named ROMA:Women aims to determine whether MAG improves major heart and brain-related events and quality of life compared to SAG. The study includes 2,300 women to examine outcomes like death, stroke, heart attacks, repeat surgeries, and hospital stays, along with quality of life and mental and physical health symptoms in a subgroup of 500 participants. Important patient subgroups such as age, diabetes status, race, surgical techniques, and type of arterial grafts will also be analyzed. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either single arterial grafting, where the left internal thoracic artery is connected to the heart's left anterior descending artery along with venous grafts, or multiple arterial grafting, where an additional arterial graft such as the right internal thoracic artery or radial artery is used for other coronary branches, plus other grafts as needed. The trial leverages existing infrastructure and continues enrollment with additional sites to reach its target sample size. Both treatment arms follow the same randomization, interventions, and follow-up protocols as the parent ROMA trial. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for at least 2.5 years after surgery to track major cardiac and cerebrovascular events and assess disease-specific and generic quality of life measures using questionnaires such as the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and PROMIS-29. The trial will collect data through clinical assessments and questionnaires to evaluate health outcomes and symptom changes. Safety and effectiveness will be closely followed to understand the impact of the two grafting methods in women undergoing CABG.

Researchers are studying whether performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on all significant blocked arteries (multivessel complete PCI) is better than treating only the artery causing the current heart attack (culprit-lesion only PCI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who have blockages in multiple heart arteries. This trial is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, and open-label study conducted at multiple centers to compare these two treatment approaches for people with NSTEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups: one receiving PCI only on the artery responsible for the heart attack (culprit-lesion revascularization), and the other receiving PCI on all significant blockages in the heart arteries (complete PCI). The procedures involve opening blocked arteries using standard catheter-based techniques. The study will monitor participants over an estimated average of two years to evaluate outcomes. During the study, researchers will track the combined rate of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for a new heart attack as the primary outcome. Participants will be followed closely for up to two years, with regular assessments and medical monitoring to capture these events. This approach aims to determine which PCI strategy leads to better long-term heart health and fewer complications.

Researchers are conducting a prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial to compare early catheter-directed treatment combined with conventional care versus conventional care alone in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism. This trial focuses on patients with acute massive pulmonary embolism who have a high risk of mortality as defined by specific European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. The primary goal is to evaluate outcomes related to mortality, recurrent cardiac arrest, or persistent shock within 7 days. Participants randomized to the early catheter-interventional treatment group will undergo catheter-directed therapy within 60 minutes of randomization. This treatment may involve the use of certified devices such as aspiration thrombectomy, local fibrinolytic therapy, or ultrasound-assisted fibrinolysis, administered via transfemoral venous access. Sheaths used during the procedure are typically removed immediately after thrombectomy or 5 to 10 hours following local fibrinolysis. The comparator group will receive conventional reperfusion treatment. Preparations for fibrinolytic therapy are made in parallel to ensure timely administration if needed. During the study, participants will be closely monitored for clinical outcomes related to survival, cardiac arrest, and shock within the first week. Assessments include imaging studies such as CT angiograms and echocardiograms to confirm pulmonary embolism status and right-ventricular function. Safety and effectiveness are evaluated through this observation period. The study includes adults aged 18 years and older and excludes those with contraindications to catheter-based or fibrinolytic treatments, as well as pregnant individuals. Total study duration and follow-up details are not specified.

Researchers are investigating whether the medicine vicadrostat, when taken together with empagliflozin, can lower the risk of heart-related problems in adults who have type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease but no history of heart failure. This study is a Phase III trial that compares the effects of vicadrostat plus empagliflozin to a placebo plus empagliflozin in people with these conditions. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group takes vicadrostat and empagliflozin tablets, and the other group takes placebo tablets that look like vicadrostat along with empagliflozin. All participants take one tablet daily for a period ranging from two and a half years up to four years and three months. Throughout the study, participants continue their usual medications for diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease. During up to 51 months of participation, participants visit the study site regularly where doctors collect health information and blood samples. Researchers track when participants experience cardiovascular events such as heart-related deaths or heart failure events. The study also monitors participants’ overall health and any side effects they may experience to assess the safety and effects of the treatments.

Researchers are evaluating maridebart cafraglutide, a drug given as an addition to standard care, to see if it reduces heart-related problems and deaths better than a placebo in people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who are overweight or obese. This phase 3 study focuses on cardiovascular events such as heart attacks, strokes, and deaths related to heart conditions, aiming to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Participants will receive either maridebart cafraglutide or a placebo, both administered by injection under the skin. The study compares these two groups over a period of up to approximately 35 months, monitoring heart-related health events to assess the drug's impact. The placebo group will receive injections that look identical but contain no active drug, ensuring a double-blind study design. During the study, participants will be regularly evaluated for major cardiovascular events, including heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and death. Researchers will track the time until these events occur to measure the drug's effectiveness. Safety and health will be closely monitored throughout the study period, and participants will be followed for up to nearly three years to gather comprehensive data on cardiovascular outcomes and overall survival.