Flensburg

PeriPREVENT is a prospective, multi-centre, controlled, open-label, 1:1 randomized superiority trial with two parallel groups. In the intervention group patients will undergo a routine peripheral angiographic intervention (PVI) using a maximally contrast medium sparing strategy with an automated CO2 injection system including iodinated CM as bailout option in case of insufficient image quality or patient's intolerability of CO2 angiography. The control intervention is routine PVI using iodinated contrast media (CM) as standard of care. All patients are followed up until 12 months after the PVI.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are evaluating asthma control, health-related quality of life (HRQL), lung function, and asthma medication use in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab in a real-life clinical setting in Germany. This prospective, non-interventional, single-arm, multicenter study aims to observe these outcomes over a 52-week period to better understand benralizumab's impact outside of randomized clinical trials. Patients prescribed benralizumab according to label and local reimbursement criteria will be followed for up to 52 weeks. The study will monitor asthma control using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ®) at various timepoints. Health-related quality of life will be assessed with the mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (miniAQLQ) at baseline and routine follow-up visits. Patients will also track and report their weekly asthma medication intake using either paper-based or electronic diaries throughout the study. Participants will complete questionnaires every 4 weeks and record medication intake weekly. Researchers will measure changes in ACT scores, proportions of responders, and reductions in inhaled corticosteroid doses from baseline to weeks 12, 24, and 52. Safety and health outcomes will be observed under routine clinical care. This study includes adults aged 18 to 120 years with severe eosinophilic asthma who can understand study instructions and provide informed consent.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a combination treatment including adagrasib, pembrolizumab, and platinum-doublet chemotherapy compared to a placebo combined with pembrolizumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy. This study focuses on adults with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a KRAS G12C mutation. The trial is a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study designed to provide insights into treatment options for this specific lung cancer type. Participants receive either adagrasib plus pembrolizumab alongside platinum-doublet chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin and pemetrexed, or they receive a placebo plus pembrolizumab and the same chemotherapy regimen. The dosages and schedules of these drugs are specified and administered on predetermined days. The trial compares these two treatment groups to understand better the impact of adding adagrasib to the existing pembrolizumab and chemotherapy treatment. Throughout the study, participants are closely monitored for progression-free survival and overall survival, assessed up to seven years using standardized criteria for tumor response. Regular imaging scans such as CT or MRI are used to measure disease status. Safety and tolerability are also evaluated during the study, with ongoing assessments to track adverse effects and treatment response. The total duration of follow-up allows for long-term observation of treatment outcomes and participant health.

Researchers are studying metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients whose tumors have a BRAFV600E mutation, which is known to have a poorer outlook compared to non-mutated cases. Standard treatments after the first therapy have shown limited success, with low response rates and short survival times. This study aims to understand how the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab works in real-world settings, focusing on effectiveness, quality of life, safety, and tolerability in German, Austrian, and Swiss patients who have already received prior therapies. Participants will receive encorafenib combined with cetuximab, treatments that target specific cancer mutations. This study is observational and non-interventional, meaning it records how patients respond to these drugs in routine care without altering their treatment. The study allows initial retrospective data collection and will follow patients longitudinally to gather comprehensive information about their experiences with the therapy. During the study, patients will be monitored for overall survival twelve months after starting treatment. Researchers will assess how well the treatment controls the cancer, side effects experienced, and patients' quality of life. Data will be collected from medical records and patient reports in regular clinical care, providing insights into the real-life use and impact of encorafenib and cetuximab for this patient group.

Researchers are evaluating whether using a reminder app alongside standard skin care can better prevent grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis in female breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant hypo-fractionated radiotherapy. This randomized, multinational trial compares standard skin care alone to skin care supported by a mobile app designed to remind patients to perform skin care tasks. The study also examines secondary outcomes such as pain in the radiation area, patient satisfaction with the app, how the app affects use of health technology, and support from medical staff in using the app. Patients receive radiotherapy of 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, with some receiving an additional sequential boost depending on age and risk factors, extending treatment to 4 weeks. Standard skin care involves applying fatty cream with urea four times daily, with additional treatments like mometasone furoate cream and antiseptic agents if certain skin conditions develop. The intervention group uses a reminder app that notifies patients four times daily, guides them through skin care with illustrations, and motivates adherence through a points system. Patients can customize notification schedules and postpone reminders. Throughout the study, radiation dermatitis is assessed weekly by trained observers blinded to routine care, starting at radiotherapy onset and continuing through treatment completion. Patients in the app group complete a questionnaire about satisfaction and technology use at the end of radiotherapy. Researchers monitor prevention of grade 2 or higher dermatitis, pain levels, and app impact over approximately 4 weeks of treatment. Data analysis includes various statistical tests to compare outcomes between groups, with safety and protocol adherence also recorded.

Researchers are collecting detailed information on adults diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and related blood cancers such as other leukemias and certain types of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. The purpose is to gather real-world data on diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes to support ALL research and improve quality of care. This registry includes patients whether or not they are part of other clinical trials. Participants included in this registry are adults aged 18 and older diagnosed with ALL or similar leukemias who are treated according to established ALL treatment protocols. It also includes patients with specific subtypes of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma treated according to B-ALL protocols. The study involves collecting clinical data and biological samples over time to understand treatment responses and disease progression. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor participants' health outcomes, including overall survival for up to 10 years. Data collected will cover diagnostics, treatments received, and patient outcomes in routine clinical care. This long-term follow-up aims to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of current therapies and patient experiences with these blood cancers.

Researchers are evaluating maintenance therapies for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have undergone induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This phase III clinical trial compares a maintenance treatment combining iberdomide and isatuximab with iberdomide alone. The main goal is to see if adding isatuximab reduces the amount of myeloma cells in the bone marrow after two years. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives 39 cycles of oral iberdomide, each cycle lasting 29 days. The other group receives the same iberdomide treatment plus subcutaneous isatuximab injections given on specific days during the first three cycles and then monthly from cycle four onward. Both groups receive dexamethasone during the first cycle. The study treatment continues for up to 36 months. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including bone marrow tests to measure minimal residual disease, blood tests, and questionnaires to evaluate quality of life. Researchers monitor disease progression, response to treatment, and survival over time. The primary outcome is the level of minimal residual disease in the bone marrow 24 months after starting maintenance therapy. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, and patient-reported quality of life measures.

Researchers are investigating treatment options for adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that have a mutation in the IDH1 gene and who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. The study aims to see if adding the drug venetoclax to the current standard treatment of ivosidenib and azacitidine improves outcomes and safety for these patients. The study is a phase 3 trial comparing the effects of venetoclax versus a placebo when combined with the standard treatment. Participants receive either venetoclax or placebo orally daily from day 1 through day 28 of each treatment cycle, alongside ivosidenib and azacitidine as part of their therapy. The study evaluates the treatment effects over multiple cycles, with details on dosing schedules maintained throughout. Those receiving placebo will follow the same schedule as those on venetoclax to ensure comparison accuracy. During the trial, participants are closely monitored through regular assessments including blood tests, genetic confirmation of IDH1 mutation, and safety evaluations. Researchers measure event-free survival twelve months after the last patient with AML is included to assess treatment effectiveness. Safety is also tracked throughout the study. The total participation duration depends on treatment cycles and follow-up requirements, with informed consent obtained before any procedures.