Hagen

Researchers are evaluating various approved injectable and oral disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in Germany. This observational, non-interventional, multicenter, open-label study collects primary data prospectively over up to four years, alongside retrospective data. The study captures medical history, disease duration, laboratory values, disability scores (EDSS), MRI results, and relapse information to provide real-world insights into treatment use and outcomes. Patients receiving routine medical treatment with any approved injectable or selected oral DMTs—including ofatumumab, glatiramer acetate, interferon 21, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, and diroximel fumarate—are enrolled without treatment allocation by the study. Two cohorts are observed: one treated primarily with injectable DMTs and another with injectable or oral DMTs. The core study period lasts about two years, with an optional extension providing an additional two years of observation, totaling up to four years. Follow-up visits and monitoring happen at the investigator's discretion and may include telemedicine. During the study, participants provide data through questionnaires and electronic case report forms. Routine clinical care procedures, such as diagnostic tests and monitoring, continue as usual. Researchers measure the proportion of patients continuing their baseline treatment at 24 months and collect ongoing clinical and imaging data. The study emphasizes real-world treatment patterns, safety, and disease activity over the extended follow-up period.

Researchers are evaluating the clinical utility of serum neurofilament light (sNfL) as a prognostic marker for disease activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional study in Germany aims to understand how sNfL values can influence patient management and treatment decisions. The study focuses on patients treated with category 1 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) who have incorporated sNfL testing into their care. Participants will either continue their current category 1 DMT, which includes therapies such as dimethylfumarate, glatiramer acetate, interferon beta, and teriflunomide, or switch to ofatumumab based on their physician’s clinical judgment. There is no treatment allocation by the study itself. Data collection will cover up to 24 months, and the frequency of visits and assessments will follow routine clinical practice without a fixed protocol. During the study, baseline and follow-up data will be gathered according to standard care recommendations, including clinical evaluations and sNfL measurements. Researchers will monitor the proportion of patients with high sNfL levels over time to assess disease activity. The observational period is flexible and guided by the treating physician, with no additional diagnostic or monitoring procedures beyond standard care. Participants will be followed for up to two years to better understand how sNfL influences treatment management in relapsing MS.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a common and aggressive form of leukemia. This phase 3, open-label, randomized study aims to compare a triple combination therapy of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax (GAVe) against a double combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GVe) to see which better prolongs progression-free survival (PFS). High risk CLL patients are identified by specific genetic risk factors such as 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype, or unmutated IGHV gene status, which indicate a poorer prognosis and less response to chemotherapy. Participants receive fixed-duration treatments. The triple combination group receives obinutuzumab via intravenous infusion during cycles 1 through 6, venetoclax orally with a gradual dose ramp-up from cycle 1 to 12, and acalabrutinib orally twice daily during cycles 15 to 24. The comparison group receives obinutuzumab and venetoclax on the same schedules but without acalabrutinib. The study investigates how adding the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib to the existing combination may improve outcomes by targeting different pathways and reducing early disease progression. During the study, participants are closely monitored for progression-free survival over 50 months after the first patient is included. Researchers assess clinical status, laboratory tests, and genetic markers to evaluate response and safety. The study also tracks liver and kidney function, infection status, and adverse events to ensure treatment tolerability. The total duration includes initial treatment cycles and extended follow-up to measure the long-term effectiveness of these therapies in high risk CLL patients.

Atrial tachycardia (AT) that occurs after ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) or cardiac surgery can be difficult to treat due to complex underlying heart tissue changes and arrhythmia mechanisms. Many patients experience various types of tachycardias, and arrhythmia recurrence is common. This prospective, multi-center, randomized study aims to compare a standard approach to AT ablation with a minimal ablation approach guided by novel ultra-high-density mapping techniques to better understand and treat the arrhythmias, focusing on arrhythmia-free survival. Participants will undergo catheter-based ablation using radiofrequency to target arrhythmias. The study compares two different ablation strategies for treating consecutive AT: a standard method and a minimalized ablation of the clinical AT, both guided by ultra-high-density mapping. This advanced mapping technology helps characterize the AT mechanisms and the underlying heart tissue substrate. During the study, participants will be monitored for the recurrence of any sustained arrhythmia lasting longer than 30 seconds over one year. Researchers will evaluate heart rhythms and arrhythmia-free survival after the ablation procedure. Safety monitoring and follow-up assessments will be conducted to measure outcomes and ensure participant well-being throughout the one-year period.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with generalized Mantle Cell Lymphoma in this Phase 3 trial. The study aims to identify one of three treatment approaches as a future standard by comparing failure-free survival, which measures the time from treatment start until stable disease, disease progression, or death. Secondary goals include assessing overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, safety, and tolerability of the treatments, as well as exploring factors like minimal residual disease and stem cell mobilization. Participants receive one of three treatment plans: the control arm with alternating R-CHOP and R-DHAP chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); an experimental arm adding ibrutinib during induction and maintenance with ASCT; or an experimental arm with ibrutinib during induction and maintenance without ASCT. Chemotherapy includes drugs such as rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, dexamethasone, Ara-C, and cisplatin. Ibrutinib is given in certain induction cycles and as daily maintenance for two years. ASCT conditioning uses specific chemotherapy regimens or total body irradiation depending on the site. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging, laboratory tests, and evaluations of response and side effects. Researchers monitor failure-free survival up to 10 years, along with secondary outcomes like overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety events. Follow-up includes measuring molecular remission, relapse timing, and quality of life. The total duration includes treatment, maintenance, and long-term observation, with safety and efficacy carefully tracked throughout.

The trial investigates the effects of two types of heart pacing, left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing and right ventricular (RV) pacing, in patients with atrial fibrillation who have preserved left ventricular function. The study aims to compare the clinical, functional, and electrophysiological outcomes between these two pacing methods after atrioventricular (AV) node ablation. Researchers want to see if LBBA pacing reduces the risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, which is a decline in heart function, compared to RV pacing, while maintaining safety and improving quality of life and physical capacity. Participants will undergo pacemaker implantation before AV node ablation, with one group receiving LBBA pacing and the other receiving RV pacing. The study is randomized and single-blinded across multiple centers. The pacing devices are implanted prior to the AV node ablation procedure. Both groups are monitored to assess the effects of their assigned pacing method over time. During the 36-month study period, researchers will track the number of patients who develop pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy, defined as a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 10% or more to below 50%. Assessments will include heart function measurements and tracking of clinical and functional outcomes. Patient safety and quality of life will also be monitored throughout the study to understand the long-term impact of each pacing method.

Researchers are collecting detailed information on adults diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and related blood cancers such as other leukemias and certain types of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. The purpose is to gather real-world data on diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes to support ALL research and improve quality of care. This registry includes patients whether or not they are part of other clinical trials. Participants included in this registry are adults aged 18 and older diagnosed with ALL or similar leukemias who are treated according to established ALL treatment protocols. It also includes patients with specific subtypes of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma treated according to B-ALL protocols. The study involves collecting clinical data and biological samples over time to understand treatment responses and disease progression. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor participants' health outcomes, including overall survival for up to 10 years. Data collected will cover diagnostics, treatments received, and patient outcomes in routine clinical care. This long-term follow-up aims to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of current therapies and patient experiences with these blood cancers.

Researchers are collecting long-term follow-up data on patients with multiple myeloma who took part in therapy studies conducted by the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG). This observational registry study aims to track important outcomes such as overall survival, progression-free survival, and follow-up duration to support scientific research. The registry combines data from previous trials with ongoing patient information for comprehensive analysis. The GMMG Myeloma Registry is a national, observational, and non-interventional study that includes both past and ongoing patient data. It incorporates study databases from various GMMG trials, including the phase 3 GMMG-HD6 trial, which evaluated adding the monoclonal antibody elotuzumab to standard therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients eligible for transplant. Data is collected from 35 centers across Germany, with no limit on sample size. Participants will be followed during their standard care treatment until death, loss to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent. Follow-up visits occur every six months until the first disease progression and then yearly afterward. Clinical data is securely stored and regularly monitored with automated checks to ensure accuracy. The main outcome tracked is progression-free survival after five years and through the study's completion, averaging one additional year of observation.

Researchers are evaluating maintenance therapies for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have undergone induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This phase III clinical trial compares a maintenance treatment combining iberdomide and isatuximab with iberdomide alone. The main goal is to see if adding isatuximab reduces the amount of myeloma cells in the bone marrow after two years. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives 39 cycles of oral iberdomide, each cycle lasting 29 days. The other group receives the same iberdomide treatment plus subcutaneous isatuximab injections given on specific days during the first three cycles and then monthly from cycle four onward. Both groups receive dexamethasone during the first cycle. The study treatment continues for up to 36 months. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including bone marrow tests to measure minimal residual disease, blood tests, and questionnaires to evaluate quality of life. Researchers monitor disease progression, response to treatment, and survival over time. The primary outcome is the level of minimal residual disease in the bone marrow 24 months after starting maintenance therapy. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, and patient-reported quality of life measures.