Sri Vijaya Puram

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) with or without durvalumab compared to the investigator's choice chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab in patients who have PD-L1 positive locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This Phase III, randomized, open-label, international study aims to see if adding durvalumab to Dato-DXd can help patients live longer without their cancer worsening or simply live longer compared to standard chemotherapy with pembrolizumab. The study also examines how the treatments and cancer impact patients' quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Dato-DXd plus durvalumab, Dato-DXd alone, or investigator's choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or gemcitabine plus carboplatin) combined with pembrolizumab. All treatments are given by intravenous infusion. The study design includes stratification based on geographic location, disease-free interval history, and prior PD-1/PD-L1 treatment for early-stage TNBC. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor their disease status using RECIST 1.1 criteria and undergo imaging reviewed by blinded independent central review. Researchers will track progression-free survival, quality of life, safety, and other health measures over an anticipated period of up to 33 months. Participants must provide tumor samples for PD-L1 testing, and safety monitoring will continue throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating whether the medicine tenecteplase helps adults recover from an acute ischemic stroke when given more than 4.5 hours after they were last seen well. This study focuses on people who had a stroke caused by a clot blocking blood flow in the brain and who have imaging showing brain tissue that can still be saved. Participants should not be planning to receive a procedure to remove the clot and must have a pre-stroke disability level of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin Scale. Participants are randomly placed into two groups. One group receives a single injection of tenecteplase into a vein, while the other group receives standard medical care. The study includes adults aged 18 and over who had an acute stroke or woke up with stroke symptoms more than 4.5 hours ago. Imaging with MRI or CT is used to confirm eligibility. The study lasts about three months, starting with a hospital stay of about one week. During the study, participants have seven clinical examinations or visits to monitor their recovery and health. The last two visits may be done from home to allow remote assessments. Researchers use the modified Rankin Scale to measure disability or dependence in daily activities at 90 days after treatment. They also monitor for any side effects or health changes to compare the effects of tenecteplase against standard care.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness of Saruparib (AZD5305) combined with a physician's choice of new hormonal agents (NHA) compared to a placebo plus NHA in men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). This phase III study aims to demonstrate whether Saruparib plus NHA can improve radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in two groups of participants: those with homologous recombination repair mutations (HRRm) and those without (non-HRRm). About 1800 adult male participants with mCSPC will be divided into two cohorts based on their HRRm status. Each cohort will be randomized equally to receive either Saruparib orally with their chosen NHA or a placebo orally with the chosen NHA. The new hormonal agents may include abiraterone acetate, darolutamide, or enzalutamide. Participants will continue their assigned treatment and undergo regular tumor evaluation scans until their disease progresses or treatment is stopped for other reasons. Throughout the study, participants will have tumor tissue and blood samples collected to confirm HRRm status and monitor disease. They will be followed for survival until the study ends. An independent data monitoring committee will review safety and tolerability of Saruparib plus NHA. The main outcome measured is radiographic progression-free survival, tracked for up to approximately 50 months, to evaluate how well the treatments control cancer progression.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Volrustomig in women with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer (stages IIIA to IVA) who have not experienced disease progression after completing platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). This phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled global study aims to provide new insights for this patient group by comparing Volrustomig to a placebo treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive either Volrustomig or a placebo, both given through intravenous infusion. The study is conducted across multiple centers worldwide, maintaining a double-blind design to ensure unbiased results. Treatment details include administration of the investigational drug or placebo after completion of their initial CCRT. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival based on assessments by investigators, with follow-up lasting up to about seven years. Researchers will evaluate health status, organ function, and any side effects through regular clinical assessments and laboratory tests. Safety and long-term outcomes will be closely tracked to understand the impact of Volrustomig in this setting.