Baden Baden

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and patient compliance of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This observational study also compares ribociclib treatment with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and endocrine therapy alone, aiming to better understand treatment decisions and clinical adoption in routine practice. The study is conducted across breast centers and gynecological practices to represent typical healthcare settings. Participants receive treatment based on their physicians clinical judgment without randomization or intervention assignment. The study collects data from patients treated with ribociclib plus aromatase inhibitor with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, or endocrine therapy alone with or without LHRH. Baseline data and follow-up information on adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, and socio-economic factors are gathered over time. During the study, participants undergo assessments including evaluation of invasive disease-free survival up to 36 months, quality of life questionnaires, medication adherence reports, and monitoring of adverse events and treatment changes. Data on reasons for treatment decisions, patient perceptions, and healthcare provider involvement are also collected. The study duration extends up to 39 months to provide a comprehensive overview of treatment impact and patient experience in real-world clinical settings.

Researchers are evaluating treatment options for patients with advanced HRD-positive high-grade ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary who have no remaining tumor after primary tumor debulking surgery. This phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label study aims to compare the recurrence-free survival between patients receiving 3 cycles versus 6 cycles of carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy, followed by maintenance therapy with niraparib. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups one group receives 3 cycles of carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy, while the other group receives 6 cycles of the same chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance. Niraparib maintenance therapy starts at a dose of 200 mg or 300 mg once daily and continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other stopping criteria. Tumor assessments using CT or MRI scans are done at specific intervals, and the tumor marker CA-125 is measured every 12 weeks. Clinical visits for blood tests and toxicity monitoring occur regularly during chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance. During the study, participants will attend clinical visits for safety monitoring, including adverse event tracking, blood counts, physical exams every 12 weeks, and serum pregnancy tests for women of childbearing potential. Tumor evaluations occur 9 to 12 weeks after starting therapy and then every 6 months. The study will follow patients for up to 8 years to measure recurrence-free survival and other outcomes such as overall survival, quality of life, and safety. About 640 patients will be recruited across approximately 60 sites in six European countries over 36 months.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness of asciminib in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase Ph CML-CP. This observational study compares patients who are newly diagnosed or previously treated with one ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitor TKI to those treated with other TKIs. The study aims to assess tolerability, safety, and molecular response outcomes in routine clinical care. Participants are grouped into cohorts based on their treatment those receiving asciminib, those newly diagnosed treated with imatinib, and those newly diagnosed treated with second-generation TKIs such as dasatinib, bosutinib, or nilotinib. Treatment decisions are made by physicians prior to enrollment, and treatment must not have started more than 14 days before joining the study. The study follows patients over time to document treatment patterns, dose changes, interruptions, and discontinuations. Participants will attend routine follow-up visits and complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires assessing medication adherence, quality of life, and work productivity at multiple time points up to 24 months. Researchers will measure major molecular response at 12 months as the primary outcome and evaluate various secondary molecular responses, reasons for treatment changes, and quality of life scores. The study duration extends through September 2030, allowing long-term observation of treatment effectiveness and safety.

Researchers are collecting data in a registry study for adults diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia AML, including newly diagnosed and relapsed cases. The study aims to gather important information about the diseases epidemiology, such as patient age and prognostic factors, and to compare incidence and age distribution with population tumor registry data. It also evaluates key clinical outcomes like relapse-free survival, time to relapse, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival. This observational study does not involve treatment assignment but documents treatment strategies used by patients. Data is gathered over a 10-year period to thoroughly monitor outcomes and disease patterns. The registry also collects information on complete remission rates, treatment-related mortality, therapy-associated morbidity, and quality of therapy and diagnosis. Additionally, the study seeks to validate known prognostic factors and explore new ones while describing new therapies and supportive care measures. Participants are adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with AML according to WHO criteria, including acute promyelocytic leukemia. The study involves long-term follow-up with yearly assessments over 10 years. Researchers will evaluate epidemiological parameters and important survival outcomes. Since this is an observational registry, participants continue with their usual care while data is collected. The study is sponsored by Technische Universitt Dresden and involves multiple sites in Germany.

This research aims to gather a large group of patients diagnosed with BCR-ABL 1-negative myeloid neoplasms, classified according to WHO 20082016 standards. The study focuses on collecting detailed clinical, biological, and quality-of-life data to better understand disease characteristics, outcomes, and potential prognostic markers. It is an observational registry conducted by the University of Ulm to improve knowledge about this condition over time. Participants in this registry will provide various biological samples, such as bone marrow aspirate, peripheral blood, plasma, buccal swabs, and occasionally skin biopsies. These samples will be used for morphological and genetic analysis. The study does not involve any experimental treatments but collects comprehensive data and samples to assess disease features and clinical outcomes. Throughout the study, researchers will collect clinical information using a defined catalog of relevant variables and assess quality of life with specific symptom assessment forms. They will track outcomes including treatment decisions, responses, overall survival, progression-free survival, and duration of response for up to 25 years. This long-term follow-up allows detailed monitoring of patient health and disease progression.

Triple negative breast cancer TNBC is a type of breast cancer that lacks certain receptors and tends to have a poor prognosis and aggressive behavior. The study focuses on patients with low-risk, early-stage TNBC stage I-II node-negative who generally have better outcomes, but still face significant clinical challenges. Researchers are evaluating neoadjuvant therapies to improve treatment strategies for this group, especially comparing sacituzumab govitecan alone versus its combination with pembrolizumab. Participants will receive neoadjuvant treatment for 12 weeks, either sacituzumab govitecan alone or combined with pembrolizumab. Sacituzumab govitecan is given intravenously at 10 mgkg on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days, while pembrolizumab is administered intravenously at 200 mg every three weeks. Depending on their response after 12 weeks, some patients may continue treatment for an additional 6 weeks before surgery. Patients who achieve a complete response may not require further systemic treatment, while those with residual disease may receive additional chemotherapy as decided by their investigator. Throughout the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments including pathological evaluation at surgery and invasive disease-free survival measured after three years. Other outcomes include overall survival and quality of life assessments. Safety and response will be regularly evaluated to guide treatment decisions. The trial aims to enroll adult women with early-stage TNBC and will continue through September 2029, with detailed follow-up planned to capture long-term outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the best neoadjuvant therapy for patients with less advanced HER2-positive early breast cancer EBC. This Phase 2 trial focuses on improving treatment outcomes by comparing trastuzumab-deruxtecan T-DXd with standard chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The study targets patients with low to intermediate risk HER2 EBC, aiming to show higher rates of complete tumor response and excellent survival outcomes. Participants receive different treatment regimens depending on their risk group and assigned study arm. Treatments include 12 or 18 weeks of T-DXd alone or combined with standard chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. After neoadjuvant treatment, post-neoadjuvant therapy with T-DXd or standard care continues for up to one year, with adjustments based on tumor response. Some patients may receive additional chemotherapy depending on residual tumor burden. During the study, participants undergo regular evaluations including tumor response assessments and safety monitoring for adverse drug reactions. Key outcomes measured are pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant therapy and distant disease-free survival after three years. Researchers also track various survival outcomes, quality of life, and treatment-related side effects over time. Participants are followed until study completion in 2030, with detailed monitoring throughout the treatment and follow-up phases.

Researchers are investigating the real-world use and effects of ovarian function suppression OFS combined with endocrine therapy in pre- and perimenopausal women with breast cancer who have low genomic risk according to MammaPrint testing. The study aims to understand differences in treatment outcomes based on menopausal status, chemotherapy use, and endocrine therapies, with a focus on adherence and quality of life over time. This observational registry will collect data to provide insights into treatment paths, outcomes, and factors influencing prognosis in these patients. Participants receive standard-of-care endocrine therapy with or without ovarian suppression and may have received chemotherapy based on clinical decisions and genomic risk assessments. The registry observes various treatment approaches in a real-world setting, including management of ovarian function, and follows patients for up to 10 years. Quality of life assessments occur regularly during the first five years, and treatment adherence is monitored throughout the study period. During the study, participants medical data including baseline characteristics, treatment details, relapse information, and quality of life questionnaires will be collected at multiple time points. Researchers will evaluate outcomes such as distant recurrence-free interval, disease-free survival, overall survival, and endocrine response over 5 to 10 years. The long-term follow-up allows for detailed monitoring of treatment adherence and correlation of genomic and clinicopathological markers with patient outcomes.

Researchers are observing the real-world effects and patient experiences of trastuzumab deruxtecan T-DXd treatment in adults with HER2-positive, HER2-low, or HER2-ultralow unresectable or metastatic breast cancer. This prospective, non-interventional study takes place in multiple centers in Germany and aims to collect patient-reported outcomes along with safety and efficacy data during routine clinical practice. Approximately 800 patients will be enrolled, divided evenly between HER2-positive and HER2-lowultralow cohorts. Participants will receive T-DXd treatment as prescribed by their doctors according to the approved product guidelines SmPC. Treatment and visit schedules are determined by the treating physician and are not fixed by the study protocol. Patients will also be informed about using a digital healthcare application DiGA during the study. The study includes two cohorts based on HER2 status, both receiving T-DXd in routine care. During the study, participants will be followed to measure the time until their next treatment or death, assessed for up to 60 months from the first T-DXd dose. Quality of life will be evaluated using questionnaires at six months after baseline. Patient safety and treatment effects will be monitored through data collected in routine clinical visits. The total participation period may extend up to eight years, allowing for long-term observation of treatment outcomes in real-world settings.

Researchers are observing adults with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia CLL who are receiving the drug venetoclax, either alone or combined with other medications such as rituximab, obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, or acalabrutinib. The study aims to understand how these treatments work in real-life settings, focusing on the effectiveness, costs related to health economics, and outcomes reported by the patients themselves. Participants receive venetoclax as prescribed by their doctors following local medical guidelines. They may receive it alone or alongside one of the other drugs mentioned. This study does not assign treatments but observes patients as they undergo therapy according to routine clinical practice across several countries. During the study, participants are monitored for their response to treatment, with the main focus on the best overall response rate within 12 months. Researchers collect data on health outcomes, costs, and patient experiences to better understand the impact of these therapies. The study spans several years, allowing long-term observation of treatment effects and outcomes.