Pforzheim

Researchers are evaluating various approved injectable and oral disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in Germany. This observational, non-interventional, multicenter, open-label study collects primary data prospectively over up to four years, alongside retrospective data. The study captures medical history, disease duration, laboratory values, disability scores (EDSS), MRI results, and relapse information to provide real-world insights into treatment use and outcomes. Patients receiving routine medical treatment with any approved injectable or selected oral DMTs—including ofatumumab, glatiramer acetate, interferon 21, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, and diroximel fumarate—are enrolled without treatment allocation by the study. Two cohorts are observed: one treated primarily with injectable DMTs and another with injectable or oral DMTs. The core study period lasts about two years, with an optional extension providing an additional two years of observation, totaling up to four years. Follow-up visits and monitoring happen at the investigator's discretion and may include telemedicine. During the study, participants provide data through questionnaires and electronic case report forms. Routine clinical care procedures, such as diagnostic tests and monitoring, continue as usual. Researchers measure the proportion of patients continuing their baseline treatment at 24 months and collect ongoing clinical and imaging data. The study emphasizes real-world treatment patterns, safety, and disease activity over the extended follow-up period.

Researchers are evaluating the clinical utility of serum neurofilament light (sNfL) as a prognostic marker for disease activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional study in Germany aims to understand how sNfL values can influence patient management and treatment decisions. The study focuses on patients treated with category 1 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) who have incorporated sNfL testing into their care. Participants will either continue their current category 1 DMT, which includes therapies such as dimethylfumarate, glatiramer acetate, interferon beta, and teriflunomide, or switch to ofatumumab based on their physician’s clinical judgment. There is no treatment allocation by the study itself. Data collection will cover up to 24 months, and the frequency of visits and assessments will follow routine clinical practice without a fixed protocol. During the study, baseline and follow-up data will be gathered according to standard care recommendations, including clinical evaluations and sNfL measurements. Researchers will monitor the proportion of patients with high sNfL levels over time to assess disease activity. The observational period is flexible and guided by the treating physician, with no additional diagnostic or monitoring procedures beyond standard care. Participants will be followed for up to two years to better understand how sNfL influences treatment management in relapsing MS.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tulisokibart, a humanized monoclonal antibody, in people with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. The research includes two studies: Study 1, which has induction and maintenance treatment phases, and Study 2, which only includes induction treatment. The main goals are to see if tulisokibart can help participants achieve clinical remission and endoscopic response compared to placebo, measured at 12 and 52 weeks depending on the study and region (US/FDA or EU/EMA).

This research aims to assess how satisfied people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are after receiving subcutaneous (under the skin) injections of ocrelizumab over a period of 12 months. The study focuses on participants diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RMS) or primary progressive MS (PPMS) according to 2017 McDonald criteria, who are starting ocrelizumab treatment for the first time. The main goal is to understand participant satisfaction using a special questionnaire designed for subcutaneous therapy administration. Participants will receive ocrelizumab as an injection under the skin, with the exact dosing and schedule determined by their treating physician following local medical guidelines. This observational study does not change standard care but monitors patients throughout their treatment with ocrelizumab. During the study, participants will complete the Therapy Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire for subcutaneous treatment after 12 months to measure their satisfaction. Researchers will also observe and record any relevant clinical information. The total study duration for each participant is 12 months, during which their experience and outcomes with ocrelizumab are carefully tracked.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and performance of the Zimmer Nexel Total Elbow device when used for primary or revision total elbow replacement. The study focuses on confirming the device's safety and effectiveness by analyzing standard scoring systems, radiographs, and records of adverse events. Conditions studied include elbow joint destruction, post-traumatic lesions, arthritis types, joint instability, and related elbow injuries. The study involves the use of the Zimmer Nexel Total Elbow device during elbow replacement surgeries. Both primary and revision total elbow arthroplasty procedures are included. The device's performance is assessed through various measures such as pain relief, functional outcomes, implant survival, patient health status, and radiographic success. Safety is monitored by tracking the frequency and incidence of adverse events related to the device. Participants will undergo scheduled follow-up evaluations to monitor outcomes over time. Researchers will collect data including pain and function scores, radiographs, and adverse event reports. The primary outcome measured is the 10-year survivorship of the implant. The study includes both retrospective patients who received the Nexel Total Elbow since July 2013 and prospective patients who will receive the device during the study period.

Researchers are collecting new real-world data on first-line treatment for women newly diagnosed with advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer in Germany. This study aims to understand how maintenance treatment with Poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) affects routine medical care, patient outcomes, and treatment sequences, especially in those undergoing surgery and chemotherapy. It also explores patient-reported experiences, physician insights, genetic testing practices, and drug safety in this setting. The study observes patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, including those who have completed primary debulking surgery. It includes patients who have started or are planning to start chemotherapy, with the total number of chemotherapy cycles tailored by the treating physician. Women of childbearing potential must use reliable contraception during the study. The study does not involve any experimental interventions but monitors treatments as they occur in regular clinical practice. Participants will be followed to evaluate progression-free survival and other outcomes up to 84 months from the start of chemotherapy. Patient-reported outcomes will be collected electronically to capture experiences and needs during and after maintenance therapy. The study also tracks the use of BRCA/HRD testing, treatment safety, and physician experiences to better understand care patterns and long-term results in routine clinical settings.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and performance of the TriClip™ device for treating severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are critically ill. This registry study focuses on a real-world setting and involves patients who often have limited treatment options due to high surgical risks caused by factors like advanced age, pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular impairment, and other comorbidities. The study aims to understand if percutaneous therapy with the TriClip system is safe and effective, especially in those at high or prohibitive risk, and whether procedural success influences outcomes over time. Participants will undergo a percutaneous edge-to-edge repair of the tricuspid valve using the TriClip system. This procedure uses a catheter-based approach to improve valve function by clipping the valve leaflets together, similar to techniques used in mitral valve repair. The study is observational, single-center, and open-label, following patients after they receive this device in a post-market setting. During the study, participants will be monitored to assess procedural success at 12 months as the primary outcome. Researchers will collect data on short-, mid-, and long-term clinical results, including safety and effectiveness. Follow-up evaluations will include medical assessments, imaging, and symptom monitoring to track the impact of the device on heart function and patient well-being.

Researchers are studying pre- and perimenopausal women with estrogen- and/or progesterone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer who have an intermediate to high clinical risk but low genomic risk of recurrence based on MammaPrint4 testing. The study aims to understand the real-world use of ovarian function suppression (OFS) combined with endocrine therapy, with or without prior chemotherapy, and how secondary amenorrhea after chemotherapy might affect outcomes. It also focuses on treatment adherence and quality of life over time, given the importance of long-term endocrine treatment up to 10 years. The registry will follow patients receiving standard-of-care treatment, which may include endocrine therapy with or without ovarian function suppression, and potentially chemotherapy based on clinical decisions. Data on treatment choices, including the use of OFS and chemotherapy, will be collected along with tumor characteristics assessed by local pathology and genomic signatures. Quality of life assessments will be conducted at baseline and multiple time points up to five years, while treatment adherence and outcomes will be tracked over up to 10 years. Participants will provide baseline information including tumor and treatment details. Researchers will collect follow-up data on treatment adherence, quality of life using specific questionnaires, and disease outcomes such as the five-year distant recurrence-free interval. Monitoring will include hormonal status and clinical assessments to correlate treatment effects with genomic risk scores and clinical markers. The overall goal is to improve understanding of treatment patterns and outcomes in this specific breast cancer population under real-world conditions.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness of nemolizumab for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adolescents and adults. This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional trial that aims to measure treatment outcomes through physician assessments and patient-reported outcomes over approximately 12 months. The goal is to understand how nemolizumab works in routine clinical practice, focusing on physician evaluations and patient experiences at Month 6. Treatment with nemolizumab is determined solely by the participant's physician before joining the study, with no extra visits, procedures, or lab tests beyond standard care. The study does not define a specific visit schedule; instead, visits follow routine medical practice to collect data systematically. A sub-study in Germany and the UK will have participants complete daily questionnaires on itch severity, sleep disturbance, and pain from Day -1 to Day 14 remotely, without requiring clinic visits. Participants will be involved in routine clinical visits where physician assessments and patient-reported outcome measures will be gathered. Key outcomes measured include the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP NRS) at Month 6. The study observes participant responses and safety under normal care conditions, with data collection lasting about a year to evaluate nemolizumab's effectiveness in everyday treatment settings.