Dortmund

Researchers are investigating new treatment options for breast cancer that is hormone receptor-positive HR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative HER2-, specifically for cases that are unresectable locally advanced or metastatic. This type of breast cancer involves cancer cells that depend on hormones like estrogen or progesterone and have low HER2 protein levels. The study focuses on comparing the effects of patritumab deruxtecan against chemotherapy or trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients whose cancer has progressed despite prior treatments. Participants receive either patritumab deruxtecan through intravenous infusions every three weeks for about 13 months or a treatment chosen by their physician, which may include various chemotherapy drugs or trastuzumab deruxtecan, administered according to specific schedules for up to 13 months. The study is randomized and open-label, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups, and both the patients and researchers know which treatment is given. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments to monitor cancer progression and overall survival for up to approximately 85 months. Researchers evaluate tumor response, duration of response, and changes in quality of life using standardized questionnaires. Safety is carefully monitored by recording adverse events and treatment discontinuations. The goal is to understand if patritumab deruxtecan can improve outcomes compared to current treatment options.

This observational study follows patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis RMS who are being treated with approved injectable or selected oral disease-modifying therapies DMTs in Germany. The study is non-interventional and open-label, designed to collect real-world data on treatment and disease progression over several years. It aims to understand how patients continue their baseline treatments and how these treatments impact various health and quality of life measures. Participants receive routine medical care with approved injectable or oral DMTs such as ofatumumab, interferon b21, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, or diroximel fumarate. The study includes two cohorts with up to approximately two years of prospective observation each, with an optional extension allowing up to four years total. Treatment decisions and monitoring follow the patients usual care and physicians discretion, including routine visits and telemedicine options. During the study, participants provide medical history, complete questionnaires, and have data collected on disability status, MRI findings, relapses, and laboratory tests. Researchers assess treatment continuation rates, fatigue, anxiety, depression, quality of life, lesion counts, and relapse rates at multiple time points. Safety and treatment interruptions are also documented. Follow-up is flexible and based on standard care procedures, with data collection occurring throughout the observational periods.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and patient compliance of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This observational study also compares ribociclib treatment with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and endocrine therapy alone, aiming to better understand treatment decisions and clinical adoption in routine practice. The study is conducted across breast centers and gynecological practices to represent typical healthcare settings. Participants receive treatment based on their physicians clinical judgment without randomization or intervention assignment. The study collects data from patients treated with ribociclib plus aromatase inhibitor with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, or endocrine therapy alone with or without LHRH. Baseline data and follow-up information on adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, and socio-economic factors are gathered over time. During the study, participants undergo assessments including evaluation of invasive disease-free survival up to 36 months, quality of life questionnaires, medication adherence reports, and monitoring of adverse events and treatment changes. Data on reasons for treatment decisions, patient perceptions, and healthcare provider involvement are also collected. The study duration extends up to 39 months to provide a comprehensive overview of treatment impact and patient experience in real-world clinical settings.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness and safety of combining petosemtamab with pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab alone as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic PD-L1 positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma HNSCC. This Phase 3 randomized, open-label study focuses on patients who have not received previous systemic therapy for incurable recurrent or metastatic disease and aims to improve treatment outcomes in this population. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the combination of petosemtamab plus pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone. The study excludes patients previously treated with anti PD-L1 or anti-EGFR therapies, with some exceptions for local treatments like cetuximab under specific conditions. The treatments will be administered as part of the trial, with researchers comparing the two approaches over the treatment period. During the study, participants will undergo regular evaluations including tumor assessments based on RECIST v1.1 criteria, health-related quality of life questionnaires, and safety monitoring for adverse events. The main outcomes measured include overall survival and objective response rate up to approximately three years. Additional assessments include progression-free survival, duration of response, and pharmacokinetics. These activities aim to provide comprehensive data on how well the treatments work and their safety profiles throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating treatment options for patients with advanced HRD-positive high-grade ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary who have no remaining tumor after primary tumor debulking surgery. This phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label study aims to compare the recurrence-free survival between patients receiving 3 cycles versus 6 cycles of carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy, followed by maintenance therapy with niraparib. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups one group receives 3 cycles of carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy, while the other group receives 6 cycles of the same chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance. Niraparib maintenance therapy starts at a dose of 200 mg or 300 mg once daily and continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other stopping criteria. Tumor assessments using CT or MRI scans are done at specific intervals, and the tumor marker CA-125 is measured every 12 weeks. Clinical visits for blood tests and toxicity monitoring occur regularly during chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance. During the study, participants will attend clinical visits for safety monitoring, including adverse event tracking, blood counts, physical exams every 12 weeks, and serum pregnancy tests for women of childbearing potential. Tumor evaluations occur 9 to 12 weeks after starting therapy and then every 6 months. The study will follow patients for up to 8 years to measure recurrence-free survival and other outcomes such as overall survival, quality of life, and safety. About 640 patients will be recruited across approximately 60 sites in six European countries over 36 months.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia CLL, a type of blood cancer that is aggressive and currently incurable. This phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized study aims to compare the effectiveness of a triple drug combination acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax against a double combination obinutuzumab and venetoclax in prolonging progression-free survival PFS for patients with specific high-risk genetic features such as 17p-deletion, TP53 mutation, complex karyotype, or unmutated IGHV gene status. The study addresses a crucial medical need for better treatments in this difficult-to-treat group. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives the triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax, while the other group receives obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. Obinutuzumab is given as intravenous infusions on specific days across six cycles. Venetoclax is taken orally with a carefully planned dose escalation and maintenance over 12 cycles. Acalabrutinib is administered orally twice daily during cycles 15 to 24. The study explores whether adding acalabrutinib improves outcomes by using these fixed-duration, chemotherapy-free regimens. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor response and safety, including checks for minimal residual disease MRD and overall survival. These evaluations occur up to 50 months after the first patient is enrolled. Researchers will also track progression-free survival, complete and overall response rates, event-free survival, duration of response, and time to next treatment. Safety monitoring and laboratory tests will be performed as part of study visits. The total study participation is expected to last several years to capture long-term outcomes for this high-risk patient population.

Researchers are evaluating how well once-weekly insulin icodec maintains blood sugar levels compared to daily basal insulin injections in adults with type 2 diabetes. The study focuses on people who need to start basal insulin treatment after using other glucose-lowering medications. This phase 4 trial aims to assess insulin icodecs effectiveness in real-world clinical practice over about 13 months. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either weekly subcutaneous injections of insulin icodec or daily subcutaneous injections of basal insulin analogues such as insulin glargine, detemir, or degludec. The study compares these two insulin regimens as part of standard type 2 diabetes care. Treatment continues during the 52-week period to monitor blood sugar control and treatment satisfaction. Throughout the study, participants will undergo assessments including measuring changes in glycated hemoglobin HbA1c from baseline to week 52. They will also complete questionnaires on treatment adherence, satisfaction, and burden, and researchers will track severe hypoglycemia episodes and insulin doses. The trial spans about 13 months, providing thorough monitoring of treatment impact and safety in daily clinical use.

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of zanidatamab combined with a physicians choice of chemotherapy compared to trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy in treating adults with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who have either progressed on or cannot tolerate previous trastuzumab deruxtecan T-DXd treatment. Zanidatamab has shown promising results against various HER2-positive advanced tumors, including metastatic breast cancer, and may serve as a potential treatment option for these patients. The study also investigates patient-reported tolerability and physical functioning, as well as the pharmacokinetics and immune response to zanidatamab with chemotherapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either zanidatamab or trastuzumab, each given by intravenous infusion alongside one of several chemotherapy options chosen by the physician eribulin, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or capecitabine the latter is taken orally. Treatment will be administered according to the assigned group, and the study is open-label and multicenter, designed to compare these two treatment combinations in this patient population. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor disease progression using imaging criteria RECIST version 1.1, evaluate survival, treatment response, and duration of response. Safety and side effects will be tracked through adverse event reporting and patient questionnaires on symptoms and physical function. Blood samples will be collected to study drug levels and immune reactions. Participants will be followed until disease progression, death, or for up to approximately 44 months for key outcomes, with overall survival monitored for up to about 80 months.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of pirtobrutinib LOXO-305 compared to ibrutinib in participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma SLL. The study includes participants who may or may not have received prior treatment for their cancer. Part 1 of the trial lasts up to six years, while Part 2 focuses on treatment-nafve participants with a specific genetic deletion 17p deletion and lasts up to two years. Participants will receive pirtobrutinib or ibrutinib orally, depending on their assigned study group. Part 1 compares pirtobrutinib to ibrutinib in a randomized, open-label design. Part 2 evaluates pirtobrutinib alone in participants with the 17p deletion who have not yet been treated. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other study-defined reasons. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including clinical evaluations and monitoring of their response to treatment using established criteria. Researchers measure overall response rates, progression-free survival, event-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, time to next treatment, symptom worsening, and treatment tolerability. Participation involves ongoing monitoring for up to six years in Part 1 and two years in Part 2 to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness of asciminib in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase Ph CML-CP. This observational study compares patients who are newly diagnosed or previously treated with one ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitor TKI to those treated with other TKIs. The study aims to assess tolerability, safety, and molecular response outcomes in routine clinical care. Participants are grouped into cohorts based on their treatment those receiving asciminib, those newly diagnosed treated with imatinib, and those newly diagnosed treated with second-generation TKIs such as dasatinib, bosutinib, or nilotinib. Treatment decisions are made by physicians prior to enrollment, and treatment must not have started more than 14 days before joining the study. The study follows patients over time to document treatment patterns, dose changes, interruptions, and discontinuations. Participants will attend routine follow-up visits and complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires assessing medication adherence, quality of life, and work productivity at multiple time points up to 24 months. Researchers will measure major molecular response at 12 months as the primary outcome and evaluate various secondary molecular responses, reasons for treatment changes, and quality of life scores. The study duration extends through September 2030, allowing long-term observation of treatment effectiveness and safety.