Traunstein

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and patient compliance of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This observational study also compares ribociclib treatment with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and endocrine therapy alone, aiming to better understand treatment decisions and clinical adoption in routine practice. The study is conducted across breast centers and gynecological practices to represent typical healthcare settings. Participants receive treatment based on their physicians clinical judgment without randomization or intervention assignment. The study collects data from patients treated with ribociclib plus aromatase inhibitor with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, or endocrine therapy alone with or without LHRH. Baseline data and follow-up information on adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, and socio-economic factors are gathered over time. During the study, participants undergo assessments including evaluation of invasive disease-free survival up to 36 months, quality of life questionnaires, medication adherence reports, and monitoring of adverse events and treatment changes. Data on reasons for treatment decisions, patient perceptions, and healthcare provider involvement are also collected. The study duration extends up to 39 months to provide a comprehensive overview of treatment impact and patient experience in real-world clinical settings.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a new medicine called NNC0487-0111 in people who have Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction HFpEF or Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction HFmrEF and excess body weight. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating these conditions compared to a placebo. Participants have HFpEF or HFmrEF and a body mass index of 30 or above. The study is sponsored by Novo Nordisk AS and uses a randomized, quadruple-masked design. Participants will receive either NNC0487-0111 or a matching placebo by injection under the skin once a week. The NNC0487-0111 is given in increasing doses over time. The study is parallel in design, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups and receive that treatment throughout the trial. This treatment period extends for up to about 165 weeks. The study evaluates the time to certain heart failure events, hospitalizations, cardiovascular deaths, and other major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess heart failure outcomes and kidney function, as well as quality of life using questionnaires like the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Safety and effectiveness are assessed through hospital visits, heart failure event tracking, and blood tests including kidney function and blood sugar levels. The total participation spans over three years, with ongoing evaluations to measure the time to heart failure events and cardiovascular outcomes. Participants receive close medical monitoring throughout the study period.

This trial investigates the effectiveness and safety of two treatment combinations for people with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three prior treatments and were previously treated with lenalidomide. It compares mezigdomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone MeziVd against pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone PVd to see which is better for this condition. The study is a Phase 3, randomized, open-label trial sponsored by Celgene. Participants receive either the MeziVd combination or the PVd combination, with specified doses given on certain days according to the study plan. These treatments are given as drugs, and participants are randomly assigned to one of these two groups to compare their effects. The study will continue for up to approximately five years to evaluate long-term outcomes. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly through various assessments including measuring disease progression, survival, response to treatment, and quality of life using specific questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20. Blood samples may be checked for drug levels, and adverse events will be tracked. The main focus is progression-free survival, measured from randomization until disease worsening or death. Participants health and responses will be followed for up to five years, with ongoing visits and evaluations throughout this period.

This study aims to collect prospective safety and effectiveness data for the C-Brace System, a microprocessor-controlled knee ankle foot orthosis, following standard care practices. The research focuses on patients with lower extremity pareses who are fitted with the C-Brace device. The goal is to better understand how the C-Brace influences walking speed, balance, risk of falling, and confidence in balance over time. The C-Brace is a custom-made device with thigh, calf, and foot components connected by an ankle joint or spring element. It uses sensors to continuously monitor knee joint movement and walking phases, adjusting hydraulic resistance and knee motion accordingly. Patients enrolled in the registry will undergo baseline evaluation, fitting, training or therapy sessions, and follow-up visits at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after fitting. Participants will be assessed through various tests including timed walk tests, balance confidence scores, and mobility assessments at different intervals. The study also tracks falls related to device use and changes in activity levels with an activity tracker. Data collected will help characterize the safety and functional impact of the C-Brace over three years of follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of a medicine called BI 690517 combined with empagliflozin in adults with chronic kidney disease CKD who are at risk of their kidney condition getting worse. The study includes people with or without type 2 diabetes and those who may already be taking medicines like angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors ACEi, angiotensin receptor blockers ARB, or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors SGLT2i. The goal is to understand if adding BI 690517 can help delay worsening kidney function, hospitalizations due to heart failure, or cardiovascular death. After a run-in period where all participants take empagliflozin and other standard medications, participants are randomly assigned to receive either BI 690517 tablets or placebo tablets once daily alongside empagliflozin. The run-in period confirms that participants are stabilized on empagliflozin before randomization. The treatment phase continues for about three to four years until enough kidney or heart-related events have occurred to compare outcomes between the two groups. During the study, participants visit the study site about five times in the first six months and then every six months thereafter. At these visits, health is regularly checked through blood and urine tests, blood pressure and weight measurements, kidney function monitoring, and collection of any side effect information. The main outcome measured is the time until the first occurrence of kidney disease progression, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death.

Researchers are evaluating whether systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy LNE improves overall survival in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer who have a high risk of recurrence. The trial also looks at how LNE affects disease-free survival, quality of life, complications, side effects, and the number of lymph nodes removed. A total of 640 patients with specific histological types and stages of endometrial cancer will take part in this study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In Arm A, patients will undergo the standard surgical procedure including total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with an omentectomy added for certain cancer types. In Arm B, patients will receive the same standard surgery plus systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy reaching up to the left renal vein. The study compares these two surgical approaches. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for overall survival over 60 months. Researchers will also assess disease-free and disease-specific survival at multiple time points up to five years. Serious complications will be recorded during surgery and follow-up visits. Quality of life will be evaluated regularly using standardized questionnaires. The number of lymph nodes removed will be documented during surgery to support the evaluation of treatment impact and safety.

This research aims to gather detailed data and biomaterials from adults diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ALL and related diseases, including certain types of Leukemia and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. The registry supports ALL research and quality assurance by collecting information regardless of whether patients participate in clinical trials. The study is observational and involves adults diagnosed and treated under ALL protocols. Participants include adults aged 18 and older with ALL subtypes, other leukemias treated according to ALL protocols, and specific subtypes of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma treated under B-ALL protocols. The study collects data prospectively on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, along with biomaterials related to these conditions. Participants provide information during routine clinical care and follow-up visits for up to 10 years. Data collected includes survival rates, remission status assessed by various methods including PET scans, relapse rates, quality of life questionnaires, and monitoring of toxicities and comorbidities. The study tracks overall survival and other outcomes over long-term follow-up to support research and quality assurance in adult ALL and related diseases.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of two treatment strategies for patients newly diagnosed with advanced ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. This international, multicenter, randomized, open Phase III trial compares carboplatinpaclitaxel chemotherapy followed by niraparib alone versus carboplatinpaclitaxel combined with bevacizumab followed by both bevacizumab and niraparib. The study includes patients with high-grade, non-mucinous, non-clear cell epithelial tumors at specific advanced stages who have had surgery or plan chemotherapy with interval debulking surgery. All patients receive an initial cycle of carboplatin and paclitaxel before randomization. After central testing of tumor BRCA status, participants are randomly assigned to one of two arms Arm 1 continues with five more cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by daily niraparib for up to three years Arm 2 receives five cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab, then maintenance bevacizumab for up to one year alongside daily niraparib for up to three years. This design aims to determine if adding bevacizumab improves outcomes over the standard treatment. Participants undergo frequent assessments including scans and laboratory tests to monitor progression-free survival and other health outcomes. Researchers also evaluate overall survival, time to additional therapies, treatment-related side effects, and quality of life up to several years after enrollment. Patients attend regular visits for treatment, monitoring, and completion of questionnaires, with safety follow-up 30 days after the last dose. The entire observation period can last up to 66 months after the last patient joins the trial.

Researchers are gathering real-world clinical data from women with primary advanced FIGO stage III or IV or recurrent endometrial cancer who are treated with first-line chemotherapy regimens combining Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Durvalumab CPD. This observational study focuses on patients receiving maintenance therapy with durvalumab alone or durvalumab combined with olaparib, depending on their tumors DNA mismatch repair status. The aim is to evaluate treatment outcomes including effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported experiences after chemotherapy. Participants receive first-line CPD chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy tailored to their tumor characteristics patients with DNA mismatch repair deficient tumors receive durvalumab maintenance, while those with proficient status receive both durvalumab and olaparib maintenance. Treatment decisions are made as part of routine care in collaboration with their doctors, independent of the study. The study observes patients who achieve disease control after chemotherapy, tracking their ongoing treatments according to approved guidelines. During the study, participants complete questionnaires to report their quality of life and health status over time. Researchers monitor time to next treatment and progression-free survival at 12 months, as well as the duration of maintenance therapy and chemotherapy phases, and timing between treatments. Safety and real-world usage of therapies are assessed up to 46 months. The study spans multiple centers in Germany and aims to better understand characteristics of patients benefiting from these treatments in everyday clinical practice.

This research aims to evaluate the addition of venetoclax to standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy in adults newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia AML or myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts-2 MDS-EB-2. It is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 clinical trial preceded by a dose-escalation feasibility phase to establish the venetoclax dose. The study is conducted across multiple centers and sponsored by the University of Ulm. Participants first undergo a feasibility run-in phase where venetoclax dosing is determined. Then, eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either intensive chemotherapy combined with venetoclax or with a placebo. Treatment includes two cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation therapy based on initial randomization and established protocols. Patients achieving complete remission or certain other response states continue consolidation, and some may undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation or other treatments depending on clinical factors. During the study, participants receive detailed evaluations including assessments of treatment safety and effectiveness. Researchers monitor event-free survival, dose-limiting toxicities, remission rates, relapse, survival, and quality of life using questionnaires and laboratory testing. Treatment adherence and safety are closely tracked. The study follows participants until at least 16 months after the last patient is enrolled, with some outcome measures extending to 28 months, to gather comprehensive data on treatment impact and patient health.